Skip to main content

Addressing nutritional gaps with multivitamin and mineral supplements


A balanced and varied diet is the best source of essential vitamins and minerals; however, nutrient deficiencies occur, including in populations with bountiful food supplies and the means to procure nutrient-rich foods. For example, the typical American diet bears little resemblance to what experts recommend for fruit, vegetables, and whole grains, which serve as important sources of an array of vitamins and minerals. With time, deficiencies in one or more micronutrients may lead to serious health issues. A common reason people take multivitamin and mineral (MVM) supplements is to maintain or improve health, but research examining the effectiveness of MVMs in the prevention of certain chronic conditions is ongoing. In addition to the utility of MVMs for filling in relatively small but critical nutritional gaps, which may help prevent conditions such as anemia, neural tube defects, and osteoporosis, some evidence supports possible benefits of MVM supplementation with regard to cancer prevention (particularly in men) and prevention or delay of cataract, as well as some aspects of cognitive performance. Unlike some single-vitamin supplements, MVM supplements are generally well tolerated and do not appear to increase the risk of mortality, cerebrovascular disease, or heart failure. The potential benefits of MVM supplements likely outweigh any risk in the general population and may be particularly beneficial for older people.

Peer Review reports


Evidence suggests that eating patterns that include relatively high intakes of fruit, vegetables, nuts, and whole grains are linked to a significantly lower risk of heart disease, cancer, and stroke [1, 2], conditions that rank among the top 4 leading causes of death in adults living in the United States [3]. Plant foods, lean protein foods, and low-fat dairy products are all important sources of micronutrients that help ensure health and prevent disease [4].

The US Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has defined Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) for 29 vitamins and minerals (Table 1) [5]. Expert groups including the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) recommend obtaining essential micronutrients by eating a balanced and varied diet [6]. However, persistent or periodic nutritional gaps are common in the general population [7], and people who don’t consume adequate amounts of certain foods may have nutrient shortfalls. In addition, there are times throughout the life cycle when the body requires more nutrients than the typical diet may provide, such as iron during pregnancy and vitamin B12 after age 50 years [4]. Over the course of a lifetime, deficiencies in one or more nutrients may contribute to serious health issues [8].

Table 1 Dietary reference intakes (DRIs): recommended dietary allowances or adequate intakes for vitamins and elements [5]

Dietary supplement use is common among consumers; in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), approximately half of all non-institutionalized civilian persons living in the United States were taking dietary supplements, most commonly multivitamin and mineral (MVM) supplements, for a variety of reasons [9, 10]. Thirty-three percent to 39% of the total US population takes multivitamins [9, 11]. In spite of their popularity, there is no standardized or regulatory definition for MVM supplements. A range of definitions have been used to describe MVMs, and the term "MVM" may refer to products of widely varied compositions and characteristics [12]. The US National Institutes of Health has defined MVMs as supplements that consist of 3 or more micronutrients at doses less than the Tolerable Upper Level (UL) determined by the Food and Nutrition Board of the IOM and are free of herbs, hormones, or drugs [13]. Other definitions suggest that MVM content should not be limited to only the B vitamins [14, 15]. Using these definitions, products with widely varying compositions, ranging from those that contain a small number of vitamins or minerals to those containing many more vitamins and minerals, and in varying doses, are all classified as MVM supplements.

This article reviews the potential health benefits and risks of MVM supplements in several key areas, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, age-related eye disease, and cognition. Although the focus of the article is on MVM supplements containing 10 or more vitamins and minerals, there have been relatively few studies, such as the Physicians’ Health Study II (PHS II) [16, 17], of such formulations. Most studies have investigated individual vitamins, or MVMs with only a few constituents; such studies are reviewed here as appropriate.

Ensuring nutritional adequacy

Micronutrients are required for nearly all metabolic and developmental bodily processes. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA), issued by the US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services, recommend that “nutrient needs should be met primarily through consuming foods”, but also indicate that “in certain cases, fortified foods and dietary supplements may be useful in providing one or more nutrients that otherwise might be consumed in less than recommended amounts” [4]. The DGA cites 4 nutrients of concern in adults and children living in the United States: potassium, fiber, calcium, and vitamin D. These nutrients are routinely underconsumed in the general population. The DGA also recognizes folic acid, iron, and vitamin B12 as nutrients of concern in certain populations; folic acid and iron in women of childbearing age, and vitamin B12 in men and women over the age of 50 years [4].

The term “hidden hunger” has been used to describe nutritional deficiencies that occur when people consume adequate calories but inadequate micronutrients. “Hidden hunger” is largely due to eating patterns dominated by energy-dense, but nutrient-poor, foods that are often relatively inexpensive [18]. Large nationally representative surveys indicate that the intake of certain nutrients in the US falls below the IOM’s Estimated Average Requirement (EAR)—the average daily nutrient intake level estimated to meet the requirements of half the healthy individuals in a particular life stage and gender group [19]. For example, in an analysis of data from NHANES for 2003 through 2006, the population had total usual intakes from all food sources (excluding supplements) below the EAR for vitamins A, C, D, and E (45%, 37%, 93%, 91%, respectively), calcium (49%), and magnesium (55%) [20].

Some people are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies due to excessive losses (e.g., through hemodialysis), abnormal metabolism (e.g., genetic polymorphisms, alcoholism, conditions that impair fat absorption), and/or inadequate synthesis (e.g., insufficient sunlight exposure to allow vitamin D synthesis) [21]. Inadequate micronutrient intake, sometimes even at borderline levels of deficiency, has been linked to stunted growth and neurocognitive deficits [18], as well as increased risks of various symptoms and conditions [8, 2123]. Most nutrients act in all tissues, and all tissues need all nutrients; therefore, inadequate intakes may adversely affect every body system, but with more pronounced effects in some than others [24].

