Skip to main content
Download PDF

Beverage consumption and energy intake among Canadians: analyses of 2004 and 2015 national dietary intake data

Nutrition Journal volume 18, Article number: 60 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Among adults and children consuming Western diets, beverages are significant sources of free sugars, saturated fats, excess calories, and alcohol, with relevance to chronic disease risk. The impact of recent healthy eating policies and beverage market evolutions on population-level consumption patterns in Canada is unknown. The current study examined trends in intake of a range of beverage types among a nationally-representative sample of Canadians, with stratification by socio-demographic characteristics.

Methods

The 2004 (n = 34,775) and 2015 (n = 20,176) nutrition-focused cycles of the Canadian Community Health Surveys are cross-sectional surveys representative of the population of the 10 Canadian provinces. Based on a single multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall for each participant, fluids consumed as beverages were grouped into seven categories. Using linear regression, reported intake (volume, ml and energy, kcal) of each category was characterized over time and in relation to sex, age, ethnicity, income, body mass index (BMI), and province of residence.

Results

In 2015, Canadians reported consuming an average of 1806 ml (275 kcal) fluids as beverages per day, including: plain water 867 ml (0 kcal); other unsweetened beverages, e.g. coffee, 364 ml (6 kcal); sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) 204 ml (99 kcal); plain milk 132 ml (64 kcal); alcoholic drinks 120 ml (71 kcal); 100% juice 74 ml (34 kcal); and diet or low calorie beverages 44 ml (2 kcal). Differential consumption was observed across socio-demographic groups, with high consumption of sugary drinks (i.e., SSBs and 100% juice) and alcohol across groups. From 2004 to 2015, the reported volumes of beverages consumed decreased by 10% (energy: − 24%). With adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics, there were significant changes (p < 0.001) over time in intake of: 100% juice − 40% (− 38%); plain milk − 37% (− 35%); SSBs − 26% (− 20%); diet or low calorie beverages (− 46%); and other unsweetened beverages − 11% (− 42%). The volume of plain water consumed increased by 10% (p < 0.0001). Intake of alcoholic (volume and energy) and diet or light beverages did not change significantly.

Conclusions

Lower intake of beverages was reported by Canadians in 2015 versus 2004, with a shift towards plain water. Consumption of sugary drinks decreased, but these beverages continue to contribute substantially to Canadians' overall energy intake. The findings underscore the need for policies to further reduce the consumption of sugary and alcoholic beverages, as well as calories from beverages.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diet-related diseases are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide [1]. Consistent with other countries, rates of diet-related diseases, including diabetes and obesity, have risen dramatically in Canada in recent years [2, 3]. Beverage intake, which is a component of diet, has an important influence on health and on risk for diet-related diseases. Although water is critical for life [4] and beverages are the primary source of water intake [5], beverages also contribute free sugars, saturated fats, excess calories, and alcohol [6,7,8,9], each of which has been linked to disease outcomes [10, 11]. In particular, consumption of sugary beverages has received substantial attention and been shown to be associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, obesity, obesity-related conditions including numerous cancers and cardiovascular disease, as well as dental caries [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Alcohol is similarly an important risk factor for chronic disease, as well as acute harms including injuries and interpersonal violence [18].

Evidence from high-income countries indicates recent decreases in consumption of traditional sugar-sweetened beverages, such as carbonated soft drinks and fruit drinks containing added sugar, alongside increased consumption of novel products, such as sweetened coffees, teas, energy drinks, and sports drinks [19,20,21,22]. Intake of 100% juice has also increased and consumers have switched from higher fat milks to reduced fat products [20, 22]. Among adults, alcohol remains a significant source of energy intake, though it is typically excluded from definitions of sugary drinks [22].

Despite the critical role of beverages in promoting or harming health, there is relatively little data on trends in beverage consumption for many countries, including Canada. As in most other countries, national nutrition surveys in Canada have been infrequent, with the two most recent surveys conducted in 2004 and 2015 [23]. Analyses of Canadian data from 2004 indicate that, among children and youth, beverages contributed 30% of daily energy; adults’ energy intake from beverages was lower and ranged from 11 to 20% depending on age and sex [24, 25]. Except among young children (1–8 years), water was the most consumed beverage by volume. Consumption was also characterized by high intake of sugary drinks, especially among children and youth, high alcohol intake among adults, and high milk intake among young children [24, 25].

Echoing global developments [26,27,28], since 2004, several policies have been implemented in Canada to promote healthy eating, including reduced sugar intake, such as provincial-level bans on the sale of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in schools [29]. The beverage industry has evolved over the same period to expand the diversity of beverages available, including products containing a wide range of sweeteners and beverages marketed for their ‘functional’ properties (e.g., caffeine, protein) [30]. The impact of evolutions in the market on population-level consumption patterns in Canada is unknown. The purpose of this study was thus to examine per capita daily beverage consumption among the Canadian population by 1) examining mean beverage intake (volume and energy) reported by Canadians in 2015; 2) identifying significant differences in reported beverage intake in 2015 according to sex, age, ethnicity, income, province, and body mass index (BMI) category; and 3) characterizing changes in reported beverage intake between 2004 and 2015, adjusted for socio-demographic variables.

Methods

Data sources

Beverage consumption was characterized using dietary intake data from the 2004 and 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey–Nutrition (CCHS-Nut) probability-based cross-sectional surveys, conducted by Statistics Canada and Health Canada [31,32,33]. Each CCHS-Nut consists of a General Health Survey and a standardized 24-h dietary recall (24HR), and provides nationally-representative estimates for Canadians residing in the 10 provinces (2004: ages ≥0 years, N = 35,107; 2015: ages ≥1 years, N = 20,487). The sampling frames cover 90–98% of the provincial populations. Excluded persons were those living on reserve and other Indigenous peoples’ settlements, full-time members of the Canadian Forces, and the institutionalized population. Respondents were limited to one person per household. Interviews were completed with parents or guardians for children under 6 years of age and proxy-assisted for those aged 6 to 11 years. The surveys’ methods are reported in detail elsewhere [31,32,33].

Using a computer-assisted interviewing tool, trained interviewers administered the General Health Survey and the multiple-pass 24HR to elicit details regarding foods and beverages consumed the previous day. A probabilistic sample of approximately 30% of respondents completed a second 24HR, 3 to 10 days later. Foods and beverages reported in the 24HR were then coded by Health Canada using a food composition database based on the Canadian Nutrient File. The current study drew upon data from the first dietary recall only and included all respondents with a valid recall as defined by Health Canada [31, 32].

To align the age ranges between the two survey cycles, infants (n = 355 respondents age < 1 year) were excluded from the CCHS-Nut 2004 dataset. The final samples (2004: N = 34,463; 2015: 20176) excluded respondents who exclusively consumed breastmilk, were pregnant, or were breastfeeding. The CCHS Master Files were accessed through the Statistics Canada South-Western Ontario Research Data Centre at the University of Waterloo. Ethics clearance from the University of Waterloo’s Office of Research Ethics was not required given the rigorous data protections in place within the Research Data Centre.

Measures

Beverage intake

A range of beverage categories, distinguishing products based on the presence or absence of free sugars and including water and alcohol, were considered. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of free sugars was adopted: monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods and beverages, as well as honey, syrups, fruit juices, fruit concentrates, and other sugars that are naturally present in foods and beverages [34]. Given the health risks of free sugars, differentiating between beverages with or without free sugars is important [12, 13, 35, 36], though few studies make this distinction [21].

Based on food codes assigned by Health Canada, fluids consumed as beverages were first grouped into 37 mutually-exclusive sub-categories (Additional file 1: Appendix A) and then aggregated into seven mutually-exclusive categories (Table 1). Double-counting was eliminated by including only those beverages classified within the dataset as ‘basic’ or ‘recipe’ (i.e., an ‘as consumed’ format); beverages reported as ‘ingredients’ in recipes were excluded. For each beverage category, reported intake was analyzed by volume (ml) and energy (kcal). One gram of beverage was converted to 1 millilitre [25]. Non-consumers were assigned zero values for volume and energy variables, permitting the calculation of per capita estimates.

Table 1 Beverage category definitions
Full size table

Socio-demographic measures

Previous research examining the CCHS-Nut 2004 dataset reported significant differences in reported beverage consumption by socio-demographic characteristics [24, 25, 37,38,39,40]. Socio-demographic variables for inclusion in this analysis were identified based on these known associations and their role as potential confounders in temporal trends. Variables of interest available for both survey cycles included sex (male, female), age (continuous), ethnicity (13 binary variables for Aboriginal, white, Chinese, South Asian, Black, Filipino, Latin American, Southeast Asian, Arab, West Asian, Japanese, Korean, Other), total household income (continuous), province, and BMI category (adults ≥17 years: underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese class I, obese class II, obese class III; school-aged children 5–17 years: thin, normal, overweight, obese; preschool-aged children < 5 years: thin, normal, at risk of overweight, overweight, obese) [41,42,43].

Based on observed frequencies, age was recoded into five categories (1–8, 9–18, 19–30, 31–50, 51+). Ethnicity was recoded into six categories (white only, Chinese only, South Asian only, Black only, Indigenous inclusive, mixed/other/not stated/missing). To calculate per capita income, each respondent’s total household income was divided by the square root of the respondent’s household size. Using the square root of household size as an equivalence scale accounts for economies of scale in consumption [44, 45]. With survey weights applied, per capita income was separated into quartiles ranging from 1 (low income) to 4 (high income); non-respondents were coded into a fifth ‘not reported’ category. BMI was recoded into four categories [underweight/normal weight (includes at risk of overweight), affected by overweight, affected by obesity, and don’t know/refusal/not stated].

Analysis

Beverage intake in 2015 is reported using mean [95% confidence intervals, 95% CI)] volume (ml) and energy (kcal) for total beverage intake and each beverage category. To examine associations between intake and sociodemographic covariates, linear models using generalized least squares regression were constructed using each beverage category’s volume and energy as dependent variables (no model was constructed for energy intake contributed by plain water). All models included sex, age, ethnicity, income, BMI category, and province as covariates. Pairwise t-test comparisons tested for differences among categories for each variable (Additional file 1: Appendix B). For comparison purposes, beverage intake in 2004 by socio-demographic characteristics is reported in the Additional file 1: Appendix C. Also reported are intakes of beverage sub-categories for all respondents and by age-sex group (males 1–18, females 1–18, males 19+, females 19+; Additional file 1: Appendix D and Appendix E).

To examine differences in intake between 2004 and 2015, the relative changes (% difference) in volume and energy for total beverages and each beverage category were calculated. Generalized least squares regression was applied with volume and energy for each beverage category as dependent variables. An indicator variable for survey year was included in the model, along with the socio-demographic covariates.

A bootstrap resampling method was applied to account for variance resulting from the surveys’ stratified multi-cluster designs [31, 32]. The bootstrapped weights prepared by Statistics Canada and Health Canada were applied in the statistical software SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA; 2016) using PROC SURVEYMEANS (means and 95% CI) or PROC SURVEYREG (linear regression) with the BRR option. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied with a false discovery rate of 0.05 as a post hoc adjustment to variables with multiple comparisons [46]. All reported sample sizes are weighted.

Results

Sample characteristics

Table 2 outlines the socio-demographic characteristics of the weighted samples for the 2004 and 2005 CCHS cycles.

Table 2 Sample socio-demographic characteristics, weighted
Full size table

2015 Beverage consumption

In 2015, the mean reported consumption of all beverages was 1806 ml (275 kcal) per capita, per day. As Fig. 1 indicates, plain water was consumed in the highest volume, whereas SSBs contributed the most to energy intake, followed by alcohol.

Fig. 1
figure1

Daily per capita beverage volume and energy intakes in 2015 (N = 20,176). Dark shading indicates volume (ml), light shading indicates energy (kcal). Data source: 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey–Nutrition. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. Plain water contained no energy. Abbreviations: kcal, kilocalorie; ml, millilitre; SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages

Full size image

Tables 3 and 4 show beverage intake by socio-demographic group. The pairwise comparisons are reported in the Additional file 1: Appendix B.

Table 3 Daily per capita beverage volume intake (ml) from beverage categories in 2015, by socio-demographic characteristic (N = 20,176)
Full size table
Table 4 Daily per capita energy intake (kcal) from beverage categories in 2015, by socio-demographic variable (N = 20,176)
Full size table

Sex

For SSBs, alcohol, 100% juice, and milk, males consumed significantly more, both in terms of volume and calories, compared with females. Males also consumed significantly more volume of other unsweetened beverages. For SSBs, males reported consuming more than double the volume compared with females, with the contribution to energy from this category also double compared with females. For alcohol, males consumed almost triple the volume and double the calories consumed by females. For water and diet beverages, there were no significant differences between males’ and females’ reported intakes by volume or energy contribution.

Age

Age was associated with intake of all beverage categories, and numerous pairwise comparisons were significant. For 100% juice and milk, reported mean intake was highest among young children (1–8 years) and was lower among older age groups. Adults aged 19–30 years reported higher SSB consumption than all other age groups except 9–18 years. Compared with children, adults’ alcohol consumption was significantly higher. Water consumption was significantly different among almost all age groups; the highest reported intake was among adults aged 19–30 years. Intake of other unsweetened beverages was significantly higher with increasing age. Intake of diet beverages was also significantly higher with increasing age, then held constant from 31 to 50 years.

Ethnicity

Ethnicity was significantly associated with intake of all beverage categories, except 100% juice and energy intake of ‘other unsweetened beverages’. Respondents indicating Indigenous ethnicity consumed the highest reported volume of SSBs compared to all other ethnicities. Those of Indigenous ethnicity had the highest intakes of energy from SSB, diet beverage energy and volume, and water volume; the differences were significant compared to only some ethnicity groups.

Among those of white ethnicity, intake of alcohol was higher compared to all other ethnicity groups. Those of white ethnicity reported the highest volume of ‘other unsweetened beverages’, with some significant differences compared with other ethnicities. Milk intake was highest among those of South Asian ethnicity compared to all groups except white. Compared with all other groups, respondents of Chinese ethnicity reported the lowest intake of SSBs. Compared to most other groups, those of Chinese ethnicity also reported the lowest consumption of diet beverages, water, and alcohol. Those of Black ethnicity reported the lowest intake of milk, which was significantly lower compared with that reported among those of South Asian or white ethnicity, and lower intake of other unsweetened beverages, which was significantly lower compared with all other ethnicities.

Income

Compared with other income groups, respondents in Quartile 4 (highest income) reported significantly higher consumption of water whereas those in Quartile 1 (lowest income) reported significantly lower consumption of water (Table 3). For Quartile 1, alcohol intake was lowest but the difference was significant compared only with Quartile 4 and ‘income not reported’. Alcohol intake (volume and energy) was highest among those in Quartile 4, but was not significantly different compared with other groups. Other unsweetened beverage volume was lowest among those in Quartile 2 compared with those in Quartile 3 and Quartile 4. Respondents in Quartile 4 consumed significantly more diet beverages volume than those in Quartile 2.

BMI category

BMI category was significantly associated with intake of 100% juice, diet beverages, and water. Intake of 100% juice was highest and intake of diet beverages was lowest among those characterized as underweight/normal compared to those affected by overweight and by obesity. Intake of 100% juice intake was lowest and diet beverage intake was highest among those affected by obesity, with some significant differences compared to other body weight groups. For water, there appeared to be a gradient whereby intake was significantly higher with increasing BMI category.

Province

Province was significantly associated with intake of all beverage categories, and some pairwise comparisons were significant. Table 5 and Additional file 1: Appendix B report details of all provincial-level comparisons. In brief, respondents from British Columbia had the lowest mean reported intake of SSBs and diet beverages. Respondents from Alberta reported the highest intakes of SSBs energy and water, and the lowest intake of 100% juice. Those from Manitoba had the highest intake of SSBs volume and lowest intake of alcohol. Respondents from Saskatchewan reported consuming the most milk and volume of unsweetened beverages. Respondents from Quebec had the highest 100% juice and alcohol intakes, and the lowest unsweetened beverage intake. Among respondents from NL, the reported intake of diet beverage volume was highest; milk and water intakes were the lowest.

Table 5 Change between 2004 (N = 34,463) and 2015 (N = 20,176) average per capita daily beverage consumption (N = 54,579)
Full size table

Changes in consumption between 2004 and 2015

Compared with 2004, reported per capita daily consumption of all beverages decreased by 10% for volume and 24% for energy in 2015. After adjustment for covariates (Table 5), water intake significantly increased from 2004 to 2015, while intake of other beverages (except alcohol and volume of diet beverages) significantly decreased.

The Additional file contains additional results reporting 2004 intake by socio-demographic variable (Additional file 1: Appendix C), as well as 2004 and 2015 intakes of all beverage categories and sub-categories for all respondents and by age-sex group (Additional file 1: Appendix D, Appendix E).

Discussion

In 2015, Canadians’ reported beverage consumption averaged 1806 ml (275 kcal) per person per day, with significant variations by socio-demographic characteristics. For all beverages combined, significant declines of − 10% by volume and − 24% by energy were observed between 2004 and 2015, equating with meaningful reductions in the volume and energy consumed from this source. Reductions in energy intake over time were mainly due to lower consumption of plain milk, SSBs, and 100% juice.

In 2015, SSBs were the leading source of energy intake from beverages (36% of calories), while juice accounted for 10% of beverage calories. The free sugars in these products increase risk for excess weight gain, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [12, 13, 35, 36], warranting continued efforts to reduce Canadians’ exposure. As an approximation, 132 kcal from these sugary drinks equates with 7% of a 2000 kcal diet [47]. This suggests that Canadians’ average free sugars intake from sugary drinks alone may exceed the WHO’s recommendation to limit the consumption of free sugars to no more than 10% of total energy intake, with further benefits from reducing to less than 5% [34]. Although this study did not examine the proportions of Canadians who exceeded these thresholds, given observed mean consumption, they are unlikely to be trivial. Within the SSB category, reductions in intake between 2004 and 2015 were primarily driven by reduced intake of caloric carbonated soft drinks and fruit drinks. These reductions canceled out increases in intake of other SSB types, such as energy drinks, flavoured waters, and sweetened flavoured milk. Milk products containing free sugars (e.g. chocolate milk) are commonplace in the Canadian food supply [6]. Based on analysis of proprietary data sources [48] for Canada and trends in the US and UK [19,20,21,22], the declines in Canadians’ sugary drink intake were expected and may be due to shifting consumer preferences, increased public concern related to the health implications of SSBs, as well as public health interventions that have discouraged consumption of sugary drinks [49]. Decreases observed between 2004 and 2015 were preceded by decades of increasing soft drink and fruit juice consumption, as reported using data from Canadian household budget surveys between 1938 and 2011 [50]. There remains substantial scope for reducing Canadians’ sugary drink consumption through complementary measures such as reformulation, sugary drink taxation, and polices to reduce their availability [26]. Indeed, Canada’s Dietary Guidelines emphasize that sugary drinks and foods should not be consumed regularly and indicate that foods and beverages offered in publicly-funded institutions should align with this guidance, providing an actionable step to begin shifting food environments [51].

As in many other Western countries [5], alcohol consumption represents a significant source of energy intake among Canadians. Alcohol contributed one in four calories from beverages, the second highest proportion. The contribution of beverage calories from alcohol was even higher among adults. Males consumed alcohol at a higher volume, whereas based on calories per millilitre, females consumed comparatively more energy-dense alcoholic beverages. Unlike sugary drink categories, alcohol consumption did not decrease from 2004 to 2015, which is concerning given the growing body of evidence on both the acute harms (e.g. risk of physical injury and criminal offences) and longer-term impacts (e.g. alcohol dependence and chronic diseases) of even modest levels of intake [52].

Plain milk (which includes plant-based substitutes) was the third leading contributor of beverage calories (23%). Unlike other analyses of 2004 CCHS-Nut [24, 25], the plain milk category used in this study excluded sugar-sweetened milks containing free sugars (e.g. chocolate milk), which were instead considered within SSBs. Plain milk is less energy dense but consumed in much greater volume (7 times greater) compared with flavoured milks. Compared to all other beverage categories, the greatest reduction from 2004 to 2015, both by volume and calories, was observed for plain milk, consistent with other findings [50].

Although sugary drinks, alcohol, and plain milk were the main sources of calories from beverages, plain water and other unsweetened beverages were the leading contributors by volume (48 and 20%, respectively). Neither beverage category contained products with free sugars. Due to the health benefits of consuming water rather than other beverage types, Canada’s Food Guide and other nutrition guidance recommend water as the best choice for hydration [53, 54]. In contrast to most other beverage categories, intake of plain water increased from 2004 to 2015. Consumers may be using water to compensate for reduced intake of plain milk, SSB, and juice consumption; this substitution may yield health benefits. Diet or light beverages, which may also be considered a possible substitute for higher calorie beverages, continued to represent the smallest volume of beverages consumed in 2015 at only 2%. The low consumption of these products may reflect Canadians’ discomfort with non-nutritive sweeteners, including artificial sweeteners [55], and their lesser presence in the Western food supply compared to products with added sugars [56]. Despite the reported introduction of a wider range of diet and low calorie beverages to Canadian consumers [57], sampled Canadians reported consuming a smaller volume of these products in 2015 than in 2004. This is contrary to trends in the US that show increased consumption [19, 58].

Similar to previous studies in Canada [24, 25], there were differences observed in 2015 beverage consumption according to sex and age. Some differences may not be sufficient to be of importance for nutrition and health, but the overall patterns suggest some important disparities. In 2015, males reported significantly higher consumption compared with females for all beverage categories except water (though males generally have higher consumption of energy overall). The highest sugary drink consumption continues to be seen among children and young people. Young children and young adults were the highest consumers of 100% juice and SSBs, respectively, while the second highest consumption of these categories was among older children. Those of Indigenous ethnicity consumed the highest level of SSBs. Those of white ethnicity, who made up 72% of the weighted sample, consumed the most alcohol. As reported for the US and Australia [59, 60], alcohol consumption was greatest among the highest income quartile. Across the provinces, consumption varied and it is unclear whether differences may be attributable to provincial-level policies. For example, higher alcohol consumption was observed in Quebec, which has a less restrictive alcohol control system compared with other provinces [61]. Future comparisons of this nature may be helpful for identifying the implications of policy interventions that may differ by jurisdiction. Few differences were observed in beverage consumption by income quartile, similar to previous research [37, 38, 62, 63].

Previous studies show few associations between BMI and beverage intake [39, 40]. In this study, the 2015 intake of 100% juice was lowest and, as reported in the US [64], consumption of diet beverages was highest among persons with obesity compared with other BMI groups. This is possibly due to misreporting of dietary intake that is associated with body weight status [65] and that complicates comparisons in relation to BMI. Additionally, it is possible that any given individual with overweight or obesity may be attempting to lose weight on a given day, potentially leading to the consumption of water or diet beverages instead of sugary drinks. The association between higher 100% juice consumption and lower BMI may also be due to confounding with other healthy behaviours. Despite the presence of free sugars in 100% juice, there are widespread misperceptions that it is health-promoting [65].

This study’s findings should be interpreted in light of multiple considerations. Dietary intake data are affected by measurement error, both random and systematic. The study’s research questions focused on population-level means, which did not require adjustments for within-person random error (i.e., day-to-day variation in intake) [31, 32, 66]. Systematic error has been shown to be less substantial in data from 24-h dietary recalls compared to that from other dietary assessment tools, such as food frequency questionnaires [67]. Nonetheless, evidence indicates that underestimation of energy intake occurred in both survey years [68, 69]; thus, the beverage intake reported may underestimate true intake levels. Additionally, underreporting appears to be higher in the 2015 survey [69]. This differential misreporting by survey year, which has been reported for other jurisdictions [70,71,72], may have contributed to observed declines in intake and suggests that the findings of the trend analyses should be cautiously interpreted. No standard adjustment currently exists for correcting underreporting [73]. CCHS is not representative of the entire Canadian population: the sampling frame did not include Canada’s three territories and persons living on reserve and other Indigenous peoples’ settlements. Despite these limitations, the CCHS data represent the most robust estimates of beverage intake in Canada. Socio-economic status is a complex construct and is not adequately represented using income alone [74]. Finally, when examining alcohol consumption, the current study did not report consumption according to the ‘standard drinks’ format used in Canada’s alcohol guidelines [75].

Conclusions

Canadians reported consuming less 100% juice, SSBs, plain milk, and other beverages in 2015 compared to 2004, with an apparent shift toward plain water. Differential consumption was seen across socio-demographic groups; however, at the population level, the consumption of sugary drinks and alcohol remains high. Given misreporting of dietary intake, the estimated consumption may be underestimated, with possible increases in underestimation over time contributing to observed declines in consumption [69]. The findings underscore the need for policies to further reduce the consumption of sugary and alcoholic beverages, as well as calories from beverages.

Availability of data and materials

The authors do not own the data underlying this study. CCHS-Nut data is available through Statistics Canada’s Research Data Centres once researchers have met the required criteria.

Abbreviations

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

BMI:

Body-mass index

CCHS-Nut:

Canadian Community Health Survey–Nutrition

DK:

Don’t know

kcal:

kilocalorie

ml:

millilitre

NF:

Newfoundland and Labrador

non. sig.:

Statistically non-significant

NS:

Not stated

PEI:

Prince Edward Island

SSB:

Sugar-sweetened beverage

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Gakidou E, Afshin A, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1345–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System 1996/1997-2011/2012. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2016. Available from: http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/9525c8c0-554a-461b-a763-f1657acb9c9d. Cited 2017 Jul 15

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Twells LK, Gregory DM, Reddigan J, Midodzi WK. Current and predicted prevalence of obesity in Canada: a trend analysis. CMAJ Open. 2014;2(1):E18–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Popkin BM, D’Anci KE, Rosenberg IH. Water, hydration, and health. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(8):439–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gibson S, Shirreffs SM. Beverage consumption habits “24/7” among British adults: association with total water intake and energy intake. Nutr J. 2013;12:9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bernstein JT, Schermel A, Mills CM, L’Abbé MR. Total and free sugar content of Canadian prepackaged foods and beverages. Nutrients. 2016;8(9):582.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kirkpatrick SI, Raffoul A, Lee KM, Jones AC. Top dietary sources of energy, sodium, sugars, and saturated fats among Canadians: insights from the 2015 Canadian community health survey. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44(6):650–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Popkin BM, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(2):174–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rehm J, Lachenmeier DW, Llopis EJ, Imtiaz S, Anderson P. Evidence of reducing ethanol content in beverages to reduce harmful use of alcohol. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(1):78–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    de Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, Cozma AI, Ha V, Kishibe T, et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h3978.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Global BMI Mortality Collaboration, Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju S, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Te Morenga L, Howatson AJ, Jones RM, Mann J. Dietary sugars and cardiometabolic risk: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the effects on blood pressure and lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):65–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ. 2013;345(7891):e7492.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, Mursu J, Hayashino Y, Bhupathiraju SN, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ. 2015;351:h3576.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kim Y, Je Y. Prospective association of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage intake with risk of hypertension. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109(4):242–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Moynihan PJ, Kelly S. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res. 2014;93(1):8–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Prospective Studies Collaboration. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–96.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stockwell T, Butt P, Beirness D, Gliksman L, Paradis C. The basis for Canada’s new low-risk drinking guidelines: a relative risk approach to estimating hazardous levels and patterns of alcohol use. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012;31(2):126–34.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kit BK, Fakhouri THI, Park S, Nielsen SJ, Ogden CL. Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999-2010. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(1):180–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mesirow MSC, Welsh JA. Changing beverage consumption patterns have resulted in fewer liquid calories in the diets of US children: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2010. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(4):559–566.e4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Miller G, Merlo C, Demissie Z, Sliwa S, Park S. Trends in beverage consumption among high school students: United States, 2007-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(4):112–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ng SW, Ni Mhurchu C, Jebb SA, Popkin BM. Patterns and trends of beverage consumption among children and adults in Great Britain, 1986-2009. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(3):536–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rippin HL, Hutchinson J, CEL E, Jewell J, Breda JJ, Cade JE. National nutrition surveys in Europe: a review on the current status in the 53 countries of the WHO European region. Food Nutr Res. 2018;62. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v62.1362.

  24. 24.

    Garriguet D. Beverage consumption of Canadian adults. Health Rep. 2008;19(4):23–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Garriguet D. Beverage consumption of children and teens. Health Rep. 2008;19(4):17–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    WCRF. NOURISHING database: World Cancer Research Fund; 2018. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing-database. Cited 2018 Nov 22

  27. 27.

    Nieto C, Rodríguez E, Sánchez-Bazán K, Tolentino-Mayo L, Carriedo-Lutzenkirchen A, Vandevijvere S, et al. The INFORMAS healthy food environment policy index (food-EPI) in Mexico: an assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations. Obes Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12814.

  28. 28.

    Vandevijvere S, Mackay S, Swinburn B. Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ministry of Education. Policy/Program Memorandum No. 150 - School Food and Beverage Policy. Government of Ontario; 2010. Available from: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/extra/eng/ppm/150.html. Cited 2014 Apr 7.

  30. 30.

    Euromonitor International. Passport database. Available from: http://go.euromonitor.com/passport.html. Cited 2017 Oct 20.

  31. 31.

    Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey Cycle 2.2 User Guide. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2008. Available from: http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb-bmdi/document/5049_D24_T9_V1-eng.pdf. Cited 2016 Jun 1.

  32. 32.

    Statistics Canada. 2015 Canadian community health survey (CCHS) - nutrition: user guide. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2017.

  33. 33.

    Health Canada. Reference guide to understanding and using the data: 2015 Canadian community health survey-nutrition. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2017. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/food-nutrition-surveillance/health-nutrition-surveys/canadian-community-health-survey-cchs/reference-guide-understanding-using-data-2015.html. Cited 2019 Mar 21

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    World Health Organization. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/149782/1/9789241549028_eng.pdf?ua=1. Cited 2016 Nov 1

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1084–102.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Malik AH, Akram Y, Shetty S, Malik SS, Yanchou NV. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverages on blood pressure. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(9):1574–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Danyliw AD, Vatanparast H, Nikpartow N, Whiting SJ. Beverage intake patterns of Canadian children and adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(11):1961–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nikpartow N, Danyliw AD, Whiting SJ, Lim HJ, Vatanparast H. Beverage consumption patterns of Canadian adults aged 19 to 65 years. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(12):2175–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Danyliw AD, Vatanparast H, Nikpartow N, Whiting SJ. Beverage patterns among Canadian children and relationship to overweight and obesity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(5):900–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nikpartow N, Danyliw AD, Whiting SJ, Lim H, Vatanparast H. Fruit drink consumption is associated with overweight and obesity in Canadian women. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(3):178–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    WHO. BMI-for-age. Child growth standards. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/bmi_for_age/en/. Cited 2019 Apr 10.

  42. 42.

    WHO. BMI-for-age (5–19 years). Growth reference 5–19 years. 2019. Available from: http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/. Cited 2019 Apr 10.

  43. 43.

    WHO EURO. Body mass index - BMI. 2019. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi. Cited 2019 Apr 10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Murphy B, Zhang X, Dionne C. Revising statistics Canada’s low income measure (LIM). Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2010. Available from: https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75f0002m/75f0002m2010004-eng.htm. Cited 2017 Dec 4

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. What are equivalence scales? Paris: OECD; 2009. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Health Canada. Carbohydrates. Nutrients in food. 2012. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/nutrients/carbohydrates.html40. Cited 2017 Dec 15.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jones AC, Veerman JL, Hammond D. The health and economic impact of a tax on sugary drinks in Canada [internet]. Waterloo: University of Waterloo; 2017. Available from: https://www.heartandstroke.ca/-/media/pdf-files/canada/media-centre/health-economic-impact-sugary-drink-tax-in-canada-en.ashx?la=en&hash=B3DFB8DEA34A2454D3A01EDB1482FB3D27C22DB7

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Welsh JA, Sharma AJ, Grellinger L, Vos MB. Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(3):726–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Moubarac J-C, Batal M, Martins APB, Claro R, Levy RB, Cannon G, et al. Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2014;75(1):15–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Health Canada. Canada’s Dietary Guidelines. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2019. Available from: https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/guidelines/. Cited 2019 Sep 20

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;0(0) Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31310-2/abstract. Cited 2018 Aug 25.

  53. 53.

    Health Canada. Canada’s food guide: healthy eating recommendations. Health Canada: Ottawa; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: a Global Perspective. 2018. Available from: www.dietandcancerreport.org. Cited 2018 Aug 19.

  55. 55.

    White C, Vanderlee L, Reid J, Paquette M-C, Hammond D. Perceptions of sugary drinks among Canadian youth and young adult. Poster presented at. Victoria: International Society of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2017.

  56. 56.

    Dunford EK, Taillie LS, Miles DR, Eyles H, Tolentino-Mayo L, Ng SW. Non-nutritive sweeteners in the packaged food supply-an assessment across 4 countries. Nutrients. 2018;10(2):1–13.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Grant M. Canadian beverage association balance calories initiative: baseline report [internet]. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada; 2016. Available from: https://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=8379&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1. Cited 2018 Jul 28

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sylvetsky AC, Welsh JA, Brown RJ, Vos MB. Low-calorie sweetener consumption is increasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(3):640–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wymond BS, Dickinson KM, Riley MD. Alcoholic beverage intake throughout the week and contribution to dietary energy intake in Australian adults. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(14):2592–602.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Butler L, Poti JM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake from alcoholic beverages among US adults by sociodemographic characteristics, 1989–2012. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(7):1087–1100.e6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Giesbrecht N, Wettlaufer A, Simpson S, April N, Asbridge M, Cukier S, et al. Strategies to reduce alcohol-related harms and costs in Canada: a comparison of provincial policies. Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2016;5(2):33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Mark S, Lambert M, O’Loughlin J, Gray-Donald K. Household income, food insecurity and nutrition in Canadian youth. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(2):94–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Shupler M, Raine KD. Socio-economic status and fruit juice consumption in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2017;108(2):145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bleich SN, Wolfson JA, Vine S, Wang YC. Diet-beverage consumption and caloric intake among US adults, overall and by body weight. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):e72–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    McElligott JT, Roberts JR, Varadi EA, O’Brien ES, Freeland KD, Basco WT. Variation in fruit juice consumption among infants and toddlers: associations with WIC participation. South Med J. 2012;105(7):364–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Key Concepts about Identifying Analytic Implications of Different Types of Data. NHNAES Dietary Web Tutorial. 2013; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/Dietary/Basic/StatisticalConsiderations/Info4.htm. Cited 2016 Nov 11.

  67. 67.

    Kipnis V, Subar AF, Midthune D, Freedman LS, Ballard-Barbash R, Troiano RP, et al. Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(1):14–21 discussion 22-26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Garriguet D. Under-reporting of energy intake in the Canadian community health survey. Health Rep. 2008;19(4):37–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Garriguet D. Accounting for misreporting when comparing energy intake across time in Canada. Health Rep. 2018;29(5):3–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Health Survey: Users’ Guide 2011–2013. 2014. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/ abs@.nsf/Lookup/B42F59546AB32C44CA 257CD2001DF4CE?opendocument.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Murakami K, Livingstone MBE. Prevalence and characteristics of misreporting of energy intake in US adults: NHANES 2003-2012. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(8):1294–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Murakami K, Livingstone MBE. Prevalence and characteristics of misreporting of energy intake in US children and adolescents: National Health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2003-2012. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(2):294–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Key Concepts about Understanding Measurement Error. NHNAES Dietary Web Tutorial. 2013; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/Dietary/Basic/StatisticalConsiderations/Info2.htm. Cited 2016 Nov 11.

  74. 74.

    Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi KS, Metzler M, et al. Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA. 2005;294(22):2879–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Butt P, Beirness D, Gliksman L, Paradis C, Stockwell T. Alcohol and health in Canada: a summary of evidence and guidelines for low-risk drinking. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Sustance Abuse; 2011. Available from: http://www.ccdus.ca/Resource%20Library/2011-Summary-of-Evidence-and-Guidelines-for-Low-Risk%20Drinking-en.pdf. Cited 2018 Jul 22.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Pat Newcombe-Welch at the South-Western Ontario Research Data Centre for her assistance with data access and analysis guidance.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by a CIHR Project Grant (NAS-151550). Additional support was provided by Ontario Graduate Scholarship (ACJ), University of Waterloo President’s Graduate Scholarship (ACJ), CIHR PHAC Chair in Applied Public Health (DH). The funders had no role in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington, Newtown, 6242, New Zealand

    Amanda C. Jones

  2. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Sharon I. Kirkpatrick & David Hammond

Authors
  1. Amanda C. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon I. Kirkpatrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Hammond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors conceptualized the study. ACJ analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to designing the study, interpreting the data, and writing the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the submitted version.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda C. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required for this analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, A.C., Kirkpatrick, S.I. & Hammond, D. Beverage consumption and energy intake among Canadians: analyses of 2004 and 2015 national dietary intake data. Nutr J 18, 60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-019-0488-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Beverage intake
  • Fluid intake
  • Nutrition surveillance
  • Sugar-sweetened beverages
  • Sugary drinks
  • Alcohol

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us