Erratum to: Weight Science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift
Nutrition Journal volume 10, Article number: 69 (2011)
Since publication of this article , it has come to our attention that there is an error in the section discussing assumptions about obesity-related costs. Table 2 is correct, indicating that 36% of the population is misidentified when BMI is considered, but there is a typographical error in the text which reported it as 31%.
Bacon L, Aphramor L: Weight Science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J. 2011, 10: 9-10.1186/1475-2891-10-9.
The online version of the original article can be found at10.1186/1475-2891-10-9
About this article
Cite this article
Bacon, L., Aphramor, L. Erratum to: Weight Science: Evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J 10, 69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-69