Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Dietary intake and gastrointestinal symptoms are altered in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: the relative contribution of autism-linked traits

Nutrition Journal volume 23, Article number: 27 (2024) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 02 April 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Dietary and gastrointestinal (GI) problems have been frequently reported in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the relative contributions of autism-linked traits to dietary and GI problems in children with ASD are poorly understood. This study firstly compared the dietary intake and GI symptoms between children with ASD and typically developing children (TDC), and then quantified the relative contributions of autism-linked traits to dietary intake, and relative contributions of autism-linked traits and dietary intake to GI symptoms within the ASD group.

Methods

A sample of 121 children with ASD and 121 age-matched TDC were eligible for this study. The dietary intake indicators included food groups intakes, food variety, and diet quality. The autism-linked traits included ASD symptom severity, restricted repetitive behaviors (RRBs), sensory profiles, mealtime behaviors, and their subtypes. Linear mixed-effects models and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to estimate the relative contributions.

Results

Children with ASD had poorer diets with fewer vegetables/fruits, less variety of food, a higher degree of inadequate/unbalanced dietary intake, and more severe constipation/total GI symptoms than age-matched TDC. Within the ASD group, compulsive behavior (a subtype of RRBs) and taste/smell sensitivity were the only traits associated with lower vegetables and fruit consumption, respectively. Self-injurious behavior (a subtype of RRBs) was the only contributing trait to less variety of food. Limited variety (a subtype of mealtime behavior problems) and ASD symptom severity were the primary and secondary contributors to inadequate dietary intake, respectively. ASD symptom severity and limited variety were the primary and secondary contributors to unbalanced dietary intake, respectively. Notably, unbalanced dietary intake was a significant independent factor associated with constipation/total GI symptoms, and autism-linked traits manifested no contributions.

Conclusions

ASD symptom severity and unbalanced diets were the most important contributors to unbalanced dietary intake and GI symptoms, respectively. Our findings highlight that ASD symptom severity and unbalanced diets could provide the largest benefits for the dietary and GI problems of ASD if they were targeted for early detection and optimal treatment.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interactions and the presence of restricted, repetitive behaviors (RRBs), interests, or activities (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision [DSM-5-TR]; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022). Epidemiological studies have shown a rapid increase in the prevalence of ASD in recent years [1]. A three-level meta-analysis including 79 studies reported that the pooled ASD prevalence estimates were 0.72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.85%) [2]. Autism emerges in the early developmental period, typically diagnosed in childhood, but fully manifests when the social demands exceed their limited capacities [3]. Autism has underlying cognitive features [4] and often co-exists with other psychiatric, behavioral, and physical symptoms (for example, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], anxiety disorders [AD], obsessive-compulsive disorder [OCD], obesity, feeding, and gastrointestinal [GI] problems) [5], and impairments in autism are severe enough to cause social, occupational, or other vital functional deficits [3].

Children with ASD are more likely than typically developing (TD) peers to experience feeding problems, with many suffering from some manifestation of food selectivity, food neophobia, food refusal, ritualized eating, rapid eating, and disruptive mealtime behaviors [6]. Deficits in social communication, RRBs, sensory sensitivities, GI problems, and oral and fine motor skill impairments may be potential mechanisms underlying feeding problems in ASD [7]. Feeding problems may lead to the underconsumption of certain foods and overconsumption of a few foods. For instance, children with ASD rejected nutrient-dense foods like legumes and dairy products [8] and consumed energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods like sweetened beverages and snack foods [9]. The presence of feeding and dietary problems has both short and long-term implications for health [10]. Short-term consequences can result in weight loss, dehydration, low energy, failure to thrive, and malnutrition [11,12,13]. Long-term implications include vitamin deficiencies (scurvy, beriberi, rickets, vision loss, etc.) and iron, zinc, and calcium deficiency [14].

Most published studies exploring the relationship between autism-related traits and feeding problems focused on feeding behaviors rather than food intake and diet quality [15, 16]. However, the relationship between autistic traits – autism severity and feeding behaviors differed according to evaluation tools. For instance, ASD severity was positively associated with food selectivity by parent reports via the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) but not as assessed by clinician observation using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale-Calibrated Severity Scale (ADOS-CSS) [7]. Moreover, studies evaluating feeding behaviors in ASD are very heterogeneous, and they show differences in assessment criteria and methodologies, including rating scales, checklists, observations, surveys, and interviews, as well as more assessments [7, 17]. Also, the absence of unique definitions of feeding behaviors in ASD leads to inconsistent and conflicting results [6, 17]. For example, one study that used multiple measures of feeding difficulties indicated that children with more severe autism engage in more disruptive behaviors when presented with nonpreferred food, but not more food-selective behaviors than those with less severe autism [18]. These issues could potentially explain the variable relationship between ASD severity and feeding behaviors. Therefore, this study focused on food groups and diet quality as the outcome of dietary intake.

The dietary balance index (DBI), which characterizes the overall diet quality and adheres to the Chinese Dietary Guidelines (CDGs) and Chinese Food Pagoda (CFP), is made up of fundamental food groups. To date, there is a relative paucity of studies quantifying diet quality based on DBI in autism. The comparative data on specific food groups among children with ASD and typically developing children (TDC) are available, but the results are inconsistent. The case-control study reported that 32 autistic children from 4 to 8 years of age consumed more servings of fruit each day compared to 23 TD peers (2.5 versus 1.6, P < 0.01) and children in both groups did not show significant differences in their daily intake of grains, vegetables, and sweets [19]. A study using a case-control design found that 105 children with ASD ate more legumes (beta = 39.36, 95% CI = 24.02–54.69, P < 0.001) and vegetables (beta = 28.29, 95% CI = 11.61–44.97, P < 0.001) than TDC after adjusting for age and sex [20]. However, another case-control study showed that 53 children with ASD consumed significantly fewer daily servings of fruits and vegetables than 58 TDC (3.1 versus 4.4, P = 0.006) [9]. Therefore, more studies with larger sample sizes, carefully controlling for confounders, are needed to determine the differences that exist in which food groups.

To date, comparisons to control groups have identified dietary intake differences related to autism, and which autistic traits associated with the specific diets within autism are understudied. The autism-linked traits (including RRBs, sensory sensitivity, and feeding problems) are integral in our understanding of autism, not just as the specific symptoms but also in their associations with dietary and/or GI symptoms. It is reported that the more severe ASD symptoms, RRBs, and sensory sensitives, the greater food selectivity [7, 21, 22]. Specifically, repetitive patterns of behavior and interests in ASD may play a part in the development of feeding difficulties [7, 23, 24]. Sensory sensitivities in ASD may be one factor contributing to the mealtime behaviors, indicating that taste, smell, and texture play important sensory roles in accepting or rejecting food [7, 25, 26]. However, few studies have taken these traits into account and analyzed them simultaneously [17, 20, 22], and little is known about their relative contribution to dietary intake. Given the heterogeneity of autism [27] and the discrepancies in the prevalence of feeding difficulties among children with ASD [6], it is essential to determine the relative contributions of distinctive autism-linked traits to dietary intake in ASD. This will help identify the significant contributing factors to unbalanced diets and mitigate the risk of nutritional complications.

