Skip to main content


Maternal low glycaemic index diet, fat intake and postprandial glucose influences neonatal adiposity – secondary analysis from the ROLO study

Article metrics



The in utero environment is known to affect fetal development however many of the mechanisms by which this occurs remain unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between maternal dietary macronutrient intake and lifestyle throughout pregnancy and neonatal weight and adiposity.


This was an analysis of 542 mother and infant pairs from the ROLO study (Randomised cOntrol trial of LOw glycaemic index diet versus no dietary intervention to prevent recurrence of fetal macrosomia). Food diaries as well as food frequency and lifestyle and physical activity questionnaires were completed during pregnancy. Maternal anthropometry was measured throughout pregnancy and neonatal anthropometry was measured at birth.


Multiple linear regression analysis revealed the main maternal factor associated with increased birth weight was greater gestational weight gain R2 adj23.3% (F = 11.547, p < 0.001). The main maternal factor associated with increased birth length was non-smoking status R2 adj27.8% (F = 6.193, p < 0.001). Neonatal central adiposity (determined using waist:length ratio) was negatively associated with maternal age, and positively associated with the following parameters: smoking status, maternal pre-pregnancy arm circumference, percentage energy from saturated fat in late pregnancy, postprandial glucose at 28 weeks gestation and membership of the control group with a positive trend towards association with trimester 2 glycaemic load R2 adj 38.1% (F = 8.000, p < 0.001).


Several maternal diet and lifestyle factors were associated with neonatal anthropometry . Low glycaemic index dietary intervention in pregnancy was found to have a beneficial effect on neonatal central adiposity. Additionally, central adiposity was positively associated with maternal dietary fat intake and postprandial glucose highlighting the important role of healthy diet in pregnancy in promoting normal neonatal adiposity.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN54392969.


The in utero environment has been found to affect fetal development in a variety of ways from cognitive development [1] to development of the fetal organs [2] to growth and fat deposition [3]. Environmental factors to which the pregnant woman is exposed result in epigenetic changes which impact on fetal genetic transcription and affect the fetus differently depending on the stage of pregnancy [2, 4, 5]. The maternal diet during pregnancy is particularly important as the mother is relied on to provide all of the nutrients required for the fetus to grow and develop [6], however maternal pre-pregnancy nutritional status and lifestyle have also been found to be important [7]. Pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity as well as excessive gestational weight gain have been found to result in fetal macrosomia i.e. a birthweight of ≥4 kg [7]. Macrosomic infants are at increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome in later life and this effect may persist in later generations through intergenerational programming [8]. Macrosomia also increases obstetric risks such as shoulder dystocia, maternal anal sphincter injury, instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency caesarean section [9].

The hyperglycaemia-hyperinsulinism theory proposes that the mother’s intake of carbohydrate and her natural pregnancy-related progressive insulin insensitivity results in higher levels of maternal blood glucose which is transferred to the fetus [10]. In response, the fetus produces its own insulin which then acts as a growth hormone resulting in increased fetal growth and adiposity [9, 10]. Studies support this hypothesis during gestational diabetes [11] and also within normal limits of maternal blood glucose [12]. As such it is important for maternal blood glucose levels to be maintained within normal levels to ensure fetal glucose levels, and subsequent insulin levels are also maintained within normal ranges.

Other dietary factors including maternal dietary energy and protein intake have also been found to influence neonatal anthropometry [1315] while the quality of macronutrients also appears to have a role, in particular the quality of fat i.e. saturated or trans-fat vs polyunsaturated fat intake [16, 17] and the type of protein i.e. dairy vs meat protein [18]. Maternal micronutrient intakes also affect neonatal body composition however even less data is available in this area except in the area of deficiency and supplementation in the developing world in order to reduce preterm birth and small for gestational age infants [19, 20]. Therefore, this study focuses on the association between maternal macronutrient intake throughout pregnancy and neonatal body composition. The relationship between neonatal size and maternal dietary intake is not clear cut since, in addition to diet, a variety of maternal characteristics and lifestyle factors including physical activity, socioeconomic and demographic status, stress, smoking, alcohol consumption and other drug intake as well as genetic factors also affect fetal growth and development [4, 2123]. Due to the complex nature of the determinants of neonatal size and adiposity and the fact that the most commonly reported anthropometric parameters “weight” and “length” are very limited measures of adiposity which give no information on body fat distribution [24] there remains a paucity of data in the area. The aim of this study was to use a cohort from the ROLO (Randomised cOntrol trial of LOw glycaemic index diet versus no dietary intervention to prevent recurrence of fetal macrosomia) study to examine the effect of maternal body composition, demographic characteristics, macronutrient intake and lifestyle both pre-pregnancy and throughout pregnancy on neonatal weight and adiposity.