Although MVM supplement formulations vary widely in number of nutrients; dose of each; and the type, form, or source of vitamins and minerals, as a whole they are often instrumental in filling nutritional gaps [7], including in populations where the food supply is relatively bountiful and balanced [7, 2528]. In most cases, MVM supplements lack potassium and provide far less than the recommended daily intake for calcium, but many MVMs provide adequate folic acid, iron, vitamin B12, and vitamin D that can help prevent anemia, neural tube defects, and bone disease [29]. For example, in general, MVMs provide 100% of the daily value (a simplified reference value established by the US Food and Drug Administration to facilitate label comparisons of the nutrient content of food products [30]) for vitamin D [4], which is useful for people who consume inadequate amounts of vitamin D-rich foods, such as salmon, fortified milk, and orange juice [4].

MVM supplements are what the name implies and should not be regarded as substitutes for a balanced diet and other beneficial lifestyle habits [8]. It is worth noting that nutritional inadequacies are less common among those who take MVM supplements, not only because of the nutrients that MVMs provide, but also possibly because MVM supplement users may eat more nutrient-rich foods and may have healthier lifestyles overall [31]. Data from NHANES found that men, women, and children who used MVM supplements had higher dietary intake of key micronutrients than nonusers [7, 32]. In another national US study, regular use of supplements resulted in an estimated ≥75% decrease in the proportion of older persons with inadequate micronutrient intakes [25].

Prevention of chronic diseases

As defined by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 [33], dietary supplements are intended to supplement the diet—not prevent or treat disease. Yet, according to a recent national survey of US residents, just 22% of dietary supplement users said they take supplements “to supplement the diet” [10]. Among the most common reasons people cited for using dietary supplements were to “improve overall health” and to “maintain health” [10]. The potential benefits of MVM supplements in preventing certain chronic conditions are not well established, but insight into the issue continues to emerge. When evaluating results across different studies of supplementation with different MVM formulations, it is important to note that MVM products are not homogeneous [29]. The different types and amounts of nutrients in the products available, as well as differences in the duration of supplement use make it challenging to compare across studies.


The studies evaluating the effects of individual or small combinations of vitamin and mineral supplements on cancer risk are inconsistent [3440], and some trials and meta-analyses have suggested an increased incidence of cancer associated with certain individual vitamin supplements. Although β-carotene and lutein are phytonutrients rather than vitamins, their long-term use, as well as long-term retinol use, has been associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, particularly in those at high risk [4143]. The randomized Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) reported that high-dosage vitamin E supplementation was associated with a 17% increased risk of prostate cancer in healthy men after 7 years (P = .008) [44]. A meta-analysis of 6 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of folic acid supplementation reported a possible increased risk of any cancer [45], although another meta-analysis found folic acid supplementation to be associated with 40% to 50% reductions in risks of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers [46]. Investigations of the effects of folate on colorectal cancer risk have had conflicting results, with protective effects shown for dietary folate and effects ranging from modestly protective to potentially harmful associated with supplementation with folic acid (the synthetic form of folate) [4752].

While findings on the effect of individual or small combination supplements on cancer risk have showed mixed results, some evidence from RCTs suggests a benefit. The French Supplémentation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants (SU.VI.MAX) RCT evaluated a supplement containing ascorbic acid 120 mg, vitamin E 30 mg, β-carotene 6 mg, selenium 100 µg, and zinc 20 mg. This supplement was associated with a 31% reduction in overall cancer incidence (P = .008) and a 37% reduction in overall mortality (P = .02) in men (ages 45–60 years), but not in women (ages 35–60 years), after a median intake of about 7.5 years [53].

Two randomized, double-blind clinical trials evaluating the effects of MVM supplements on cancer risk were conducted in rural Linxian County, China, which has a relatively high rate of esophageal cancer and related mortality, as well as a high rate of borderline deficiencies in micronutrient intake [54]. One of the Linxian trials, conducted in relatively healthy persons, found that supplementation with a combination of β-carotene 15 mg/d, vitamin E 30 mg/d, and selenium 50 μg/d for 5 years was associated with a trend toward a 7% lower risk of cancer and significant reductions in mortality (9% overall; 13% cancer specific) [54]. Long-term follow-up of this study indicated that the benefits of taking MVMs persisted for up to 10 years after active supplementation had ceased [55]. The second Linxian study compared Centrum® multivitamins (Pfizer Consumer Healthcare, Madison, NJ) (2 pills daily containing 26 vitamins and minerals) plus 15 mg/d β-carotene versus placebo for 6 years in 3,318 patients with esophageal dysplasia and no history of previous cancer [56]. MVM supplements did not reduce or increase the incidence of any cancer, including esophageal/gastric cancers, although there were nonsignificant trends favoring supplementation with regard to overall and cancer-specific mortality.

The recent PHS II was a large (N = 14,641), long-term (median 11.2 years follow-up) RCT of the MVM Centrum® Silver (Pfizer Consumer Healthcare) once daily in male physicians in the United States [16]. MVM supplementation was associated with a statistically significant 8% reduction in incidence of total cancer (P = .04; Figure 1). In addition, men with a history of cancer derived the most benefit from MVM supplementation, with a 27% lower incidence of new cancer versus placebo in this subgroup (P = .02). There was no effect on the risk of any specific individual cancer types due to a lack of statistical power, and there was a nonsignificant trend toward lower cancer-specific mortality (P = .07). Because the study was conducted with well-nourished male physicians, it is not known whether the results apply to other types of people, including women and those more likely to have dietary insufficiencies.

Figure 1

Physicians' Health Study II cumulative incidence of total cancer with MVM supplements vs placebo [16].

Data from some meta-analyses and large nonrandomized trials of MVM supplement users also suggest a possible protective effect against cancer. A meta-analysis of 13 prospective European and North American cohort studies reported a decrease in risk of colon cancer among MVM supplement users compared with nonusers (relative risk [RR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81–0.96) [57]. MVM supplement use for 15 years was associated with a 75% reduction in colon cancer risk in the prospective Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) based on questionnaires completed by 88,756 female nurses in the United States [51]. In another report from the NHS, MVM supplementation had no overall effect on risk of breast cancer [58]. This study did, however, report an increase in risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (6–9 multivitamins/week: RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.05–1.83; ≥10 multivitamins/week: RR: 3.36; 95% CI: 1.93–5.86; P for trend = .0008), and risk was higher among women who used MVM supplements for ≥10 years [59]. No such association was found among men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study [59].

