Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Preoperative carbohydrate load and intraoperatively infused omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids positively impact nosocomial morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting: a double-blind controlled randomized trial

  • Gibran Roder Feguri1, 2, 3, 8Email author,
  • Paulo Ruiz Lúcio de Lima4,
  • Danilo de Cerqueira Borges2,
  • Laura Ramos Toledo5,
  • Larissa Nadaf Batista2,
  • Thaís Carvalho e Silva2,
  • Neuber José Segri6 and
  • José Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento7
Nutrition Journal201716:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-017-0245-6

Received: 2 February 2017

Accepted: 11 April 2017

Published: 20 April 2017

Abstract

Background

A strategy of limited preoperative fasting, with carbohydrate (CHO) loading and intraoperative infusion of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFA), has seldom been tried in cardiovascular surgery. Brief fasting, followed by CHO intake 2 h before anesthesia, may improve recovery from CABG procedures and lower perioperative vasoactive drug requirements. Infusion of ω-3 PUFA may reduce occurrences of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and shorten hospital stays. The aim of this study was to assess morbidity (especially POAF) in ICU patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)/cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in combination, if preoperative fasts are curtailed in favor of CHO loading, and ω-3 PUFA are infused intraoperatively.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to receive 12.5% maltodextrin (200 ml, 2 h before anesthesia), without infusing ω-3 PUFA (CHO, n = 14); water (200 ml, 2 h before anesthesia), without infusing ω-3 PUFA (controls, n = 14); 12.5% maltodextrin (200 ml, 2 h before anesthesia) plus intraoperative ω-3 PUFA (0.2 mcg/kg) (CHO + W3, n = 15); or water (200 ml, 2 h before anesthesia) plus intraoperative ω-3 PUFA (0.2 mcg/kg) (W3, n = 14). Perioperative clinical variables and mortality were analyzed, examining the incidence of POAF, as well as the need for inotropic vasoactive drugs during surgery and in ICU.

Results

Two deaths occurred (3.5%), but there were no instances of bronchoaspiration and mediastinitis. Neither ICU stays nor total postoperative stays differed by group (P > 0.05). Patients given preoperative CHO loads (CHO and CHO + W3 groups) experienced fewer instances of hospital infection (RR = 0.29, 95%CI 0.09–0.94; P = 0.023) and were less reliant on vasoactive amines during surgery (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38–0.94; P = 0.020). Similarly, the number of patients requiring vasoactive drugs while recovering in ICU differed significantly by group (P = 0.008), showing benefits in patients given CHO loads. The overall incidence of POAF was 29.8% (17/57), differing significantly by group (P = 0.009). Groups given ω-3 PUFA (W3 and CHO + W3 groups) experienced significantly fewer instances of POAF (RR = 4.83, 95% CI 1.56–15.02; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Preoperative curtailment of fasting was safe in this cohort. When implemented in conjunction with CHO loading and infusion of ω-3 PUFA during surgery, expedited recovery from CABG with CPB was observed.

Trial registration

NCT: 03017001

Keywords

Myocardial revascularization CAGB Perioperative care POAF Fasting Metabolism

Background

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFA) are likely involved in proper balance of host immunity postoperatively. Although most studies of nutrients implicated in immunity pertain to abdominal surgery, there is some evidence that ω-3 PUFA is beneficial for patients undergoing cardiac surgery as well [1]. A recent meta-analysis has shown that ω-3 PUFA may reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and shorten hospital stays [2, 3].

POAF is among the most common complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), ranging from 10 to 40% in incidence. Such events are known to impact healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality, postoperative discomfort, and tachycardia, necessitating rhythm reversal and prolonging ICU stays or forcing readmission. Hence, perioperative strategies to minimize occurrences of POAF are of great importance and are constantly under study [4, 5].

On the other hand, an abbreviated period of preoperative fasting with oral intake of carbohydrate (CHO) may offset insulin resistance after surgery and help reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) [6]. In cardiac surgery specifically, some randomized trials have shown that CHO loading 2 h before inducing anesthesia will reduce ICU and hospital stays while reducing the need for perioperative vasoactive drug delivery [7, 8].

In our search of the current literature, no studies to date have combined preoperative CHO loading and intraoperative infusion of ω-3 PUFA in cardiac surgery. Presuming that this combination might confer some benefit, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of these two nutrients on morbidity in ICU (POAF primarily) suffered by patients who undergo CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods

This was a double-blind, controlled and randomized trial, examining patients subjected to CABG with CPB at General University Hospital, Cuiabá, Brazil between March, 2014 and June, 2016. The hospital’s Ethics Committee granted approval in advance (Protocol No 30493514.5.000.5165; 2014), and a Clinical Trials registration (NCT: 03017001) was obtained.