542 mother and infant pairs from the ROLO study were included in this analysis. The ROLO study was a randomised control trial of 800 secundigravida women with a previous macrosomic baby (>4 kg) randomised to receive low glycaemic index (GI) dietary advice versus usual care (no dietary advice) to reduce recurrence of macrosomia. Detailed methodology and results of the ROLO study, which was carried out in the National Maternity Hospital, Ireland, have previously been published [25, 26] but in brief; the primary outcome was birthweight and the secondary outcomes were gestational weight gain and glucose intolerance. Low GI dietary advice was given at week 14 of pregnancy while demographic, well-being and lifestyle questionnaires were returned by 28 weeks gestation. 3-day food diaries were also completed in each trimester of pregnancy and used to determine the glycaemic index and glycaemic load of the women’s diets. The control group received no dietary advice and had routine antenatal care. The ROLO study found that the intervention group significantly lowered their glycaemic index and glycaemic load and had significantly lower gestational weight gain and glucose intolerance but birthweight or risk of macrosomia was not significantly reduced [25, 27]. This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki with ethics approval from the National Maternity Hospital review board and written informed maternal consent.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Participants were secundigravida women with a previous macrosomic baby (>4 kg). They were required to have sufficient literacy and English language fluency to understand the intervention and be capable of completing questionnaires. Women were only included if they had healthy, singleton pregnancies with no intrauterine growth abnormalities.

Maternal demographics, lifestyle and well-being

Of the 800 participants of the ROLO study, 542 completed questionnaires in the first half of pregnancy exploring various background socioeconomic and socio-demographic, and lifestyle variables. Questions from SLAN (Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland) [28] relating to lifestyle habits were completed, including questions on physical activity, smoking and educational attainment. Well-being was measured using the World Health Organisation 5-Item Index (WHO-5) expressed as a percentage score from 0-100% i.e. the lowest to highest possible wellbeing scores [29].

Maternal and neonatal anthropometry

Maternal weight, height and mid-upper arm circumference were measured at the first antenatal consultation and BMI calculated. Maternal weight was also measured at each subsequent consultation and gestational weight gain calculated.

Neonatal weight, length, mid-upper arm, abdominal, hip and thigh circumference, and biceps, triceps, subscapular and thigh skinfold measurements were taken at birth. Weight and length were measured for all 542 neonates while other anthropometric measurements began to be taken later in the study and therefore complete data were available for 266 neonates. Waist:hip, waist:length and triceps skinfold:subscapular skinfold ratios as well as sum of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses and sum of all skinfold thicknesses were calculated as a measure of neonatal adiposity.

Maternal dietary intake

3-day food diaries were completed in each trimester of pregnancy and used to determine macronutrient intake as well as the glycaemic index and glycaemic load of the women’s diet. Macronutrients were expressed as a percentage of total energy. Macronutrient intake during each trimester of pregnancy was examined separately. Underreporting was examined using Goldberg ratios ie the ratio of energy intake to estimated basal metabolic rate [30]. Basal metabolic rate was calculated using Schofield equations and a Goldberg ratio of ≤0.9 was used to identify definite underreporters [3032].

Cluster analysis had been previously completed for the control group of this cohort using 3 day food diaries to define food group intake at each trimester which was then analysed using k-means cluster analysis resulting in the identification of 2 main clusters of “healthy” and “unhealthy” individuals with regard to diet [33]. In brief the unhealthy dietary cluster was characterised by significantly higher intakes of white bread, refined breakfast cereals, confectionery, chips, processed meats and high-energy beverages. The second cluster was characterised by significantly higher intakes of wholegrain breads and breakfast cereals, fruit, vegetables, fruit juice, fish, low-fat milk and white meat [33]. Dietary intake over the past 3 months was examined using the self-administered 170 item SLAN (Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland) food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) which was given in early pregnancy and returned by 28 weeks gestation. The SLAN FFQ was originally adapted from the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) study and has been validated for use in the Irish adult population [34, 35]. Dietary data from the completed FFQs was used to create a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) index i.e. a score measuring the level of concordance with the DASH diet from 0 which indicates total non-concordance to 11 which indicates total concordance [36]. The DASH diet was developed for the reduction of hypertension but, as with other dietary indices, also indicates overall healthy diet [37].

Full methodology for entry and analysis of the dietary intake of participants has previously been published [27]. In brief, all food diaries and food frequency questionnaires were entered by a trained dietitian/clinical nutritionist with the use of the household measures and UK Food Standards Agency average portion sizes [38]. Food Diaries were analysed using Tinuviel WISP software, version 3.0, in which the food composition tables used are derived from the 6th edition of McCance and Widdowson’s Food Composition Tables [39]. Food Frequency Questionnaires were analysed using Tinuviel QBuilder software, version 2.0, which also uses food compositions from the 6th edition of McCance and Widdowson’s Food Composition Tables [39]. GI values were updated in WISP and QBuilder from 2002 values using the 2008 International Tables of Glycaemic Index Values and other more recently published GI values [40, 41].