Overall, there is little evidence that MVM supplements increase cancer risk. Analysis of data from a 1997 dietary questionnaire administered to the Swedish Mammography Cohort reported a 19% higher risk of breast cancer among MVM supplement users versus nonusers [60]. However, a subsequent meta-analysis of 5 cohort studies (including the Swedish Mammography Cohort study) and 3 case–control studies found that MVM supplement use had no impact—positive or negative—on the risk of breast cancer (cohort studies: RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.60–1.60; case–control studies: odds ratio [OR]: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.51–1.97) [61]. Furthermore, the Women’s Health Initiative, a large observational study, reported that MVM supplement use was not associated with an increase in risk of breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, kidney, bladder, stomach, or lung cancer in postmenopausal women [62]. A meta-analysis of 4 RCTs, 8 cohort studies, and 2 case–control studies found no association between use of MVM supplements and prostate cancer (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.95–1.29) [63]. As already discussed, an increased risk of lung cancer and prostate cancer has been observed in some trials employing levels of certain micronutrients much higher than the RDA [4145]. It is possible that the increase in cancer seen in these studies is due to the fact that high levels of individual vitamins may be harmful and should be used with caution. This theory is illustrated in SELECT, which found no association between the combination of vitamin E and selenium and prostate cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05; 99% CI: 0.89–1.22, P = .46), even though vitamin E was associated with an increased risk [44].

Although many of these earlier trials, including cohort studies and trials of MVM supplements with fewer than 10 ingredients, have yielded mixed results in terms of their impact on cancer incidence and mortality, PHS II confirms the results from a range of trials that suggest a benefit of dietary supplementation in cancer prevention, at least in a population of well-nourished males in the United States. PHS II was likely able to measure a prevention benefit in cancer for a number of reasons. Firstly, a multivitamin composed of most of the essential vitamins and minerals was used, thus addressing all potential nutritional inadequacies and providing appropriate balance to the different components of the multivitamin [17], since it is possible that there are potential risks associated with supplementation of single vitamins and/or minerals without combination with other complementary vitamins/minerals [44]. Secondly, PHS II employed a large population in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial and was powered to detect differences in cancer incidence. Finally, subjects in PHS II were followed for a relatively long period of time (mean of 11.2 years). As demonstrated in the NHS, long-term use of continuous multivitamins for 10 to 15 years may be required for the benefits to be realized [51].

Cardiovascular disease

There is minimal evidence that supplementation with individual micronutrients reduces cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Research into potential cardiovascular benefits of dietary supplements has focused particularly on B vitamins because of their established correlation with levels of homocysteine, a marker for CVD risk, including ischemic stroke [64]. A meta-analysis of 19 RCTs of B vitamins (including folic acid, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, and B-complex vitamins) found no effect of supplementation on rates of CVD, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death, or all-cause mortality despite significant reductions in homocysteine levels; however, risk of stroke was reduced by 12% (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82–0.95) [64]. A second meta-analysis of 26 RCTs of folic acid supplementation resulted in a 7% reduction in risk of stroke (P = .05) [65]. Supplementation with vitamin E, β-carotene, and vitamin C, a group of vitamins sometimes referred to as antioxidant vitamins, has had similarly neutral results with regard to cardiovascular outcomes. A meta-analysis of 15 RCTs found that supplementation with vitamin E, β-carotene, and vitamin C had no effect on rates of major cardiovascular events, MI, stroke, overall or cardiovascular mortality, revascularization, coronary heart disease, angina, or congestive heart failure [66].

The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) and 7-year open-label HOPE-The Ongoing Outcomes extension found significant increases in risk of heart failure (P = .03) and related hospitalization (P = .045) associated with vitamin E supplementation (400 IU/d) in high-risk people ≥55 years of age [67]. A meta-analysis of 9 RCTs further found vitamin E supplementation to be associated with a significant 22% increase in risk of hemorrhagic stroke (P = .045), but a 10% decrease in risk of ischemic stroke (P = .02) [68].

A number of studies have investigated the effect of MVM supplements on CVD risk. The randomized PHS II study described above also evaluated the effects of MVM supplementation on major cardiovascular events, including nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular mortality, total MI, total stroke, and congestive heart failure and found no significant reduction in CVD risk [17]. Similar results were seen in the first PHS, in which MVM supplements were not associated with any increased or decreased risk of death from coronary heart disease (P = .88) or CVD mortality (P = .46) in healthy male physicians [69].

MVM supplements were associated with cardiovascular benefits in the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP), a large Swedish population-based case–control study [70]. SHEEP compared adults aged 45 to 70 years who had no previous history of MI with those who had experienced a first MI and survived >28 days. Regular use of dietary supplements, 80% of which were MVM supplements, was associated with a significant 22% reduction in risk of MI in men and a significant 33% reduction in risk of MI in women compared with nonuse after controlling for consumption of fruit, vegetables, and fiber. However, it is difficult to draw conclusions as to the role of MVMs in this study since their use was self-reported and the composition of MVMs and other supplements used may have been somewhat variable.

The benefits of taking MVMs for women were also seen in a separate population-based Swedish cohort study (N = 38,984 women) in which use of MVM supplements alone was associated with a 27% (95% CI: 7%–43%) lower risk of MI compared with nonuse in women ages 49 to 83 years with no history of CVD. MVM supplement use for 5 years or longer was associated with a further 41% (95% CI: 44%–80%) reduction in risk of MI. However, MVM supplements had a neutral effect on risk of MI in women with a history of CVD [71].