In addition to concomitant feeding problems, higher rates of co-occurring GI symptoms (e.g., constipation, diarrhea, and abdominal pain) among children with ASD have sparked significant concern [28]. Co-occurring GI complaints are serious due to the pain, discomfort, and functional impairments they produce and their short- and long-term implications for health [29]. Notably, not all studies have reported co-occurring GI conditions in ASD [30], despite the previous findings suggesting that the gut and microbiota-gut-brain axis might be involved in the pathophysiology of ASD [31]. A large autism stool metagenomics study (n = 247) failed to replicate previously reported associations between ASD diagnosis and microbiome, and they concluded that a less-diverse diet that relates to autism diagnostic features reduced microbial taxonomic diversity and looser stool consistency [32]. Although not direct findings of diets and GI issues, this study provided clues about the relationship between a less varied diet and GI symptoms in autism.

In the present study, we hypothesized that dietary intake and GI symptoms are altered in children with ASD when compared to age-matched TDC. In the ASD group, distinct autism-linked traits have different degrees of contribution to dietary intake, and ASD-related diets may be the main contributor to GI symptoms. The aims of this study are to: (i) compare the differences in dietary intake and GI symptoms between children with ASD and age-matched TDC. (ii) quantify the relative contributions of autism-linked traits to dietary intake, and relative contributions of autism-linked traits and dietary intake to GI symptoms in ASD children.

Methods

Study participants

An age- and sex-matched (1:1) case-control study was carried out in China. Participants were recruited based on the Research Project (Follow-up Assessment of Child Cognitive Development) between September 2021 and May 2022. Thereinto, the children with ASD were randomly recruited from the Center for Child and Adolescent Psychology and Behavioral Development of Sun Yat-sen University and Little Angel Rehabilitation Center in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. The TD children were randomly recruited from the Center for Child and Adolescent Psychology and Behavioral Development of Sun Yat-sen University and the Department of Child Healthcare, Foshan Women and Children Hospital. The participant age range selected for this study was from 2 to 10 years to avoid breastfeeding or formula feeding as the most important source of nutrition before two years, to avoid binge eating and binge drinking, and to avoid eating outside the house during puberty (after age 10) [33]. Puberty is a critical risk period for the development of binge, loss of control eating, and more obesogenic food consumption patterns for boys and girls [34]. This study excluded children who received a special diet (including the gluten-free/casein-free diet and the ketogenic diet) set by parents, who took probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics supplements, antibiotics or antifungal medications, and laxatives within the last three months, and children who had a prior diagnosis of clinically evident inflammatory conditions (e.g., Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis). Finally, a sample of 121 children with ASD and 121 age-matched TDC were eligible for the study, see Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram for study participants

Full size image

To ensure the validity and reliability of the survey data, we compared the demographic information between 121 ASD children recruited for this study and 93 ASD children recruited from July 2018 to May 2019. The results displayed that no significant differences existed in the child’s sex, ASD symptom severity, intellectual functioning, maternal educational attainment, and monthly per-capita income between these two groups of children with ASD (P > 0.05), implying the good representativeness of the study samples, see Supplementary Table 1 for further details.

Sample size

Feeding problems have been found to occur in approximately 25% of TD children [35]. Children with ASD are two times more likely to experience inadequate nutrient intake than TD children [36]. The correlation coefficient between cases and their matched controls (phi) was 0.2 [37]. By taking into account the 95% qualified rate of questionnaire filling and achieving 90% statistical power (1-β) with a significance level (α) of 5%, a sample of 121 cases and 121 controls were needed in the matched case-control phase. Beyond the case-control approach, the sample size within the ASD group was calculated based on the cross-sectional study design. Specifically, the estimated prevalence of feeding problems was 80% in children with ASD [35]. In this case, we defined the allowable error as 0.1 of the prevalence estimation, and that was 8%. Therefore, 121 children with ASD were needed to obtain a 95% confidence level.

Procedures

Parents were required to provide proof of ASD diagnosis by a licensed medical provider (e.g., psychiatrist, neurodevelopmental pediatrician, or psychologist). The patient’s ASD diagnosis was further confirmed in accordance with the DSM-5 criteria by two experienced developmental and behavioral pediatricians in this study.

Children undertook face-to-face measures by trained psychometrists or research assistants at the research center. Autism-linked traits and information on demographics, sleep, physical activity, parenting behavior, dietary intake, and GI symptoms were obtained via validated scales/questionnaires and in-person interviews with parents of children. Informed consent was obtained for participation, and the study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Committee of the School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University (No. 067 [2022]).

Dietary assessment

Parents were also asked to complete a validated 7-day food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) [38] about their children’s consumption frequency as the number of times during the past seven days for each food, and the average quantity of food consumed each time based on a specified standardized portion size (a serving = 50 g). Then, the average daily intake of food was calculated as (consumption frequency [times/week] × average quantity each time/7). The FFQ consisted of food lists (cereals/potatoes, vegetables, fruit, livestock/poultry meat, fish/shrimp, eggs, soybeans, dairy, and drinking water).

The dietary intake indicators for this study included food groups intakes, food variety, and diet quality. The diet quality was quantified using DBI, which was established based on the recommended daily food intake from the CDGs (2022) and CFP (Supplementary Table 2). The scoring method and evaluation index of DBI were established with reference to the DBI_16 [39], see Supplementary Tables 3, 4, and 5.

GI symptoms assessment

A shortened version of the 6-item Gastrointestinal Severity Index (6-GSI) questionnaire was intended to assess the severity of GI symptoms among patients with ASD in the present study. In a 2011 study, it was employed as an instrument to measure aspects of GI symptoms in ASD research [40]. The 6-GSI is composed of six symptoms, including constipation, diarrhea, stool consistency, stool smell, flatulence, and abdominal pain. Each symptom is rated on a three-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 2, with a higher score signifying more severe GI symptoms [41]. The interrater reliability (intraclass correlation [ICC]) of the GI total scores was found to be high at 0.95 [95% CI: 0.87–0.98] [41].

Measures of autism-linked traits

ASD symptom severity

The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) is a behaviorally based clinical scale derived from interaction and observation [42]. It contains 15 items rated from 1 (age appropriate) to 4 (severely autistic), covering language and communication skills, response to sensory information, and socio-emotional and interactional skills. CARS had demonstrated a high degree of internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92.

and high validity with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 90% [43]. The CARS was applied in this study to distinguish between mild-to-moderate and severe ASD. According to the manual, a CARS score between 30 and 36.5 is indicative of mild-to-moderate ASD, and a score between 37 and 60 represents severe ASD [44].

