Skip to main content

Erratum to: Weight Science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift

The Original Article was published on 24 January 2011

Correction

Erratum

Since publication of this article [1], it has come to our attention that there is an error in the section discussing assumptions about obesity-related costs. Table 2 is correct, indicating that 36% of the population is misidentified when BMI is considered, but there is a typographical error in the text which reported it as 31%.

References

  1. Bacon L, Aphramor L: Weight Science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J. 2011, 10: 9-10.1186/1475-2891-10-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Bacon.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found at10.1186/1475-2891-10-9

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bacon, L., Aphramor, L. Erratum to: Weight Science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J 10, 69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-69

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-69