The Vitamin and Lifestyle Study, a population-based prospective study, evaluated mortality in a cohort of 77,673 subjects from western Washington State who used either MVM supplements (defined as containing 10 or more vitamins and/or minerals) or individual vitamin C and E supplements [72]. There was no association between MVM supplement use and risk of total mortality at any duration or frequency of use, nor were MVM supplement users at a statistically significant higher risk for death from CVD, cancer, or other causes. Use of MVM supplements for 6 to 7 days per week for 10 years was associated with a decrease in mortality due to CVD among persons with no history of CVD (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62–0.98).

Results of the studies reviewed here indicate that there is little evidence that MVM supplements have a negative impact on cardiovascular risk and that they may have a modest benefit in certain groups of people.

Age-related eye disease

Studies of 1 or 2 vitamin supplements have not proven benefit in preventing or slowing eye disease [73, 74]. For example, in a Swedish population-based cohort study of men ages 45 to 79 years, use of high-dose vitamin C or E supplements was associated with an increased incidence of age-related cataract. However, use of multivitamins only or multiple supplements in addition to vitamin C or E was not associated with cataract risk [73].

In the randomized Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), over a median of 6.3 years, high doses of 3 vitamins with antioxidant properties (500 mg/d vitamin C, 400 IU/d vitamin E, and 15 mg/d β-carotene) with zinc (80 mg zinc oxide) significantly reduced the risk of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by 28% (P = .007) [75] and reduced the risk of any lens opacity by 16% and of nuclear cataract by 25% (both P < .01) [76]. In the AREDS2 RCT, the addition of the carotenoid alcohol phytonutrients lutein (10 mg) and zeaxanthin (2 mg), and omega-3 fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (350 mg) and eicosapentaenoic acid (650 mg) or all four to the original AREDS formulation did not slow progression to advanced AMD or loss of visual acuity in people aged 50 to 85 years at high risk of progression to advanced AMD [77]. However, among the two-thirds of participants in the original AREDS trial who elected to take a formulation of Centrum® without lutein, MVM supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in development or progression of cataract after a median follow-up of 6.3 years (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79–0.98) [76]. Furthermore, in the 1.5-year, multicenter Age Related Macular Degeneration Study Group study, OcuGuard® (Twinlab Corporation, American Fork, UT), an MVM supplement containing 14 antioxidants and minerals, stabilized multiple measures of visual function (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution [LogMAR] activity, near M print acuity, and 6 cycle/degree contrast sensitivity in left eyes) in patients with AMD [78].

The Italian-American Clinical Trial of Nutritional Supplements and Age-Related Cataract (CTNS) was a single-center RCT of MVM supplements (Centrum®) in persons aged 55 to 75 years who had early cataracts (n = 710) or no cataracts (n = 310) [79]. After a mean follow-up of 9 years, those who received MVM supplementation were 18% less likely to experience a lens event, defined as development or progression of any cataract (P = .03). Analysis of specific types of opacities indicated that MVM supplements were associated with a 34% lower risk of nuclear opacity (P = .004), a neutral effect on cortical opacity (P = .07), and a doubling in the risk of the less common posterior subcapsular cataract opacity (P < .001).

Similar results were seen in the PHS II trial, which also evaluated the effects of MVM supplements on eye disease in healthy male physicians [80]. This study showed that daily supplementation with MVM supplements significantly reduced the risk of total cataract by 9% compared to placebo (P = .04) but had no effect on the incidence of visually significant AMD [HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.94–1.50; P = .15]). As with the Italian-American CTNS, MVM supplements significantly reduced the risk of nuclear cataract by 13% compared to those assigned to placebo (P = .005). There were also 10% fewer cortical cataracts with MVM, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .17). MVMs had no effect on the development of posterior subcapsular cataract (P = .85).

It is evident from the studies discussed here that MVM supplements have little effect on the prevention or progression of AMD, with just 1 of 3 studies showing only limited benefit [78]. However, it appears that they can be taken safely in combination with the high-dose antioxidant vitamins that have been shown to reduce the rate of eye disease progression. All 4 of the studies that investigated the effect of MVMs on cataract suggested that MVM supplements have a role in the prevention of cataract, particularly the most common subtype, nuclear cataract.


MVM supplementation has resulted in limited benefits to cognitive performance in some, but not all, studies. A meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (N = 3,200) concluded that daily MVM supplement use by cognitively intact adults significantly improved immediate free recall memory (P < .01), with the strongest effect seen for MVM supplements with more constituents, but that MVM supplements had no significant effects on delayed free recall memory or verbal fluency [14]. Two of the studies reviewed suggested possible improvements in mathematical processing ability. One limitation of this analysis is that 7 of the 10 trials studied MVM supplement use for short durations ranging from 6 weeks to 6 months, so the effects of longer MVM use on cognitive function are not known.

In an RCT of healthy adults aged 18 to 86 years, a supplement containing the vitamins folic acid (400 μg), vitamin B12 (6 μg), and vitamin E (30 IU alpha-tocopherol), as well as S-adenosylmethionine (400 mg), N-acetyl cysteine (600 mg), and acetyl-L-carnitine (500 mg) improved cognitive performance for the duration of its use only [81]. These latter compounds have a range of physiologic roles in metabolism and are often taken as supplements. Improvements were seen on some parts of the California Verbal Learning Test II (which measures short- and long-term word recall) and the Trail-Making Test (a measure of neuromuscular coordination and executive function) both in the double-blind phase and in an open-label extension. Scores returned to baseline following withdrawal of the supplement, but improved again when the supplement was reintroduced. An increased percentage of participants 74 years of age or older did not show improvement with the supplement product, which may be due to age-related difficulties in adsorption and/or basal nutritional deficiencies, or age-related cognitive decline during the course of the study. The authors concluded that the findings from this particular study support the benefit of nutritional supplements containing vitamins and other biologically active compounds for cognitive performance and that the elderly may require additional supplementation.

An RCT of an Australian supplement containing approximately 50 vitamins, minerals, and herbs found that it improved contextual recognition memory in men aged 50 to 74 years [82]. Contextual recognition memory, a measure of episodic memory, is often the first cognitive function to be impaired in patients with progressive cognitive decline or Alzheimer’s dementia. In a second study, a version of the supplement designed for women improved speed of response on a measure of spatial working memory in women aged 64 to 82 years who had reported memory worsening at screening [83].

The randomized, controlled Mineral and Vitamin Intervention Study, conducted in North-East Scotland, evaluated the cognitive effects of a daily MVM supplement containing 16 vitamins and minerals in 910 persons age ≥65 years [84]. After 1 year, there was no evidence of benefit on tests of immediate memory (digit span forward test) and executive function (verbal fluency test).

Evidence for cognitive benefits of MVMs is limited to a small number of studies showing positive results with only some of the cognitive tests performed. There have been no reports of MVM supplements having a negative impact on cognitive function, and it’s probably reasonable to use MVMs to address nutritional gaps with little, if any, concern for increasing the rate of cognitive decline. However, it should be noted that older persons have likely been exposed to dietary deficiencies for longer periods of time and have nutritional status that is less homogeneous than younger populations, compounded by disease and polypharmacy. As a result, the use of supplements is harder to generalize for populations over 60 years of age.


Concerns have arisen, based on studies employing supplements with individual or combinations of a small number of vitamins, that dietary supplements may possibly be associated with increased mortality. In general, data on the effects of MVM supplements on mortality have been largely reassuring.

In the randomized PHS II study described above, MVM supplementation trended positively, but did not alter total mortality significantly (P = .13) [16]. Several large observational studies have similarly shown no increase in risk of mortality among MVM supplement users [72, 85, 86], as did a meta-analysis of 21 RCTs (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.94–1.02) [15]. Similarly, the Multiethnic Cohort Study of 215,000 ethnically diverse persons living in Hawaii and California who completed a detailed questionnaire on diet, medical history, and lifestyle showed no increase in risk among men or women who used MVM supplements versus nonusers with regard to overall mortality or mortality attributable to CVD, cancer, or all other causes during 11 years of follow-up [85]. The single exception to those findings was in men who used MVM supplements either more than once daily or for <5 years’ duration who had a possible increase in risk of mortality from causes other than CVD or cancer. A study using nationally representative data from NHANES I (N = 10,758) found no evidence that MVM supplements affected mortality [86]. Overall mortality was comparable for regular users compared with nonusers among men (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.82–1.06) and women (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.90–1.17).

One study with contrasting data was the Iowa Women’s Health Study, a nonrandomized, observational trial in postmenopausal women that showed a significant 6% increase in mortality in women taking MVMs [87]. However, the Women’s Health Initiative observational trial, conducted with a similar population of 161,806 postmenopausal women, found no increase in risk of death over 8 years of follow-up among MVM supplement users (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97–1.07) [62]. Finally, a 5% increase in mortality rate was found in men, but not women, who self-reported use of MVM supplements as part of a large (N = 1,063,023) observational US study [88]; however, death rates were lower among both men and women if they used a combination of MVM supplements and vitamin A, C, or E. Overall, these studies suggest that generally well-nourished populations that take MVMs suffer no significant increased risk of mortality. There are some weaknesses in these analyses of mortality. Firstly, most of these studies rely on self-report of MVM use, so it is not clear if subjects were taking formulations that were age and gender appropriate. Secondly, none of these studies have investigated mortality in a cohort of patients who took an MVM consistently starting at a young age, following them over a lifetime.

Conclusions and implications for practice

MVMs may help prevent a number of health problems. In bridging nutrient gaps, it is plausible that MVMs help prevent iron-deficiency anemia, neural tube defects, neurological damage in people age 50 years and older, and bone disease by supplementing the diet with iron, folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin D, respectively.

A recent draft of the US Preventive Services Task Force found that there was no rationale to recommend for or against multivitamin use for primary prevention of CVD or cancer [89]. Although this group noted the significant reductions in cancer incidence in PHS II and SU.VI.MAX, the lack of generalizability to the general population meant evidence was insufficient to recommend routine use of MVM supplementation for primary prevention. The group also noted little consistent evidence to support or refute a role of single and paired vitamins and minerals in the prevention of cancer. A recent review by Comerford suggested that these more recent studies provided moderate evidence suggesting that MVM supplements containing vitamins and minerals at or near the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) are beneficial in reducing the risk of chronic disease in at-risk populations, especially given their demonstrated safety [90].

It is necessary to consider a person’s medical history as well as the quality of their diet when advising on the use of MVMs. For example, for people with a history of cancer, those taking prescription and over-the-counter medications, and those planning surgery should consult their doctors about taking MVMs and other dietary supplements. Likewise, people who take MVMs and other dietary supplements and who regularly consume fortified foods and beverages may consume certain nutrients at levels exceeding the IOM’s UL, which may cause adverse effects.

Even when a diet is well planned, it is not always possible for most people to choose foods containing the recommended amounts of all essential micronutrients, and chronic, relatively minor nutrient shortfalls can cause health problems. The role of MVMs also needs to be considered in the context of macro-nutrient consumption (carbohydrates, protein, and fats) and its effects on digestion, absorption, and bioavailability of vitamins and minerals, as well as the effect of the balance of macro-nutrient intake on metabolism and the need for different vitamins and minerals. While MVM supplements cannot replace eating adequate amounts of a variety of foods, they may be particularly beneficial to people who have poor nutrition for a variety of reasons, including inadequate intake of foods from all the food groups, advanced age, and chronic illness.

When choosing an MVM product, consumers should take a preparation that is tailored to their age, gender, family history/risk factors, and stage of life, including the childbearing years and the senior years. Wherever possible, the specific MVM formulation selection should be based on a nutritional assessment that identifies deficiencies as well as inadequate or erratic intake that can put a person at risk for deficiencies. The decision to take an MVM, like the decision to take any drug or supplement, should consider whether any potential risks outweigh the benefits. For example, smokers and, possibly, former smokers should avoid MVMs with large amounts of β-carotene or vitamin A, because studies have linked these nutrients to an increased risk of lung cancer in this population [42, 43]. Taking excess vitamin A (as preformed retinol but not β-carotene) during pregnancy can increase the risk of birth defects, so women capable of conceiving should consider the advice to limit daily consumption of preformed vitamin A to 10,000 IU/d (3,000 μg/d) or less [91]. Likewise, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends all women capable of becoming pregnant take 400 μg folic acid daily to help prevent birth defects [4]. Most healthy adult males and postmenopausal women should also avoid MVMs with more than 8 mg of iron and limit their total iron intake to 45 mg/d [91].

When deciding whether to recommend the use of dietary supplements, it is important to consider the benefit:risk ratio. Current data suggest minimal, if any, risk associated with MVM preparations containing 10 or more vitamins and minerals at recommended daily intake levels in healthy people and a possibility of modest benefits that include a reduced risk of cancer and nuclear cataract, for a relatively low financial cost.


  1. 1.

    Hu FB: Plant-based foods and prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78: 544S-551S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boffetta P, Couto E, Wichmann J, Ferrari P, Trichopoulos D, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, van Duijnhoven FJ, Buchner FL, Key T, Boeing H, Nothlings U, Linseisen J, Gonzalez CA, Overvad K, Nielsen MR, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Morois S, Lagiou P, Naska A, Benetou V, Kaaks R, Rohrmann S, Panico S, Sieri S, Vineis P, Palli D, van Gils CH, et al: Fruit and vegetable intake and overall cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010, 102: 529-537.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Leading Causes of Death.,

  4. 4.

    Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2010,,

  5. 5.

    Dietary Reference Intakes: Recommended Dietary Allowances and Adequate Intakes for Vitamins and Elements.,

  6. 6.

    Dietary Supplements.,

  7. 7.

    Bailey RL, Fulgoni VL, Keast DR, Dwyer JT: Examination of vitamin intakes among US adults by dietary supplement use. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012, 112: 657-663.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ames BN: Low micronutrient intake may accelerate the degenerative diseases of aging through allocation of scarce micronutrients by triage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 17589-17594.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bailey RL, Gahche JJ, Lentino CV, Dwyer JT, Engel JS, Thomas PR, Betz JM, Sempos CT, Picciano MF: Dietary supplement use in the United States, 2003–2006. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 261-266.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bailey RL, Gahche JJ, Miller PE, Thomas PR, Dwyer JT: Why US adults use dietary supplements. JAMA Intern Med. 2013, 173: 355-361.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gahche J, Bailey R, Burt V, Hughes J, Yetley E, Dwyer J, Picciano MF, McDowell M, Sempos C: Dietary supplement use among U.S. adults has increased since NHANES III (1988–1994). NCHS Data Brief. 2011, 61: 1-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yetley EA: Multivitamin and multimineral dietary supplements: definitions, characterization, bioavailability, and drug interactions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 85: 269S-276S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    National Institutes of Health: National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: multivitamin/mineral supplements and chronic disease prevention. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 85: 257S-264S.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Grima NA, Pase MP, Macpherson H, Pipingas A: The effects of multivitamins on cognitive performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 29: 561-569.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Macpherson H, Pipingas A, Pase MP: Multivitamin-multimineral supplementation and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013, 97: 437-444.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gaziano JM, Sesso HD, Christen WG, Bubes V, Smith JP, MacFadyen J, Schvartz M, Manson JE, Glynn RJ, Buring JE: Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer in men. The Physicians' Health Study II Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2012, 308: 1871-1880.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sesso HD, Christen WG, Bubes V, Smith JP, MacFadyen J, Schvartz M, Manson JE, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Gaziano JM: Multivitamins in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: the Physicians' Health Study II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012, 308: 1751-1760.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cole CR: Preventing hidden hunger in children using micronutrient supplementation. J Pediatr. 2012, 161: 777-778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Interactive DRI Glossary.,

  20. 20.

    Fulgoni VL, Keast DR, Bailey RL, Dwyer J: Foods, fortificants, and supplements: Where do Americans get their nutrients?. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 1847-1854.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fairfield KM, Fletcher RH: Vitamins for chronic disease prevention in adults: scientific review. JAMA. 2002, 287: 3116-3126.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Muller O, Krawinkel M: Malnutrition and health in developing countries. CMAJ. 2005, 173: 279-286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Whatham A, Bartlett H, Eperjesi F, Blumenthal C, Allen J, Suttle C, Gaskin K: Vitamin and mineral deficiencies in the developed world and their effect on the eye and vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008, 28: 1-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Heaney RP: Nutrients, endpoints, and the problem of proof. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 1591-1595.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sebastian RS, Cleveland LE, Goldman JD, Moshfegh AJ: Older adults who use vitamin/mineral supplements differ from nonusers in nutrient intake adequacy and dietary attitudes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007, 107: 1322-1332.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Elmadfa I, Freisling H: Nutritional status in Europe: methods and results. Nutr Rev. 2009, 67 (Suppl 1): S130-S134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Troesch B, Hoeft B, McBurney M, Eggersdorfer M, Weber P: Dietary surveys indicate vitamin intakes below recommendations are common in representative Western countries. Br J Nutr. 2012, 108: 692-698.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Whiting SJ, Langlois KA, Vatanparast H, Greene-Finestone LS: The vitamin D status of Canadians relative to the 2011 Dietary Reference Intakes: an examination in children and adults with and without supplement use. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011, 94: 128-135.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    The Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database (DSID): Comparison of Adult and Children's MVM Products [Poster].,

  30. 30.

    Guidance for Industry: a Food Labeling Guide (14. Appendix F: Calculate the Percent Daily Value for the Appropriate Nutrients).,

  31. 31.

    Prentice RL: Clinical trials and observational studies to assess the chronic disease benefits and risks of multivitamin-multimineral supplements. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 85: 308S-313S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bailey RL, Fulgoni VL, Keast DR, Lentino CV, Dwyer JT: Do dietary supplements improve micronutrient sufficiency in children and adolescents?. J Pediatr. 2012, 161: 837-842.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994.,

  34. 34.