Restricted repetitive behaviors

The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) is a parent or caregiver-report scale for capturing the breadth of RRBs observed in individuals with ASD. The RBS-R has sound psychometric characteristics. Cronbach’s alphas for all of the subscales were satisfactorily high (between 0.78 and 0.91, mean = 0.83) [45]. The Chinese version of the RBS-R was revised by Li et al., and it has been proved to have good reliability and validity among children with ASD [46]. The 43 items of RBS-R have been conceptually grouped into six subscales that each represents the principal typologies of restricted repetitive behaviors: stereotypic behavior, self-injurious behavior, compulsive behavior, ritualistic behavior, sameness behavior, and restricted interests. Every item is rated on a 0-point (never) to 3-point (always) Likert-type scale; thus, higher scores reflect more severe stereotypical and repetitive behavior.

Sensory profiles

The short sensory profile (SSP), an abbreviated form of Dunn’s Sensory Profile, is one of the primary measures of sensory phenotyping among autistic children [47]. It has adequate internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranging from 0.70 to 0.90 [48]. The validated Chinese version of SSP has been established by Xu et al. with good reliability and validity [49]. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the SSP is above 0.7, and the correlation coefficient between each of the subscales and the total SSP is above 0.5 [49]. The SSP consists of 38 items divided into seven subscales, each corresponding to one of the sensory subtypes: tactile, taste/smell, movement, underresponsive/seeks sensation, visual/auditory sensitivity, auditory filtering, and low energy/weak. Each item is answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from always (1) to never (5), with higher total and subscale scores indicating more typical performance, while low scores emblematize heightened sensitivity in that sensory domain.

Mealtime behaviors

The Brief Autism Mealtime Behaviour Inventory (BAMBI) is a standardized and parent-reported measure of mealtime behaviors in ASD children with adequate reliability based on internal consistency scores (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.88) [50]. A test-retest reliability coefficient was calculated between the initial administration of the BAMBI and the second administration using the total score. It was found to be significant with r of 0.87 [50]. For the criterion-related validity, there existed a significant correlation between the BAMBI total frequency score and the Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS) child behavior frequency score with r of 0.77 [50]. The BAMBI contains 18 items ranked on a five-point Likert level ranging from 1 (never/rarely) to 5 (almost every meal) and is divided into three subscales that include limited variety, food refusal, and features of ASD. The items were summed to create total scores and subscale scores. Higher scores stand for a greater frequency of problematic behaviors.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables were reported as mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentages). Variables in the aspects of demographic information, autism-linked traits, dietary intake, and GI symptoms were compared between the ASD and TDC groups by applying the two-sample t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, χ2 tests, and multiple linear regression analysis. The relative contributions of autism-linked traits to dietary intake, and relative contributions of autism-linked traits and dietary intake to GI symptoms were estimated via the standardized beta coefficients with 95% CIs derived from the linear mixed-effects models, and the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs from the mixed-effects logistic regression models. Considering the sample size, all the independent variables were not put into the mixed-effects models simultaneously but entered the mixed-effects models after carefully choosing candidate variables, to ensure parsimony of the final model. The specific screening process is as follows: (1) Candidate variables with a P value < 0.1 on univariate analysis and P value < 0.05 on multivariable models (including independent variable and covariates) (Supplementary Table 6) were put into the multivariable models simultaneously (Supplementary Table 7) to screen out final variables. (2) Final variables showing significant associations (P value < 0.05) with different dietary and GI outcomes were put into the multivariable mixed-effects models simultaneously to compare the relative contributions of autism-linked traits. Notably, collinearity diagnosis was conducted to test the potential multicollinearity among the variables (independent and covariates variables) included in the models. To estimate effect sizes, the formula r = Z/√(N) was used for Mann-Whitney U-tests, effect size φ for 2 × 2 tables, and Cramer-V for tables larger than 2 × 2, with threshold values of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 used to categorize effects as small, medium, and large, respectively [51]. The Cohen’s f2 was calculated for multiple regression models, and f2 ≥ 0.02, f2 ≥ 0.15, and f2 ≥ 0.35 were interpreted as small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively [52].

Also, one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to create a balanced covariate distribution between ASD and TD groups based on the nearest neighbor method, and then the dietary intake and GI symptoms were compared between the ASD and TD sub-groups. The variables selected for the propensity score calculation included the child’s age, sex, intellectual functioning, birth mode, birth order, average daily sleep duration, maternal educational attainment, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, and monthly per-capita income [52,53,54,55,56,57], and the score was calculated using a logistic regression model. Details of covariates are presented in Supplementary Table 8.

All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS Statistics 26.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp) and GraphPad Prism version 8.4.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at a two-tailed P < 0.05.

Results

There were statistically significant differences between ASD and TDC groups in the demographic characteristics, including sex, intellectual functioning, birth mode, birth order, average daily sleep duration, maternal educational attainment, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, and monthly per-capita income (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.1), see Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the children with ASD and age-matched TD children
Full size table

Children with ASD had poorer diets than age-matched TD children

There were significant differences between ASD and TDC groups in the daily vegetables/fruit intake, daily food variety, and inadequate/unbalanced dietary intake (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.1), and the results remained consistent when the participants were stratified by age into 2–5 and 6–10 years old, see Supplementary Table 9. When the participants were matched using PSM, children with ASD had poorer diets with lower daily vegetables/fruit intake, less variety of food, and a higher degree of inadequate/unbalanced dietary intake (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.1), see Supplementary Table 11. Similarly, the crude and adjusted general linear models show that children with ASD had poorer diets than age-matched TDC (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.02), see Fig. 2.

Children with ASD experienced more severe GI symptoms than age-matched TD children

There were significant differences between the ASD and TDC groups in constipation, abnormal smell of stool, and total GI symptoms scores (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.1), see Supplementary Table 10. When the participants were matched using PSM, the children with ASD suffered far more severe constipation and total GI symptoms (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.1), see Supplementary Table 11. Similarly, the crude and adjusted general linear models show that children with ASD experienced more severe constipation and total GI symptoms than age-matched TDC (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.02), see Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Children with ASD had poorer diets than age-matched TD children (n = 242).a g/day. b Food variety scores ranged from − 12 to 0, with lower scores representing less variety of food. c Evaluated using the low bound score (LBS) and diet quality distance (DQD), respectively, with higher scores representing a higher degree of inadequate/unbalanced diets. Adjusted for child’s age, sex, intellectual functioning, birth mode, birth order, average daily sleep duration, maternal educational attainment, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, monthly per-capita income, and parenting behavior. Effect size = Cohen’s f2 for linear models. ASD: autism spectrum disorder, TD: typically developing, CI: confidence interval

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Children with ASD experienced more severe GI symptoms than age-matched TD children (n = 242). Constipation and total GI symptoms scores were evaluated by subscale and total scores of the 6-item gastrointestinal severity index (6-GSI). Adjusted for child’s age, sex, intellectual functioning, birth mode, birth order, average daily sleep duration, maternal educational attainment, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, and monthly per-capita income. Effect size = Cohen’s f2 for linear models. GI: gastrointestinal, ASD: autism spectrum disorder, TD: typically developing, CI: confidence interval

Full size image

The relative contribution of autism-linked traits to poorer diets in children with ASD

The significant differences between ASD and TDC groups in sensory profiles and mealtime behaviors were identified before assessing the relative contributions of autism-linked traits to diets (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.1), see Supplementary Table 12. Similarly, the crude and adjusted general linear models show that children with ASD experienced more severe sensory abnormalities and mealtime behavior problems (including subtype limited variety) than age-matched TDC (P < 0.05, effect size > 0.02), see Supplementary Tables 13 and 14.