Oral glucose challenge test (GCT)

At 28 weeks gestation, fasting glucose was measured and a glucose challenge test (GCT) measuring serum glucose one hour post 50 g glucose load was performed. Postprandial blood glucose levels were recorded with results ≥7.8 mmol/L categorised as glucose intolerance [42, 43]. GCT is normally carried out as part of institutional policy only if women have specific risk factors for gestational diabetes. If women have a blood glucose level of > 8.3 mmol/L 1 hour post GCT, formal glucose tolerance testing is carried out on a different day to rule out gestational diabetes. However, all participants of the ROLO study underwent GCT as part of the study protocol. They were then referred for glucose tolerance testing only if blood glucose level was > 8.3 mmol/L in accordance with institutional policy.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software version 20.0. Statistical analyses involved correlations, independent sample t-tests, ANOVA, ANCOVA, simple and multiple linear regression modelling. The intervention and control groups were analysed both separately and together to ensure all results were representative of both groups. Because there was no difference in neonatal anthropometry except for thigh circumference [44] and waist:length ratio between the control and intervention groups, groups were not analysed separately for final analysis but group was controlled for in all final models. Analysis was also carried out both including and excluding definite underreporters of dietary intake and since the exclusion of these underreporters did not change any of the significant associations but did decrease the power of the analysis, dietary underreporters were not excluded when presenting final models with the exception of the waist:length circumference whose associations were affected. In order to determine whether the loss of significance of some associations in this model was due to a loss of power or actually due to the effect of underreporting, underreporting was then controlled for in this model and both the adjusted and unadjusted models presented. Healthiness of the diet was compared to neonatal anthropometry by examining dietary clusters (as defined above) and the DASH dietary index using simple linear regression. In order to build multiple regression models, variables (including macronutrient intake for each trimester, parental height, weight and BMI, gestational weight gain, maternal physical activity, smoking status, ethnicity, age, marital/partner status, oral glucose challenge test results, alcohol intake and glycaemic index and load status) were first analysed using correlations, independent sample t-tests and ANOVA as appropriate. Variables that were found to be significantly associated with neonatal anthropometry were further analysed using simple linear regression then imputed into the final multiple regression model for well-being using a forced enter and backwards stepwise approach. Variables that were statistically significantly associated with neonatal anthropometry using simple linear regression were then included in a backwards stepwise multiple regression block resulting in any non-significant variables being discarded from the model in a stepwise manner. Variables known to effect neonatal size (education level as a marker of socioeconomic status, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, length of gestation and neonate gender) were controlled for using a forced enter multiple regression block in all models. As mentioned, membership of the control or intervention group was also included by forced enter multiple regression in these models. Multiple linear regression resulted in a best and final model and those that were statistically significant overall (p < 0.05) were chosen as those which best predicted neonatal anthropometric measurements.


Demographics, lifestyle and well-being

Maternal characteristics are listed in Table 1. Maternal characteristics did not differ between the control and intervention groups except for gestational weight gain [25, 27], glucose intolerance and maternal well-being score [29] as previously described. 91.4% of the women were of “white Irish”, 6.7% of “white other”, 0.3% of “African”, 0.5% of “Chinese”, 0.1% of “Indian” and 1.0% of “Filipino/South East Asian” ethnicity. Again, there was no difference in ethnicity between the control and intervention groups (p = 0.159). 78.1% of the women had achieved 3rd level education while 21.9% had not and there was no difference in these rates between the control and intervention groups (p = 0.680), similarly there was no difference between reported smoking status between women in the control and intervention groups with 4.0% smokers and 96.0% non-smokers (p = 0.208). There was also no difference in physical activity levels between the control and intervention groups at baseline.

Table 1 General maternal characteristics during pregnancy, neonatal anthropometry and comparison of control and intervention (low glycaemic index diet) groups


There was no difference in underreporting between the intervention and control groups (12.7% vs 9.7% definite underreporters respectively, p = 0.821). There was no difference in any of the associations in the final models when definite underreporters were removed with the exception of waist:length ratio, however the power of these models was reduced. Therefore the final models presented in Table 2. include underreporters. When definite underreporters were removed from the waist:length model, significant positive associations remained with maternal smoking and trimester 3 saturated fat intake while the associations with maternal age, mid-upper arm circumference, trimester 2 GL, postprandial glucose and group lost significance. In order to determine whether this was due to a lack of power or to underreporting being an actual confounder, underreporting was added to the final multiple linear regression model in order to control for it. Subsequently, all factors regained statistical significance with the exception of trimester 2 GL which originally had only showed a trend toward a significant association, and postprandial glucose which showed a trend (p = 0.050) towards a positive association with waist:length circumference when the model was adjusted for underreporting. This adjusted final model is presented in Table 2 in addition to the unadjusted model.

Table 2 Maternal and paternal characteristics and maternal nutrient intakes associated with neonatal anthropometry – adjusted for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, education level, length of gestation and neonate gender 1, 2

Maternal and neonatal anthropometry

There was no difference in neonatal weight, length or other anthropometric measurements between the intervention and control groups except in thigh circumference measurement which has previously been described [44] and in neonatal waist:length ratio which was significantly lower in the intervention group. Mean maternal and neonatal anthropometric measurements are shown in Table 1. Maternal anthropometry was not significantly different at baseline but gestational weight gain was higher in the control group than the intervention group as described above.