Patients of both genders (age range, 18–80 years) were included, each medically diagnosed with chronic coronary heart disease and eligible for elective CABG. All patients granted written informed consent. Grounds for exclusion were insulin-dependent diabetes, hepatic or renal disorders, thrombocytopenia, critical dyslipidemia (triglycerides 3-fold greater than established normal), gastroesophageal reflux, acute coronary syndromes, allergy to fish oil, and severe malnutrition. Candidates undergoing off-pump CABG, combined heart procedures, reoperations, or blood transfusion within 3 months prior were also excluded.

Using standard software (QuickCalcs [online]; GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA), subjects were randomly assigned to one of four groups as follows: 1) CHO (8-h fast for solids; 2-h fast plus 200-mL oral intake of 12.5% maltodextrin [25 g] in water; no intraoperative ω-3 PUFA); 2) controls (8-fast for solids; 2-h fast plus 200-mL oral intake of water only; no intraoperative ω-3 PUFA); 3) CHO + W3 (8-h fast for solids; 2-h fast plus 200-mL oral intake of 12.5% maltodextrin [25 g] in water; intraoperative infusion of ω-3 PUFA [0.2 mcg/kg over 4 h]); and 4) W3 (8-fast for solids; 2-h fast plus 200-mL oral intake of water only; intraoperative infusion of ω-3 PUFA [0.2 mcg/kg over 4 h]).

A hospital dietitian, as sole attendant privy to charted randomization, directed preoperative intake. Drinks delivered by ward nurse were given to patients before transport to the operative suite. The anesthesiologist was also informed (by dietician) of which patients would receive intraoperative ω-3 PUFA. None of the surgical team (surgeon or assistants) was aware of patient assignments. A team of cardiologists and intensive care physicians, also blind to study design and patient randomization, collected all data.

Endpoints

Primary study endpoints were incidence of POAF and need of inotropic vasoactive drugs (dobutamine and/or noradrenalin) for weaning from CPB intraoperatively or postoperatively in ICU. As secondary endpoints, perioperative morbidity, hospital mortality, and durations of ICU and total postoperative hospitalization were analyzed.

Anesthesia and surgical technique

The same surgeon (GRF) performed all procedures. Routine anesthetic techniques were used, namely induction via infusion of etomidate (0.2 mg/kg), fentanyl citrate (5 mcg/kg), and pancuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg). Isoflurane was administered by inhalation route in usual doses (0.6-1.8%) until end of procedure for balanced general anesthesia. As maintenance, another bolus of fentanyl (2 mcg/kg), midazolam (0.1 mg/kg), and pancuronium bromide (0.05 mg/kg) was given, serving for muscle relaxation. All patients were kept under mechanical ventilation, with oxygen (FiO2) at 60% (or higher if needed).

Surgical entry was through median sternotomy, with CPB in the allotted time. The oxygenator used was membrane type (Braile Biomédica, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil). To protect myocardium, we used hypothermic intermittent anterograde blood cardioplegia (every 15–20 min), along with mild systemic hypothermia (33°–35 °C). All patients received intravenous cefuroxime (1.5 g) 1 h before inducing anesthesia, giving another dose after CPB. Maintenance doses (750 mg) were then administered every 6 h for 48 h. A bolus of methyl prednisolone (7 mg/kg) was delivered intravenously at anesthesia induction.

Statistical analysis

The calculation of the sample size was based on the premise that the intervention with W3 + CHO protocol would reduce POAF by 50% versus controls. Assuming a β error (type II) of 20% and a α error (type I) of 5%, sample size calculations indicated 15 patients per group would be sufficient for this study. For values with Gaussian distributions, we used parametric paired (or non-paired) t-tests and analysis of variance for repeated measures, applying nonparametric tests (Friedman, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney) to values with non-Gaussian distributions. Qualitative variables were assessed via chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Descriptive analyses were undertaken in Microsoft Office Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA, USA), and statistical computations relied on SPSS v17.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). All testing was two-tailed at 80% power, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