The crude and adjusted associations of autism-linked traits with dietary intake in the ASD group are displayed in Table 2, Fig. 4, and Fig. 5. Figure 4 is the probability plot in mixed-effects logistic regression models for assessing the probability of poorer diets associated with autism-linked traits. The linear mixed-effects models (Table 2) and mixed-effects logistic regression models (Fig. 5) show the relative contributions of autism-linked traits to poorer diets. Only compulsive behavior (a subtype of RRBs) was statistically significantly associated with lower daily vegetable intake (adjusted standardized β: − 0.291, 95% CI: − 0.504 to − 0.077, P = 0.008, effect size = 0.267), and was statistically significantly associated with higher odds of inadequate vegetable intake (adjusted OR: 1.307, 95% CI: 1.083 to 1.577, P = 0.006). Only taste/smell sensitivity (a subtype of sensory symptoms) was significantly associated with lower daily fruit intake (adjusted standardized β: 0.240, 95% CI: 0.009 to 0.470, P = 0.042, effect size = 0.175), and was significantly associated with higher odds of inadequate fruit intake (adjusted OR: 0.842, 95% CI: 0.719 to 0.985, P = 0.032). Only self-injurious behavior (a subtype of RRBs) was significantly associated with less variety of food (adjusted standardized β: − 0.228, 95% CI: − 0.432 to − 0.024, P = 0.029, effect size = 0.280), and was statistically significantly associated with higher odds of less food variety (adjusted OR: 1.485, 95% CI: 1.120 to 1.969, P = 0.006). Limited variety (adjusted standardized β: 0.289, 95% CI: 0.063 to 0.514, P = 0.013, effect size = 0.304) was a bigger contributor than ASD symptom severity (adjusted standardized β: 0.261, 95% CI: 0.005 to 0.517, P = 0.046, effect size = 0.304) to inadequate dietary intake. Also, limited variety (adjusted OR: 1.152, 95% CI: 1.057 to 1.256, P = 0.001) played a bigger role in higher odds of inadequate dietary intake relative to ASD symptom severity (adjusted OR: 1.135, 95% CI: 1.040 to 1.239, P = 0.005). ASD symptom severity (adjusted standardized β: 0.347, 95% CI: 0.092 to 0.601, P = 0.008, effect size = 0.350) was a bigger contributor than limited variety (adjusted standardized β: 0.312, 95% CI: 0.093 to 0.531, P = 0.006, effect size = 0.350) to unbalanced dietary intake; ASD symptom severity (adjusted OR: 1.132, 95% CI: 1.046 to 1.226, P = 0.002) played a bigger role in higher odds of unbalanced dietary intake relative to limited variety (adjusted OR: 1.112, 95% CI: 1.025 to 1.208, P = 0.012).

The relative contribution of autism-linked traits and unbalanced dietary intake to GI symptoms in children with ASD.

The crude and adjusted associations of autism-linked traits and dietary intake with GI symptoms in children with ASD are analyzed. The linear mixed-effects models (Table 3) show that unbalanced dietary intake was a significant independent factor associated with constipation (adjusted standardized β: 0.198, 95% CI: 0.023 to 0.374, P = 0.027, effect size = 0.214) and total GI symptoms scores (adjusted standardized β: 0.231, 95% CI: 0.063 to 0.400, P = 0.008, effect size = 0.284), and no statistically significant associations between autism-linked traits and constipation/total GI symptoms scores were identified in children with ASD.

Table 2 The relative contribution of autism-linked traits to poorer diets in children with ASD (n = 121)
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Probability of poorer diets associated with autism-linked traits in children with ASD (n = 121). a, b Inadequate vegetable/fruit intake: inadequate vs. appropriate intake; c, d Less variety of food: food variety scores between − 12 to − 7 vs. − 6 to 0 (with lower scores representing less variety of food); e, f Inadequate dietary intake: moderate-high inadequate dietary intake vs. appropriate, more appropriate, and low inadequate dietary intake; g, h Unbalanced dietary intake: moderate-high unbalanced dietary intake vs. more appropriate, and low unbalanced dietary intake. ASD: autism spectrum disorder

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

The relative contribution of autism-linked traits to the odds of poorer diets in children with ASD (n = 121). a, b Inadequate vegetable/fruit intake: inadequate vs. appropriate intake; c Less variety of food: food variety scores between − 12 to − 7 vs. − 6 to 0 (with lower scores representing less variety of food); d Inadequate dietary intake: moderate-high inadequate dietary intake vs. appropriate, more appropriate, and low inadequate dietary intake; e Unbalanced dietary intake: moderate-high unbalanced dietary intake vs. more appropriate, and low unbalanced dietary intake. Adjusted for child’s age, sex, intellectual functioning, birth mode, average daily sleep duration, average daily SB time, average daily MVPA time, average daily walking time, maternal educational attainment, monthly per-capita income, and parenting behavior. ASD: autism spectrum disorder, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, SB: sedentary behavior, MVPA: moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Full size image
Table 3 The relative contribution of autism-linked traits and unbalanced dietary intake to GI symptoms in children with ASD (n = 121)
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, children with ASD ate poorer diets with lower vegetables/fruit, less variety of food, a higher degree of inadequate/unbalanced dietary intake, and experienced more severe constipation/total GI symptoms than age-matched TDC. Among the ASD group, ASD symptom severity, compulsive and self-injurious behavior, taste/smell sensitivity, and limited variety were the top contributors to poorer diets. Notably, unbalanced dietary intake was a significant independent factor associated with constipation/total GI symptoms in ASD, and autism-linked traits showed no contributions.

Making comparisons of dietary differences between ASD and age-matched TD groups after adjusting for a comprehensive set of covariates was a highlight of this study. Regarding the specific food groups, our findings were consistent with most of the previous studies that autistic children consumed fewer vegetables/fruits than TD children [14, 58,59,60,61,62]. However, contrasting findings of higher vegetables/fruit consumption in the ASD group or equal amounts of vegetables/fruit consumption in both groups were revealed in some previous research [20, 63,64,65]. This is probably because of the food cultural and national diversity among participants and the different definitions of vegetables/fruit, for example, some vegetables included both raw and boiled and some fruits included fresh fruit juice [59, 65, 66]. In our study, apart from lower vegetables/fruit consumption, a less variety of food and a higher degree of inadequate/unbalanced diets among ASD children were observed. In line with our findings, a study [65] from Hong Kong with similar traditional Chinese culture recorded that there was less variety of food and poorer overall diet quality in children with ASD than in the TD group. Prior evidence supported these findings, indicating that children with ASD had a more limited food repertoire compared to TD children (19.0 foods vs. 22.5 foods)., as well as inadequate intake of a greater number of nutrients (with or without the exclusion of children on special diets) [67]. Similarly, Sharp et al. found that 78.5% of children with ASD followed a diet at risk for five or more nutrient inadequacies [14]. On the contrary, a study [20] performed in the Mediterranean Region reported that the food variety score and healthy eating index were not significant between ASD and TD children (6–9 years), which may be explained by the fact that parents of children who had been diagnosed with autism pay specific attention to diets of their children and these compensate to some degree for unhealthier diets. Combined with previous studies, we discovered the poorer diet quality in children with ASD compared to TD children. The prolonged exposure to unhealthier diets deserves attention because of the adverse outcomes like developmental and growth delays, inappropriate weight gain, cognitive and social deficits, and poor academic achievement [10, 22, 68, 69].

Results of the present study indicated that compulsive behavior, a subtype of RRBs, was the only contributor to less vegetable intake in children with ASD. Genetic contributions [32] to compulsive behavior and the serotonin system [70] could be the potential explanations for this finding. The other autism-linked traits like ASD symptom severity, sensory abnormalities, and mealtime behavior problems showed no associations with vegetable consumption in the current study. Related to our findings, Marler et al. recorded that there existed an association between compulsive behavior and functional constipation in autism [71]. As we know, diets rich in vegetables can prevent and alleviate constipation because of their dietary fiber content which can provide a natural laxative effect [72]. Future research elucidating the mechanisms involved in lower vegetables intake in ASD can help us clarify these complex associations and implement the targeted interventions.

The present study also indicated that taste/smell sensitivity, a subtype of sensory abnormalities, was the only contributor to lower fruit consumption. Higher taste/smell sensitivity may limit autistic children’s willingness to experiment with fruit with a stronger flavor and odor and restrict their feeding to preferred and tolerable food. This is a novel finding, most previous studies investigated the associations between sensory sensitivity and eating behaviors rather than dietary intake [73, 74]. Despite Coulthard et al. suggesting that children with sensitivities to taste and smell ate fewer fruits, this study was conducted among TD children instead of among children with ASD [75]. Only Chistol et al. in 2017 observed similar results to ours that autistic children with atypical Oral Sensory Over-sensitivity (a measure of sensory hyper-sensitivity for taste and smell sensory input) consumed less variety of fruits than those with ASD without Oral Sensory Over-sensitivity [76]. Insufficient consumption of fruit in childhood can increase the risk of micronutrient deficiencies and a range of future chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer [77]. Early identification of and intervention for taste/smell abnormalities is crucial for promoting greater consumption of fruit in children with ASD.

Previous evidence had proposed that the consumption of less variety of food would stem from more mealtime behaviors in children with ASD [67]. As a strength, we simultaneously analyzed the autism-linked traits to quantify their relative contributions to less variety of food. It is surprising that self-injurious behavior, a subtype of RRBs, was the only contributing trait. Similarly, self-injurious behavior has been recognized as a correlate of anorexia nervosa, and there seem to be psychopathological links between them in emotion dysregulation, maladaptive coping, and a dysfunctional reward system [78]. In this regard, a worthwhile avenue for future study is exploring the psychopathological and neurobiological overlap between self-injurious behavior and fewer kinds of food in ASD for clarifying their basic mechanisms.

With regard to inadequate dietary intake, this study provided evidence that limited variety – a subtype of mealtime behavior problems – was the primary contributing trait, followed by ASD symptom severity. Indeed, there have been suggestions that the deteriorated feeding and mealtime behaviors observed in children with ASD may correspond to a lower diet quality [79]. Interestingly, the ASD symptom severity was found to be the larger contributor than limited variety to unbalanced dietary intake in the present study. Coincidentally, Patton et al. [22] stated that greater ASD severity was associated with fewer bites of unfamiliar food, greater disruptive behavior during meals, and greater parental commands to take bites during meals; higher levels of limited variety were only associated with fewer bites of unfamiliar food. Based on this finding, it may be inferred that ASD symptom severity as a composite indicator played a more prominent role than limited variety in the children’s unbalanced dietary intake through the influence of various aspects. Priority should be given to implementing dietary assessments for children with more severe autism and limited food variety to address the health and nutritional challenges.

Consistent with previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, our results indicated that the children with ASD suffered more severe constipation/total GI symptoms [31, 80]. ASD-related behaviors such as stereotypic or repetitive behaviors, self-injurious and aggressive behaviors, sensory over-responsivity, sleep disturbances, sudden irritability, and anxiety are very common in autistic children with GI symptoms [81,82,83], and thus some have suggested that these certain problematic behaviors may be the possible expressions of GI symptoms [29, 81]. However, these common problematic behaviors are not specific to those with GI symptoms but also to autistic children without GI symptoms [81]. Based on these results, we speculated that the core autistic symptoms may not be the main influential factors of GI conditions. In the current study, only unbalanced dietary intake instead of autism-linked traits was found to be associated with constipation/total GI symptoms in children with ASD. This is supported by Berding et al. [84], who raised that an eating pattern characterized by a higher intake of healthy foods such as fruit, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and seeds was associated with a bacterial profile that could potentially be linked to some aspects of GI health [84,85,86]. Valenzuela et al. in 2022 reported an unbalanced diet (low numbers of fruits and vegetables or foods rich in fiber) seems to have an essential role in the appearance of GI symptoms due to diet’s predominant role in changes in the gut microbiota [87]. Yap et al. in 2021 claimed that microbiome differences in ASD may reflect ASD-specific dietary preferences, whereas direct associations between the gut microbiome and ASD diagnosis were negligible [32]. In recent years, more attention has been paid to the relationship between eating behaviors and GI symptoms [88]. Leader et al. noted that more GI symptoms were reported in children and adolescents with ASD who experienced feeding problems than those who did not [89]. However, mealtime behaviors showed no significant associations with GI symptoms in our study. Also, the research conducted by Postorino found no evidence of a relationship between GI symptoms and food selectivity in children with ASD [90]. This inconsistency suggested that the problematic mealtime behaviors could not be used to explain GI problems alone and that the dietary imbalance associated with autistic traits was the key contributing factor to GI questions. On this basis, we further speculate that an unbalanced diet in children with autism may contribute to GI symptoms via changes in the microbiome and intestinal permeability [87], and we will continue to explore this direction.

The present study has several strengths. This study jointly used the linear mixed-effects model and mixed-effects logistic regression model, allowing us to examine the relative contributions of autism-linked traits to dietary and GI problems in children with ASD. The study encompassed greater numbers of participants, as well as compared dietary intake and GI symptoms based on PSM. It also controlled for a wider spectrum of covariates than most of the previous studies in ASD [32, 91], thus mitigating confounding bias. The study firstly evaluated diet quality by applying the DBI based on the CDGs (2022) and CFP. Some other strengths of this study were that all subjects were recruited based on research projects, which may help reduce the admission rate bias [92]. The present study was integrated into a comprehensive assessment project, which may help mitigate parents’ recruitment bias stemming from their interest in dietary intake and adverse GI reactions [93]. To control for the investigation bias, all investigators underwent rigorous training, two assessments, and three on-site supervision and feedback sessions, and the evaluation data and reports were reviewed by the different investigators [94]. This study also has several limitations. The questionnaires such as FFQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form (IPAQ-SF), and Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) completed by parents may be subject to social desirability bias and recall bias [15, 95]. Future studies are encouraged to apply specific biochemical parameters as a surrogate for measuring dietary intake. Additionally, the use of Actigraph GT3X + accelerometer and sleep trackers can provide objective monitoring of physical activity and sleep duration. Besides, the absence of strict limits on the severity of autism symptoms may result in unequal distributions of ASD symptom severity, with a smaller sample size of severe severity. The higher prevalence of ASD in boys [16] leads to unequal gender distributions with smaller sample sizes of ASD girls observed in this study. Finally, the mechanisms underlying dietary and GI issues have not been thoroughly elucidated. Future studies should integrate microbiome and metabolome analyses to investigate these potential mechanisms in ASD. In addition to the GI symptoms, diseases such as celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and functional GI disorders frequently co-exist with ASD [96–97], and future studies can also utilize a multi-omics approach to probe the comorbid mechanism of these disorders and autism.

In conclusion, children with ASD had poorer diets, more severe GI symptoms, sensory abnormalities, and mealtime behavior problems than age-matched TDC. ASD symptom severity, compulsive and self-injurious behavior, taste/smell sensitivity, and limited variety were the top contributing traits to poorer diets. An unbalanced dietary intake was a significant independent factor associated with constipation/total GI symptoms. These findings identified the different levels of contributors to dietary and GI questions which provide the largest benefits for the dietary and GI problems of ASD if they were targeted for early detection and optimal treatment.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

GI:

gastrointestinal

ASD:

autism spectrum disorder

TDC:

typically developing children

RRBs:

restricted repetitive behaviors

DSM-5:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,Fifth Edition

APA:

American Psychiatric Association

ADHD:

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

AD:

anxiety disorders

OCD:

obsessive-compulsive disorder

ADI-R:

Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised

ADOS-CSS:

Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale-Calibrated Severity Scale

CDGs:

Chinese Dietary Guidelines

CFP:

Chinese Food Pagoda

FFQ:

food frequency questionnaire

DBI:

Dietary balance index

LBS:

low bound score

DQD:

diet quality distance

6-GSI:

6-item Gastrointestinal Severity Index

ICC:

intraclass correlation

CARS:

Childhood Autism Rating Scale

RBS-R:

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised

SSP:

Short Sensory Profile

BAMBI:

Brief Autism Mealtime Behaviour Inventory

BPFAS:

Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale

SD:

standard deviation

IQR:

interquartile range

CIs:

confidence intervals

ORs:

odds ratios

PSM:

propensity score matching

IPAQ-SF:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form

CSHQ:

Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaires

IBD:

inflammatory bowel disease

References

  1. Salari N, Rasoulpoor S, Rasoulpoor S, Shohaimi S, Jafarpour S, Abdoli N, et al. The global prevalence of autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive systematic review and meta–analysis. Ital J Pediatr. 2022;48:112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Talantseva OI, Romanova RS, Shurdova EM, Dolgorukova TA, Sologub PS, Titova OS, et al. The global prevalence of autism spectrum disorder: a three-level meta -analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1071181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bi XS, Fan XZ, Mi WL, He HZ. A comparison of diagnostic criteria on the autism spectrum disorder observation for ICD-11 and DSM-5. J Int Psychiatry. 2021;48:193–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lord C, Brugha TS, Charman T, Cusack J, Dumas G, Frazier T, et al. Autism spectrum disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Genovese A, Ellerbeck K. Autism spectrum disorder: a review of behavioral and psychiatric challenges across the lifespan. SN Compr Clin Med. 2022;4:217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baraskewich J, von Ranson KM, McCrimmon A, McMorris CA. Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: a scoping review. Autism. 2021;25:1505–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Page SD, Souders MC, Kral TVE, Chao AM, Pinto-Martin J. Correlates of feeding difficulties among children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52:255–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canals-Sans J, Esteban-Figuerola P, Morales-Hidalgo P, Arija V. Do children with autism spectrum disorders eat differently and less adequately than those with subclinical ASD and typical development? EPINED Epidemiological Study. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52:361–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans EW, Must A, Anderson SE, Curtin C, Scampini R, Maslin M, et al. Dietary patterns and body mass index in children with autism and typically developing children. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012;6:399–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Leader G, O’Reilly M, Gilroy SP, Chen JL, Ferrari C, Mannion A. Comorbid feeding and gastrointestinal symptoms, challenging behavior, sensory issues, adaptive functioning and quality of life in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021;24:35–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ball SL, Panter SG, Redley M, Proctor CA, Byrne K, Clare IC, et al. The extent and nature of need for mealtime support among adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56:382–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matson JL, Fodstad JC, Dempsey T. The relationship of children’s feeding problems to core symptoms of autism and PDD-NOS. Autism Spectr Disord. 2009;3:759–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong NN, Ji CY, Li Y, He ZH, Bo HL, Zhao YF. The physical status of children with autism in China. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharp WG, Postorino V, McCracken CE, Berry RC, Criado KK, Burrell TL, et al. Dietary intake, nutrient status, and growth parameters in children with autism spectrum disorder and severe food selectivity: an electronic medical record review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118:1943–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adams SN. Feeding and swallowing issues in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022;18:2311–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schröder SS, Danner UN, Spek AA, van Elburg AA. Problematic eating behaviours of autistic women-A scoping review. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022;30:510–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Margari L, Marzulli L, Gabellone A, de Giambattista C. Eating and mealtime behaviors in patients with autism spectrum disorder: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:2083–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aponte CA, Romanczyk RG. Assessment of feeding problems in children with autism spectrum disorder. Res Autism Spectr Disorders. 2016;21:61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herndon AC, DiGuiseppi C, Johnson SL, Leiferman J, Reynolds A. Does nutritional intake differ between children with autism spectrum disorders and children with typical development? J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:212–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marí-Bauset S, Llopis-González A, Zazpe I, Marí-Sanchis A, Suárez-Varela MM. Comparison of nutritional status between children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children in the Mediterranean Region (Valencia, Spain). Autism. 2017;21:310–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zulkifli MN, Kadar M, Fenech M, Hamzaid NH. Interrelation of food selectivity, oral sensory sensitivity, and nutrient intake in children with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review. Res Autism Spectr Disorders. 2022;93:101928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patton SR, Odar Stough C, Pan TY, Holcomb LO, Dreyer Gillette ML. Associations between autism symptom severity and mealtime behaviors in young children presented with an unfamiliar food. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;103:103676.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahearn WH, Castine T, Nault K, Green G. An assessment of food acceptance in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31:505–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matson JL, Fodstad JC. The treatment of food selectivity and other feeding problems in children with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2009;3:455–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zobel-Lachiusa J, Andrianopoulos MV, Mailloux Z, Cermak SA. Sensory differences and mealtime behavior in children with autism. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69:6905185050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malhi P, Saini S, Bharti B, Attri S, Sankhyan N. Sensory processing dysfunction and mealtime behavior problems in children with autism. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:842–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hirota T, King BH. Autism spectrum disorder: a review. JAMA. 2023;329:157–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang JY, Ma B, Wang JJ, Zhang ZY, Chen O. Global prevalence of autism spectrum disorder and its gastrointestinal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:963102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Holingue C, Poku O, Pfeiffer D, Murray S, Fallin MD. Gastrointestinal concerns in children with autism spectrum disorder: a qualitative study of family experiences. Autism. 2022;26:1698–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leader G, Abberton C, Cunningham S, Gilmartin K, Grudzien M, Higgin E, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2022;14:1471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Settanni CR, Bibbò S, Ianiro G, Rinninella E, Cintoni M, Mele MC, et al. Gastrointestinal involvement of autism spectrum disorder: focus on gut microbiota. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;15:599–622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yap CX, Henders AK, Alvares GA, Wood DLA, Krause L, Tyson GW, et al. Autism-related dietary preferences mediate autism-gut microbiome associations. Cell. 2021;184:5916–31e17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wei J, Liu S, Cheng Y, Yang WF, Zhu ZH, Zeng LX. Association of infant physical development and rapid growth with pubertal onset among girls in rural China. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e216831.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Vannucci A, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Ranzenhofer LM, Kelly NR, Hannallah LM, Pickworth CK, et al. Puberty and the manifestations of loss of control eating in children and adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 2014;47:738–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Nadon G, Feldman DE, Dunn W, Gisel E. Association of sensory processing and eating problems in children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res Treat. 2011;2011:541926.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Molina-López J, Leiva-García B, Planells E, Planells P. Food selectivity, nutritional inadequacies, and mealtime behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder compared to neurotypical children. Int J Eat Disord. 2021;54:2155–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dupont WD. Power calculations for matched case-control studies. Biometrics. 1988;44:1157–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang LL, Luo XM, Tan Y, Su XY. Study on reproducibility and validity of food frequency questionnaire in Guangzhou. Chin J Disease Control. 2013;17:711–14.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gao XL, Tian ZZ, Zhao D, Li KY, Zhao YM, Xu L, et al. Associations between adherence to four a priori dietary indexes and cardiometabolic risk factors among hyperlipidemic patients. Nutrients. 2021;13:2179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Adams JB, Johansen LJ, Powell LD, Quig D, Rubin RA. Gastrointestinal flora and gastrointestinal status in children with autism–comparisons to typical children and correlation with autism severity. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Thulasi V, Steer RA, Monteiro IM, Ming X. Overall severities of gastrointestinal symptoms in pediatric outpatients with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2019;23:524–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaat A, Lecavalier L. Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Encyclopedia Autism Spectr Disorders. 2013;590–3.

  43. Nordin V, Gillberg C, Nydén A. The Swedish version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale in a clinical setting. J Autism Dev Disord. 1998;28:69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiao Y, Chen R, Ke XY, Cheng L, Chu KK, Lu ZH, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms predict symptom severity of autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:971–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lam KSL, Aman MG. The repetitive behavior Scale-Revised: independent validation in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37:855–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li JY, Jiang ZM, Cui GX, Guo LM, Zhu JL. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) in children with autism. Chin Pediatr Integr Tradit West Med., Rogers SJ, Hepburn S, Wehner E. Parent reports of sensory symptoms in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003;33:631–42.

  47. Tomchek SD, Dunn W. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou BR, Xu Q, Lu P, Yu X, Dunn W, Xu X. Reliability and validity analysis and clinical application of the Chinese version of Short Sensory Profile. China Conference Proceedings Database. 2016;238–9.

  49. Lukens CT, Linscheid TR. Development and validation of an inventory to assess mealtime behavior problems in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008;38:342–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Selya AS, Rose JS, Dierker LC, Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Front Psychol. 2012;3:111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Al-Zalabani AH, Al-Jabree AH, Zeidan ZA. Is cesarean section delivery associated with autism spectrum disorder? Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2019;24:11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Turner T, Pihur V, Chakravarti A. Quantifying and modeling birth order effects in autism. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Reynolds AM, Malow BA. Sleep and autism spectrum disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011;58:685–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dong YL, Zhang WB. Analysis of influencing factors of in children aged 6 to 12 years with autism spectrum disorder. Maternal Child Health Care China. 2021;36:2459–61.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Urbonaite G, Knyzeliene A, Bunn FS, Smalskys A, Neniskyte U. The impact of maternal high-fat diet on offspring neurodevelopment. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:909762.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Hubbard KL, Anderson SE, Curtin C, Must A, Bandini LG. A comparison of food refusal related to characteristics of food in children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1981–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Malhi P, Venkatesh L, Bharti B, Singhi P. Feeding problems and nutrient intake in children with and without autism: a comparative study. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84:283–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Buro AW, Gray HL, Kirby RS, Berkman K, Agazzi H, Shaffer-Hudkins E. Diet quality in an ethnically diverse sample of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder compared with nationally representative data. Disabil Health J. 2021;14:100981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Esteban-Figuerola P, Canals J, Fernández-Cao JC, Arija Val V. Differences in food consumption and nutritional intake between children with autism spectrum disorders and typically developing children: a meta-analysis. Autism. 2019;23:1079–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sharp WG, Berry RC, McCracken C, Nuhu NN, Marvel E, Saulnier CA, et al. Feeding problems and nutrient intake in children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis and comprehensive review of the literature. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43:2159–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Diolordi L, del Balzo V, Bernabei P, Vitiello V, Donini LM. Eating habits and dietary patterns in children with autism. Eat Weight Disord. 2014;19:295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kral TVE, Eriksen WT, Souders MC, Pinto-Martin JA. Eating behaviors, diet quality, and gastrointestinal symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorders: a brief review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28:548–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yeung SSY, Chan R, Li L, Chan D, Leung J, Leung T-F. Eating behaviors and diet quality in Chinese preschoolers with and without autism spectrum disorder: a case-control study. J Pediatr. 2021;237:258–66e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Al-Thbiany A, Farghal S, Al-Harbi G, Abduallah M, Al-Rehaly R, Al-Johani G et al. Assessment of some nutritional risk factors that predispose to Autism among Preschool & School Saudi Children Living in AL-Madinah Al-Monawarah City. 2017. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsezu.2017.238392.

  66. Bandini LG, Anderson SE, Curtin C, Cermak S, Evans EW, Scampini R, et al. Food selectivity in children with autism spectrum disorders and typically developing children. J Pediatr. 2010;157:259–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zimmer MH, Hart LC, Manning-Courtney P, Murray DS, Bing NM, Summer S. Food variety as a predictor of nutritional status among children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:549–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Li Y-J, Xie X-N, Lei X, Li Y-M, Lei XY. Global prevalence of obesity, overweight and underweight in children, adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020;21:e13123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Muller CL, Anacker AMJ, Veenstra-VanderWeele J. The serotonin system in autism spectrum disorder: from biomarker to animal models. Neuroscience. 2016;321:24–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Marler S, Ferguson BJ, Lee EB, Peters B, Williams KC, McDonnell E, et al. Association of rigid-compulsive behavior with functional constipation in autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:1673–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Eswaran S, Muir J, Chey WD. Fiber and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:718–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kral TVE, Souders MC, Tompkins VH, Remiker AM, Eriksen WT, Pinto-Martin JA. Child eating behaviors and caregiver feeding practices in children with autism spectrum disorders. Public Health Nurs. 2015;32:488–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lane AE, Geraghty ME, Young GS, Rostorfer JL. Problem eating behaviors in autism spectrum disorder are associated with suboptimal daily nutrient intake and taste/smell sensitivity. ICAN: Infant Child Adolesc Nutr. 2014;6:172–80.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Coulthard H, Blissett J. Fruit and vegetable consumption in children and their mothers. Moderating effects of child sensory sensitivity. Appetite. 2009;52:410–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Chistol LT, Bandini LG, Must A, Phillips S, Cermak SA, Curtin C. Sensory sensitivity and food selectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48:583–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Hodder RK, O’Brien KM, Stacey FG, Wyse RJ, Clinton-McHarg T, Tzelepis F, et al. Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD008552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Oudijn M, Linders J, Mocking R, Lok A, van Elburg A, Denys D. Psychopathological and neurobiological overlap between anorexia nervosa and self-injurious behavior: a narrative review and conceptual hypotheses. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:756238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Johnson CR, Turner K, Stewart PA, Schmidt B, Shui A, Macklin E, et al. Relationships between feeding problems, behavioral characteristics and nutritional quality in children with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:2175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. McElhanon BO, McCracken C, Karpen S, Sharp WG. Gastrointestinal symptoms in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014;133:872–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Maenner MJ, Arneson CL, Levy SE, Kirby RS, Nicholas JS, Durkin MS. Brief report: Association between behavioral features and gastrointestinal problems among children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:1520–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Madra M, Ringel R, Margolis KG. Gastrointestinal issues and autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021;44:69–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Mazurek MO, Vasa RA, Kalb LG, Kanne SM, Rosenberg D, Keefer A, et al. Anxiety, sensory over-responsivity, and gastrointestinal problems in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41:165–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Berding K, Donovan SM. Diet can impact microbiota composition in children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:515.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Shin N-R, Whon TW, Bae J-W. Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:496–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:13780–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Valenzuela-Zamora AF, Ramírez-Valenzuela DG, Ramos-Jiménez A. Food selectivity and its implications associated with gastrointestinal disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nutrients. 2022;14:2660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Kerwin ME, Eicher PS, Gelsinger J. Parental report of eating problems and gastrointestinal symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders. Children’s Health Care. 2005;34:217–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Leader G, Tuohy E, Chen JL, Mannion A, Gilroy SP. Feeding problems, gastrointestinal symptoms, challenging behavior and sensory issues in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020;50:1401–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Postorino V, Sanges V, Giovagnoli G, Fatta LM, De Peppo L, Armando M, et al. Clinical differences in children with autism spectrum disorder with and without food selectivity. Appetite. 2015;92:126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Mathew NE, Mallitt KA, Masi A, Katz T, Walker AK, Morris MJ, et al. Dietary intake in children on the autism spectrum is altered and linked to differences in autistic traits and sensory processing styles. Autism Res. 2022;15:1824–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Davies HT, Crombie IK. Bias in case-control studies. Hosp Med. 2000;61:279–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lee W, Bindman J, Ford T, Glozier N, Moran P, Stewart R, et al. Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Guan LZ, Shi YM. The theory, design and practice of case-control studies in medical research. Beijing Med J. 2020;42:660–3.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene IS, Ockene JK. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:389–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Zambrano S, Parma B, Morabito V, Borini S, Romaniello R, Molteni M, et al. Celiac disease in autism spectrum disorder: data from an Italian child cohort. Ital J Pediatr. 2023;49:79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhu JY, Meng HR, Zhang L, Li Y. Exploring the molecular mechanism of comorbidity of autism spectrum disorder and inflammatory bowel disease by combining multiple data sets. J Transl Med. 2023;21:372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Lasheras I, Seral P, Latorre E, Barroso E, Gracia-García P, Santabárbara J. Microbiota and gut-brain axis dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder: evidence for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;47:101874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the participants and their parents for their continuous and enthusiastic participation in the investigation.

Funding

The study was supported by the Social-Area Science and Technology Research Program of Foshan City (Department of Science and Technology of Foshan City, 2120001008276), the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province, 2019B030335001), the Research Program of Guangzhou Disabled Persons’ Federation (K19-51000-052), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872639), and the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2021A1515010439).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Child Healthcare, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, 528000, P.R. China

    Saijun Huang, Hong Yu & Xi Su

  2. Research Center of Children and Adolescent Psychological and Behavioral Development, Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China

    Hailin Li, Jin Jing, Tingfeng Gu, Xiaoxuan Ou, Shuolin Pan & Yanna Zhu

  3. Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China

    Yanna Zhu

Authors
  1. Hailin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saijun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tingfeng Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoxuan Ou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shuolin Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yanna Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xi Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xi Su, Yanna Zhu, and Jin Jing were responsible for study design, data acquisition, and funding acquisition. HailinLi contributed to the investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and editing. Saijun Huang, Hong Yu, Tingfeng Gu, Xiaoxuan Ou, and Shuolin Pan aided in data collection and administration. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanna Zhu or Xi Su.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Committee of the School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University (No. 067 [2022]). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants’ parents/caregivers for the anonymous publication of the study findings.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article has been updated: Affiliations 1 and 2 should be switched

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Huang, S., Jing, J. et al. Dietary intake and gastrointestinal symptoms are altered in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: the relative contribution of autism-linked traits. Nutr J 23, 27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-00930-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-00930-8

Keywords

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us