Associations of maternal characteristics and macronutrient intake with neonatal anthropometry observed using simple linear regression are listed in Table 3. Statistically significant multiple linear regression models for the association between maternal characteristics and neonatal anthropometry are shown in Table 2. No significant multiple linear regression models existed for; hip circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, biceps skinfold thickness, thigh skinfold thickness, waist:hip circumference ratio, sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness or for sum of all skinfold thicknesses. Statistically significant multiple regression models exist for birthweight, birthlength, abdominal circumference, thigh circumference, chest circumference, subscapular skinfold thickness, subscapular:triceps skinfold thickness ratio and waist circumference:length ratio as follows:

Table 3 Maternal and paternal characteristics and maternal nutrient intakes associated with neonatal anthropometry-unadjusted analysis

Birthweight was positively associated with gestational weight gain R2 adj23.3% (F = 11.547, p < 0.001). Birthlength was negatively associated with maternal smoking R2 adj27.8% (F = 6.193, p < 0.001). Neonatal abdominal circumference was positively associated with maternal saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake and showed a negative trend towards association with polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake in trimester 3 R2 adj5.5% (F = 2.484, p = 0.019). Neonatal thigh circumference was negatively associated with frequency of strenuous physical activity reported in early pregnancy R2 adj46.7% (F = 4.365, p = 0.008). Neonatal chest circumference showed a trend towards a positive association with maternal weight at booking and was significantly negatively associated with frequency of strenuous physical activity reported in early pregnancy R2 adj37.7% (F = 2.906, p = 0.039). Neonatal subscapular skinfold thickness was showed a trend towards a negative association with PUFA intake in trimester 3 R2 adj5.0% (F = 2.301, p = 0.038). Neonatal subscapular:triceps skinfold thickness ratio, a measure of central adiposity, was significantly negatively associated with percentage well-being score R2 adj5.1% (F = 2.410, p = 0.030). Neonatal waist circumference:length ratio, another measure of central adiposity, was significantly negatively associated with maternal age and positively associated with maternal smoking, maternal mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) in early pregnancy, SFA intake in trimester 3, postprandial glucose at 28 weeks gestation and membership of the control group and showed a trend towards a positive association with Glycaemic Load in trimester 2 R2 adj38.1% (F = 8.003, p < 0.001).

Macronutrient intakes

Maternal macronutrient intakes are displayed in Table 1. Their association with neonatal anthropometric measurements using simple linear regression are displayed in Table 3 and those that remained significantly associated with neonatal anthropometry when analysed using multiple linear regression are displayed in Table 2. SFA intake in trimester 3 was positively associated with neonatal abdominal circumference (B = 0.147, p = 0.004) while there was a trend towards PUFA intake in trimester 3 being negatively associated (B = −0.184, p = 0.065). There was a trend towards PUFA intake in trimester 3 being negatively associated with subscapular skinfold thickness (B = −0.140, p = 0.062). Finally, SFA intake in trimester 3 was positively associated with abdominal adiposity as measured by waist circumference:length ratio while there was a trend towards a positive association with GL in trimester 2 (B = 0.004, p = 0.001 and B = 0.003e−1, p = 0.059 respectively). There was no difference in maternal macronutrient intake between the control and intervention groups except for maternal GI and GL intake and protein intake as a percentage of total energy intake as previously described [27]. No significant association was found between level of concordance with a DASH diet and any of the neonatal body measurements examined. Similarly, previously defined healthy and unhealthy diet clusters were not associated with neonatal body measurements.


The main maternal factor associated with increased birth weight was greater gestational weight gain while the main maternal factor associated with greater birth length was non-smoking status. Neonatal central adiposity, determined using waist:length ratio, was negatively associated with maternal age, and positively associated with maternal smoking status, pre-pregnancy mid-upper arm circumference, trimester 3 saturated fat intake, postprandial glucose at 28 weeks gestation and membership of the control group and showed a trend towards a positive association with trimester 2 glycaemic load.

Similar to other studies [4547], gestational weight gain was found to be positively associated with birthweight in this cohort. Guidelines from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) rely on pre-pregnancy BMI to determine an appropriate range of gestational weight gain [48]. It is well established that those who exceed the IOM guidelines are at risk of delivering a macrosomic infant [49]. Excess gestational weight gain increases the normal insulin resistance that occurs in pregnancy and may also affect other hormones that regulate nutrient transport across the placenta resulting in increased fetal insulin secretion, growth and adiposity [45]. Research by Ludwig et al. into multiparous women throughout successive pregnancies has found that gestational weight gain is responsible for increased birthweight despite controlling for genetic and sociodemographic factors [45].

Our finding that maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with decreased birth length is well established in the literature [50, 51]. Maternal smoking was also found to be positively associated with waist:length ratio, the equivalent of which (waist:height ratio) has been found to be a good measure of central adiposity in adults and children with a ratio of ≥0.5 indicating excess central adiposity [52]. A recent study by Brambilla et al. found it to be a better measure of adiposity than waist circumference or BMI in children and adolescents [53]. A meta-analysis by Ino [54] found that maternal smoking is associated with childhood overweight and obesity, possibly through a combination of the thrifty phenotype and catch-up growth during early infancy. Although maternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with reduced birth weight, length and relatively unchanged ponderal index in the literature [55, 56], we were unable to identify any studies that had measured waist:length ratio at birth in relation to maternal smoking status. The only studies identified that had measured waist:length ratio at birth were from the same group and involved creation of normative waist:length centile charts at birth [57]. The increased waist:length ratio observed in the off-spring of smokers in this study appears to reflect the reduced height also observed and likely indicates that, while birthweight is not increased, central and visceral adiposity may be, increasing the risk of metabolic syndrome in later life.

Maternal early pregnancy MUAC was positively associated with neonatal waist:length ratio. MUAC has been found to be well correlated with maternal weight and BMI and remains stable in pregnancy i.e. unaffected by length of gestation [58]. As a measure of maternal overweight and obesity, MUAC has been found to be positively associated with birthweight [5961]. Again, there is no information on its association with neonatal waist:length ratio to date to the best of our knowledge.

Trimester 3 SFA intake was positively associated with abdominal circumference and waist:length ratio. Trimester 3 PUFA intake showed a trend towards a negative association with abdominal circumference and subscapular skinfold thickness. There is a paucity of similar data into the effect of maternal fat intake in pregnancy on neonatal adiposity. High fat isocaloric diet in rats has been found to result in no difference in birthweight of pups [62]. Similarly, Brion et al. [63] found no association between maternal diet and child adiposity at 9 or 11 years of age in humans. However, the quality of dietary macronutrient intakes may be more important than absolute intakes and high SFA diet in pregnancy has been found by Murrin et al. [64] to be positively associated with child weight at age 5. Maternal intake of trans fatty acids in trimester 2 of pregnancy was also found by one group to be positively associated with birthweight [65] while other studies have reported conflicting results possibly due to examination of different trans fatty acids [17, 66, 67]. Fetal fat deposition increases with gestational age, therefore our observation that maternal fatty acid intake in trimester 3 is associated with neonatal adiposity is reasonable [3]. Although there is little research into the effect of SFA in pregnancy there is more interest into the effect of maternal dietary PUFA intake, in particular the possible anti-obesogenic effect of a greater omega 3:omega 6 ratio. However, a recent review by Hauner et al. [68] found that there is little evidence of this to date due to conflicting study results. Results of a prospective intervention study involving omega 3 supplementation and dietary reduction of omega 6 showed no effect on fat mass at age 1 [69]. This study, the INFAT study, similar to others involving fish oil supplementation found that birthweight and length of gestation were increased, however adiposity was not affected [69]. We believe ours is the first study to show an association between neonatal central adiposity and dietary fat quality.

Trimester 2 Glycaemic load (GL) was included in the multiple linear regression model and showed a trend towards a positive association with waist:length ratio. However, while the overall model, which included trimester 2 GL, was statistically significantly associated with waist:length ratio, T2 GL was not independently significantly associated and lost significance when underreporting was controlled for. Maternal postprandial blood glucose and membership of the control group were significantly positively associated with waist:length ratio although the relationship between postprandial glucose and waist:length circumference was reduced to a trend (p= 0.050) when underreporting was controlled for. There has been much research into glycaemic control and into the effect of dietary glycaemic index and load during pregnancy on birthweight due to the well-established risk of macrosomia in gestational diabetes [70]. The risk of macrosomia and increased neonatal adiposity has also been found to be increased towards the upper limits of normal blood glucose control in pregnancy [9, 71, 72] which is in line with our results. Low glycaemic index diet has been found to ameliorate the normal pregnancy-related increase in glucose intolerance associated with pregnancy resulting in fewer peaks in maternal postprandial glucose concentration [9]. The positive trend towards association between postprandial glucose and waist:length ratio in this study may indicate that the reduction in postprandial blood glucose levels observed with low glycaemic index diet was associated with reduced glucose transfer to the fetus and therefore less deposition of fetal adiposity. While the ROLO study found that the intervention group reduced the GI and GL of their diet, even when underreporters were excluded from the analysis [27], and had reduced glucose intolerance, no difference in birthweight was observed. In contrast, a recent retrospective analysis of members of the Danish National Birth Cohort has found that those in the highest GL quintile had significantly higher offspring birthweight than those in the lowest quintile [73] indicating that effects may be observed at extremes. The finding by the current study, that neonatal waist:length ratio was lower in the intervention group indicates that improved dietary carbohydrate quality may be associated with reduced central adiposity rather than birthweight at less extreme levels as the reduction in GI and GL observed in this study was quite modest.

This was a large, well-powered clinical trial designed to examine the effect of diet and lifestyle on neonatal size and adiposity. Rich dietary data was available at each trimester in combination with biochemical measures of glycaemic control. One limitation of this study was that detailed neonatal anthropometric data was not available for the full cohort, however weight and length measurements were taken for all infants. It should also be noted that this was a cohort at risk of macrosomia, therefore care should be taken regarding generalisation of results to other populations. A further limitation was that fatty acid composition was not broken down into omega 3, omega 6 and trans fats. This clinical trial was originally focused on the effect of GI, GL and glycaemic control on birthweight but nevertheless, data on SFA, MUFA, PUFA and total fat was available and this is the first human study to report an association between dietary fat quality and neonatal central adiposity.