    Han X, Li J, Brasky TM, Xun P, Stevens J, White E, Gammon MD, He K: Antioxidant intake and pancreatic cancer risk: the Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) Study. Cancer. 2013, 119: 1314-1320.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gaziano JM, Glynn RJ, Christen WG, Kurth T, Belanger C, MacFadyen J, Bubes V, Manson JE, Sesso HD, Buring JE: Vitamins E and C in the prevention of prostate and total cancer in men: the Physicians' Health Study II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009, 301: 52-62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Etminan M, FitzGerald JM, Gleave M, Chambers K: Intake of selenium in the prevention of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2005, 16: 1125-1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen GC, Pang Z, Liu QF: Magnesium intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012, 66: 1182-1186.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Carman S, Kamangar F, Freedman ND, Wright ME, Dawsey SM, Dixon LB, Subar A, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC: Vitamin E intake and risk of esophageal and gastric cancers in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 165-170.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Simonetti RG, Gluud C: Antioxidant supplements for preventing gastrointestinal cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, 3: CD004183-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hotaling JM, Wright JL, Pocobelli G, Bhatti P, Porter MP, White E: Long-term use of supplemental vitamins and minerals does not reduce the risk of urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder in the VITamins And Lifestyle study. J Urol. 2011, 185: 1210-1215.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Satia JA, Littman A, Slatore CG, Galanko JA, White E: Long-term use of beta-carotene, retinol, lycopene, and lutein supplements and lung cancer risk: results from the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009, 169: 815-828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cortes-Jofre M, Rueda JR, Corsini-Munoz G, Fonseca-Cortes C, Caraballoso M, Bonfill CX: Drugs for preventing lung cancer in healthy people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 10: CD002141

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR, Glass A, Keogh JP, Meyskens FL, Valanis B, Williams JH, Barnhart S, Hammar S: Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 1150-1155.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Klein EA, Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Crowley JJ, Lucia MS, Goodman PJ, Minasian LM, Ford LG, Parnes HL, Gaziano JM, Karp DD, Lieber MM, Walther PJ, Klotz L, Parsons JK, Chin JL, Darke AK, Lippman SM, Goodman GE, Meyskens FL, Baker LH: Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA. 2011, 306: 1549-1556.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Baggott JE, Oster RA, Tamura T: Meta-analysis of cancer risk in folic acid supplementation trials. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012, 36: 78-81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Larsson SC, Giovannucci E, Wolk A: Folate intake, MTHFR polymorphisms, and risk of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2006, 131: 1271-1283.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sanjoaquin MA, Allen N, Couto E, Roddam AW, Key TJ: Folate intake and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analytical approach. Int J Cancer. 2005, 113: 825-828.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Fife J, Raniga S, Hider PN, Frizelle FA: Folic acid supplementation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2011, 13: 132-137.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhang SM, Moore SC, Lin J, Cook NR, Manson JE, Lee IM, Buring JE: Folate, vitamin B6, multivitamin supplements, and colorectal cancer risk in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2006, 163: 108-115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ebbing M, Bonaa KH, Nygard O, Arnesen E, Ueland PM, Nordrehaug JE, Rasmussen K, Njolstad I, Refsum H, Nilsen DW, Tverdal A, Meyer K, Vollset SE: Cancer incidence and mortality after treatment with folic acid and vitamin B12. JAMA. 2009, 302: 2119-2126.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Fuchs C, Rosner BA, Speizer FE, Willett WC: Multivitamin use, folate, and colon cancer in women in the Nurses' Health Study. Ann Intern Med. 1998, 129: 517-524.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kennedy DA, Stern SJ, Moretti M, Matok I, Sarkar M, Nickel C, Koren G: Folate intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011, 35: 2-10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hercberg S, Galan P, Preziosi P, Bertrais S, Mennen L, Malvy D, Roussel AM, Favier A, Briancon S: The SU.VI.MAX Study: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the health effects of antioxidant vitamins and minerals. Arch Intern Med. 2004, 164: 2335-2342.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Blot WJ, Li JY, Taylor PR, Guo W, Dawsey S, Wang GQ, Yang CS, Zheng SF, Gail M, Li GY: Nutrition intervention trials in Linxian, China: supplementation with specific vitamin/mineral combinations, cancer incidence, and disease-specific mortality in the general population. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993, 85: 1483-1492.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Kamangar F, Fan JH, Abnet CC, Sun XD, Johnson LL, Gail MH, Dong ZW, Yu B, Mark SD, Taylor PR: Total and cancer mortality after supplementation with vitamins and minerals: follow-up of the Linxian General Population Nutrition Intervention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009, 101: 507-518.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Li JY, Taylor PR, Li B, Dawsey S, Wang GQ, Ershow AG, Guo W, Liu SF, Yang CS, Shen Q: Nutrition intervention trials in Linxian, China: multiple vitamin/mineral supplementation, cancer incidence, and disease-specific mortality among adults with esophageal dysplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993, 85: 1492-1498.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Park Y, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Albanes D, Bergkvist L, Buring JE, Freudenheim JL, Giovannucci E, Goldbohm RA, Harnack L, Kato I, Krogh V, Leitzmann MF, Limburg PJ, Marshall JR, McCullough ML, Miller AB, Rohan TE, Schatzkin A, Shore R, Sieri S, Stampfer MJ, Virtamo J, Weijenberg M, Willett WC, Wolk A, Zhang SM, Smith-Warner SA: Intakes of vitamins A, C, and E and use of multiple vitamin supplements and risk of colon cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2010, 21: 1745-1757.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ishitani K, Lin J, Manson JE, Buring JE, Zhang SM: A prospective study of multivitamin supplement use and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 167: 1197-1206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhang SM, Giovannucci EL, Hunter DJ, Rimm EB, Ascherio A, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Willett WC: Vitamin supplement use and the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among women and men. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 153: 1056-1063.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Larsson SC, Akesson A, Bergkvist L, Wolk A: Multivitamin use and breast cancer incidence in a prospective cohort of Swedish women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 1268-1272.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Chan AL, Leung HW, Wang SF: Multivitamin supplement use and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2011, 45: 476-484.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Neuhouser ML, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Thomson C, Aragaki A, Anderson GL, Manson JE, Patterson RE, Rohan TE, Van HL, Shikany JM, Thomas A, LaCroix A, Prentice RL: Multivitamin use and risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease in the Women's Health Initiative cohorts. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 294-304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Stratton J, Godwin M: The effect of supplemental vitamins and minerals on the development of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 2011, 28: 243-252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Huang T, Chen Y, Yang B, Yang J, Wahlqvist ML, Li D: Meta-analysis of B vitamin supplementation on plasma homocysteine, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Clin Nutr. 2012, 31: 448-454.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Yang HT, Lee M, Hong KS, Ovbiagele B, Saver JL: Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in cardiovascular disease prevention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Intern Med. 2012, 23: 745-754.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Ye Y, Li J, Yuan Z: Effect of antioxidant vitamin supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e56803-