A study flowchart is depicted in Fig. 1. Although 96 patients were eligible, 36 were excluded for various reasons. Ultimately, 60 were randomly assigned to the four groups; and after excluding one patient each from groups CHO, W3, and controls, 57 remained for analysis (CHO + W3: n = 15; others: n = 14, each). Nutritional and demographic data are shown by group in Table 1. In Table 2, clinical data of all groups are presented. All comparisons of the above showed these groups to be homogeneous.
Fig. 1

Flowchart of study design

Table 1

Demographic, nutritional, and clinical data of patient population (N = 57) by group

 

CHO

Control

CHO + W3

W3

P value

(n = 14)

(n = 14)

(n = 15)

(n = 14)

Age (y/o)

60.86 ± 10.55

(63.00)

63.43 ± 8.56

(63.50)

59.93 ± 11.77

(63.00)

62.71 ± 10.90

(65.00)

0.797a

Males

12 (86)

10 (71)

7 (47)

9 (64)

0.160c

Caucasians

7 (50)

9 (64)

8 (53)

5 (36)

0.380c

Body weight (kg)

72.71 ± 12.58

(71,90)

72.82 ± 11.21

(71.20)

65.95 ± 10.69

(66.00)

73.78 ± 18.66

(69.20)

0.513b

Height (m)

1.67 ± 0.10

(1.64)

1.63 ± 0.08

(1.62)

1.64 ± 0.07

(1.64)

1.64 ± 0.10

(1.64)

0.663a

BMI (kg/m2)

26.26 ± 3.59

(26.60)

26.49 ± 3.38

(26.30)

25.27 ± 3.48

(25.40)

27.26 ± 5.64

(25.70)

0.911b

SGA-A (n; %)

11 (79)

13 (93)

13 (87)

13 (93)

0.617c

Data expressed as mean ± SD, median (in parentheses) for continuous variables, or number (%) for categorical variables

BMI body mass index, SGA subjective global assessment

aOne way-ANOVA

bKruskal-Wallis test

cChi-square test

Table 2

Clinical data and risk factors of patient population (N = 57) by group

 

CHO

Control

CHO + W3

W3

P value

(n = 14)

(n = 14)

(n = 15)

(n = 14)

LVEF

0.55 ± 0.12

(0.60)

0.57 ± 0.11

(0.60)

0.54 ± 0.13

(0.60)

0.62 ± 0.11

(0.65)

0.168a

Smoking

6 (43)

9 (64)

7 (47)

8 (57)

0.653b

Diabetes

4 (29)

3 (21)

5 (33)

6 (43)

0.666b

Dyslipidemia

11 (79)

12 (86)

8 (53)

11 (79)

0.204b

Previous AMI

7 (50)

9 (64)

6 (40)

7 (50)

0.631b

Beta-blocker use

9 (64)

10 (71)

6 (40)

11 (79)

0.151b

Statin use

11 (79)

11 (79)

9 (60)

11 (79)

0.580b

Fibrate use

2 (14)

2 (14)

2 (13)

3 (21)

0.930b

Previous PCI

1 (7)

4 (29)

4 (27)

3 (21)

0.495b

Data expressed as mean ± SD, median (in parentheses) for continuous variables, or number (%) for categorical variables

LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, AMI acute myocardial infarction, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention

aKruskal-Wallis test

bChi-square test

Intraoperative period

No patients suffered bronchial aspiration during intubation or after terminating anesthesia, and no intraoperative deaths occurred. Data from the intraoperative period are shown Table 3. There were no significant differences among the four groups.
Table 3

Intraoperative patient data (N = 57) by group

 

CHO

Control

CHO + W3

W3

P value

(n = 14)

(n = 14)

(n = 15)

(n = 14)

Operative time (min)

244.64 ± 40.31

(240.00)

232.31 ± 49.27

(225.00)

249.29 ± 24.01

(240.00)

253.93 ± 40.86

(270.00)

0.532a

Duration of CPB (min)

77.14 ± 20.37

(82.50)

66.64 ± 24.50

(60.00)

63.53 ± 15.63

(66.00)

78.79 ± 22.93

(85.00)

0.147a

Duration of AC (min)

63.71 ± 17.29

(66.50)

56.86 ± 28.21

(50.50)

54.20 ± 15.52

(56.00)

61.57 ± 18.58

(68.00)

0.586a

Blood components transfused

7 (50)

7 (50)

7 (47)

8 (57)

0.953b

Number of grafts

3.00 ± 0.96

(3.00)

2.36 ± 0.93

(2.00)

2.67 ± 0.82

(3.00)

2.86 ± 0.86

(3.00)

0.266a

Complications

1 (7)

2 (14)

0 (0)

1 (7)

