- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Chronologically scheduled snacking with high-protein products within the habitual diet in type-2 diabetes patients leads to a fat mass loss: a longitudinal study
© Navas-Carretero et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 11 April 2011
- Accepted: 14 July 2011
- Published: 14 July 2011
Obesity is the most relevant overnutrition disease worldwide and is associated to different metabolic disorders such as insulin resistance and type-2 diabetes. Low glycemic load foods and diets and moderately high protein intake have been shown to reduce body weight and fat mass, exerting also beneficial effects on LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride concentrations, postprandial glucose curve and HDL-cholesterol levels. The present study aimed at studying the potential functionality of a series of low glycemic index products with moderately high protein content, as possible coadjuvants in the control of type-2 diabetes and weight management following a chronologically planned snacking offer (morning and afternoon).
The current trial followed a single group, sequential, longitudinal design, with two consecutive periods of 4 weeks each. A total of 17 volunteers participated in the study. The first period was a free living period, with volunteers' habitual ad libitum dietary pattern, while the second period was a free-living period with structured meal replacements at breakfast, morning snack and afternoon snack, which were exchanged by specific products with moderately high protein content and controlled low glycemic index, following a scheduled temporal consumption. Blood extractions were performed at the beginning and at the end of each period (free-living and intervention). Parameters analysed were: fasting glucose, insulin, glycosylated hemoglobin, total-, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, C - reactive protein and Homocysteine concentrations. Postprandial glucose and insulin were also measured. Anthropometrical parameters were monitored each 2 weeks during the whole study.
A modest but significant (p = 0.002) reduction on body weight (1 kg) was observed during the intervention period, mainly due to the fat mass loss (0.8 kg, p = 0.02). This weight reduction was observed without apparently associated changes in total energy intake. None of the biochemical biomarkers measured was altered throughout the whole study.
Small changes in the habitual dietary recommendations in type-2 diabetes patients by the inclusion of specific low-glycemic, moderately high-protein products in breakfast, morning and afternoon snacks may promote body weight and fat-mass loss, without apparently altering biochemical parameters and cardiovascular risk-related factors.
Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01264523.
- Glycemic Index
- Glycemic Load
- Voluntary Food Intake
- Afternoon Snack
- Morning Snack
Type-2 diabetes prevalence in adults has grown in the last years in many societies, accompanying the high incidence of obesity-related and other cardiovascular risk factors . Indeed, obesity is the most relevant overnutrition disease worldwide, being more dramatic than a self-esteem problem or an aesthetic issue, since it is associated to different metabolic disorders such as coronary diseases, hypertension, certain tumors, dislipidemia, biliary disorders, immunodeficiencies and insulin resistance .
Different studies have shown the efficacy of low-fat diets on weight reduction, which has been associated to an improvement in overweight-related chronic pathological conditions [3, 4]. However, the concomitant high carbohydrate content in some weight-loss diets may imply the intake of foods with an elevated glycemic index, which leads to alterations in appetite directly associated to weight regain . Furthermore, these commonly sugar-rich diets may exert negative effects on lipid profile  and insulin resistance . In addition, there is increasing evidence about the key role of the quantity and quality of carbohydrates in diets, on the risk of developing chronic diseases [7–11]. Moreover, diets with a high glycemic load have been related to a higher risk of developing diabetes , while studies carried out with foods and diets of low glycemic load and high protein content have been associated with a reduction on LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, as well as a lower postprandial glucose curve and an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels [7–14].
A number of trials have also demonstrated that diets with a low glycemic load increase satiety, reduce energy intake and produce a raised thermogenic effect [15, 16], favoring weight loss and subsequently reducing cardiovascular disease and diabetes manifestations, although this apparently higher efficacy of diets with this macronutrient approach remains as a debate issue .
Additional investigations have shown that meals and diets with high protein content may be effective to combat the most important metabolic alterations observed in diabetic patients [7, 12, 18–20]. Additionally, some studies have demonstrated beneficial effects associated to dietary interventions based on specific breakfast patterns [12, 19, 20].
The present study aimed at researching the potential functionality of a series of low glycemic index products with a moderately high protein content, as possible coadjuvants in the control of type 2-diabetes and weight management within a nutritionally balanced dietary pattern, following a chronologically planned snacking offer (morning and afternoon), as well as the influence on biomarkers of the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk manifestations.
The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University of Navarra (reference: 078/2009), and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT01264523). The full trial protocol can be accessed in Clinical Trials website (clinicaltrials.gov) by introducing the identifier. Recruitment took part during February - March 2010 and the study finished in June 2010. Written informed consent was given by all the volunteers participating in the intervention.
Taking into account the design of the present study as a single group longitudinal intervention, the authors have tried to fulfill the CONSORT 2010 guidelines , except for those points where it was considered non-applicable, such as blinding.
The present trial was developed at the facilities of the University of Navarra with 17 participants, and followed a longitudinal design, with two consecutive periods of 4 weeks each. The first period, control phase, was a free living diet and status, where the patients followed their habitual ad libitum dietary pattern (following the recommendations of their physician), while the second period consisted on an intervention phase with structured meal replacements, where the volunteers' habitual breakfast, morning snack and afternoon snack, were exchanged by specific products, provided by the researchers, with a moderately high protein content and a controlled low glycemic index, following a scheduled temporal consumption. Therefore, the measurements and evaluation in the first period are considered as control values in relation to the intervention phase.
Blood extractions were performed at recruitment, if the volunteers didn't have a recent blood analysis (during the last three months), and on week 0 (beginning of the free living period), week 4 (end of free-living period and beginning of the intervention period) and week 8 (end of the intervention period). Anthropometrical parameters were also measured on weeks 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 of the trial.
The primary outcomes of the current intervention were body-weight and fat mass, while glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as selected cardiovascular risk biomarkers were established as secondary outcomes.
Volunteers were asked to maintain their physical activity throughout the whole intervention. An important increase/decrease of physical activity compared to the baseline estimation was considered an exclusion criteria. Physical activity was estimated with a 24 h recall at the beginning and the end of the nutritional intervention.
Substitution guidelines during the intervention period of the volunteers' habitual breakfast, morning and afternoon snack.
Breakfast (choose alternatively one option each day)
• 3 bars
• 4 bars
• 2 bars plus a glass (250 mL) of semi-skimmed milk
• 3 bars plus a glass (250 mL) of semi-skimmed milk
• 1 milk shake (disolved in 150 mL semi-skimmed milk)
• 1 milk shake (disolved in 150 mL semi-skimmed milk) + 4 biscuits
• 1 glass (250 mL) of semi-skimmed milk plus 8 biscuits
• 1 glass (250 mL) of semi-skimmed milk plus 8 biscuits plus 1 bar
Morning and afternoon snack (choose alternatively one option each day)
• 1 bar
• 1 bar
• 1 salted snack (25 g)
• 1 salted snack (25 g)
• 1 Minirock (25 g - soy and chocolate snacks) pack
• 1 Minirock (25 g - soy and chocolate snacks) pack
Subjects participating in the nutritional intervention had to fulfill the following inclusion criteria: to be type-2 diabetes diagnosed patients, aged between 45 and 75 years old, following the dietary recommendations prescribed by their primary care physician, and eventually treated only with metformin (stable dosage during at least three months).
Exclusion criteria, which were controlled by a specifically trained physician, were to have a BMI under 22 or over 35 kg/m2, to follow a pharmacological treatment with other drugs but metformin, or being already insulin-dependent, to have other concomitant pharmacological treatments for weight loss, hormonal substitutive therapy, altered thyroid function, etc. without an stable dosage (at least three months prior the beginning of the study).
Additional exclusion criteria were to suffer from complications due to type 2 diabetes (microangiopathy, polyneuropathy, cardiopathy, hepatic and renal impairments, etc) or having a recent (within the three months prior to the beginning of the study) uncontrolled diagnostic of hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertryglyceridemia.
Sample size calculation
Assuming a maximum loss of 0.6 kg/week, and expecting a total weight loss during the intervention period of 2.4 ± 2.5 kg compared to the free-living period, for an α value of 0.05 (5%) and an statistical power of 80%, the number of participants needed was estimated at 13 volunteers. Assuming an expected 20% drop-out during the trial, the minimum sample size required was established at 16 volunteers.
Body weight, and body composition status were measured by a bioimpedance equipment (Tanita SC-330, Tanita corp, Japan), waist and hip circumferences were measured with a commercial measure tap following validated protocols . Measures were taken with the participants in a fasting state of at least 8 hours.
Glucose metabolism determinations
Fasting glycosylated hemoglobin levels were assessed at the Clinica Universidad de Navarra (Pamplona, Spain), by a high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methodology . Serum glucose was measured in an autoanalyser Pentra C-200 (HORIBA ABX, Madrid, Spain) and insulin concentrations were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) in a Triturus autoanalyser (Grifols SA, Barcelona, Spain). Insulin resistance was estimated by the Homeostasis Model Assessment Index (HOMA-IR), which was calculated as stated in the following formula : HOMA-IR = [glucose (mmol/L) × insulin (µU/ml)]/22, 5
Postprandial serum glucose and insulin levels were also measured at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after the consumption of both the habitual breakfast and the test breakfast with 40-30-30 products at weeks 4 and 8, respectively.
Lipid metabolism variables
Total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride serum concentrations were measured in an autoanalyser Pentra C-200 (HORIBA ABX, Madrid, Spain). LDL-cholesterol levels were calculated following the Friedewald formula .
C - reactive protein concentrations were analysed by an ELISA assay (Inmunodiagnostics, MA, USA) in a Triturus autoanalyser (Grifols SA, Barcelona, Spain). Homocysteine was determined in an autoanalyser Pentra C-200 (HORIBA ABX, Madrid, Spain).
Dietary intake and satiety assessment
During the free-living period and during the nutritional intervention period, participants filled two 72 h dietary records, in which they must declare all the foods and quantities they had eaten in each period . These questionnaires were further analysed with the DIAL software (Alce Ingenieria, Madrid, Spain).
Satiety was measured through self-reported questionnaires previously validated , based on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Volunteers filled a total of four questionnaires during the postprandial glucose curves (before, having breakfast, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after having breakfast) at weeks 4 and 8.
The differences on variables between the beginning and the end of each period were analysed by a paired t-test, while the analysis of differences between both periods (free-living vs. intervention) was performed through an independent measures t-test. Postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations were analysed through a repeated measures ANOVA. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. All the statistical analysis were performed with the SPSS 15.1 software for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).
Adherence to the nutritional intervention
Fifty-two subjects suffering from type-2 diabetes demonstrated an interest in participating on the study. Once at the Metabolic Unit, staff explained to them the complete protocol of the present nutritional intervention, 12 subjects declined the invitation to participate, and another 23 patients were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria: 11 were on another pharmacological treatment but not metformin, 6 subjects had a recent diabetes diagnostic and treatment was not yet established and 5 subjects were not within the requested age range, while another subject exceeded BMI criteria.
Anthropometrical baseline characteristics of the subjects who completed the study (n = 15).
Waist circumference (cm)
Hip circumference (cm)
Fat mass (%)
Fat-free mass (kg)
Changes in anthropometrical parameters
Changes in macronutrient intake between the free-living and the intervention period
FREE-LIVING PERIOD (WEEK 0 TO 4)
INTERVENTION PERIOD (WEEK 4 TO 8)
1710 ± 354
300 ± 168
93 ± 86
713 ± 115
110 ± 86
493 ± 223
1815 ± 335
346 ± 59
111 ± 54
722 ± 154
111 ± 66
524 ± 238
152 ± 52 (36)
39 ± 24
12 ± 11
51 ± 21
12 ± 11
38 ± 23
145 ± 48
34 ± 6
10 ± 4
53 ± 29
10 ± 6
38 ± 18
- Sugars (g)
73 ± 25
23 ± 17
8 ± 8
17 ± 7
7 ± 7
18 ± 8
72 ± 16
26 ± 6
7 ± 4
15 ± 7
7 ± 5
15 ± 9
51 ± 10
43 ± 22
37 ± 21
58 ± 9
40 ± 10
40 ± 10
20 ± 8
4 ± 3
1 ± 1
9 ± 6
1 ± 1
5 ± 2
22 ± 7
4 ± 1
1 ± 1
10 ± 5
1 ± 1
5 ± 2
78 ± 16* (18)
11 ± 6* (15)
4 ± 5*
37 ± 7 (21)
4 ± 4
21 ± 13 (17)
100 ± 15* (22)
25 ± 5*
7 ± 3*
36 ± 9
7 ± 5
24 ± 11
74 ± 13 (39)
10 ± 6
2 ± 2
33 ± 6 (42)
4 ± 3
24 ± 12 (44)
79 ± 15
12 ± 2
4 ± 1
35 ± 9
4 ± 2
26 ± 11
Food intake and satiety assessment
Total energy intake did not greatly differ between the free-living and the nutritional intervention period (table 3), while protein intake significantly increased during the dietary snacking substitution with 40-30-30 products. Caloric profile in breakfast, morning and afternoon snack switched from a typical distribution around 15-55-30 (% protein-% carbohydrate-% lipid of the total energy intake) in the free-living period to the 40-30-30, during the intervention period. Glycemic index was also evaluated in the breakfast, morning snack and afternoon snack, and no significant differences were observed between both periods (table 3), despite that a global trend to increase was found as a consequence of 40-30-30 products consumption. No changes were observed in relation to physical activity during the intervention period (data not shown).
Changes in biochemical biomarkers
Changes in biochemical determinations between the beginning and the end of the study.
159.2 ± 62.2
156.7 ± 59.4
10.2 ± 5.1
10.0 ± 4.9
3.65 ± 2.00
3.43 ± 1.84
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (%)
7.0 ± 1.3
7.2 ± 1.5
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
177.0 ± 37.4
176.9 ± 32.8
42.7 ± 9.0
42.5 ± 8.1
92.0 ± 37.2
102.9 ± 25.7
178.5 ± 103.6
157.7 ± 92.8
31.8 ± 22.2
26.9 ± 16.1
36.6 ± 23.5
31.6 ± 19.5
Uric acid (mg/dL)
5.8 ± 1.3
6.1 ± 1.5
22.7 ± 4.4
23.3 ± 4.4
C-reactive protein (mg/L)
13.6 ± 15.1
9.8 ± 10.7
The present trial reports the benefits of including within the habitual diet, different moderately high protein products (40% Carbohydrates-30% protein-30% lipids) for weight management, following a chronologically scheduled pattern. Thus it has been demonstrated that, within a free-living diet without dietary or energy restrictions, the substitution of a single meal by products with higher protein content resulted in a weight loss, due mainly to a fat mass reduction. In this sense, the results obtained with this work are in accordance with data previously reported [26, 28–31].
Ad libitum diets with high protein intake have been considered as useful approaches for effective weight loss and later maintenance [11, 28, 29]. Indeed, some long-term studies with no calorie restriction and programmed macronutrient distribution have resulted in a more effective weight loss and maintenance than conventional macronutrient distribution energy-restricted diets [11, 30, 31]. In a recent study, an isocaloric diet with a moderately high content in protein led to a body weight and fat mass reduction after 10 weeks , without affecting fat-free mass and maintaining glucose and lipid profile, which matches with the outcomes of the current intervention.
The short duration of the present trial together with a total modest increase of the total protein intake (from 18 to 22% of caloric intake) may have played a role on the slight, although statistically significant, weight and fat mass reduction (approximately 1 kg). However, a period of 4 weeks is a good predictor of body fat changes with a dietary approach [32, 33]. Indeed, when analyzing meals separately, the total protein content in breakfast, morning and afternoon snack has been increased in a range from 50 to 95% during the intervention compared to the free-living period, which seemed to be enough to produce a body weight reduction without caloric restriction, and gives support about the importance on timing of energy consumption, meal frequency and nutrient quality intake for weight maintenance [3, 4, 8, 11, 12, 34].
The combination of protein content and glycemic index in a diet could be determinant on body composition changes [11, 35]. In a recent study in Europe , it has been demonstrated the efficacy of high-protein, low-glycemic index diets on adults for weight maintenance . In this same study, it was suggested that the isolated effect of protein content or glycemic index in ad libitum diets did not influence body weight in children, while the conjunction of these two dietary factors has been shown as protective against obesity . Likewise, the current dietary intervention achieved an increase in protein intake together with a low glycemic index in the substituted meals, which may explain the observed improvement in body composition as assessed by bioimpedance measurements, a method which has been recently validated in our research group using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) as gold standard reference .
For the first time to our knowledge, it has been demonstrated that the inclusion of some specific meals in the habitual diet with high-protein low-glycemic index products may be sufficient for weight management, preserving lean mass and helping to decrease fat mass in type-2 diabetes patients, compared to a control period of free-living diet. These effects should be ascribed to the protein induced rise in thermogenesis [7, 11, 26, 36, 37], or even to the increased satiety consequence of high protein ingestion [38, 39], although the assessed satiety scores have not reflected this effect in the current study.
In relation to the lack of changes concerning glucose and insulin levels as well as the insulin resistance index, it may be due to the short intervention period, although previous studies with similar or even shorter periods have shown clinically relevant effects with respect to an improvement on insulin sensitivity .
Furthermore, contrasting with other nutritional intervention studies, our results did not show differences between the free-living and the intervention periods on lipid metabolism. Several studies have evidenced that exchanging protein for fat improves lipid-related cardiovascular risk profile [36, 40]. However, most of these studies used energy-restricted, low-fat, high-protein diets [37, 40–43]. Indeed, all the foods included in these hypocaloric diets were low fat products, decreasing also saturated fat intake, which could be one of the main factors involved in the reduction of total and LDL cholesterol. On the other hand and in agreement with our findings, several studies comparing high protein diets have not observed changes in lipid profile, concretely on total and LDL cholesterol [7, 37, 42]. However, a recent study by Morenga and co-workers  found that an ad libitum diet relatively high in protein improved total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in comparison with standard dietary advice. In this case, the fiber content of the diet was also relatively high (>35 g per day), which could counteract the high fat consumption in this group . It is important to point out that, in the present study, the driven substitution of specific single meals by 40-30-30 products, led to a modest increase in the total dietary daily protein content (22%), which is lower than the quantities routinely used in high protein intervention programmes .
High protein diets have been also related with reductions in triglyceride levels [36, 37, 44, 45]. Comparing the duration of the present nutritional intervention period to other nutritional programmes, this one may have been relatively short to achieve significant changes in triglyceride levels. Indeed, triglyceride levels tended to be lower at the end of the nutritional intervention period in spite of not reaching statistical significance. Moreover, the effect on triglyceride levels has not always been observed in longer dietary interventions with a moderately high-protein content [7, 46]
A limitation encountered for the implementation of the current nutritional intervention has been the low sample size and the limited duration of the intervention, which can not permit us to generalize the outcomes obtained without further research. However, it is generally assumed that finding statistical significance with a small population is more difficult than when having a higher sample size. This outcome usually indicates that there is a real difference between the experimental periods. In any case, a type II error can not be discarded . Furthermore, as the study was designed as a longitudinal intervention with two consecutive periods, the first period is really a control, where the researchers only performed observational follow-up work. This approach has been already successfully employed and published elsewhere [48–51].
The overall results of this study may have been partly affected by the fact that the participants in the nutritional intervention were type-2 diabetes patients with initially controlled dietary treatment. In fact, the glycemic indexes in the breakfast, morning and afternoon snack during the free-living period were relatively low at baseline (< 55 units), and similar to the glycemic load reached with the products assayed. Thus, in another trial , the consumption of a low glycemic index breakfast during 21 days, compared to a high glycemic breakfast, led to a significant reduction on fasting glucose levels without affecting other biochemical biomarkers in obese subjects. In addition, a benefit on satiety was also reported, as it increased with the low glycemic index meal , which was not seen in the current trial. These observations suggest that in this population, the moment/time of consumption may be relevant in interpreting the results.
Moreover, when comparing two hypocaloric diets differing in the glycemic index, beneficial additional effects were found after weight loss (-5.3% vs. -7.5% change with the high- or low-glycemic diet, respectively) as well as in total- and LDL-cholesterol concentrations, where the decrease was 4-fold higher in the low glycemic index diet .
The reduction of glycemic index in a specific meal  or a diet  has also been associated to an increase in the satiety and a reduction on the voluntary food intake during the postprandial state. Indeed, the voluntary food intake may be an 80% higher after the consumption of a high glycemic vs. a low glycemic index meal . In this context, it is also in agreement with previous studies the similarity of the satiety scores observed between the free-living period and the intervention period in the present trial, as glycemic index remained unchanged between both periods.
The present results together with those from others [19, 34, 38] indicate the evident benefits of nutritional interventions on selected meals, giving an increasing importance to chrononutrition and meal frequency intake. Therefore, this is a good example of translational research carried out in a limited number of volunteers.
Summing up, the present trial evidences that small changes in the habitual dietary recommendations in type-2 diabetes patients by the inclusion of specific low-glycemic, moderately high-protein products in breakfast, morning and afternoon snacks may promote body weight and fat-mass loss, without apparently altering biochemical parameters and cardiovascular risk-related factors. The importance of these findings are related to the novelty of demonstrating that increasing protein content of selected meals offered in specific moments (breakfast, morning and afternoon snack) leads to an improvement in body composition, and it is also important to highlight the effect of regulating meal frequency and timing as a basis for future research concerning chrononutrition.
Acknowledgements and Funding
The authors are grateful to the volunteers of the study, as well as Mutilva medical center for the support on volunteers' recruitment, specifically Dr. Carmen Frauca. They also want to thank clinical and laboratory support to Blanca Martinez de Morentin, Salome Perez and Veronica Ciaurriz.
The supply of the high-protein, low-glycemic index products from Equipe Enervit, and the partial funding from Rovi Laboratories SA is gratefully acknowledged. This study was also funded by the special research line "Nutrition, Health and Obesity" of the University of Navarra (LE/97).
- Cugnet-Anceau C, Bauduceau B: Glycaemic control and cardiovascular morbi-mortality: The contribution of the 2008 studies. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2009, 70: 48-54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organisation, "Obesity Fact Sheets". Accessed April, 2011, [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html]
- Abete I, Astrup A, Martinez JA, Thorsdottir I, Zulet MA: Obesity and the metabolic syndrome: role of different dietary macronutrient distribution patterns and specific nutritional components on weight loss and maintenance. Nutr Rev. 2010, 68: 214-231. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00280.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Astrup A, Grunwald GK, Melanson EL, Saris WH, Hill JO: The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000, 24: 1545-1552. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Due A, Larsen TM, Hermansen K, Stender S, Holst JJ, Toubro S, Martinussen T, Astrup A: Comparison of the effects on insulin resistance and glucose tolerance of 6-mo high-monounsaturated-fat, low-fat, and control diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 855-862.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J: Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002, 76: 281S-285S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abete I, Parra MD, Martinez de Morentin B, Martinez JA: Effects of two energy-restricted diets differing in the carbohydrate/protein ratio on weight loss and oxidative changes of obese men. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2008, 25: 1-13.Google Scholar
- Abete I, Parra MD, Zulet MA, Martínez JA: Different dietary strategies for weight loss in obesity: Role of energy and macronutrient content. Nutr Res Rev. 2006, 19: 5-17. 10.1079/NRR2006112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu S, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Holmes MD, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, Willet WC: Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001, 73: 560-566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarvi AE, Karlstrom BE, Granfeldt YE, Bjorck IE, Asp NG, Vessby BO: Improved glycemic control and lipid profile and normalized fibrinolytic activity on a low-glycemic index diet in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1999, 22: 10-18. 10.2337/diacare.22.1.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larsen TM, Dalskov SM, van Baak M, Jebb SA, Papadaki A, Pfeiffer AFH, Martinez JA, Handjieva-Darlenska T, Kunešová M, Pihlsgård M, Stender S, Holst C, Saris WHM, Astrup A, for the Diet and Genes (Diogenes) Project: Diets with High or Low Protein Content and Glycemic Index for Weight-Loss Maintenance. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363: 2102-2113. 10.1056/NEJMoa1007137.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pal S, Lim S, Eger G: The effect of a low glycemic index breakfast on blood glucose, insulin, lipid profiles, blood pressure, body weight, body composition and satiety in obese and overweight individuals: A pilot study. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008, 3: 387-393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buyken AE, Toeller M, Heitkamp G, Karamanos B, Rottiers R, Muggeo M, Fuller JH, EURODIAB IDDM: Complications Study group: Glycemic index in the diet of European outpatients with type 1 diabetes: relations to glycated hemoglobin and serum lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001, 73: 574-581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luscombe ND, Noakes M, Clifton PM: Diets high and low in glycemic index versus high monounsaturated fat diets: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in NIDDM. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999, 53: 473-478. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600779.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson GH, Woodend D: Effect of glycemic carbohydrates on short-term satiety and food intake. Nutr Rev. 2003, 61: S17-S26. 10.1301/nr.2003.may.S17-S26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shai I, Schwarfuchs D, Henkin Y, Shahar DR, WItkow S, Greenberg I, Golan R, Fraser D, Bolotin A, Vardi H, Tangi-Rozental O, Zuk-Ramot R, Sarusi B, Brickner D, Schwartz Z, Sheiner E, Marko R, Katorza E, Thiery J, Fiedler GM, BlÚher M, Stumvoll M, Stampfer MJ, Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT) Group: Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or low-fat diet. New Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 229-41. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, Smith SR, Ryan DH, Anton SD, McManus K, Champagne CM, Bishop LM, Laranio N, Leboff MS, Rood JC, de Jongue L, Greenway FL, Loria CM, Obarzanek E, Williamson DA: Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein and carbohydrates. New Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 859-873. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804748.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hamdy O, Carver C: The Why WAIT program: improving clinical outcomes through weight management in type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2008, 8: 413-20. 10.1007/s11892-008-0071-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kabir M, Oppert JM, Vidal H, Bruzzo F, Fiquet C, Wursch P, Slama G, Rizkalla SW: Four-week low-glycemic index breakfast with a modest amount of soluble fibers in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 2002, 51: 819-26. 10.1053/meta.2002.33345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gannon MC, Nuttal FQI, Saeed A, Jordan K, Hoover H: An increase in dietary protein improves the blood glucose response in persons with type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78: 734-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT group: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. British Med J. 2010, 340: 698-702.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández Ruiz de Eguilaz M, Martínez de Morentin BE, Pérez-Diez S, Navas-Carretero S, Martinez JA: Comparative study of body composition measures by dual X-ray absorptiometry, bioimpedance and skinfolds in women. An R Acad Nac Farm. 2010, 76: 209-222.Google Scholar
- Kumar PR, Bhansali A, Ravikiran M, Bhansali S, Dutta P, Thakur JS, Sachdeva N, Bhadada SK, Walia R: Utility of glycated hemoglobin in diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a community-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 2832-5. 10.1210/jc.2009-2433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985, 28: 412-419. 10.1007/BF00280883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Navas-Carretero S, Cuervo M, Abete I, Zulet MA, Martínez JA: Frequent Consumption of Selenium-Enriched Chicken Meat by Adults Causes Weight Loss and Maintains Their Antioxidant Status. Biol Trace Elem Res.Google Scholar
- Flint A, Raben A, Blundell JE, Astrup A: Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obes. 2000, 24: 38-48. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801083.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kushner RF, Doerfler B: Low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets revisited. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008, 24: 198-203. 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f43a87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larsen TM, Dalskov S, van Baak M, Jebb S, Kafatos A, Pfeiffer A, Martinez JA, Handjieva-Darlenska T, Kunesová M, Holst C, Saris WH, Astrup A: The Diet, Obesity and Genes (Diogenes) Dietary Study in eight European countries - a comprehensive design for long-term intervention. Obes Rev. 2010, 11: 76-91. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00603.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, McGuckin BG, Brill C, Mohammed BS, Szapary PO, Rader DJ, Edman JS, Klein S: A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 2082-2090. 10.1056/NEJMoa022207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stern L, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, Chicano KL, Daily DA, McGrory J, Williams M, Gracely EJ, Samaha FF: The effects of low carbohydrate versus conventional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004, 140: 778-785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thorsdottir I, Tomasson H, Gunnarsdottir I, Gisladottir E, Kiely M, Parra MD, Bandarra NM, Schaafsma G, Martinéz JA: Randomized trial of weight-loss-diets for young adults varying in fish and fish oil content. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007, 31: 1560-6. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803643.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Handjieva-Darlenska T, Handjiev S, Larsen TM, van Baak MA, Jebb S, Papadaki A, Pfeiffer AF, Martinez JA, Kunesova M, Holst C, Saris WH, Astrup A: Initial weight loss on an 800-kcal diet as a predictor of weight loss success after 8 weeks: the Diogenes study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010, 64: 994-9. 10.1038/ejcn.2010.110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gatenby SJ: Eating frequency: methodological and dietary aspects. Br J Nutr. 1997, 77 (Suppl 1): 7-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papadaki A, Linardakis M, Larsen TM, van Baak MA, Lindroos AK, Pfeiffer AF, Martinez JA, Handjieva-Darlenska T, Kunesová M, Holst C, Astrup A, Saris WH, Kafatos A, DioGenes Study group: The effect of protein and glycemic index on children's body composition: the DiOGenes randomized study. Pediatrics. 2010, 126: 1143-52. 10.1542/peds.2009-3633.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morenga LT, Williams S, Brown R, Mann J: Effect of a relatively high-protein, high-fiber diet on body composition and metabolic risk factors in overweight women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010, 64: 1323-1331. 10.1038/ejcn.2010.163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farnsworth E, Luscombe ND, Noakes M, Wittert G, Argyiou E, Clifton PM: Effect of a high-protein, energy-restricted diet on body composition, glycemic control, and lipid concentrations in overweight and obese hyperinsulinemic men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78: 31-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sebely P, Siew L, Egger G: The effect of a low glycaemic index breakfast on blood glucose, insulin, lipid profiles, blood pressure, body weight, body composition and satiety in obese and overweight individuals: A pilot study. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008, 27: 387-393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ludwig DS, Majzoub JA, Al-Zahrani A, Dallal GE, Blanco I, Roberts SB: High glycemic index foods, overeating and obesity. Pediatrics. 1999, 103: 26-31. 10.1542/peds.103.3.e26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clifton PM, Bastiaans K, Keogh JB: High protein diets decrease total and abdominal fat and improve CVD risk profile in overweight and obese men and women with elevated triacylglycerol. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009, 19: 548-54. 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noakes M, Keogh JB, Foster PR, Clifton PM: Effect of an energy-restricted, high-protein, low-fat diet relative to a conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet on weight loss, body composition, nutritional status, and markers of cardiovascular health in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 1298-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luscombe-Marsh ND, Noakes M, Wittert GA, Keogh JB, Foster P, Clifton PM: Carbohydrate-restricted diets high in either monounsaturated fat or protein are equally effective at promoting fat loss and improving blood lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 762-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerksick CM, Wismann-Bunn J, Fogt D, Thomas AR, Taylor IV L, Campbell BI, Wilborn CD, Harvey T, Roberts MD, La Bounty P, Galbreath M, Marcello B, Rasmussen CJ, Kreider RB: Changes in weight loss, body composition and cardiovascular disease risk after altering macronutrient distributions during a regular exercise program in obese women. Nutrition Journal. 2010, 9: 59-10.1186/1475-2891-9-59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hession M, Rolland C, Kulkarni U, Wise A, Broom J: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of low-carbohydrate vs. low-fat/low-calorie diets in the management of obesity and its comorbidities. Obes Rev. 2009, 10: 36-50. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00518.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, Makris AP, Rosenbaum DL, Brill C, Stein RI, Mohammed BS, Miller B, Rader DJ, Zemel B, Wadden TA, Tanhave T, Newcomb CW, Klein S: Weight and metabolic outcomes after 2 years on a low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diet: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010, 153: 147-57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abete I, Parra D, Martinez JA: Legume-, fish-, or high-protein-based hypocaloric diets: effects on weight loss and mitochondrial oxidation in obese men. J Med Food. 2009, 12: 100-108. 10.1089/jmf.2007.0700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez González MA, Sánchez Villegas A, Faulin Fajardo J: Bioestadística amigable. Edited by: Díaz de Santos, Madrid. 2010, 3Google Scholar
- Specter SE, Bellisle F, Hémery-Véron S, Fiquet P, Bornet FR, Slama G: Reducing ice cream energy density does not condition decreased acceptance or engender compensation following repeated exposure. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998, 52: 703-710. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600627.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labayen I, Diez N, Parra MD, Gónzalez A, Martínez JA: Time-course changes in macronutrient metabolism induced by a nutritionally balanced low-calorie diet in obese women. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2004, 55: 27-35. 10.1080/09637480310001642457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young KW, Greenwood CE, van Reekum R, Binns MA: Providing nutrition supplements to institutionalized seniors with probable Alzheimer's disease is least beneficial to those with low body weight status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004, 52: 1305-12. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52360.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS: Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006, 106: 543-9. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abete I, Parra D, Martinez JA: Energy-restricted diets based on a distinct food selection affecting the glycemic index induce different weight loss and oxidative response. Clin Nutr. 2008, 27: 545-51. 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar