Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of the association between maternal folic acid supplementation and the risk of congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nutrition Journal volume 21, Article number: 20 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Folic acid (FA), as a synthetic form of folate, has been widely used for dietary supplementation in pregnant women. The preventive effect of FA supplementation on the occurrence and recurrence of fetal neural tube defects (NTD) has been confirmed. Incidence of congenital heart diseases (CHD), however, has been parallelly increasing worldwide. The present study aimed to evaluate whether FA supplementation is associated with a decreased risk of CHD.

Methods

We searched the literature using PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar, for the peer-reviewed studies which reported CHD and FA and followed with a meta-analysis. The study-specific relative risks were used as summary statistics for the association between maternal FA supplementation and CHD risk. Cochran's Q and I2 statistics were used to test for the heterogeneity.

Results

Maternal FA supplementation was found to be associated with a decreased risk of CHD (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.94). However, the heterogeneity of the association was high (P < 0.001, I2 = 92.7%). FA supplementation within 1 month before and after pregnancy correlated positively with CHD (OR 1.10, 95%CI 0.99–1.23), and high-dose FA intake is positively associated with atrial septal defect (OR 1.23, 95%CI 0.64–2.34). Pregnant women with irrational FA use may be at increased risk for CHD.

Conclusions

Data from the present study indicate that the heterogeneity of the association between maternal FA supplementation and CHD is high and suggest that the real relationship between maternal FA supplementation and CHD may need to be further investigated with well-designed clinical studies and biological experiments.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Folic acid (FA) is a synthetic (that is, not generally occurring naturally) form of folate. Clinical and epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that folate deficiency during pregnancy can lead to birth defects, such as fetal neural tube defects (NTD) [1,2,3]. To prevent folate deficiency such as NTD, FA has been used as a substitute for natural folate because the folic acid, which due to its synthetic form has fully oxidized structure make it more stable than reduced folate [4, 5]. The preventive effect of FA supplementation in pregnant women on the occurrence and recurrence of neural tube defects (NTD) has been fully confirmed, it is generally believed that FA supplementation in pregnant women is beneficial to reproductive outcomes, including the incidence of congenital heart disease (CHD). In recent decades, however, the prevalence of CHD continues to be increased worldwide [6]. In many countries and regions in the world, the updated birth rate of CHD has become the first human birth defects, which accounts for nearly one-third of all major congenital anomalies [6, 7].

In China, the public health policy of FA supplementation for pregnant women originated from the US-China joint research project, which successfully reduced the incidence of NTD by 41–79% [8]. From 1987 to 2017, the incidence of NTD dropped from the first place among the 23 birth defects monitored during the perinatal period in China to the 12th place [9, 10]. However, with the advancement of the FA supplement policy, the overall prevalence of birth defects has not been controlled as expected, rising from 109.79/10,000 in 2000 to 153.23/10,000 in 2011 [10]. The main factor for the above deviation is increased CHD because CHD has become the largest class of birth defects since 2005 [11]. Further analysis of the birth rate of specific CHD subtypes showed that the incidence of atrial septal defect (ASD) has increased significantly over time [12]. We are unable to explain the differences in temporal trends in incidence between NTD and CHD. Apparently, there is a large discrepancy between the current state of FA supplementation to prevent CHD knowledge and practice for clinical application. Therefore, the question of whether there exists an association between maternal FA supplementation and the risk of CHD is raised. To address this question, in the present study, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of maternal FA supplementation on the risk of CHD, and to provide a scientific basis for further medical decision and research on maternal FA supplementation and prevention of CHD.

Methods

Search strategy

We searched the literature with a cut-off date of June 30, 2021, using PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar, for the peer-reviewed studies with English abstracts which reported CHD and FA. The main search terms used were (‘congenital heart disease’, or ‘congenital heart defect’, or ‘CHD’, or ‘septal defect’ or ‘atrial septal defect’) and (‘folic acid’, or ‘folate’, or ‘multivitamins’). In addition, we searched for the studies that using the key words of coronary artery disease and birth defects and examined the relevant references. We further followed published quality standards for conducting the meta-analyses [13].

Eligibility criteria

We selected the articles that (1) were original epidemiologic studies and clinical control studies (i.e., case–control, cohort or randomized controlled trial, RCT), (2) examined the association between periconceptional FA use and either CHD overall or ASD (or septal defects) subtypes in infants, (3) were published in the English language, (4) either the results reported as risk ratios or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) or provided raw data from which these measures could be calculated, (5) defined CHD or ASD (or septal defects) subtypes as an outcome. We also excluded the results of research in the pregnant women with diseases (for instance, diabetes). In addition, non-peer reviewed articles and the studies with experimental animals, concerning ecological assessments, and mechanisms were excluded. Articles that reported results contained multiple populations were considered to consist of separate studies, with one study for each population investigated. Only first published article or the largest number of cases was included in our study, when multiple articles were found to examine the same study.

Date extraction

Data extraction and quality assessment were completed independently by two researchers to reduce the bias and errors of in the date extraction process. Disagreements between investigators were resolved through discussions until a consensus was reached. The following study characteristics were recorded: publication year, geographic region, the sample size, case classification information, exposure, and outcome assessments, adjusted estimates and their corresponding 95% Cl and confounding factors that were controlled for by adjustments in the data analysis. Because a proportion of women might take a multivitamin containing FA during pregnancy, in the current study, we thus analyzed the data separately and found similar results when taking FA alone or taking a multivitamin (Please see Supplemental Fig. 1). If the content of FA in the multivitamin could not be determined to be 0.4 mg, we did not include these data in the analysis. Additionally, the information on the dosage and the timing of FA intake were collected, grouped into three types of FA dose: high-dose, medium-dose, and low-dose. We assessed initiation of any folic intake for 3 times window: 4 weeks before conception, 4 weeks after conception, 5 to 12 weeks after conception. Some studies did not report the exact time of initiation of FA intake, we divided it into four types: short-term taking before pregnancy, long-term taking before pregnancy, short-term taking after pregnancy, long-term taking after pregnancy. To assess study quality, we used a 9-star system based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale [14]. We defined a high-quality study as one with a quality score greater than or equal to 7.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A flow chart of identification and selection of the studies in the current meta-analysis

Full size image

Statistical analysis

As summary statistics, we used study-specific relative risks for the association between maternal FA supplementation and CHD risk. To simplify the procedure, an OR was used to represent results from case–control studies and an RR was used to represent all reported study-specific results from cohort studies. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics.

We conducted subgroup analyses based on study design (i.e., RCT or cohort versus case–control studies), geographical region (i.e., USA, Europe, and China), study quality (i.e., low versus high quality) and relevant confounder (i.e., age). In addition, we have made statistics on the time and dose of FA intake. We evaluated heterogeneity between subgroups by meta-regression analysis. A P-value less than 0.05 for the meta-regression analysis was considered to indicate a significant difference between subgroups.

Publication bias was assessed by via visual inspection of a funnel plot for asymmetry using Egger's linear regression [15] and Begg's rank correlation methods [16]. For both tests, significant statistical publication bias was defined to be indicated by a P-value of < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (version 14.0; StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Study characteristics

The initial search returned a total of 1,824 potentially eligible publications from databases. Finally, a total of 21 studies involving 106,920 CHD individuals were included for the analysis. The process of identification and selection in the studies for the current meta-analysis is summarized in Fig. 1. All the studies were published in the period from 1993 to 2020, and they included 1 randomized controlled trial, 5 cohort studies and 15 case–control studies. The characteristics of all studies are summarized in Supplemental Table 1. Of them, more than half of the studies (61.9%) were published after 2010, and 5 studies performed in the United States [17,18,19,20,21], 9 studies in Europe [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], 4 studies in China [31,32,33,34], 2 studies in Canada [35, 36], and 1 study in Australia [37].

Table 1 Dosage information in FA supplementation and it’s relation with CHD or ASD
Full size table

Maternal FA supplementation and CHD

Figure 2 represents the results of the association between maternal FA supplementation and the risk of CHD in this study. The overall results of this meta-analysis showed the decreased risk of CHD with maternal FA supplementation (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.94; Fig. 2A). Figure 2B shows the comparison results with each dose level of the maternal FA supplementation and the association of CHD. Of the 21 studies included in the current study, data from 4 studies were adopted to evaluate CHD for the intake of FA during pregnancy. Each of the studies included in FA intake is not consistent, we thus summarized and roughly divided into high-dose group, low-dose group, and middle-dose group, while the middle-dose group was taken into OR calculation as a reference. FA dosage information included in these studies is summarized and represented in Table 1. The results of this meta-analysis provided evidence that FA intake affected the association of CHD. The summary OR for any type of heart defect of low dose intake compared with middle dose intake was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.99–1.52), with no significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%, P = 0.429); the high-dose group was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.82–1.38), with no significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%, P = 0.542).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Possible association between maternal FA supplementation and CHD. FA: folic acid; CHD: congenital heart disease; A. Odd ratio (OR) estimates for the overall association of maternal FA supplementation with the risk of CHD; B. OR estimates for the association between maternal FA supplement intake and CHD; C. OR estimates for the association between the initiation of FA supplementation on CHDs; D. Estimated OR of the association between FA supplementation time and CHD

Full size image

As presented in Fig. 2C, the meta-analysis showed that the initiation of FA supplementation within 1 month before conception and 1 month after conception was associated with an increased risk of CHD, the ORs of any heart defect in offspring was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.99–1.23), 1.08 (95% CI, 0.95–1.24), compared with the reference group with no FA intake. Only 4 studies assessed the effects of time of pregnant women FA exposure on CHD [19, 22, 31, 34]. With above studies, 2 studies evaluated initiation of any FA intake within one month before or after pregnancy [19, 22], one month after pregnancy, the remained 2 studies evaluated the effect of maternal FA supplementation on CHD by the length of time [31, 34]. The association between the duration of maternal FA supplementation and CHD occurrence is summarized in Table 2. Data from the meta-analysis demonstrated that the association between short-term FA supplementation after pregnancy was weakest. The OR of any heart defect in offspring was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.42–1.47) compared with the reference group with no FA intake (Fig. 2D).

Table 2 Association between duration of maternal FA supplementation and occurrence of CHD or ASD
Full size table

Maternal FA supplementation and ASD

As seen in Fig. 3, there was the association between maternal FA supplementation and the risk of ASD in this study. The overall results of this meta-analysis showed a decreased in the risk of ASD (or septal defect) with maternal FA supplementation (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72–0.96; Fig. 3A). The summary OR for ASD (or septal defect) of low dose intake compared with middle dose intake was 1.46 (95% CI, 0.86–2.48); the high-dose group was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.64–2.34), with no heterogeneity (Fig. 3B). FA dosage information included in these studies is summarized and represented in Table 1.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Possible association between maternal FA supplementation and ASD. FA: folic acid; ASD: atrial septal defects; A. Odd ratio (OR) estimates for the overall association of maternal FA supplementation with the risk of ASD; B. OR estimates for the association between Maternal folic acid supplement intake and ASD; C. OR estimates for the association between the initiation of folic acid supplementation on ASD; D. Estimated OR of the association between folic acid supplementation time and ASD

Full size image

The initiation of FA supplementation was represented by three variables: within 1 month before pregnancy, within 1 month after pregnancy, after 1 month of pregnancy, the ORs of ASD in offspring was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.94–1.27), 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02–1.22), 1.02 (95% CI, 0.86–1.21) compared with the reference group with no FA intake (Fig. 3C). The initiation of FA supplementation within 1 month after conception was associated with an increased OR for ASD. Data from the meta-analysis demonstrated that the association between short-term FA supplementation after pregnancy was weakest. The OR of ASD in offspring was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.41–1.07) compared with the reference group with no FA intake (Fig. 3D). The association between the duration of maternal FA supplementation and CHD occurrence is summarized in Table 2.

Heterogeneity analysis

Although our meta-analysis showed that maternal FA supplementation reduced the risk of CHD and ASD (or septal defect), we found that the heterogeneity of studies for possible association between FA supplementation and CHD was significant (P < 0.001, I2 = 92.7%), with no publication bias (Begg’s test: P = 0.211; Fig. 4A). Furthermore, a significant heterogeneity of studies for possible association between FA supplementation and ASD was also detected (P < 0.001, I2 = 86.5%), with no publication bias (Begg’s test: P = 0.621; Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Begg’s test for possible association between FA supplementation and CHD/ASD. FA: folic acid; CHD: congenital heart disease; ASD: atrial septal defects; A. Begg's test of studies examining the association between maternal folate supplementation and the risk of CHD; B. Begg's test of studies examining the association between maternal folate supplementation and the risk of ASD

Full size image

To clarify the sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a sensitivity analysis. However, I2 did not decrease substantially when any individual study was removed. Subsequently, a subgroup analysis was carried out on the studies of CHD and maternal FA supplementation. In the subgroup analyses, the corresponding pooled OR was not materially altered in any stratification (Please see Supplemental Figs. 2 and 3, Table 3). However, the results of the meta-analysis have changed in different regions, different designs. Studies in Europe/Australia showed that there was no statistical difference between FA supplementation and the incidence of CHD (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.84–1.09), and the cohort study/RCT study showed that there was no statistical difference between FA supplementation and the incidence of CHD (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.84–1.05) but there is still significant heterogeneity between studies. We also found that the differences in age, maternal smoking, family history may contribute to the heterogeneity.

Table 3 The subgroup analyses of studies concerning the association between maternal FA supplementation and the risk of CHD in offspring
Full size table

Table 4 represents the subgroup analyses of studies examining the association between maternal FA supplementation and the risk of ASD (or septal defect) in offspring. We found that differences in the geographical region, design, age, Maternal smoking, family history may contribute to the heterogeneity we observed. In subgroup analyses, the corresponding pooled ORs for studies of “Cohort or RCT”, “America”, “Before 2010” were 1.010, 1.008, 1.200, and were materially altered (Table 4 and see Supplemental Figs. 4 and 5). Design of the studies may change the results of association between maternal FA supplementation and ASD. However, RCT is believed to yield the highest level of evidence for causality because of no recall bias and other advantages. Moreover, the prevalence of ASD was shown an upward trend since 2009 [6]. Therefore, the effect of maternal FA supplementation to prevent ASD may be still under question.

Table 4 The subgroup analyses of studies regarding the association between maternal FA supplementation and the risk of ASD in offspring
Full size table

Discussion

We have conducted a meta-analysis of the recent 21 studies concerning maternal FA supplementation and CHD. Although the data from our analysis implicate that maternal FA supplementation is associated with the reduced risk of CHD, the heterogeneity of this association is high. First, the association is presented to be geographically different. The reports from China suggest that FA supplementation is associated with the decreased incidence of CHD [31,32,33,34], while the studies in Europe and Australia demonstrate that the association was not statistically significant [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30, 37]. Second, the designs of these studies are related with the different results. The case–control studies implicate that FA supplementation reduced the incidence of CHD, but the cohort/RCT studies indicate no significant association [22, 29, 30, 34,35,36]. There could be several explanations for the high heterogeneity. First, the baseline FA levels among fertile women in the developing regions or countries are lower. Second, the case–control studies are observational and may not provide the evidence as cohort study/RCT at the same levels [38] because the case–control study may be confounded by the factors, including age, maternal smoking, maternal alcohol, maternal BMI fetal sex, and family history. Indeed, confounding is always an issue when assessing the association of a single environmental factor with a complex outcome like CHD, particularly, the incidence of CHD is low [6]. Third, the dosage of FA could be one more issue for these conflicting results.

According to clinical phenotypes, ASD is classified as one of subtypes of CHD [39]. In the current study, we found that the summary OR of ASD at the high-dose group of FA intake was increased by nearly 20% compared with what at the middle dose group. It is interesting that we found a positive association between FA supplementation within 1 month before and after pregnancy and CHD, and high-dose FA intake is positively associated with ASD. FA supplementation may have a negative effect on heart development in high doses or specific time windows, the precise biological mechanisms of FA on heart development remain to be elucidated [40]. At present, little is known about the effects of dosage of FA supplementation on infant birth outcome. However, several studies have reported the association between the dosage of FA supplements and adverse pregnancy outcomes. A cohort reported that FA supplement use ≥ 800 µg/day during pregnancy was related to elevated gestational diabetes mellitus risk [41]. In addition, the use of high-dose (≥ 800 µg/d) FA supplements is associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension [42], FA also affect fetal cardiovascular system [43].

In epidemiological studies, there are many factors that may affect the analysis of the results and the results of the analysis. Differences in methods used for studies are probably the most common factor contributing to heterogeneity. Some scholars have proposed that the addition of multivitamins containing folic acid may improve the effect of primary prevention of CHD compared with the use of FA alone [44]. To exclude interfering factors, in the current study, we not only analyzed taking FA alone and taking multivitamins containing FA, but also excluded the content of FA in multivitamins below 0.4 mg from the analysis. By using zebrafish, an experimental study has demonstrated that maternal micronutrient and homocysteine status are associated with the risk of CHD in offspring [45]. Furthermore, FA and other micronutrient deficiencies can lead to accumulation of homocysteine and mitotic dysfunction [45, 46]. In China, after the implementation of public health policies to increase FA intake in women, population statistics should theoretically support the preventive effect of FA intake during pregnancy on CHD, but the results are not consistent with expectations [11]. This problem cannot be fully explained, as more than 90% of women take supplements [47]. Therefore, through the analysis progress of this study, we believe that due to the different methods of taking FA to avoid the generation of heterogeneity, it may be more important to strengthen the within-group comparison than the between-group comparison in the analysis method and process.

Several studies have demonstrated that the continued FA supplementation after pregnancy may increase the risk of large-for-gestational-age birth [48], childhood asthma [49], childhood allergic [50], negative neurodevelopmental outcomes [51, 52]. Thereby, we have an assumption that FA supplementation may not negatively but positively be associated with the risk of CHDs was consistent with the trend of CHD epidemic. Further research should be done on the reasonable time and dosage of FA intake and the mechanism of adverse pregnancy caused by excessive supplementation.

Conclusion

Data from the current meta-analysis suggest that although the maternal FA supplementation seems associated with a decreased risk of CHD, the heterogeneity of this association is significantly high. The heterogeneity may be caused by the confounders such as timing and dose of FA administration, and the heterogeneity may subsequently influence the outcome on actual effect of FA supplementation on CHD. On this basis, we believe it is necessary to correctly assess the association of FA supplementation with CHD. Further experiments designed to study the association between FA and CHD and its molecular mechanisms have been taken into consideration.

Availability of data and materials

All the data in this study were available in the figures in the main text and supplemental documents of this manuscript.

Abbreviations

ASD:

Atrial septal defect

BMI:

Body mass index

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

FA:

Folic acid

NTD:

Neural tube defect

OR:

Odds ratio

RR:

Risk ratio

THF:

Tetrahydrofolate

VSD:

Ventricular septal defect

References

  1. Rasmussen LB, Andersen NL, Andersson G, Lange AP, Rasmussen K, et al. Folate and neural tube defects Recommendations from a Danish working group. Dan Med Bull. 1998;45(2):213–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Green NS. Folic acid supplementation and prevention of birth defects. J Nutr. 2002;132(Suppl 8):2356S-2360S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Czeizel AE. Primary prevention of neural-tube defects and some other major congenital abnormalities: recommendations for the appropriate use of folic acid during pregnancy. Paediatr Drugs. 2000;2(6):437–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen MT, Hendrickx IM. Model studies on the stability of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid degradation during thermal treatment in combination with high hydrostatic pressure. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(11):3352–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohrvik VE, Witthoft CM. Human folate bioavailability. Nutrients. 2011;3(4):475–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Chen S, Zühlke L, Black GC, Choy MK, Li N, et al. Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970–2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(2):455–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD, Li S, Moore CA, et al. Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China-U.S. collaborative project for neural tube defect prevention. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(20):1485–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. China Maternal and Child Health Development Report (2019) (I). Chinese Journal of Women and Children Health. 2019;10(5):1–8.

  10. Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. China Birth Defect Prevention Report. 2012. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/att/att/site1/20120912/1c6f6506c7f811bacf9301.pdf. accessed 13 August 2021.

  11. Xu WL, Deng CF, Li WY, Wang K, Tao J, Gao YY, et al. National perinatal prevalence of selected major birth defects — China, 2010–2018. China CDC Wkly. 2020;2(37):711–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao L, Chen L, Yang T, Wang T, Zhang S, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease in China, 1980–2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 617 studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(7):631–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses comparison. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology /oxford.asp. accessed 13 August 2021.

  15. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Correa A, Gilboa SM, Botto LD, Moore CA, Hobbs CA, et al. Lack of periconceptional vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid and diabetes mellitus-associated birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(3):218.e1-13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scanlon KS, Ferencz C, Loffredo CA, Wilson PD, Correa-Villaseñor A, et al. Preconceptional folate intake and malformations of the cardiac outflow tract. Baltim-Wash Infant Study Group Epidemiol. 1998;9(1):95–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Werler MM, Hayes C, Louik C, Shapiro S, Mitchell AA. Multivitamin supplementation and risk of birth defects. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(7):675–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Yang W, Lammer EJ. Periconceptional nutrient intakes and risks of conotruncal heart defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(3):144–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw GM, O’Malley CD, Wasserman CR, Tolarova MM, Lammer EJ. Maternal periconceptional use of multivitamins and reduced risk for conotruncal heart defects and limb deficiencies among offspring. Am J Med Genet. 1995;59(4):536–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Øyen N, Olsen SF, Basit S, Leirgul E, Strøm M, et al. Association between maternal folic acid supplementation and congenital heart defects in offspring in birth cohorts from Denmark and Norway. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(6):e011615.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Csáky-Szunyogh M, Vereczkey A, Kósa Z, Urbán R, Czeizel AE. Association of maternal diseases during pregnancy with the risk of single ventricular septal defects in the offspring–a population-based case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(8):738–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Czeizel AE, Vereczkey A, Szabó I. Folic acid in pregnant women associated with reduced prevalence of severe congenital heart defects in their children: a national population-based case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:34–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leirgul E, Gildestad T, Nilsen RM, Fomina T, Brodwall K, et al. Periconceptional folic acid supplementation and infant risk of congenital heart defects in Norway 1999–2009. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(5):391–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Csáky-Szunyogh M, Vereczkey A, Urbán R, Czeizel AE. Risk and protective factors in the origin of atrial septal defect secundum–national population-based case-control study. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2014;22(1):42–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Csáky-Szunyogh M, Vereczkey A, Kósa Z, Gerencsér B, Czeizel AE. Risk and protective factors in the origin of conotruncal defects of heart–a population-based case-control study. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(10):2444–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Beynum IM, Kapusta L, Bakker MK, den Heijer M, Blom HJ, de Walle HE. Protective effect of periconceptional folic acid supplements on the risk of congenital heart defects: a registry-based case-control study in the northern Netherlands. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(4):464–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Czeizel AE. Prevention of congenital abnormalities by periconceptional multivitamin supplementation. BMJ. 1993;306(6893):1645–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Czeizel AE, Dobó M, Vargha P. Hungarian cohort-controlled trial of periconceptional multivitamin supplementation shows a reduction in certain congenital abnormalities. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70(11):853–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li X, Li S, Mu D, Liu Z, Li Y, Lin Y, et al. The association between periconceptional folic acid supplementation and congenital heart defects: a case-control study in China. Prev Med. 2013;56(6):385–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Qu Y, Lin S, Zhuang J, Bloom MS, Smith M, et al. First-trimester maternal folic acid supplementation reduced risks of severe and most congenital heart diseases in offspring: a large case-control study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(13):e015652.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Feng Y, Cai J, Tong X, Chen R, Zhu Y, Xu B, Mo X. Non-inheritable risk factors during pregnancy for congenital heart defects in offspring: A matched case-control study. Int J Cardiol. 2018;264:45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mao B, Qiu J, Zhao N, Shao Y, Dai W, et al. Maternal folic acid supplementation and dietary folate intake and congenital heart defects. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187996.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu S, Joseph KS, Luo W, León JA, Lisonkova S, et al. Effect of folic acid food fortification in Canada on congenital heart disease subtypes. Circulation. 2016;134(9):647–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bedard T, Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Harder JR, Trevenen C, et al. Folic acid fortification and the birth prevalence of congenital heart defect cases in Alberta, Canada. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(8):564–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bower C, Miller M, Payne J, Serna P. Folate intake and the primary prevention of non-neural birth defects. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006;30(3):258–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2234–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bradley EA, Zaidi AN. Atrial septal defect. Cardiol Clin. 2020;38(3):317–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Han X, Wang B, Jin D, et al. Precise dose of folic acid supplementation is essential for embryonic heart development in Zebrafish. Biology (Basel). 2021;11(1):28.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li Q, Zhang Y, Huang L, Zhong C, Chen R, et al. High-dose folic acid supplement use from prepregnancy through midpregnancy is associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(7):e113–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Q, Xu S, Chen X, Zhang X, Li X, et al. Folic acid supplement use and increased risk of gestational hypertension. Hypertension. 2020;76(1):150–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sinclair KD, Allegrucci C, Singh R, Gardner DS, Sebastian S, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19351–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Czeizel AE, Bánhidy F. Vitamin supply in pregnancy for prevention of congenital birth defects. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011;14(3):291–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Elizabeth KE, Praveen SL, Preethi NR, Jissa VT, Pillai MR. Folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine and polymorphisms in folate metabolizing genes in children with congenital heart disease and their mothers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71(12):1437–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tang LS, Wlodarczyk BJ, Santillano DR, Miranda RC, Finnell RH. Developmental consequences of abnormal folate transport during murine heart morphogenesis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70(7):449–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang X, Liu J, Jin Y, et al. Folate of pregnant women after a nationwide folic acid supplementation in China. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15(4):e12828.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang S, Ge X, Zhu B, Xuan Y, Huang K, et al. Maternal continuing folic acid supplementation after the first trimester of pregnancy increased the risk of large-for-gestational-age birth: a population-based birth cohort study. Nutrients. 2016;8(8):493.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Brown SB, Reeves KW, Bertone-Johnson ER. Maternal folate exposure in pregnancy and childhood asthma and allergy: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(1):55–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen Z, Xing Y, Yu X, Dou Y, Ma D. Effect of folic acid intake on infant and child allergic diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2021;8:615406.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. DeSoto MC, Hitlan RT. Synthetic folic acid supplementation during pregnancy may increase the risk of developing autism. J Pediatr Biochem. 2012;2:251–61.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Raghavan R, Riley AW, Volk H, Caruso D, Hironaka L, et al. Maternal multivitamin intake, plasma folate and vitamin B12 levels and autism spectrum disorder risk in offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018;32(1):100–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Ms. Lili Qiu for scientific discussion.

Funding

The research grants from China Pharmaceutical University (CPU-180815 HFG).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Zhengpei Cheng & Harvest F. Gu

  2. Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacology and Biomedical Science, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St Glasgow, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland

    Zhengpei Cheng

  3. College of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China

    Rui Gu

  4. Institute of Biological Chinese Medicine, Beijing Yichuang Institute of Biotechnology Industry, Beijing, China

    Zenglin Lian

Authors
  1. Zhengpei Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zenglin Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Harvest F. Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Rui Gu and Zhengpei Cheng: Literature study, data analysis and manuscript preparation; Zenglin Lian: Data interpretation and scientific discussion; Harvest F. Gu: Study concept and manuscript revision. All authors agreed and approved the final version of manuscript.

Authors’ information

Zhengpei Cheng is a graduate student in China Pharmaceutical University and University of Strathclyde. Rui Gu hold the degree of Master of Sciences, Zenglin Lian is a professor in Beijing Yichuang Institute of Biotechnology Industry. Harvest F. Gu used to be a senior researcher in Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, and is presently a Professor in China Pharmaceutical University.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harvest F. Gu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate.

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Z., Gu, R., Lian, Z. et al. Evaluation of the association between maternal folic acid supplementation and the risk of congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J 21, 20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00772-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00772-2

Keywords

  • Association
  • Atrial septal defect
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Folic acid
  • Heterogeneity

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us