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Lonn E, Bosch J, Yusuf S, Sheridan P, Pogue J, Arnold JM, Ross C, Arnold A, Sleight P, Probstfield J, Dagenais GR: Effects of long-term vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular events and cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005, 293: 1338-1347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Schurks M, Glynn RJ, Rist PM, Tzourio C, Kurth T: Effects of vitamin E on stroke subtypes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010, 341: c5702-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Muntwyler J, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Buring JE, Gaziano JM: Vitamin supplement use in a low-risk population of US male physicians and subsequent cardiovascular mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162: 1472-1476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Holmquist C, Larsson S, Wolk A, de Faire U: Multivitamin supplements are inversely associated with risk of myocardial infarction in men and women–Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP). J Nutr. 2003, 133: 2650-2654.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Rautiainen S, Akesson A, Levitan EB, Morgenstern R, Mittleman MA, Wolk A: Multivitamin use and the risk of myocardial infarction: a population-based cohort of Swedish women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 92: 1251-1256.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Pocobelli G, Peters U, Kristal AR, White E: Use of supplements of multivitamins, vitamin C, and vitamin E in relation to mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2009, 170: 472-483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Zheng Selin J, Rautiainen S, Lindblad BE, Morgenstern R, Wolk A: High-dose supplements of vitamins C and E, low-dose multivitamins, and the risk of age-related cataract: a population-based prospective cohort study of men. Am J Epidemiol. 2013, 177: 548-555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Evans J: Antioxidant supplements to prevent or slow down the progression of AMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye (Lond). 2008, 22: 751-760.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    AREDS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1417-1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Milton RC, Sperduto RD, Clemons TE, Ferris FL: III:. Centrum use and progression of age-related cataract in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study: a propensity score approach. AREDS report No. 21. Ophthalmology. 2006, 113: 1264-1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group: Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013, 309: 2005-2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Richer S: Multicenter ophthalmic and nutritional age-related macular degeneration study–part 2: antioxidant intervention and conclusions. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996, 67: 30-49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Maraini G, Sperduto RD, Ferris F, Clemons TE, Rosmini F, Ferrigno L: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial of multivitamin supplementation for age-related lens opacities. Clinical trial of nutritional supplements and age-related cataract report no. 3. Ophthalmology. 2008, 115: 599-607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Christen WG, Glynn RJ, Manson JE, MacFadyen J, Bubes V, Schvartz M, Buring JE, Sesso HD, Gaziano JM: Effects of multivitamin supplement on cataract and age-related macular degeneration in a randomized trial of male physicians. Ophthalmology. 2014, 121: 525-534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Chan A, Remington R, Kotyla E, Lepore A, Zemianek J, Shea TB: A vitamin/nutriceutical formulation improves memory and cognitive performance in community-dwelling adults without dementia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010, 14: 224-230.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Harris E, Macpherson H, Vitetta L, Kirk J, Sali A, Pipingas A: Effects of a multivitamin, mineral and herbal supplement on cognition and blood biomarkers in older men: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012, 27: 370-377.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Macpherson H, Ellis KA, Sali A, Pipingas A: Memory improvements in elderly women following 16 weeks treatment with a combined multivitamin, mineral and herbal supplement: A randomized controlled trial. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012, 220: 351-365.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    McNeill G, Avenell A, Campbell MK, Cook JA, Hannaford PC, Kilonzo MM, Milne AC, Ramsay CR, Seymour DG, Stephen AI, Vale LD: Effect of multivitamin and multimineral supplementation on cognitive function in men and women aged 65 years and over: a randomised controlled trial. Nutr J. 2007, 6: 10-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Park SY, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN: Multivitamin use and the risk of mortality and cancer incidence: the multiethnic cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011, 173: 906-914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Kim I, Williamson DF, Byers T, Koplan JP: Vitamin and mineral supplement use and mortality in a US cohort. Am J Public Health. 1993, 83: 546-550.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Mursu J, Robien K, Harnack LJ, Park K, Jacobs DR: Dietary supplements and mortality rate in older women: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2011, 171: 1625-1633.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Watkins ML, Erickson JD, Thun MJ, Mulinare J, Heath CW: Multivitamin use and mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 152: 149-162.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Fortmann SP, Burda BU, Senger CA, Lin JS, Whitlock EP: Vitamin and mineral supplements in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: an updated systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2013, 159: 824-834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Comerford KB: Recent developments in multivitamin/mineral research. Adv Nutr. 2013, 4: 644-656.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon Vanadium, and Zinc.,

Download references


Editorial support was provided by Lauren Cerruto, PhD, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, and was funded by Pfizer.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Ward.

Additional information

Competing interests

Elizabeth Ward received an honorarium from Pfizer in connection with the development of this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

The author alone was responsible for the content and writing of the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, E. Addressing nutritional gaps with multivitamin and mineral supplements. Nutr J 13, 72 (2014).

Download citation


  • Multivitamin and mineral supplements
  • Vitamins
  • Minerals
  • Dietary supplements
  • Benefits
  • Risks