0.519b

Data expressed as mean ± SD, median (in parentheses) for continuous variables, or number (%) for categorical variables

CPB cardiopulmonary bypass, AC aortic clamping

aOne-way ANOVA

bChi-square test

The number of patients needing vasoactive drugs (dobutamine and/or noradrenaline) for weaning from CPB did not differ significantly by group (CHO: 7/14, 50.0%; controls: 12/14, 85.7%; CHO + W3: 6/15, 40.0%; W3: 9/14, 64.3%), although a tendency for control subjects to require such agents was noted (P = 0.071). Relative to other group members (W3 and control groups), patients given preoperative CHO loads (CHO and CHO + W3 groups) were less apt to require vasoactive amines (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38–0.94; P = 0.020).

Postoperative period

Clinical data from the postoperative period are shown in Table 4. ICU stays did not differ significantly by group (P = 0.713). Group means (medians) ± SD were as follows: CHO, 2.86 (2) ± 1.88 days; controls, 3.43 (2) ± 3.16 days; CHO + W3, 2.80 (3) ± 0.94 days; and W3, 3.36 (3) ± 1.55 days. Likewise, total postoperative stays did not differ significantly by group (P = 0.998). Group mean ± SD were as follows: CHO, 8.42 ± 7.79 days; controls, 8.07 ± 4.5 days; CHO + W3, 7.00 ± 1.51 days; and W3, 7.50 ± 2.77 days.
Table 4

Clinical data during postoperative patient recovery (N = 57) by group

 

CHO

Control

CHO + W3

W3

P value

(n = 14)

(n = 14)

(n = 15)

(n = 14)

PONV at ICU

3 (21)

4 (29)

2 (13)

5 (36)

0.541b

Duration of MV (hours)

10.92 ± 11.12

(8.25)

8.47 ± 2.62

(8.50)

8.96 ± 4.01

(8.67)

8.21 ± 3.57

(7.50)

0.959a

Blood loss by12 h PO

353.57 ± 355.43

(300.00)

204.64 ± 99.78

(200.00)

233.33 ± 134.52

(200.00)

278.57 ± 169.52

(225.00)

0.351a

Vasoactive drug needed in ICU

3 (21)

10 (71)

3 (20)

8 (57)

0.008b

Blood components needed in ICU

6 (43)

5 (36)

3 (20)

3 (21)

0.470b

EVA

0 (0)

2 (14)

1 (7)

0 (0)

0.272b

AMI

1 (7)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (7)

0.557b

POAF

6 (43)

8 (57)

1 (7)

2 (14)

0.009b

Infectious complications

3 (21)

5 (36)

0 (0)

5 (36)

0.069b

Data expressed as mean ± SD, median (in parentheses) for continuous variable, or number (%) for categorical variables

PONV postoperative nausea and vomiting, MV mechanical ventilation, PO postoperative, EVA encephalic vascular accident, POAF postoperative atrial fibrillation, AMI acute myocardial infarction

aKruskal-Wallis test

bChi-square test

The number of patients needing vasoactive drugs (dobutamine and/or noradrenaline) during recovery in ICU did differ significantly by group (CHO, 3/14; 21.4%; controls, 10/14; 71.4%; CHO + W3, 3/15; 20.0%; and W3, 8/14; 57.1%) (P = 0.008). Notable differences were evident in both groups given preoperative CHO loads, compared with controls. No other calculations reached significance.

The overall incidence of POAF was 29.8% (17/57). However, rates differed significantly by group (P = 0.009). Those given ω-3 PUFA (W3 and CHO + W3 groups) experienced significantly less POAF than controls, and patients given both nutrients (CHO + W3) fared significantly better than those given CHO only (P = 0.035). Members of the CHO group did not differ significantly from controls (P = 0.571). Only 3 patients (10.3%) in the W3 and CHO + W3 groups developed POAF, compared with 14 (50.0%) in the other two groups (RR = 4.83, 95% CI 1.56–15.02; P = 0.001).

Infectious complications and hospital mortality

There were no instances of postoperative mediastinitis. Thirteen patients (22.8%) experienced postoperative infections, specifically pneumonia (n = 9; two with sepsis) and wound site infections (n = 5). Although differences among groups approached significance (P = 0.069), as seen in Table 4, groups given preoperative CHO loads (CHO and CHO + W3 groups) incurred significantly fewer infections than the others (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.94; P = 0.023).

Overall, two deaths (3.5%) were recorded, one control subject and a member of the W3 group (P = 0.543). These occurred during ICU recovery. The control subject was a woman diagnosed with a stroke in the immediate postoperative period. She progressed to acute renal failure (requiring hemodialysis), sepsis, and then cardiogenic and septic shock. The W3 group member was a man diagnosed with perioperative acute myocardial infarction that led to refractory cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure.

Discussion

In aggregate, these study outcomes indicate that administering preoperative CHO loads and intraoperative ω-3 PUFA is beneficial in the aftermath of CABG. Not only did fewer patients require vasoactive drugs for weaning from CPB or during ICU recovery, but also instances of POAF were significantly reduced. Apparently, sparing of vasoactive drugs is a function of oral CHO intake, whereas reduced rates of POAF are attributable to intraoperative infusion of ω-3 PUFA. In addition, groups given CHO-enriched drinks experienced fewer postoperative infections.

These results are in agreement with two previous studies that document speedy recovery and less need of vasoactive drugs, if oral CHO loading is done prior to cardiac surgery [7, 8]. Curtailing of preoperative fasting, with CHO loading, is no longer a novelty approach [9]. This practice of abandoning prolonged fasts is safe and has been endorsed by anesthesiology societies around the world [10, 11]. CHO-enriched drinks may ameliorate postoperative insulin sensitivity, decrease episodes of PONV, and alleviate preoperative sensations of thirst and hunger [6]. In cardiac surgery, there is not much data on the benefits of this particular strategy, so the present findings are especially relevant. As anticipated, there were no instances of bronchial aspiration in the two groups given CHO loads, nor in the groups receiving only water.

The benefits of ω-3 PUFA have been reported for decades in several areas of medicine, but primarily in the realms of cardiology and intensive care. Intravenous ω-3 PUFA is rapidly incorporated by cell membranes [12] and may reduce the production of pro-inflammatory mediators (eg, prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes, platelet-activating factor, and cytokines) [13, 14]. Such effects have been credited for reduced hospital stays [15] and lower rates of severe infection [16] in critically ill patients, fewer postoperative complications [17], and possibly lower mortality in acute lung injury [18]. In the field of cardiology, other benefits include declines in morbidity and mortality from congestive heart failure and in sudden death from infarction [19]. The administering of ω-3 PUFA is also linked with better control of dyslipidemia, heart rate, and chronic atrial fibrillation [20, 21]. However, data in the literature are controversial, some studies failing to confirm these benefits [22].

A number of investigations have addressed the benefits of perioperative ω-3 PUFA infusion, or even preoperative oral treatment, in the context of cardiovascular surgery. In a study by Berger et al. [1], two randomly assigned groups were compared, one a placebo (control) group. The other was given infusions of ω-3 PUFA (0.2 g/kg) 12 h and 2 h preoperatively and immediately following surgery. A significant decline in postoperative IL-6 (cytokine) was found in the ω-3 PUFA group, as well as a reduced incidence of arrhythmias, but without significant between-group differences. Our study showed a lower incidence of POAF, as reported in a meta-analysis by Langlois et al. [3]. Their efforts encompassed a systematic review of 19 randomized clinical trials, for a total of 4335 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Similar to our study, this meta-analysis found no effect of ω-3 PUFA on duration of ICU stays and postoperative mortality rate. However, this meta-analysis showed that infusion of ω-3 PUFA was associated with shorter hospital stays and lower incidence of POAF, especially with use of CPB. The reductions of POAF seen in our patients and in the meta-analysis above perhaps reflect a dampening of inflammatory response in this setting, induced by intraoperative infusion of ω-3 PUFA.

Outcomes of the present study must be interpreted with caution, because of the small number of patients included. Indeed, further studies on this issue are warranted. Nonetheless, we may conclude that perioperative use of these two nutrients seems beneficial for recovery of patients undergoing CABG.

Abbreviations

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CHO: 

Carbohydrate

CPB: 

Cardiopulmonary bypass

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

POAF: 

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

PONV: 

Postoperative nausea and vomiting

ω-3 PUFA: 

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the professionals of BioMed Proofreading LLC for English corrections and copyediting this manuscript.

Funding

CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - “National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development” of Brazil) has partially funded the study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

GRF conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, drafting the manuscript and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; PRLL, DCB, TCS & LNB acquisition of data, and given final approval of the version to be published; LRT acquisition of data, randomization of the study, and given final approval of the version to be published; NJS Statistical analysis, and given final approval of the version to be published; JEA-N conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the manuscript and given final approval of the version to be published; agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of the General University Hospital, Cuiabá approved the study design (Protocol No 30493514.5.000.5165; 2014). The trail was registered at Clinical Trials (NCT: 03017001). All subjects have signed a consent form to participate of the study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Federal University of Mato Grosso
(2)
General University Hospital
(3)
UNIC - University of Cuiabá
(4)
Cardiovascular Department, General University Hospital
(5)
Nutrition Service, General University Hospital
(6)
Department of Statistics, Federal University of Mato Grosso
(7)
Federal University of Mato Grosso and UNIVAG Medical School
(8)

References

  1. Berger MM, Delodder F, Liaudet L, Tozzi P, Schlaepfer J, Chiolero RL, et al. Three short perioperative infusions of n-3 PUFAs reduce systemic inflammation induced by cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:246e54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert CM, Campos H, Stampfer MJ, Ridker PM, Manson JE, Willett WC, et al. Blood levels of long-chain n-3 fatty acids and the risk of sudden death. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1113–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Langlois PL, Hardy G, Manzanares W. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiac surgery patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2016(16). doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.05.013. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  4. Yadava M, Hughey AB, Crawford TC. Postoperative Atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical correlates. Heart Fail Clin. 2016;12(2):299–308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Perrier S, Meyer N, Hoang Minh T, Announe T, Bentz J, Billaud P, Mommerot A, Mazzucotelli JP, Kindo M. Predictors of Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a Bayesian analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):92–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pimenta GP, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Prolonged preoperative fasting in elective surgical patients: why should we reduce it? Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29(1):22–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Feguri GR, Lima PR, Lopes AM, Roledo A, Marchese M, Trevisan M, Ahmad H, Freitas BB, Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Clinical and metabolic results of fasting abbreviation with carbohydrates in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012;27(1):7–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Breuer JP, von Dossow V, von Heymann C, Griesbach M, von Schickfus M, Mackh E, Hacker C, Elgeti U, Konertz W, Wernecke KD, Spies CD. Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration to ASA III-IV patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(5):1099–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maltby JR. Fasting from midnight – the history behind the dogma. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20(3):363–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American society of anesthesiologists committee on standards and practice parameters. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(3):495–511.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I, Smith A, O’Sullivan G, Søreide E, Spies C, in’t Veld B; European Society of Anaesthesiology. Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(8):556–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morlion BJ, Torwesten E, Lessire H, Sturm G, Peskar BM, Furst P, et al. The effect of parenteral fish oil on leukocyte membrane fatty acid composition and leukotriene-synthesizing capacity in patients with postoperative trauma. Metabolism. 1996;45:1208–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayer K, Fegbeutel C, Hattar K, Sibelius U, Kramer HJ, Heuer KU, et al. Omega-3 vs. omega-6 lipid emulsions exert differential influence on neutrophils in septic shock patients: impact on plasma fatty acids and lipid mediator generation. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1472–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayer K, Gokorsch S, Fegbeutel C, Hattar K, Rosseau S, Walmrath D, et al. Parenteral nutrition with fish oil modulates cytokine response in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1321–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pradelli L, Mayer K, Muscaritoli M, Heller AR. n-3 fatty acid-enriched parenteral nutrition regimens in elective surgical and ICU patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012;16(5):R184.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Palmer AJ, Ho CK, Ajibola O, Avenell A. The role of ω-3 fatty acid supplemented parenteral nutrition in critical illness in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):307–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma YJ, Liu L, Xiao J, Cao BW. Perioperative ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid nutritional support in gastrointestinal cancer surgical patients: a systematic evaluation. Nutr Cancer. 2016;68(4):568–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Li C, Bo L, Liu W, Lu X, Jin F. Enteral immunomodulatory diet (omega-3 fatty acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidant supplementation) for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5572–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Macchia A, Levantesi G, Franzosi MG, Geraci E, Maggioni AP, Marfisi R, Nicolosi G, Schweiger C, Tavazzi L, Tognoni G, Valagussa F, Marchioli R, GISSI-Prevenzione Investigators. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, total mortality, and sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction treated with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005;7(5):904–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mozaffariam D, Geelen A, Brouwer I, Geleijnse JM, Zock PL. Effect of fish Oil on heart rate in humans. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2005;112:1945–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, de Jesus JM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2960–84. PMID: 24239922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Avanzini F, Franzosi MG, Geraci E, Giansiracusa N, Rocchetti L. Risk and prevention study collaborative group. n-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(19):1800–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement