Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D dietary supplementation and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among adults with hypertension

Nutrition Journal volume 23, Article number: 33 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The relationship between vitamin D status and mortality among adults with hypertension remains unclear.

Methods

This prospective cohort study involved a sample of 19,500 adults with hypertension who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2001 to 2018. We utilized a weighted COX proportional hazard model to assess the association between vitamin D status and mortality. This statistical model calculates hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

The study indicated that lower serum 25(OH)D concentration was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality among individuals with hypertension. Specially. Those with concentrations between 25.0 and 49.9 nmol/L (HR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.22–2.40) and less than 25.0 nmol/L (HR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.15–3.39) had higher hazard ratios for all-cause mortality. Individuals with hypertension who took vitamin D supplements had a lower risk of all-cause mortality, but not the risk of CVD mortality (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.54–1.03), compared to those who did not supplement (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.61–0.94). Subgroup analysis further revealed that vitamin D supplementation was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality among individuals without diabetes (HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.52–0.81) and individuals without CVD (HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58–0.97), and a decreased risk of CVD mortality among individuals without diabetes (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.45–0.88) and without CVD (HR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.40–0.92). Furthermore, higher-dose vitamin D supplementation was also associated with a greater reduction in all-cause mortality among hypertensive individuals, and there was the potential synergistic effect of combining normal-dose calcium and vitamin D supplementation, showing a superior effect on mortality compared to low-dose supplementation in adults with hypertension.

Conclusions

This prospective cohort study demonstrated a significant association between lower serum 25 (OH)D concentration and increased all-cause mortality among adults with hypertension. Furthermore, the study found that vitamin D supplementation had a strong and significantly positive correlation with reduced all-cause and CVD mortality among hypertensive individuals without diabetes or CVD. This positive correlation suggests that vitamin D supplementation could potentially be an effective strategy to reduce the risk of mortality in this specific group of people.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

According to recent statistics, it was found that by 2019, approximately 52% of women and 43% of men worldwide had been diagnosed with hypertension [1, 2]. Despite improvements in diet and modern lifestyles, the prevalence of hypertension continues to rise, even affecting younger individuals [1,2,3]. This persistent and poorly controlled hypertension poses significant risks for cardiovascular disease and mortality, with impacts such as increased cardiac workload, vascular damage, blood clot formation, aneurysm development, and cerebrovascular events [4].

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25 (OH)D], which includes both 25 (OH)D2 and 25 (OH)D3, is the main form of vitamin D in the bloodstream and is used as an indicator to assess vitamin D levels [5]. Vitamin D deficiency is widespread, and the use of vitamin D supplements has become increasingly common [6,7,8]. Observational studies have shown that higher concentrations of serum 25 (OH)D are associated with a reduced blood pressure, lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in adults [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The presence of specific vitamin D receptors in cardiovascular tissue in basic experimental studies suggests a direct role of vitamin D in maintaining cardiovascular function [15]. Given the association between vitamin D and hypertension and CVD-related deaths, it is important to determine whether vitamin D is associated with mortality in hypertension, and whether the use of vitamin D supplements can improve mortality in hypertensive individuals. Nanri A et al. conducted a study on the correlation between dietary vitamin D intake and mortality in the Japanese and suggested that higher dietary vitamin D could reduce the risk of mortality in hypertension [16].In addition, the Honolulu Heart Program study found a significant association between low dietary vitamin D intake and higher overall mortality during 45 years of follow-up among middle-aged Japanese American men with hypertension, but not in those without hypertension [17]. Both studies indicate that higher dietary vitamin D intake is associated with lower mortality in individual with hypertension. Vitamin D supplements can provide more vitamin D than dietary intake, so whether additional vitamin D supplements can reduce mortality in individuals with hypertension. However, no studies have investigated the association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality in individual with hypertension.

Therefore, our objective is to investigate and analyze the association between serum 25 (OH)D levels, vitamin D supplementation, and mortality in adults with hypertension. This research aims to provide valuable insights and references for preventing mortality in adults with hypertension and determining the potential benefits of vitamin D supplements in this population.

Research design and methods

Study population

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate the nutritional status of the U.S. population for preventive measures, encompasses data on population diet, health interviews, physical examinations and laboratory analyses. The NHANES protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics, and all participants provided informed consent.

In the study, we acquired data from nine NHANES cycles spanning 2001 to 2018. Hypertension was defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis of hypertension, an average of three systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg or an average of three diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, and the use of antihypertensive drugs for primary hypertension. For a clinical point of view, considering the wide range of antihypertensive drugs used, such as beta blockers can be used for arrhythmia or heart failure, calcium channel blockers can be used for myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, we only used the prescription drug information from 2013 to 2018 because the prescription drug questionnaire before 2013 did not record the reason for medication use. A total of 26,613 participants with hypertension underwent screening. After excluding pregnant women, individuals under 20 years old, those with missing serum 25 (OH)D records, and incomplete death data, a total of 19,500 people were included in the study. The experimental design flow chart of this study is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study population

Full size image

Measurement of serum 25 (OH)D concentrations

Blood samples were obtained from participants through venipuncture, and serum specimens were processed, stored, and shipped to the National Center for Environmental Health. Serum 25 (OH)D concentrations were measured using DiaSorin RIA kit (Stillwater MN) from 2001 to 2006 and a standardized liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method from 2007 to 2018. According to the suggestion of CDC in NHANES website, we employed a homologous regression equation to convert serum 25 (OH)D concentrations from 2001 to 2006 to facilitate subsequent analysis. The conversion formula of serum vitamin D concentration in NHANES 2001–2006 is as follows:

2001–2002: LC-MS/MS equivalent = 6.43435 + 0.95212*RIA original.

2003–2004: LC-MS/MS equivalent = 1.72786 + 0.98284*RIA original.

2005–2006: LC-MS/MS equivalent = 8.36753 + 0.97012*RIA original.

Total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D3 and C3 epimer: 1 nmol/L = 0.40066 ng/mL (1 ng/mL = 2.4959 nmol/L).

Vitamin D supplement use

Participants who reported no use of dietary supplements in the past 30 days were categorized as non-vitamin D supplement users, while those with total vitamin D supplement intake greater than 0 were considered vitamin D supplement users. or the period 2001–2006, total vitamin D supplementation in the past 30 days was calculated based on frequency, duration, and serving form, using the formula:

2001–2006: average daily supplement= (daily dosage* corresponding dosage form* days of use) /30.

Mortality outcomes ascertainment

Mortality data was obtained from NHANES-linked National Death Index public access files through December 31, 2019. We used the International Statistical Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes to define the CVD deaths (I00-I09, I11, I13 and I20-I51). The participants’ death was considered as the endpoint for follow-up. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and CVD mortality, with specific attention to diseases of the heart, cerebrovascular disease, and hypertension flag, collectively considered as CVD death.

Covariates

Demographic and lifestyle factors, including age, gender, race, education, ratio of family income to poverty (PIR), examination month, smoking status, alcohol consumption, duration of hypertension, antihypertensive therapy, physical activity, diet quality, calcium supplements, and comorbidities, were collected through detailed questionnaires during home interviews. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) data were obtained from physical examinations conducted at a mobile examination center. Considering the influence of light exposure on serum 25(OH)D concentration, we categorized it based on examination months: November 1 through April 30 and May 1 through October 31.

The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, encompassing leisure, occupational, and travel activities, was utilized to gauge an individual’s physical activity. The Metabolic Equivalent (MET) value was calculated using the formula: MET (min/wk) = WET × weekly frequency × duration of each physical activity. Inactivity was defined as a MET value of less than 600 min/wk [18].

Diet quality was assessed using the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015), a tool that evaluates adherence to dietary guidelines, providing a comprehensive overview of dietary patterns and intake [19]. HEI-2015 scores below 50 and above 50 were categorized as inadequate and adequate, respectively [20].

Smoking status was classified as never smoker, ever smoker and current smoker according to whether they had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life and whether they smoked cigarettes now. Those who had at least 12 alcohol drinks a year were considered as drinker. Low-to-moderate drinker was defined as alcohol drinks ≤ 2 drinks/day in men or ≤ 1 drinks/day in women. Heavy drinker was defined as alcohol drinks > 2 drinks/day in men or > 1 drinks/day in women. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) included congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack and stroke. Co-morbidities included diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, CVD, renal failure and cancer.

Statistical analysis

Given the complex sampling design of NHANES, a meticulous approach to weighting the data was employed, following NHANES analysis guidelines. Sample weights, strata, and primary sampling units were utilized to account for the complex survey design. The data were combined and weighted using the wtmec2 year under the NHANES protocol.

According to the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines, we divided serum 25 (OH)D concentrations into four groups: sufficient group (≥ 75.0 nmol/L), insufficient group (50.0-74.9 nmol/L), moderate deficiency group (25.0-49.9 nmol/L) and severe deficiency group (< 25.0 nmol/L) [21]. Considering several groups of vitamin D deficiency as adverse status, we used the sufficient group as the control group. COX proportional hazard method was employed to analyze the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in hypertension associated with serum 25 (OH)D concentration and vitamin D dietary supplementation.

Two multivariate model analyses were conducted: model 2 adjusted for age, gender, race, and survey period, while model 3 adjusted for all covariates. Additionally, a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was employed to assess the nonlinear relationship between serum 25(OH)D concentration, vitamin D supplementation, and mortality. Univariate and multivariate weighted linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the impact of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25(OH)D levels.

Subgroup analysis was conducted according to gender (male and female), age (< 65 years and ≥ 65 years), BMI (< 25.0, 25.0-29.9 and ≥ 30.0), PIR (< 1.30, 1.30–3.49 and ≥ 3.50), duration of hypertension (≤ 10 years and > 10 years), diabetes (no and yes), hypercholesterolemia (no and yes), renal failure (no and yes), CVD (no and yes) and osteoporosis (no and yes). In addition, we also did sensitivity analyses. (1) Considering that mortality was related to physical activity and calcium supplements, we further adjusted them. (2) Participants who died within 1 year of follow-up was excluded. (3) Participants with a history of CVD was excluded. (4) Adults with osteoporosis were more likely to use vitamin D supplements, so we adjusted this variable further in the analysis of vitamin D supplementation and mortality. (5) Diet quality was adjusted.

Finally, we classified vitamin D supplementation by dose and calcium to further clarify the association between supplementation and mortality in hypertension. The doses were classified as 2000 IU/day (50 µg/day) and 4000 IU/day (100 µg/day) respectively. Based on supplement recommendations from most studies, we considered vitamin D < 400 IU/day (10 µg/day) and calcium < 600 mg/day to be low doses, and vitamin D ≥ 400 IU/day (10 µg/day) and calcium ≥ 600 mg/day to be normal doses [22].

All statistical analyses were conducted using R 4.2.2, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of participants

In the investigation of the correlation between serum 25 (OH)D and all-cause mortality, as well as CVD mortality in hypertension, a total of 19,500 participants were included, with 52.59% being female and a mean age of 58.8 years. The mean serum 25 (OH)D concentration, both before and after weighting, was 66.73 nmol/L and 71.32 nmol/L, respectively. Individuals with sufficient vitamin D were more likely to use vitamin D supplements (n = 3443/5785). Additional baseline data are presented in Table 1, and the weighted baseline information is available in S-Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics according to serum 25 (OH)D group
Full size table

Serum 25 (OH)D concentration and mortality

Over a mean follow-up of 8.8 years, 4481 adults with hypertension experienced mortality, including 1940 CVD deaths. As detailed in Table 2, serum 25 (OH)D concentration in participants with hypertension exhibited associations with all-cause and CVD mortality in models 1 and 2. Compared to the reference group (sufficient group, ≥ 75.0 nmol/L), all-cause mortality increased in those with serum 25 (OH)D deficiency (25.0-49.9 nmol/L, HR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.22–2.40; <25.0 nmol/L, HR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.15–3.39) after adjusting for multiple variables. However, lower serum 25 (OH)D concentration in hypertension was not significantly associated with CVD mortality (P for trend = 0.12).

Table 2 HRs (95%CIs) for mortality according to serum 25 (OH)D concentrations among hypertensive participants
Full size table

Assessment of the correlation between vitamin D supplementation and serum 25 (OH)D concentration

To investigate the effects of vitamin D dietary supplementation, univariate and multivariate weighted linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the correlation between vitamin D supplementation and serum 25 (OH)D concentration (S-Table 2). Univariate linear regression indicated a low positive association between vitamin D supplementation and serum 25 (OH)D concentration in participants with hypertension (β = 0.09, 95%CI = 0.03–0.15). After adjusting for multiple covariables, this positive correlation remained stable (β = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.09–0.18).

Vitamin D dietary supplementation and mortality

Given the association between lower serum 25 (OH)D concentration and increased mortality, the impact of vitamin D supplementation on mortality in participants with hypertension was explored using weighted COX regression. Baseline characteristics according to the use of vitamin D supplements are detailed in S-Table 3 and S-Table 4 before and after weighting, respectively. Vitamin D supplement non-users had an average serum 25 (OH)D concentration of 55.36 nmol/L, while users had 83.45 nmol/L after weighting.

As presented in Table 3, after adjusting for multiple variables, participants with hypertension who used vitamin D supplements exhibited reduced all-cause mortality compared to non-users (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.61–0.94). However, there was no significant difference in CVD mortality (P-value = 0.07).

Table 3 HRs (95%CIs) for mortality according to the use of vitamin D supplement among participants with hypertension
Full size table

Detection of nonlinear relationship

A restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was employed to examine the relationship between serum 25 (OD)D concentration, its supplementation, and mortality in participants with hypertension. Serum 25 (OH)D concentration demonstrated a linear relationship with all-cause mortality (P for linearity = 0.0002, P for nonlinearity = 0.0685, Fig. 2A). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between the use of vitamin D supplements and mortality, including all-cause mortality (P for linearity = 0.0052, P for nonlinearity = 0.4711, Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between 25 (OH)D concentration (A) as well as vitamin D supplements (B) and all-cause in adults with hypertension. Adjusted for age, gender, race, survey cycle, education, PIR, BMI, smoking, drinking, during of hypertension, medication, vitamin D supplements and co-morbidities. The red solid lines and pink areas represent the estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals, respectively

Full size image

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Subgroup analyses revealed consistent increases in all-cause mortality in participants with hypertension using vitamin D supplements across most subgroups (Fig. 3). Notably, the use of vitamin D supplements in those without a history of diabetes or CVD was associated not only with reduced all-cause mortality (without diabetes, HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.52–0.81; without CVD, HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58–0.97), but also with reduced CVD mortality (without diabetes, HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.45–0.88; without CVD, HR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.40–0.92). Additionally, there was a significant interaction of all-cause mortality between vitamin D supplementation and a history of diabetes (P for interaction < 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plots of subgroup analyses of vitamin D supplements and all-cause and CVD mortality in adults with hypertension. Age, gender, race, survey cycle, education, PIR, BMI, smoking, drinking, during of hypertension, medication, vitamin D supplements and co-morbidities were adjusted except the variable itself.

Full size image

In three sensitivity analyses, the robust association between serum 25 (OH)D concentration (especially in the group 25.0-49.9 nmol/L) and all-cause mortality persisted in participants with hypertension (S-Table 5). Further adjustments for a history of osteoporosis, physical activity, diet quality, and exclusion of participants who died within 1 year of follow-up confirmed the statistically significant correlation between vitamin D supplementation and all-cause mortality in participants with hypertension (S-Table 6).

In grouping the population into different doses of vitamin D supplementation, high doses were more strongly associated with low all-cause mortality (≥ 50 µg/day, HR = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.32–0.79; ≥100 µg/day, HR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.12–0.69) in adults with hypertension, and also significantly with CVD mortality (≥ 50 µg/day, HR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.18–0.88; ≥100 µg/day, HR = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.06–0.65) (S-Table 7).

Effect of vitamin D combined with calcium supplementation on mortality in adults with hypertension

Considering that vitamin D is commonly used in combination with calcium supplements, the population was divided into four groups for analysis: non-supplementation, normal dose vitamin D + low dose calcium, normal dose calcium + low dose vitamin D, and normal dose vitamin D + normal dose calcium. Multiple COX regression models indicated that the group receiving normal dose vitamin D combined with normal dose calcium supplementation was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.68, 95%CI = 0.51–0.92) and CVD mortality (HR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.34–0.77) in adults with hypertension (S-Table 8).

Discussion

In this prospective cohort study of adults with hypertension in the United States, our findings reveal a significant inverse relationship between serum 25(OH)D concentration and all-cause mortality. Additionally, the use of vitamin D supplements is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in adults with hypertension, and notably, this association extends to both all-cause and CVD mortality for individuals without diabetes or pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. Moreover, our investigation into the impact of vitamin D supplement dosage and the concomitant use of calcium supplements on mortality in the individual with hypertension demonstrates a strong association between high-dose vitamin D supplements, combined calcium supplements, and lower all-cause and CVD mortality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the link between vitamin D supplementation and mortality in adults with hypertension.

Currently, prevailing research primarily focuses on the general population, and there is no consensus regarding the association between serum 25(OH)D concentration, vitamin D supplements, and mortality. Most studies posit a connection between low serum 25(OH)D concentration and elevated mortality, while the impact of vitamin D supplementation on mortality remains inconclusive [10, 14, 23,24,25,26,27]. However, within the context of personalized precision therapy, our study suggests that the relationship between vitamin D and mortality may exhibit greater stability and significance within specific populations. Two studies supported our findings, including one conducted outside the United States. Park D et al. demonstrated that a low level of serum 25(OH)D increases the risk of all-cause and specific death in Koreans with hypertension [11]. Similarly, Zhao G et al. analyzed NHANES data from 2001 to 2004 and concluded that serum 25(OH)D concentration is associated with all-cause and CVD mortality in adults with hypertension [28]. While our study aligns with these findings, the observed weaker association with CVD mortality may stem from differences in the study population and the duration of follow-up.

Given the previous evidence linking low serum 25(OH)D levels with higher mortality in individuals with hypertension, our study sought to determine whether vitamin D supplementation could mitigate this risk. Contrary to findings from numerous prospectively studies suggesting that vitamin D supplementation does not significantly impact overall mortality, our study, focusing specifically on the hypertensive population, reveals consistent results with two studies on dietary vitamin D intake and mortality in hypertension [17, 29,30,31]. Moreover, our findings suggest that the benefits of vitamin D supplementation may be more pronounced in individuals with hypertension lacking a history of diabetes or CVD. This extends beyond the impact of antihypertensive medications, affecting both all-cause and CVD mortality. Patients with prediabetes who received high doses of vitamin D had a reduced risk of developing T2DM [32], while T2DM use had no significant effect on glycemic control or cardiovascular risk [33, 34]. Vitamin D supplementation did not improve the risk of mortality in critically ill patients [35, 36]. Michael W et al. concluded that vitamin D supplementation did not reduce the risk of stroke or heart attack in patients with known CVD [37]. These results suggest the ineffectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in hypertension with diabetes or CVD. Compared to population-wide studies, no consistent results were observed for the benefit of vitamin D supplementation on population-wide mortality, possibly due to the presence of a history of diabetes or CVD. This may be because diabetes and CVD have a complex and severe impact on mortality, and vitamin D supplementation does not ameliorate this effect. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on mortality in hypertension seems to be unrelated to blood pressure control, but may be related to immune regulation, anti-inflammatory and improvement of blood lipids [38,39,40,41,42,43]. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that vitamin D supplement use was more strongly associated with lower all-cause mortality in hypertension with high BMI and hyperlipidemia. It has previously been reported to reduce waist-to-hip ratio and increase adiponectin and leptin levels in obese people [44, 45]. Mechanistically, vitamin D supplementation can improve the parameters of high-fat induced inflammation and obesity [46, 47].In conclusion, our study suggests that male, BMI ≥ 30, duration > 10 years, hypercholesterolemia, non-osteoporosis, non-diabetes, non-renal failure and non-CVD may be indications of vitamin D supplementation in adults with hypertension.

While previous studies have recommended daily vitamin D doses ranging from 800 to 1000 IU (20–25 µg) daily as optimal, our study suggests that high-dose vitamin D supplementation, specifically 4000 IU (100 µg) daily, is associated with reduced all-cause and CVD mortality in adults with hypertension [22]. This suggests that high dose vitamin D supplementation not only with reduced all-cause mortality in hypertension, but also with reduced CVD mortality, which provides evidence for the benefits of high dose vitamin D supplementation in adults with hypertension. Importantly, our study found no evidence to suggest harm from high doses of vitamin D supplementation in this population. Since vitamin D supplementation are mostly used in combination with calcium, we divided hypertensive population into four groups for analysis, in order to further explore the role of vitamin D supplementation in the mortality of hypertension population. A study has reported that whether alone or combination, vitamin D supplementation and calcium have no significant effect on all-cause and CVD mortality in the whole population [48]. However, this conclusion appears to be reversed in the meta-analysis [49]. This may be related to population-specific disease, as a review comparing the association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality in people with different disease states suggests that vitamin D supplementation has different effects on disease-specific and patient-oriented outcomes [37]. Our study demonstrated that normal dose vitamin D supplementation in combination with normal dose calcium was associated with better mortality reduction than with low dose vitamin D supplementation or low dose calcium among adults with hypertension. Vitamin D effectively acts as a calcium supplement by promoting calcium absorption. When using vitamin D supplementation, the appropriate addition of calcium can have a better benefit. It is noteworthy, however, that the combined use of vitamin D and calcium may increase the risk of kidney stones and potentially promote vascular calcification, necessitating further exploration of the efficacy of single versus combined use [50, 51]. More studies are needed in the future to reveal the efficacy of single use versus combined use.

The physiological roles of vitamin D, primarily mediated through binding to intracellular vitamin D receptors and influencing various cellular functions, include the regulation of the cell cycle, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), vascular endothelial growth factor production, and anti-fibrotic effects [52,53,54,55]. Although low serum 25(OH)D levels are linked to an increased risk of coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, our study found no evidence supporting the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in preventing coronary heart disease, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation [56,57,58,59,60]. There is no evidence that vitamin D supplementation is associated with atrial fibrillation. Moreover, it not only plays an important anti-inflammatory role by reducing inflammatory cytokine storms, but also reduces oxidative stress and improves vascular endothelial function [61]. In combination with this study, the protective effect of vitamin D on blood vessels and its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects may be the important reasons for the reduction of CVD mortality in hypertensive individual without the history of diabetes or CVD.

Our research carries several strengths. As far as we are aware, this is the first study with a large sample size and a long follow-up period that examines the impact of serum 25 (OH)D concentration and the use of vitamin D supplements on mortality in individuals with hypertension. We have taken into account multiple confounding factors, increasing the reliability and accuracy of our findings. Our study not only investigates the effects of serum 25 (OH)D concentration on mortality in hypertensive individuals but also explores the potential benefits of vitamin D in combination with calcium supplementation.

Our study also has some limitations. Firstly, because the NHANES database is not longitudinal, it is not possible to infer a causal relationship between vitamin D concentration and its supplementation on all-cause mortality in hypertension. Secondly, vitamin D concentration was measured only once at baseline, which has some limitations for assessing its levels. Finally, residual or unknown confounder effects due to measurement errors and unmeasured variables (such as psychosocial stress and genetic predisposition) cannot be excluded.

Conclusion

Overall, this study found that lower serum 25 (OH)D concentration was associated with increased all-cause mortality in adults with hypertension, and that adults with hypertension who took vitamin D supplements had a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Vitamin D supplementation in hypertensive individual without diabetes or CVD was strongly associated with lower risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. Our study suggests that hypertensive individuals without diabetes or CVD are more likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation, and may provide evidence for the individualized use of vitamin D supplements in clinic.

Data availability

The original data were retrieved from NHANES database (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm).

Abbreviations

25(OH)D:

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

NHANES:

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

LC-MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

PIR:

Ratio of family income to poverty

HR:

Hazard ratio

95% CI:

95% confidence intervals

RCS:

Restricted cubic spline

References

  1. Collaboration NCDRF. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(4):223–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang Q, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of hypertension among college freshmen in China. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23075.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rapsomaniki E, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet. 2014;383(9932):1899–911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Holick MF, Vitamin Ddeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernigou P, et al. Vitamin D history part III: the modern times-new questions for orthopaedic practice: deficiency, cell therapy, osteomalacia, fractures, supplementation, infections. Int Orthop. 2019;43(7):1755–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. LeFevre ML, U.S.P.S.T., Force. Screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kantor ED, et al. Trends in Dietary supplement use among US adults from 1999–2012. JAMA. 2016;316(14):1464–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vishnu A, Ahuja V, Vitamin D, Blood Pressure Among US, Adults. A cross-sectional examination by Race/Ethnicity and gender. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(5):670–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan X et al. Vitamin D status and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large cohort: results from the UK Biobank. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020. 105(10).

  11. Park D et al. Low vitamin D status is Associated with increased risk of mortality in Korean men and adults with hypertension: a Population-based Cohort Study. Nutrients, 2022. 14(9).

  12. Scragg R, Sowers M, Bell C. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, ethnicity, and blood pressure in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20(7):713–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang TJ, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008;117(4):503–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdhury R, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. BMJ. 2014;348:pg1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Latic N, Erben RG. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease, with emphasis on hypertension, atherosclerosis, and Heart failure. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 21(18).

  16. Nanri A et al. Vitamin D intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Japanese men and women: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Eur J Epidemiol, 2023: p. 1–10.

  17. Kojima G, et al. Low dietary vitamin D in mid-life predicts total mortality in men with hypertension: the Honolulu heart program. J Am Coll Nutr. 2014;33(2):129–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Piercy KL, et al. The physical activity guidelines for americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Krebs-Smith SM, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1591–602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. De La Cruz N, Shabaneh O, Appiah D. The Association of Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Ocular diseases among US adults. Am J Med. 2021;134(2):252–259e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Holick MF, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai Z et al. Assessment of the methods used to Develop Vitamin D and Calcium Recommendations-A Systematic Review of Bone Health Guidelines. Nutrients, 2021. 13(7).

  23. Liu Y, et al. Association of Serum 25(OH)D, cadmium, CRP with All-Cause, cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study. Front Nutr. 2022;9:803985.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu C, et al. Serum bioavailable and free 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels, but not its total level, are Associated with the risk of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2018;123(8):996–1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Durazo-Arvizu RA, et al. The Reverse J-Shaped Association between Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentration and all-cause mortality: the impact of assay standardization. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(8):720–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Durup D, Reverse A, et al. Association between serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: the CopD study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(6):2339–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schottker B, et al. Strong associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer, and respiratory disease mortality in a large cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(4):782–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao G, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among US adults with hypertension: the NHANES linked mortality study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(2):284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, et al. Association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4673.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nanri A, et al. Vitamin D intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Japanese men and women: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2023;38(3):291–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Manson JE, et al. Vitamin D supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Barbarawi M et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020. 105(8).

  33. Barchetta I, et al. No effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Med. 2016;14:92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu Z, et al. Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of interventional studies. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(14):e14970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. National Heart L, et al. Early high-dose vitamin D(3) for critically ill, vitamin D-Deficient patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2529–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peng L, et al. Association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Michael W, et al. An Evidence-Based Review of Vitamin D for common and high-mortality conditions. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022;35(6):1217–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chang SW, Lee HC. Vitamin D and health - the missing vitamin in humans. Pediatr Neonatol. 2019;60(3):237–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Martineau AR, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: individual participant data meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23(2):1–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen N, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on the level of circulating high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2014;6(6):2206–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jorde R, Grimnes G. Vitamin D and metabolic health with special reference to the effect of vitamin D on serum lipids. Prog Lipid Res. 2011;50(4):303–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zittermann A, et al. Vitamin D supplementation enhances the beneficial effects of weight loss on cardiovascular disease risk markers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1321–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Holt R, et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves fasting insulin levels and HDL cholesterol in infertile men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(1):98–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Scott D, et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves waist-to-hip ratio and fasting blood glucose in vitamin D deficient, overweight or obese asians: a pilot secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;186:136–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mousa A, et al. Vitamin D supplementation increases adipokine concentrations in overweight or obese adults. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(1):195–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Marziou A et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves adipose tissue inflammation and reduces hepatic steatosis in obese C57BL/6J mice. Nutrients, 2020. 12(2).

  47. Xiang L et al. Vitamin D(3) supplementation shapes the composition of gut microbiota and improves some obesity parameters induced by high-fat diet in mice. Eur J Nutr, 2023.

  48. Zhang Y, et al. Association of Vitamin D or calcium supplementation with Cardiovascular outcomes and Mortality: a Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(2):263–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zheng Y, et al. Meta-analysis of long-term vitamin D supplementation on overall mortality. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e82109.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bargagli M et al. Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation and their association with kidney Stone Disease: a narrative review. Nutrients, 2021. 13(12).

  51. Bouderlique E et al. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation accelerate vascular calcification in a model of Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum. Int J Mol Sci, 2022. 23(4).

  52. Bikle DD, Vitamin D. Metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Chem Biol. 2014;21(3):319–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pludowski P, et al. Vitamin D supplementation guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;175:125–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Al Mheid I, Quyyumi AA. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: controversy unresolved. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):89–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Reina-Couto M, et al. Interrelationship between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and oxidative stress in chronic heart failure patients with or without renal impairment. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;133:110938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang J, et al. Association between blood vitamin D and myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis including observational studies. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;471:270–5.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Luo W, et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Postgrad Med. 2023;135(2):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Al-Ishaq RK, et al. Health implication of vitamin D on the cardiovascular and the renal system. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2021;127(3):195–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Barbarawi M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and Cardiovascular Disease risks in more than 83 000 individuals in 21 randomized clinical trials: a Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(8):765–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Jiang WL, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of Chronic Heart failure: a Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(1):56–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ali N. Role of vitamin D in preventing of COVID-19 infection, progression and severity. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(10):1373–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (no. 202201020081), Talent introduction funding project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (no. 808026) and Basic Scientific Research Project of central Universities of Jinan University (no. 21622301).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Haowen Ye, Yexin Li and Shaomin Liu contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Haowen Ye, Ying Wang, Ruxin Wang, Han Liu, Yun Wen & Lihong Wang

  2. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, No.601 Huangpu Ave West, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China

    Yexin Li, Huanzhu Liang & Chunxia Jing

  3. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Exposure and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510632, China

    Yexin Li, Huanzhu Liang & Chunxia Jing

  4. Department Clinical Experimental Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Xiaofang Zhang

  5. Department of Oncology Medilcal Center, The First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing, China

    Shaomin Liu

Authors
  1. Haowen Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yexin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaomin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaofang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huanzhu Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ruxin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Han Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yun Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chunxia Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lihong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YHW and LYX designed the research. YHW, LYX, LSM and LHZ completed data collection and analysis. WLH, JCX, ZXF, WY, WRX, LH, WY participated in the discussion. YHW wrote a manuscript. JCX and WLH revised the manuscript and confirmed the final draft with YHW. All authors approved the submitted and final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunxia Jing or Lihong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The NHANES protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics, and all participants provided informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, H., Li, Y., Liu, S. et al. Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D dietary supplementation and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among adults with hypertension. Nutr J 23, 33 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-00914-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-00914-8

Keywords

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us