Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Dietary oxalate to calcium ratio and incident cardiovascular events: a 10-year follow-up among an Asian population

Nutrition Journal volume 21, Article number: 21 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and aim

The potential cardiovascular impact of usual intakes of oxalate (Ox) is uninvestigated. We evaluated the effect of dietary Ox and its interaction with dietary calcium (Ca) on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods

We included 2966 adult men and women aged 19–84 y without known CVD during baseline enrollment (2006–2008) of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Dietary intakes were assessed using a validated FFQ, and incident CVD (i.e., coronary heart disease, stroke, and CVD mortality) were documented through March 2018.

Results

A 7.1% incident of CVD occurred during a median follow-up of 10.6 y. After multivariable adjustment for traditional risk factors and key dietary nutrients, including total fat and fiber, Ox intakes ≥220 mg/d increased incident CVD (HR T3 vs. T1 = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.02–2.12). This association was potentiated (HR T3 vs. T1 = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.19–4.89) in subjects who had a lower intake of Ca (< 981 mg/d); in a low-Ca diet, an even lower amount of dietary Ox (second tertile, 148–220 mg/d) was related to increased CVD events by 92% (HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.00–3.70). No association was observed between dietary Ox and CVD events in the presence of medium- and high levels of Ca intakes. The critical cut-off point of Ox-to-Ca for predicting CVD events was 0.14, which was related to an increased risk of CVD by 37% (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.02–1.84).

Conclusion

Higher dietary Ox intake appeared to be associated with a modestly elevated risk of incident CVD, especially in a diet with a lower amount of Ca.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

A high-oxalate (Ox) diet is the leading cause of secondary hyperoxaluria (i.e., urinary Ox over 45–50 mg/24 h) [1, 2], a potential risk factor for systemic oxalosis and cardiovascular dysfunction [3]. High-Ox levels may exert atherogenic effects by induction of oxidative stress, inflammation, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) secretion, or by elevating intracellular calcium in endothelial cells, preventing re-endothelialization and inducing endothelial cell toxicity [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Hyperoxalemia also leads to systemic inflammation and oxidative stress [10], predisposing to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Increased endogenous production, from either excessive Ox content of the food or intestinal hyper-absorption, contributes to Ox accumulation in the body [1, 2].

Mean usual dietary intake of Ox has been reported in a range of 50–350 mg/d [11, 12]; however, it may surpass 1000–2000 mg/d when high Ox-rich foods are consumed [13, 14]. Urinary Ox is equally originated from both the endogenous (i.e., metabolism of glycine, glycolate, hydroxyproline, and ascorbic acid) and exogenous sources (i.e., Ox-containing foods, including spinach, leafy vegetables, legumes, nuts, beetroot, and cocoa) [1, 15]; however, dietary contribution may reach up to 80% [16, 17]. The amount of gastrointestinal (GI)-absorbed Ox is affected by the amount of dietary Ca; the dietary Ca-to-Ox ratio would be, therefore, theoretically associated with the risk of Ca-Ox kidney stones [16, 18, 19], an independent risk factor for the development of CVD [20, 21]. Decreased dietary Ca considerably increases the contribution of dietary Ox to urinary Ox excretion up to 50% [16]. A sufficient amount of dietary Ca can reduce Ox absorption and excretion, while an imbalanced dietary intake of Ca and Ox allows more soluble Ox to be absorbed in the GI tract and induced hyperoxaluria [18].

Considering the evidence addressing cardiovascular effects of elevated plasma Ox and hyperoxaluria, one can speculate that a high-Ox diet may increase CVD risk beyond its adverse effects on renal function. This hypothesis is not investigated within population-based settings. Furthermore, it is not clear whether dietary intakes of Ca-Ox can interact to modify the risk of CVD. Here, we evaluated cardiovascular effects of dietary Ox and its potential interaction with Ca intake levels in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), a large prospective cohort of an Asian population.

Methods

Study design and population

Study population

Details of the TLGS design and study population have been reported extensively elsewhere [22]. In brief, the TLGS, begun in 1999, in a large-scale community-based prospective study on 15,005 individuals aged ≥ three years, a representative sample of residents of district 13 of Tehran, the capital city of Iran [22]. The measurements are repeated every three years to assess any change of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) risk. For the current study, we recruited 12,519 adults from both genders who had participated in the third TLGS phase (2006–2008). After excluding the participants under age 19 y, those who had a history of CVD or incomplete data regarding CVD, dietary intakes, demographics, anthropometric and biochemical measurements, 2966 healthy adults remained. Flowchart of the study population, recruited from the original sample of TLGS, is presented as Fig. 1. The remaining eligible participants were followed up to the end of the study (March 2018). The median follow-up period was 10.6 y (IQR = 9.9–11.1 y) from the baseline examination.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study participants

Full size image

Dietary assessment

Information on dietary intake at baseline was collected using a validated 168-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Details of dietary assessment have been reported elsewhere [23]. Reliability, relative validity [24], and stability of data retrieved by the FFQ over time [25] were confirmed. The Ox content of foods was derived from available documents measured and reported Ox concentration of different food items [13, 14, 26]. Estimated dietary Ox intakes were computed from the reported frequency of consumption of each specified unit of foods containing Ox. To remove confounding effect of under- or over-report of energy intakes on estimated-intakes of Ox, a residual adjustment was performed using a regression model (with total caloric intake as the independent variable and total Ox intake as the dependent variable).

Definition of outcomes and terms

The data collection of CVD outcomes has previously been described in detail by the TLGS research group [27, 28]. A specific outcome for each event was defined according to the international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th Revision CRITERIA, and the American heart association classification for cardiovascular events. Coronary heart disease (CHD)-related events included cases of definite myocardial infarction (MI) (diagnostic ECG and biomarkers), probable MI (positive ECG findings, cardiac symptoms or signs, and missing biomarkers, or positive ECG findings and equivocal biomarkers), unstable angina pectoris (new cardiac symptoms or changing symptom patterns and positive ECG findings with normal biomarkers), angiographic-confirmed CHD, and CHD death. Death from CHD or stroke was confirmed by reviewing the death certificate or medical records. Stroke was considered as a new neurological deficit that lasted at least 24 h. CVD was defined as any CHD-related event, stroke, or CVD death (definite fatal MI, definite fatal CHD, and definite fatal stroke) [27, 29].

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was defined as fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL, 2-h serum glucose ≥200 mg/dL, or use of anti-diabetic medications [30]. Hypertension (HTN) was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, or current use of antihypertensive drugs [31].

Statistical analyses

Baseline characteristics of participants were described by mean ± standard deviation (SD) values, frequency (%), or median (inter-quartile range, IQR) across CVD status. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared between the groups using independent t-test whereas dichotomous variables were compared using chi-square test. To compare variables with non-normal distributions, the Mann-Whitney U test was used.

We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of CVD events in relation to Ox intakes (as a log-transformed variable); the range of Ox intake across tertiles was < 148, 148–220 and > 220 with a median of 120, 181 and 277 mg/d. HRs (95% CI) were also estimated across low-, medium-, and high-Ca-diet, defined according to tertiles of Ca intakes as < 981, 981–1410 and > 1410 mg/d (with a median of 760, 1180, 1760 mg/d, respectively). Time to event was defined as time to end of follow-up (censored cases) or time to having an event, whichever occurred first. The proportional hazards assumption was tested. We censored participants at the time of death due to non-CVD causes, at the time of leaving the district, or study follow-up end time of March 2018.

A univariate analysis was performed to detect potential confounders (i.e. CVD risk score, total daily energy intake, and key nutrients), and the variables with a PE (P value for entry) < 0.2 were included in the multivariable model. Three Cox models were conducted; model 1 was adjusted for CVD risk score (i.e., a sex-specific “general CVD” algorithms incorporating age, total cholesterol, HDL-C, SBP, treatment for HTN, smoking, and T2DM [32]. The TLGS research group reported the accuracy and clinical importance of the score among our population in detail [33]; using this score allowed us to account for major traditional CVD confounders without adding many variables and improving our models’ instability. Model 2 was further adjusted for eGFR as an indicator of renal function. The full model (model 3) additionally included daily energy intake and key nutrients including, fats and fiber. The median of each tertile was used as a continuous variable in the Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the overall trends of HRs across tertiles of Ox intake.

The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used with an estimation of the variable sensitivity and specificity to determine the cut-off point of dietary Ox-to-Ca ratio for risk of developing CVD. The cut-off point was assessed by the maximum value of sensitivity + specificity – 1 (Youden index); the index is preferable for the finding of the optimal cut-off point because it is clinically translated to maximizing correct classification and minimizing misclassification rates [34].

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (version 20; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and MedCalc Statistical Software version 15.8 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). A P-value < 0.05 being considered significant.

Results

The median (IQR) of dietary Ox intake and mean (SD) Ox-to-Ca ratio was 182 (133–244 mg/d) and 0.17 (0.07). The baseline age of participants (44.8% men) was 39.4 ± 14.1 y. During a median follow-up of 10.6 y, 211 incident cases of CVD (7.1%). Baseline characteristics and distributions of the major known cardiometabolic risk factors across outcome status of the participants (with and without CVD events) are shown in Table 1. Compared with non-CVD subjects, those who developed CVD events were more likely to be older and had higher cardiometabolic risk factors (P for all < 0.01). Incident- compared to non-incident cases of CVD had higher intake of dietary Ox (191, IQR = 144–261 mg/d vs. 181, IQR = 132–243 mg/d) and higher Ox-to-Ca ratio (0.19 ± 0.08 vs. 0.16 ± 0.07).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants (n = 2966)
Full size table

Hazard ratios (95% CI) of CVD outcomes across tertile categories of dietary Ox intakes are reported in Table 2. In the fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, we observed a significantly elevated risk of CVD-related events in the highest, compared to the lowest tertile category (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.02–2.12). This association was potentiated (HR T3 vs. T1 = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.19–4.89) in subjects who had a lower intake of Ca (< 981 mg/d); in a low-Ca diet, an even lower amount of dietary Ox (second tertile, 148–220 mg/d) was related to increased CVD events by 92% (HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.00–3.70). In the presence of medium- and high-levels of Ca intakes (range of 981–1410 and > 1410 mg/d, with a median of 1180 and 1760 mg/d, respectively), no association was observed between dietary Ox and CVD events.

Table 2 The hazard ratio (95% CI) of CVD events across tertile categories of dietary oxalate and dietary oxalate across different levels of dietary Ca (mg/d)a
Full size table

Two sensitivity analyses of Cox regression were performed by excluding participants <30y or ≥ 65y at baseline, to consider potential confounding effect of different probability of CVD events and different dietary pattern among young and older-adults. Adjusted risk of CVD, among population older than 30y, increased by 27% (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.88–1.82) and 47% (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.03–2.10), in the second and third tertiles of Ox intakes. After exclusion of subjects older than 65y, adjusted risk of CVD was 1.33 (95% CI = 0.86–2.03) and 1.53 (1.00–2.35) in the second and third tertiles of Ox intakes.

The critical cut-off value of the dietary Ox-to-Ca ratio for CVD events, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and AUC (P-value), are presented in Fig. 2. The critical cut-off point of Ox-to-Ca for predicting CVD events was 0.14 (The AUC and 95% CI = 0.57, 0.55–0.58, P value = 0.001; sensitivity = 67.3%). In the presence of traditional CVD risk factors, dietary Ox-to-Ca ratio higher than the cut-off value (≥ 0.14) was related to increased risk of CVD by 37% (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.02–1.84).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cut-off point of Ox-to-Ca ratio for CVD events (0.14, sensitivity = 67.3%, Youden index = 0.10)

Full size image

Discussion

In this prospective study of an Asian population, higher dietary Ox intake was associated with a 47% higher risk of incident CVD events independent of well-known confounders. In a low-Ca diet, the estimated CVD risk in relation to high-Ox intake (≥ 220 mg/d) was potentiated and reached to near 2.5-fold. Using a ROC curve analysis and calculating Youden index, a cut-off value of 0.14 was determined as a critical point of dietary Ox-to-Ca ratio (with an acceptable sensitivity ~ 70%); it means an imbalanced dietary intake of Ox and Ca indicated as ≥0.14, may be associated, both statistically and clinically, with an elevated risk of CVD.

To the best of our knowledge, this was the first population-based prospective study that evaluated the preliminary hypothesis regarding the potential cardiovascular effects of a high-Ox diet. Previously, studies indicated that a high-Ox diet might result in hyperoxaluria [1, 2] and increased risk of kidney failure, including both acute and chronic kidney disease, nephrolithiasis, and nephrocalcinosis [12, 35]. Evidence has also linked an imbalanced Ox-homeostasis with the development of CHD and stroke. Although a substantial causal relationship could not be established, some evidence implies that Ox accumulation in the human body (exhibited as increased plasma/urine Ox or oxalosis) may increase CVD risk [36].

The Ox-induced oxidative stress and inflammation [37, 38] and systemic oxalosis and deposition of Ox in cardiovascular tissues [39, 40] have been suggested as mechanisms that may connect oxalemia and hyperoxaluria with CVD events. A rich-Ox diet impacts monocyte cellular bioenergetics, mitochondrial complex activity, and inflammatory signaling in humans [41]. At cellular levels, exposure to high-Ox concentrations reduces glutathione levels, increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, induces mitochondrial permeability transition mediated cell death, and MCP-1 secretion [4,5,6,7], events may lead to the development of vascular dysfunction. Elevated Ox levels may exert their atherogenic effects via increased intracellular calcium in endothelial cells and prevention of re-endothelialization [8]. Increased plasma Ox concentrations lead to accumulated vascular Ox levels, increases serum malondialdehyde (MDA), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels and decreases superoxide dismutase activity [10].

The mean intake of dietary Ox in our population was ~ 200 mg/d, and grains-cereal products, spinach, green leafy vegetables, and nuts had more contribution to total Ox intakes. The estimated average daily Ox intake of the western population has been reported in a range of 44 and 351 mg/day (~ 0.5–4.0 mmol/day) [42]. The GI-absorption of Ox has been estimated to be 2.5–9% (a mean of 6.6% for a diet containing 180 mg Ox per 2500 kcal/d) [43, 44]. A linear relationship between dietary and urinary Ox has been reported (within dietary Ox ranged 50–750 mg/d) in a normal-Ca diet (~ 1000 mg/day) [15]. In the presence of a diet containing 250 mg Ox/day, decreasing ingested Ca by 60% (from 1002 to 391 mg), significantly increased contribution of dietary Ox in urinary Ox up to 53% [16]. A balanced Ox-Ca diet preventing secondary hyperoxaluria and its complications in healthy humans has not yet been defined. Considering the estimated critical point of 0.14 for Ox-to-Ca ratio in relation to CVD events and a population-mean of 200 mg/d Ox daily intake reported in different studies, a normal-Ca diet (~ 1200–1400 mg/day dietary Ca) may be recommended. Dietary Ca must be co-ingested with Ox-rich foods to maximize the Ox binding effect of Ca in the GI tract and decreased urinary Ox excretion [16].

Our study had some strengths, including its prospective design, relatively large sample size with long-term follow-up, detailed data on well-known risk factors, and potential confounders. The TLGS-nutrition cohort is also notable for its specifically designed and validated FFQ that was sensitive to evaluate usual dietary intakes of the Iranian population. Since the questionnaire included several foods with relatively high-Ox content, we could derive an accurate estimation of Ox, as it was comparable with mean Ox intake of other populations with relatively same dietary patterns. However, some researchers have argued that using semi-quantitative FFQ to estimate Ox intake is a limitation because many Ox-rich foods, including spinach, beets, and chocolate, mainly consumed on an irregular basis, are not adequately addressed in the questionnaire [42]. A specifically developed questionnaire for assessing Ox-rich foods and an accurate estimation of total Ox intake could help obtain more meaningful data.

Some limitations of our study also warrant discussion. First, as inherent into any prospective study, some degree of misclassification might have occurred, leading to biased estimated HRs towards the null because of potential changes in an individual’s diet, as well as changes in confounders during the study follow-up. Second, we have no data on plasma Ox levels and urinary Ox-Ca concentrations of the study participants; such data provides more insights into intestinal-renal handling of Ox and the status of Ox homeostasis in the body. Third, although major-known confounding variables were adjusted in our models, there may still be residual or unmeasured confounders that may result in biased exposure effect estimates. In our study, we could not assess genome-wide association to examine potential genetic variants in relation to Ox metabolism. Lacking data of potential polymorphisms of SCL26A6 (i.e., an anion exchanger expressed on the apical membrane in kidney and intestines, serving as the primary pathway for Ox absorption and secretion) [1, 45] may lead to an unbiased causal estimate of the cardiovascular effect of dietary Ox. Lacking SLC26A6 results in a defect in intestinal Ox secretion, enhanced net absorption of Ox, elevated plasma levels of Ox, and hyperoxaluria [46]. On the other hand, the potential role of gut microbiota and abundance of species handling Ox metabolism (e.g., Oxalobacter formigenes) and dietary habits influencing Ox degradation by the intestinal bacterial community [47, 48] did not consider in our analyses.

Conclusion

A high-Ox diet, specifically in the presence of lower dietary Ca, may increase risk of developing CVD events. A balanced Ox-Ca needs to be considered, especially in subjects with a background of renal dysfunction, to prevent diet-induced secondary hyperoxaluria and oxalemia as a risk factor of cardiovascular dysfunction.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be presented upon forwarding the request to the corresponding author (mirmiran@endocrine.ac.ir) and confirmation of the director of RIES (azizi@endocrine.ac.ir).

Abbreviations

AOPP:

Advanced oxidation protein products

BP:

Blood pressure

Ca:

Calcium

CHD:

Coronary heart disease

CI:

Confidence interval

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

GI:

Gastrointestinal

HR:

Hazard ratio

HTN:

Hypertension

IQR:

Inter-quartile rage

MCP-1:

Chemoattractant protein-1

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

NCDs:

Non-communicable diseases

Ox:

Oxalate

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristic

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TLGS:

Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

References

  1. Huang Y, Zhang YH, Chi ZP, Huang R, Huang H, Liu G, et al. The handling of oxalate in the body and the origin of oxalate in calcium oxalate stones. Urol Int. 2020;104:167–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robijn S, Hoppe B, Vervaet BA, D'Haese PC, Verhulst A. Hyperoxaluria: a gut-kidney axis? Kidney Int. 2011;80:1146–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mookadam F, Smith T, Jiamsripong P, Moustafa SE, Monico CG, Lieske JC, et al. Cardiac abnormalities in primary hyperoxaluria. Circ J. 2010;74:2403–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Khand FD, Gordge MP, Robertson WG, Noronha-Dutra AA, Hothersall JS. Mitochondrial superoxide production during oxalate-mediated oxidative stress in renal epithelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;32:1339–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheid C, Koul H, Hill WA, Luber-Narod J, Kennington L, Honeyman T, et al. Oxalate toxicity in LLC-PK1 cells: role of free radicals. Kidney Int. 1996;49:413–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulay SR, Honarpisheh MM, Foresto-Neto O, Shi C, Desai J, Zhao ZB, et al. Mitochondria permeability transition versus Necroptosis in oxalate-induced AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:1857–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Umekawa T, Chegini N, Khan SR. Oxalate ions and calcium oxalate crystals stimulate MCP-1 expression by renal epithelial cells. Kidney Int. 2002;61:105–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Recht PA, Tepedino GJ, Siecke NW, Buckley MT, Mandeville JT, Maxfield FR, et al. Oxalic acid alters intracellular calcium in endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 2004;173:321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crenshaw BL, McMartin KE. Calcium oxalate monohydrate is associated with endothelial cell toxicity but not with reactive oxygen species accumulation. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2020;20:593–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun K, Tang X, Song S, Gao Y, Yu H, Sun N, et al. Hyperoxalemia leads to oxidative stress in endothelial cells and mice with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2021;46:377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes RP, Kennedy M. Estimation of the oxalate content of foods and daily oxalate intake. Kidney Int. 2000;57:1662–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor EN, Curhan GC. Oxalate intake and the risk for nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2198–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siener R, Hönow R, Voss S, Seidler A, Hesse A. Oxalate content of cereals and cereal products. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:3008–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siener R, Seidler A, Hönow R. Oxalate-rich foods. Food Sci Technol. 2020; 41: 169–173.

  15. Mitchell T, Kumar P, Reddy T, Wood KD, Knight J, Assimos DG, et al. Dietary oxalate and kidney stone formation. Am J Physiol-Renal Physiol. 2019;316:F409–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holmes RP, Goodman HO, Assimos DG. Contribution of dietary oxalate to urinary oxalate excretion. Kidney Int. 2001;59:270–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Assimos DG, Holmes RP. Role of diet in the therapy of urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:255–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lange JN, Wood KD, Mufarrij PW, Callahan MF, Easter L, Knight J, et al. The impact of dietary calcium and oxalate ratios on stone risk. Urology. 2012;79:1226–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. von Unruh GE, Voss S, Sauerbruch T, Hesse A. Dependence of oxalate absorption on the daily calcium intake. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1567–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N, Bello A, Samuel S, Klarenbach SW, et al. Kidney stones and cardiovascular events: a cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:506–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng J-P, Zheng H. Kidney stones may increase the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96:e7898.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Azizi F, Zadeh-Vakili A, Takyar M. Review of rationale, design, and initial findings: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16:e84777.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hosseini-Esfahani F, Moslehi N, Asghari G, Hosseinpour-Niazi S, Bahadoran Z, Yuzbashian E, et al. Nutrition and diabetes, cardiovascular and chronic kidney diseases: findings from 20 years of the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16:e84791.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Asghari G, Rezazadeh A, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mehrabi Y, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:1109–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaheen N, Bari L, Mannan M. Food composition table for Bangladesh: University of Dhaka; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hadaegh F, Harati H, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F. Association of total cholesterol versus other serum lipid parameters with the short-term prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13:571–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barkhordari M, Padyab M, Sardarinia M, Hadaegh F, Azizi F, Bozorgmanesh M. Survival regression modeling strategies in CVD prediction. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;14:e32156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nejat A, Mirbolouk M, Mohebi R, Hasheminia M, Tohidi M, Saadat N, et al. Changes in lipid measures and incident coronary heart disease: Tehran Lipid & Glucose Study. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:1239–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. In: Diabetes care, vol. 37. p. S142014–S14.

  31. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. D'Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khalili D, Hadaegh F, Soori H, Steyerberg EW, Bozorgmanesh M, Azizi F. Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance: the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:670–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bargagli M, Tio MC, Waikar SS, Ferraro PM. Dietary oxalate intake and kidney outcomes. Nutrients. 2020;12:2673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Arafa A, Eshak ES, Iso H. Oxalates, urinary stones and risk of cardiovascular diseases. Med Hypotheses. 2020;137:109570.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ermer T, Eckardt K-U, Aronson PS, Knauf F. Oxalate, inflammasome, and progression of kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2016;25:363–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Khan SR. Reactive oxygen species, inflammation and calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Transl Androl Urol. 2014;3:256.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. El-Saygeh S, Roese D, Moe SM. Calciphylaxis or vascular oxalosis? Clin Kidney J. 2020;14:435–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Maldonado I, Prasad V, Reginato AJ. Oxalate crystal deposition disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2002;4:257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kumar P, Patel M, Oster RA, Yarlagadda V, Ambrosetti A, Assimos DG, et al. Dietary oxalate loading impacts monocyte metabolism and inflammatory signaling in humans. Front Immunol. 2021;12:617508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Holmes RP, Assimos DG. The impact of dietary oxalate on kidney stone formation. Urol Res. 2004;32:311–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Holmes RP, Ambrosius WT, Assimos DG. Dietary oxalate loads and renal oxalate handling. J Urol. 2005;174(943–947):discussion 947.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hesse A, Schneeberger W, Engfeld S, Von Unruh GE, Sauerbruch T. Intestinal hyperabsorption of oxalate in calcium oxalate stone formers: application of a new test with [13C2]oxalate. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10(Suppl 14):S329–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mukaibo T, Munemasa T, George AT, Tran DT, Gao X, Herche JL, et al. The apical anion exchanger Slc26a6 promotes oxalate secretion by murine submandibular gland acinar cells. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:6259–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang Z, Asplin JR, Evan AP, Rajendran VM, Velazquez H, Nottoli TP, et al. Calcium oxalate urolithiasis in mice lacking anion transporter Slc26a6. Nat Genet. 2006;38:474–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lange D. Dietary habits may influence oxalate degradation by intestinal Bacteria commentary on: the role of Oxalobacter formigenes colonization in calcium oxalate stone disease. Urology. 2014;84:1263–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hatch M. Gut microbiota and oxalate homeostasis. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study participants and the field investigators of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study for their cooperation and assistance in physical examinations, biochemical evaluation and database management. This study, was supported by the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Zahra Bahadoran

  2. Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 24, Shahid-Erabi St., Yeman St., Velenjak, Tehran, Iran

    Parvin Mirmiran

  3. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Fereidoun Azizi

Authors
  1. Zahra Bahadoran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parvin Mirmiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fereidoun Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.B, P.M, and F.A designed and conducted research; Z.B and P.M analyzed data and wrote the paper. P.M had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parvin Mirmiran.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained written informed consent from all participants. Based on the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Research Council of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P. & Azizi, F. Dietary oxalate to calcium ratio and incident cardiovascular events: a 10-year follow-up among an Asian population. Nutr J 21, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00773-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00773-1

Keywords

  • Oxalate
  • Calcium
  • Cardiovascular disease

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us