Several maternal diet and lifestyle factors were associated with neonatal body composition. The finding that neonatal central adiposity was positively associated with maternal dietary saturated fat and showed a negative trend with polyunsaturated fat and a significant negative association with membership of the low GI intervention group highlights the importance of dietary quality in pregnancy and the need for further research and education in this area.


  1. 1.

    Buss C, Entringer S, Swanson JM, Wadhwa PD: The Role of Stress in Brain Development: The Gestational Environment’s Long-Term Effects on the Brain. Cerebrum: the Dana forum on brain science. 2012, New York, NY: Dana Foundation

  2. 2.

    Ritz E, Amann K, Koleganova N, Benz K: Prenatal programming—effects on blood pressure and renal function. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011, 7: 137-144.

  3. 3.

    Haggarty P: Fatty acid supply to the human fetus. Annu Rev Nutr. 2010, 30: 237-255.

  4. 4.

    Heerwagen MJ, Miller MR, Barbour LA, Friedman JE: Maternal obesity and fetal metabolic programming: a fertile epigenetic soil. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010, 299: R711-R722.

  5. 5.

    Burdge GC, Hanson MA, Slater-Jefferies JL, Lillycrop KA: Epigenetic regulation of transcription: a mechanism for inducing variations in phenotype (fetal programming) by differences in nutrition during early life?. Br J Nutr. 2007, 97: 1036-1046.

  6. 6.

    Wu G, Bazer FW, Cudd TA, Meininger CJ, Spencer TE: Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J Nutr. 2004, 134: 2169-2172.

  7. 7.

    Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Beckers K, Vansant G: Maternal obesity: pregnancy complications, gestational weight gain and nutrition. Obes Rev. 2008, 9: 140-150.

  8. 8.

    Ryckman KK, Borowski KS, Parikh NI, Saftlas AF: Pregnancy complications and the risk of metabolic syndrome for the offspring. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2013, 7: 217-223.

  9. 9.

    McGowan CA, McAuliffe FM: The influence of maternal glycaemia and dietary glycaemic index on pregnancy outcome in healthy mothers. Br J Nutr. 2010, 104: 153-159.

  10. 10.

    Pedersen J: Hyperglycaemia-hyperinsulinism theory and birthweight. The Pregnant Diabetic and Her Newborn: Problems and Management Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins. 1977, 211-220.

  11. 11.

    Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM: The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 191: 964-968.

  12. 12.

    Test OG-T: Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008, 2008: 1991-2002.

  13. 13.

    Lagiou P, Samoli E, Lipworth L, Lagiou A, Fang F, Rossi M, Xu B, Yu G-P, Adami H-O, Hsieh C-C: Energy intake during pregnancy in relation to offspring gender by maternal height. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011, 26: 39-44.

  14. 14.

    Stein AD, Ravelli AC, Lumey L: Famine, third-trimester pregnancy weight gain, and intrauterine growth: the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort Study. Hum Biol. 1995, 67: 135-150.

  15. 15.

    Cuco G, Arija V, Iranzo R, Vila J, Prieto M, Fernández‒Ballart J: Association of maternal protein intake before conception and throughout pregnancy with birth weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006, 85: 413-421.

  16. 16.

    Elias SL, Innis SM: Infant plasma trans, n − 6, and n − 3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids are related to maternal plasma fatty acids, length of gestation, and birth weight and length. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001, 73: 807-814.

  17. 17.

    Van Eijsden M, Hornstra G, van der Wal MF, Vrijkotte TG, Bonsel GJ: Maternal n − 3, n − 6, and trans fatty acid profile early in pregnancy and term birth weight: a prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 887-895.

  18. 18.

    Godfrey K, Barker D, Robinson S, Osmond C: Maternal birthweight and diet in pregnancy in relation to the infant’s thinness at birth. BJOG. 1997, 104: 663-667.

  19. 19.

    Fall CH, Yajnik CS, Rao S, Davies AA, Brown N, Farrant HJ: Micronutrients and fetal growth. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 1747S-1756S.

  20. 20.

    Scholl TO: Maternal iron status: relation to fetal growth, length of gestation, and iron endowment of the neonate. Nutr Rev. 2011, 69: S23-S29.

  21. 21.

    Abu-Saad K, Fraser D: Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes. Epidemiol Rev. 2010, 32: 5-25.

  22. 22.

    Chomitz VR, Cheung LW, Lieberman E: The role of lifestyle in preventing low birth weight. Futur Child. 1995, 5: 121-138.

  23. 23.

    Schetter CD, Tanner L: Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012, 25: 141-148.

  24. 24.

    Gorstein J, Sullivan K, Yip R, De Onis M, Trowbridge F, Fajans P, Clugston G: Issues in the assessment of nutritional status using anthropometry. Bull World Health Organ. 1994, 72: 273-

  25. 25.

    Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Mahony R, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM: Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial. Br Med J. 2012, 345: e5605-

  26. 26.

    Walsh J, Mahony R, Foley M, Mc Auliffe F: A randomised control trial of low glycaemic index carbohydrate diet versus no dietary intervention in the prevention of recurrence of macrosomia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 16-

  27. 27.

    McGowan CA, Walsh JM, Byrne J, Curran S, McAuliffe FM: The influence of a low glycemic index dietary intervention on maternal dietary intake, glycemic index and gestational weight gain during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2013, 12: 140-

  28. 28.

    Harrington J, Perry I, Lutomski J, Morgan K, McGee H, Shelley E, Watson D, Barry M: SLÁN 2007: survey of lifestyle, attitudes and nutrition in Ireland. Dietary habits of the Irish population. Psychol Rep. 2008, 6:

  29. 29.

    Horan M, McGowan C, Doyle O, McAuliffe F: Well-being in pregnancy: an examination of the effect of socioeconomic, dietary and lifestyle factors including impact of a low glycaemic index dietary intervention. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013, 68: 19-24.

  30. 30.

    Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Prentice AM: Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991, 45: 569-581.

  31. 31.

    McGowan C, McAuliffe F: Maternal nutrient intakes and levels of energy underreporting during early pregnancy. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012, 66: 906-913.

  32. 32.

    Schofield WN: Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985, 39 (Suppl 1): 5-41.

  33. 33.

    McGowan CA, McAuliffe FM: Maternal dietary patterns and associated nutrient intakes during each trimester of pregnancy. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 12: 1-11.

  34. 34.

    Morgan K, McGee H, Watson D, Perry I, Barry M, Shelley E, Harrington J, Molcho M, Layte R, Tully N: SLAN 2007: survey of lifestyle, attitudes & nutrition in Ireland: main report. Psychol Rep. 2008, 3:

  35. 35.

    Riboli E, Kaaks R: The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26 (1): S6-S14.

  36. 36.

    Folsom AR, Parker ED, Harnack LJ: Degree of concordance with DASH diet guidelines and incidence of hypertension and fatal cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens. 2007, 20: 225-232.

  37. 37.

    Kant AK: Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004, 104: 615-635.

  38. 38.

    Crawley H, Patel S, Mills A, Great Britain. Ministry of Agriculture F, Food, Agency GBFS: Food Portion Sizes. 2002, 85 Buckingham Gate, London, SW1E 6PD: Stationery Office

  39. 39.

    McCance RA, Widdowson EM, Agency FS, Agency GBFS, Research AIoF: McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods. 2002, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF: Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House (290)

  40. 40.

    Levis SP, McGowan CA, McAuliffe FM: Methodology for adding and amending glycaemic index values to a nutrition analysis package. Br J Nutr. 2011, 105: 1117-

  41. 41.

    Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC: International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: 2281-2283.

  42. 42.

    Coustan DR, Carpenter MW: The diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21: B5-B8.

  43. 43.

    Walsh JM, Mahony R, Byrne J, Foley M, McAuliffe FM: The association of maternal and fetal glucose homeostasis with fetal adiposity and birthweight. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011, 159: 338-341.

  44. 44.

    Donnelly J, Walsh J, Byrne J, Molloy E, McAuliffe F: Impact of maternal diet on neonatal anthropometry: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Obes. 2014

  45. 45.

    Ludwig DS, Currie J: The association between pregnancy weight gain and birthweight: a within-family comparison. Lancet. 2010, 376: 984-990.

  46. 46.

    Margerison Zilko CE, Rehkopf D, Abrams B: Association of maternal gestational weight gain with short-and long-term maternal and child health outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 202: 574. e571-574. e578.

  47. 47.

    Nohr EA, Vaeth M, Baker JL, Sørensen TI, Olsen J, Rasmussen KM: Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 1750-1759.

  48. 48.

    Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL: Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. 2009, Washington (DC): National Academies Press

  49. 49.

    Siega-Riz AM, Viswanathan M, Moos M-K, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, Thieda P, Lux LJ, Lohr KN: A systematic review of outcomes of maternal weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine recommendations: birthweight, fetal growth, and postpartum weight retention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 201: 339. e331-339. e314.

  50. 50.

    Abel EL: Smoking during pregnancy: a review of effects on growth and development of offspring. Hum Biol. 1980, 52: 593-625.

  51. 51.

    Howe LD, Matijasevich A, Tilling K, Brion M-J, Leary SD, Smith GD, Lawlor DA: Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring trajectories of height and adiposity: comparing maternal and paternal associations. Int J Epidemiol. 2012, 41: 722-732.

  52. 52.

    McCarthy HD, Ashwell M: A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message–‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. Int J Obes. 2006, 30: 988-992.

  53. 53.

    Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Heo M, Pietrobelli A: Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body mass index in children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2013, 37: 943-946.

  54. 54.

    Ino T: Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring obesity: meta-analysis. Pediatr Int. 2010, 52: 94-99.

  55. 55.

    Samper M, Jimenez-Muro A, Nerin I, Marqueta A, Ventura P, Rodriguez G: Maternal active smoking and newborn body composition. Early Hum Dev. 2012, 88: 141-145.

  56. 56.

    Vik T, Jacobsen G, Vatten L, Bakketeig LS: Pre-and post-natal growth in children of women who smoked in pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 1996, 45: 245-255.

  57. 57.

    Holston A, Stokes T, Olsen C, Choi YS, Curtis J, Higginson J, Adimora C, Hunt CE: Novel noninvasive anthropometric measure in preterm and full-term infants: normative values for waist circumference: length ratio at birth. Pediatr Res. 2013, 74: 299-306.

  58. 58.

    Krasovec K, Anderson MA: Maternal anthropometry for prediction of pregnancy outcomes: memorandum from a USAID/WHO/PAHO/MotherCare meeting. Bull World Health Or. 1991, 69: 523-532.

  59. 59.

    Ricalde AE, Velásquez-Meléndez G, Tanaka ACA, Siqueira AA: Mid-upper arm circumference in pregnant women and its relation to birth weight. Rev Saude Publica. 1998, 32: 112-117.

  60. 60.

    Karim E, Mascie-Taylor C: The association between birthweight, sociodemographic variables and maternal anthropometry in an urban sample from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ann Hum Biol. 1997, 24: 387-401.

  61. 61.

    Ojha N, Malla D: Low birth weight at term: relationship with maternal anthropometry. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2007, 46: 52-56.

  62. 62.

    Férézou-Viala J, Roy A-F, Sérougne C, Gripois D, Parquet M, Bailleux V, Gertler A, Delplanque B, Djiane J, Riottot M: Long-term consequences of maternal high-fat feeding on hypothalamic leptin sensitivity and diet-induced obesity in the offspring. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007, 293: R1056-R1062.

  63. 63.

    Brion M-JA, Ness AR, Rogers I, Emmett P, Cribb V, Smith GD, Lawlor DA: Maternal macronutrient and energy intakes in pregnancy and offspring intake at 10 y: exploring parental comparisons and prenatal effects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 748-756.

  64. 64.

    Murrin C, Shrivastava A, Kelleher C: Maternal macronutrient intake during pregnancy and 5 years postpartum and associations with child weight status aged five. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013, 67: 670-679.

  65. 65.

    Cohen JF, Rifas-Shiman SL, Rimm EB, Oken E, Gillman MW: Maternal trans fatty acid intake and fetal growth. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011, 94: 1241-1247.

  66. 66.

    Dirix CE, Kester AD, Hornstra G: Associations between neonatal birth dimensions and maternal essential and trans fatty acid contents during pregnancy and at delivery. Br J Nutr. 2009, 101: 399-

  67. 67.

    Dirix CE, Kester AD, Hornstra G: Associations between term birth dimensions and prenatal exposure to essential and < i > trans</i > fatty acids. Early Hum Dev. 2009, 85: 525-530.

  68. 68.

    Hauner H, Brunner S, Amann-Gassner U: The role of dietary fatty acids for early human adipose tissue growth. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013, 98: 549-555.

  69. 69.

    Hauner H, Much D, Vollhardt C, Brunner S, Schmid D, Sedlmeier E-M, Heimberg E, Schuster T, Zimmermann A, Schneider K-TM, Bader BL, Amann-Gassner U: Effect of reducing the n − 6:n − 3 long-chain PUFA ratio during pregnancy and lactation on infant adipose tissue growth within the first year of life: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012, 95: 383-394.

  70. 70.

    Wendland EM, Torloni MR, Falavigna M, Trujillo J, Dode MA, Campos MA, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI: Gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes-a systematic review of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012, 12: 23-

  71. 71.

    Peters CJ, Kayemba-Kays S, Geary MP, Hindmarsh PC: Blood glucose in multiparous women influences offspring birth size but not size at 2 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013, 98: 4916-4922.

  72. 72.

    Versantvoort A, Van Roosmalen J, Radder J: Course of Hba1c in non-diabetic pregnancy related to birth weight. Neth J Med. 2013, 71: 22-25.

  73. 73.

    Knudsen VK, Heitmann BL, Halldorsson TI, Sørensen TI, Olsen SF: Maternal dietary glycaemic load during pregnancy and gestational weight gain, birth weight and postpartum weight retention: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Br J Nutr. 2013, 1: 1-8.

Download references


This study was supported by the Health Research Board Ireland, the Health Research Centre for Health and Diet Research, The National Maternity Hospital Medical Fund and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement no. 289346.

The authors would like to thank Jacinta Byrne, research midwife, who carried out data collection and Ricardo Segurado who gave statistical advice.

Author information

Correspondence to Fionnuala M McAuliffe.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MKH- carried out data analysis, assigned the DASH diet score and wrote the manuscript, CAMcG- carried out data entry and k-means cluster analysis, ERG gave advice on study design and editing of the manuscript, JMD carried out manuscript editing, FMMcA was responsible for conception of the study, advice on study design and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark


  • Maternal diet
  • Pregnancy
  • Neonatal body composition
  • Neonatal adiposity
  • Low glycaemic index diet