Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Association between dietary inflammatory index scores and the increased disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study

Nutrition Journal volume 21, Article number: 53 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diet plays an important role in regulating inflammation, which is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to investigate the association between the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) scores and RA activity.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 184 patients with RA in rheumatology clinic in Kermanshah city, Iran, in 2020. RA was diagnosed according to the criteria of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/ European League against Rheumatism. The overall inflammatory potential of the diet was extracted from a validated 168-item food frequency questioner (FFQ) using the DII. RA disease activity was assessed using Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS-28) scores. Logistic regression and one-way ANOVA/ ANCOVA were conducted.

Results

Individuals in the highest DII quartile had the significantly higher odds of positive C-reactive protein than those in the lowest quartile of the DII scores (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.16 – 17.41, P = 0.029). A statistically significant downward linear trend in fat-free mass and weight were observed with increasing the DII quartiles (P = 0.003, P = 0.019, respectively). Patients in the highest DII quartile had higher DAS-28 scores than those in the first quartile (Mean difference: 1.16, 95% CI 0.51 – 1.81, P < 0.001) and second quartile of the DII scores (Mean difference: 1.0, 95% CI 0.34 – 1.65, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our results indicated that reducing inflammation through diet might be one of the therapeutic strategies to control and reduce the disease activity in RA patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory autoimmune disease affecting about 1% of the general population at the prime of their lives. This disease is twice as common in women as in men, but the reason is not clear [1]. RA involves considerable inflammation, stiffness, swelling, pain, and destruction of joints that ultimately leads to erosive joint damage and progressive disability [2]. RA is associated with a higher risk of infection, chronic respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [3]. Furthermore, some medications prescribed in RA patients such as methotrexate and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have adverse effects on renal function [4]. As RA is a multifactorial disease [5], the increased understanding of contributing factors to the progression or remission of disease can lead to the development of therapeutic approaches.

Patients with RA have significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) than healthy subjects [6]. Serum CRP levels in RA patients are strongly correlated with the disease activity, and the response to treatment usually does not occur unless the levels of this inflammation marker decrease [6, 7]. Diet is a modifiable environmental factor that plays an important role in regulating inflammation and immune function [8]. Some nutritional studies suggest that the intakes of foods with anti-inflammatory properties such as nuts, tea, fish, olive oil, and vegetables are associated with a lower risk or severity of RA [9, 10]. A recent clinical trial also shows that supplementation with fish oil can reduce disease activity score 28 (DAS-28) and the number of tender joints in patients with RA [11]. Nonetheless, the study of single foods is inadequate for taking into account cumulative effects among foods eaten together free-living people [12]. In this regard, a clinical trial shows that fish oil in combination with olive oil has more effects on improving RA [13]. In nutritional studies, several dietary quality indices have been designed to address this issue and assess the effects of overall diet.

In 2014, Shivappa et al. designed a literature-derived and population-based dietary index, named the dietary inflammatory index (DII), to quantify the overall inflammatory potential of diet [14]. DII has been shown in nutritional epidemiological studies to predict the relationship between overall diet and levels of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers including IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, CRP, and TNF-α [15, 16]. Recent evidence suggest using DII to predict the risk of diseases with an inflammatory etiology such as cardiovascular disease (CVDs) and mortality [17,18,19]. A recent case–control study revealed that inflammatory diets, indicated by higher DII scores, were associated with the increased odds of RA [20]. Although RA is a lifelong disease, further knowledge on the association between overall diet and RA can be helpful in the remission of the disease. In this study, we go one step further by evaluating whether higher DII scores indicate higher level of inflammatory diet.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with RA attending the outpatient rheumatology clinic in Kermanshah city, Iran, in 2020. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in accordance with the principle of the Helsinki Declaration (ID: IR.KUMS.REC.1400.219). All participants were simple randomly selected and they were informed of the objectives and benefits of the study as well as possible health risks at the time of enrollment. Then, written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Patients who were interested in participating were invited to a screening visit by the study rheumatologist using a simple random method. A key inclusion criterion was definite rheumatoid arthritis based on the criteria of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/ European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) [21]. Briefly, the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for Rheumatoid arthritis include the number and location of involved joints (score from 0 to 5), serologic abnormality (score range 0–3), increased acute-phase response (score from 0 to 1), and symptom duration (score from 0 to 1). Participants who had at least a score of six with the confirmed presence of synovitis in at least one joint which is not better explained by another disease were diagnosed as definite RA. Other inclusion criteria were female gender (higher prevalence of RA, better cooperation, and consideration the participants’ homogeneity), an age of 18 years or older and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, lactation, serious diseases (such as cancer, renal failure, and heart failure), other connective tissue or joint diseases (such as gout, lupus, and ankylosing spondylitis), inflammatory bowel disease, Cushing's syndrome, bone or joint surgery, and adherence to any specific dietary regimen. Finally, 184 eligible RA patients were included in this study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Disease activity score 28

Disease activity score 28 (DAS-28) is a validated index for monitoring the disease activity of RA. This index is a multi-dimensional instrument that utilizes the number of swollen and tender joints, the levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR), and the total self-assessment of disease activity by visual analogue scale (VAS) of general health. In this study, all patients were examined by the study rheumatologist to determine the number of swollen joints (SJ) and tender joints (TJ), and then DAS-28 scores were calculated using the following formula [22]:

$$\mathrm{DAS}-28=\left[0.56\;\sqrt{\mathrm{TJ}}\right]+\left[0.28\;\sqrt{\mathrm{SJ}}\right]+\left[0.7\;\mathrm{Ln}\;\left(\mathrm{ESR}\right)\right]+\left[0.014\;\mathrm{VAS}\right]$$

Dietary intake assessment

In the current study, a reliable and valid 168-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess usual dietary intake [23]. FFQs assess dietary intake during the last year ranking frequency of each food/beverage on a scale from “never or < 1 standard serving size per month” to “ ≥ 6 standard serving sizes per day”. Participants reported the daily, weekly, monthly, or annual consumption of each food item according to its standard serving size in the questionnaire. A trained dietitian collected dietary data from each participant through face-to-face interviews. The amount of each food item was converted to weight (grams/day) with the use of the Iranian household measures. Then, the energy and nutrients of each food item were obtained using the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA, release 22, 2009) food composition data subsumed in the Nutritionist IV software (First Databank Inc., Hearst Corp., San Bruno, CA, USA). We also used the Iranian food composition table for Iranian food items not enclosed in Nutritionist IV software [24]. Participants with a daily energy intake outside of predefined limits (± 3 standard deviation: 800–4200 kcal/day) were excluded from the final analysis [25,26,27].

Dietary inflammatory index

DII is a literature-derived and population-based dietary index designated to quantify the overall effects of diet on inflammatory mediators. The scoring algorithm of DII includes 45 food parameters in which each parameter has an inflammatory effect score in the range of “-1” (maximum anti-inflammatory) to “ + 1” (maximum pro-inflammatory) based on its effect on six known markers (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, CRP and TNFα) [28]. However, 32 food items (including: energy, carbohydrate, fiber, protein, total fat, monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), saturated fatty acid (SFA), trans fat, n-3 fatty acids, n-6 fatty acids, cholesterol, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, vitamin B9, vitamin B12, vitamin C, vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E, β-Carotene, zinc, selenium (Se), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), caffeine, onion, garlic, pepper, and green/black tea) were available for calculating the DII. In the DII calculation process, we subtracted the intake of each food parameter from the relevant global mean intake and then divided it by the global standard deviation intake to obtain a Z score. This Z score is converted to percentile score, then doubled and subtracted from “1”. This value is multiplied by the corresponding inflammatory effect score to obtain the “food parameter-specific DII score”. Finally, all of the food parameter-specific DII scores are added to obtain a total DII score for each individual [28].

Anthropometric assessment

A trained dietitian assessed the weight and height of all participants under the standard conditions. Weight was measured with minimal clothing and without shoes to the nearest 0.1 kgusing a digital scale (Seca 831, Hamburg, Germany). Height was measured without shoes to the nearest 0.1 cmusing a wall-mounted stadiometer (Seca 206, Hamburg, Germany). Then, body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters. Body fat mass (FM) and body fat-free mass (FFM) was measured with the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method using a Tanita BC- 418 body composition analyzer (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Before the BIA measure, participants were asked to refrain from consuming caffeine-containing products and exercising and to be well hydrated [29].

Biochemical assessment

Blood samples from all patients were obtained at the beginning of the study. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) that determination is an essential base for patient disposition with rheumatologic conditions and a surrogate marker of the acute phase reaction and is affected by rising concentrations of fibrinogen, the main clotting protein, and alpha globulins during an inflammatory reaction was measured using the Westergren technique [30]. Ethylene-diamine tetra-acetate (EDTA) potassium anticoagulant was added to the samples and diluted with 0.85% NaCl solution and poured into Westergren pipe with ant “0” (1 mm) sample. The distance between the top of the deposited erythrocyte column and the plasma meniscus was recorded within 1 h/mm. The samples also were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min for measuring the titration of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and antibodies against cyclic citrulline peptide (anti-CCP) using the ELISA method (Seramun Diagnostica GmbH, Heidesee, Germany) and rheumatoid factor (RF) and C-reactive protein (CRP) using the latex agglutination turbidimetric immunoassay. ANA is a various group of autoantibodies that are important to the assessment of patients with a wide range of rheumatic diseases and usual properties of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. These antibodies are helpful biomarkers for screening and diagnosis and provide insights for comprehending disease mechanisms [31, 32]. Anti-CCP is among the most specific autoantibody systems explained in RA and has a role in the pathogenesis of the disease [33]. Also, it is very specific for RA and is appeared in at least 60–75% of the patients studied. so, it is a new and important serologic diagnostic marker for the diagnosis of RA [34]. RF is an autoantibody that is directed to immunoglobulin G and the most characteristic of the autoimmune response is the presence of such antibodies [35]. RF find in up to 75% of patients with RA depending on the stage of the disease. The value of these antibodies is usually related to the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases [36]. CRP is a nonspecific acute-phase reactant that is an integral part of the innate immune system. It is synthesized in response to inflammation and/or tissue injury, and its increment is proportionate with inflammatory mediators (cytokines) produced by cells actively participating in the milieu of tissue injuries such as IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and TGF-β. The level of CRP tends to be proportional to the severity of the inflammatory process. So, levels of this marker are sensitive to narrow changes in the acute-phase response [37].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16 software. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine the normality distribution of quantitative variables. Quantitative variables with normal distribution are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), quantitative variables with non-normal distribution are presented as median [interquartile range], and others are presented as numbers (percentage). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s Post-hoc test was used to analyze quantitative variables with normal distribution, and Kruskal–Wallis H test was used to analyze quantitative variables with non-normal distribution. The odds ratio and its 95% CI for assessing the associations between qualitative variables (e.g. CRP) and DII quartiles was calculated by the binary logistic regression. Adjusted means of DAS-28 scores across the DII quartiles were obtained using ANCOVA. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The current study consisted of 184 eligible patients with RA. All patients received medication for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, including Corticosteroids, Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as Methotrexate, Hydroxychloroquine, Sulfasalazine, Azathioprine, and biological DMARDs. The mean age was 49.1 years (SD = 12.91), mean weight was 69.21 kg (SD = 13.34) the mean BMI was 27.25 kg/m2 (SD = 5.11). The most of the patients were a housekeeper (90.8%) and had a positive CRP (85.3%).

The general characteristics of the RA patients according to the quartiles (Q) of the DII scores are shown in Table 1. The mean age and median duration of disease did not differ significantly among the quartiles of DII scores (P > 0.05). In addition, the distribution of the patients in the terms of having a positive ANA, a positive anti-CCP, a positive RF, and university education and using dietary supplements was not significantly different across the quartiles of the DII scores.

Table 1 General Characteristics of participants across quartiles (Q) of the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) scores
Full size table

The values of the anthropometric characteristics and energy intake of participants according to the quartiles of the DII scores are shown in Table 2. The mean energy intake, weight, fat-free mass, and fat mass showed a significant difference between the quartiles of DII scores (P < 0.05). The further analysis showed a linear trend toward decreasing fat-free mass, weight, and energy intake in patients with increasing quartiles of the DII scores (P-trend = 0.003, P-trend = 0.019 and P-trend = 0.014 respectively). The fat-free mass trend remained significant after adjusting the effect of weight (P-trend = 0.040). The mean BMI and waist circumference were not significantly different across the quartiles of DII scores (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Anthropometric characteristics and energy intake of participants across quartiles (Q) of the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) scores
Full size table

The odds of having a positive CRP across the quartiles of the DII scores are illustrated in Fig. 1. The patients in the highest DII quartile (higher inflammatory diet) had the higher odds of having a positive CRP than those in the lowest quartile of the DII scores (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.16 – 17.4, P = 0.029). Totally, a significant upward linear trend in the odds of having a positive CRP was observed across the quartiles of the DII scores (P-trend = 0.009). The mean of DAS 28 scores of patients with RA across the quartiles of the DII scores are illustrated in Table 3. In the crude model, the patients in the highest DII quartile had the higher DAS 28 scores than those in the lowest quartile of the DII scores (Mean difference: 1.16, 95% CI 0.51 – 1.81, P < 0.001). In the energy-adjusted model as the adjusted model 1, the patients in the highest DII quartile had the higher DAS 28 scores than those in the lowest quartile of the DII scores (Mean difference: 1.51, 95% CI 0.99 – 2.09, P < 0.001). In the adjusted model 2, after the adjustment of potential confounding factors including energy intake, age, fat mass, fat free mass, weight, duration of disease, and supplement use, the patients in the highest DII quartile had the higher DAS 28 scores than those in the lowest quartile of the DII scores (Mean difference: 1.68, 95% CI 1.02 – 2.13, P < 0.001). Totally, significant upward linear trends were observed in the mean of DAS 28 scores across the quartiles of the DII scores (P-trends < 0.001) in all of the models (Table 3). Figure 2 shows the association of dietary inflammatory index with individual factor which were included in DAS-28 score. There was a significant relationship of DII scores with VAS of general health (correlation coefficient: 0.41, P = 0.001), number of swollen joints (correlation coefficient: 0.29, P = 0.001), number of tender joints (correlation coefficient: 0.31, P = 0.001), and ESR (correlation coefficient: 0.19, P = 0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Odds ratio of having a positive C-reactive protein across the quartiles of the dietary inflammatory index. P-trend was obtained from the Binary Logistic Regression

Full size image
Table 3 The mean of DAS-28 scores across the quartiles of dietary inflammatory index
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationship of dietary inflammatory index with individual factors of DAS-28 scores

Full size image

Discussion

The main finding of the current study was an association of the higher inflammatory diet with the increased activity of rheumatoid arthritis disease, independent of potential confounding factors. This study also provided additional evidence of the relationship of the dietary inflammatory index with inflammatory markers such as CRP and ESR. A significant upward linear trend in the odds of having a positive CRP was observed across DII quartiles scores. Moreover, there was a significant relationship of DII scores with fat free mass, VAS of general health, number of swollen joints, number of tender joints and ESR.

The finding indicated that the higher inflammatory potential of diet was associated with the elevated activity of rheumatoid arthritis disease and its related factors including ESR, VAS of general health, number of swollen joints, number of tender joints and CRP. To our knowledge, there was limited study conducted on the association of DII score and activity of rheumatoid arthritis disease and its components. Similar to our findings, Tandorost et al. in a study on patients with rheumatoid arthritis reported that the highest DII had significantly higher serum inflammatory (hs-CRP and TNF) and clinical markers (The number of tender joints and DAS-28 score) [38]. In a cohort study by Dainty et al. in the UK Biobank population was shown a significant association between inflammation (CRP) and diet and RA [39]. Also, diets having high amounts of fruits and vegetables are associated with low levels of hs-CRP [40]. In a cross-sectional and longitudinal study conducted in Japan showed that anti-inflammatory change in DII score was related with low disease activity [41]. According to the findings of a case–control study, adherence to an inflammatory diet such as Western Diet increases the chances of developing RA, while following a healthy diet can reduce the incidence of the disease [42]. In fact, unhealthy dietary patterns like high DII diets due to their high glycemic load and the presence of certain components such as refined carbohydrates and sweeteners in them can cause harmful effects such as overproduction of free radicals and reduced total antioxidant capacity (TAC), insulin resistance, and disruption of lipid profile levels [43,44,45]. These conditions ultimately lead to non-communicable chronic diseases (NCCD) such as diabetes, obesity, and RA. Previous observational studies have shown that consuming rich sources of omega-3 fatty acids such as fish (twice a week) can be associated with DAS-28 reduction [46]. A meta-analysis of 20 published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has shown that omega-3 fatty acids supplementation reduces eight disease-activity–related markers in patients with RA [47]. According to recent recommendations, RA patients should restrict red meats, processed meats, sugar, and beverages on diet, substitute green tea for coffee, and increase the intake of antioxidants, phytochemicals, vitamins, and flavonoids to reduce inflammation and complications of the RA disease [48]. Results of a rheumatoid arthritis registry indicated that sugar and desserts might aggravate symptoms in arthritis patients, while spinach, fish, and blueberries can improve them [49]. In another study by Linos et al., it was shown that high consumption of olive oil with cooked vegetables in the diet reduces the risk of arthritis, which is probably due to the immune-boosting effects of olive oil as well as high levels of phenolic compounds and antioxidants in vegetables that reduce the levels of inflammatory mediators in the body [50, 51]. Therefore, it seems that adherence to a diet with low DII scores might be helpful in reducing the symptoms and disease activity in patients with RA.

Another result of the study showed that the amount of fat-free mass decreases with increasing the inflammatory index of the diet. In line with this result, previous studies showed that with the increase of inflammatory markers in the body, the amount of fat-free mass decreases [52, 53]. Inflammation causes more muscle loss by increasing muscle catabolism, which in turn can lead to weight loss in the advanced stages of arthritis [54, 55]. Evidence suggests that cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β are elevated in patients with RA [56]. Increased cytokines lead to chronic systemic inflammation in these patients. This pattern of inflammation in patients with RA increases the chances of developing certain diseases such as cancer [57] and atherosclerosis [58]. Reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and consequently reducing inflammation is one of the important approaches in the treatment of RA. This is while drug treatments to reduce inflammation in patients with RA are usually associated with some side effects [58]. Increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines is one of the effects of inflammatory diets in the body [59]. Therefore, there is a strong possibility that consuming diets with high inflammatory index by patients with RA can lead to worsening of the disease and its symptoms. Conversely, by consuming an anti-inflammatory diet, there is a possibility of reducing the severity of the disease and pain in patients with RA due to the reduction of pro inflammatory factors. Some studies have shown the effect of anti-inflammatory diets on reducing the complications of arthritis [60]. Anti-inflammatory diets can be considered as a valuable and effective approach to treatment of RA as they have no side effects and are economical, comfortable and compatible with life. We suggest that in the protocols and guidelines related to the treatment of RA, dietary assessment of patients be considered as a part of treatment and according to this assessment the necessary recommendations to follow an anti-inflammatory diet should be educated and monitored.

Our study was strengthened by adjustment for potential confounding factors and the similarity among DII quartiles in terms of general characteristics. The limitation of the present study is the fact that it cannot conclude a cause–effect relationship between inflammatory potential of diets and activity of RA because of the cross-sectional design. Moreover, this study was conducted only among women, and the results may not be generalizable to men.

Conclusion

This study concludes that patients with rheumatoid arthritis often follow a poor diet with a high inflammatory index, so our results show that adherence to a diet with a low DII can lead to decreasing the level of inflammatory factors and reduce the DAS28 levels that cause the decrease of disease activity in these patients. Prospective longitudinal studies or clinical trials are needed to elucidate whether the low DII diet can induce relevant improvements in RA disease activity.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

RA:

Rheumatoid Arthritis

FFQ:

Food Frequency Questioner

DII:

Dietary Inflammatory Index

DAS28:

Disease Activity Score 28

CRP:

C-reactive protein

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

ACR/EULAR:

American College of Rheumatology/ European League against Rheumatism

VAS:

Visual Analogue Scale

ESR:

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

SJ:

Swollen Joints

TJ:

Tender Joints

MUFA:

Monounsaturated fatty acid

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acid

SFA:

Saturated fatty acid

BMI:

Body Mass Index

FM:

Fat Mass

FFM:

Fat-free mass

BIA:

Bioelectrical impedance analysis

ANA:

Anti-nuclear antibodies

Anti-CCP:

Antibodies against cyclic Citrulline Peptide

RF:

Rheumatoid Factor

TAC:

Total Antioxidant Capacity

NCCD:

Non-communicable chronic diseases

DMARDs:

Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

References

  1. Sweeney SE, Firestein GS. Rheumatoid arthritis: regulation of synovial inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36(3):372–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2205–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sparks JA. Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):Itc1-itc 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karie S, Gandjbakhch F, Janus N, Launay-Vacher V, Rozenberg S, Mai Ba CU, et al. Kidney disease in RA patients: prevalence and implication on RA-related drugs management: the MATRIX study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(3):350–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sundström B, Johansson I, Rantapää-Dahlqvist S. Diet and alcohol as risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis: a nested case-control study. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(3):533–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shrivastava AK, Singh H, Raizada A, Singh S, Pandey A, Singh N, et al. Inflammatory markers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Allergol Immunopathol. 2015;43(1):81–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawes P, Fowler P, Clarke S, Fisher J, Lawton A, Shadforth M. Rheumatoid arthritis: treatment which controls the C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate reduces radiological progression. Rheumatology. 1986;25(1):44–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maslowski KM, Mackay CR. Diet, gut microbiota and immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(1):5–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosalmanzadeh N, Jandari S, Soleimani D, ShadmandFoumani Moghadam MR, Khorramrouz F, Araste A, et al. Major dietary patterns and food groups in relation to rheumatoid arthritis in newly diagnosed patients. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8(12):6477–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosell M, Wesley AM, Rydin K, Klareskog L, Alfredsson L. Dietary fish and fish oil and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology. 2009;20(6):896–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Veselinovic M, Vasiljevic D, Vucic V, Arsic A, Petrovic S, Tomic-Lucic A, et al. Clinical Benefits of n-3 PUFA and ɤ-Linolenic Acid in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):325.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13(1):3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berbert AA, Kondo CR, Almendra CL, Matsuo T, Dichi I. Supplementation of fish oil and olive oil in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2005;21(2):131–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wirth MD, Burch J, Shivappa N, Violanti JM, Burchfiel CM, Fekedulegn D, et al. Association of a dietary inflammatory index with inflammatory indices and metabolic syndrome among police officers. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):986–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shivappa N, Hébert JR, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Langlois M, Debruyne E, et al. Associations between dietary inflammatory index and inflammatory markers in the Asklepios Study. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(4):665–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shivappa N, Hebert JR, Marcos A, Diaz LE, Gomez S, Nova E, et al. Association between dietary inflammatory index and inflammatory markers in the HELENA study. Molecular Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(6):10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ji M, Hong X, Chen M, Chen T, Wang J, Zhang N. Dietary inflammatory index and cardiovascular risk and mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Medicine. 2020;99(20):e20303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen QJ, Ou L, Li K, Ou FR. Meta-analysis of the relationship between Dietary Inflammatory Index and esophageal cancer risk. Medicine. 2020;99(49):e23539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia-Arellano A, Martínez-González MA, Ramallal R, Salas-Salvadó J, Hébert JR, Corella D, et al. Dietary inflammatory index and all-cause mortality in large cohorts: The SUN and PREDIMED studies. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2019;38(3):1221–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jandari S, et al. Dietary inflammatory index and healthy eating index-2015 are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(18):6007–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021001105.

  21. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Farheen K, Agarwal SK. Assessment of disease activity and treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Manag Care Pharm: JMPC. 2011;17(9 Suppl B):S09-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Azar M, Sarkisian E. Food composition table of Iran. Tehran: National Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Shaheed Beheshti University; 1980. p. 65.

  25. Tehrani AN, et al. The association between nutrition knowledge and adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern in Iranian female adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2019;33(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2018-0188.

  26. Bolori P, Setaysh L, Rasaei N, Jarrahi F, Yekaninejad MS, Mirzaei K. Adherence to a healthy plant diet may reduce inflammatory factors in obese and overweight women-a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(4):2795–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Babazadeh-Anvigh B, Abedi V, Heydari S, Karamati D, Babajafari S, Najafi A, et al. Healthy eating index-2015 and bone mineral density among adult Iranian women. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shivappa N, Steck SE, Hurley TG, Hussey JR, Hébert JR. Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(8):1689–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kermani TA, et al. Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(6):866–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.10.005.

  31. Meroni PL, Schur PH. ANA screening: an old test with new recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(8):1420–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Agmon-Levin N, Damoiseaux J, Kallenberg C, Sack U, Witte T, Herold M, et al. International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):17–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Boekel MA, Vossenaar ER, Van den Hoogen FH, van Venrooij WJ. Autoantibody systems in rheumatoid arthritis: specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic value. Arthritis Res Ther. 2001;4(2):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schellekens GA, Visser H, De Jong BA, Van Den Hoogen FH, Hazes JM, Breedveld FC, et al. The diagnostic properties of rheumatoid arthritis antibodies recognizing a cyclic citrullinated peptide. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(1):155–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aho K, Heliövaara M, Maatela J, Tuomi T, Palosuo T. Rheumatoid factors antedating clinical rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1991;18(9):1282–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Silman A, Neogi T, Aletaha D. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Markanday A. Acute Phase Reactants in Infections: Evidence-Based Review and a Guide for Clinicians. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2(3):ofv098. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofv098.

  38. Tandorost A, Kheirouri S, Moludi J, Seyedmardani S. Association of Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) with disease activity and inflammatory cytokines in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(11):e14792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dainty J, Sayers E, Yates M, Macgregor A. fri0561 pro-inflammatory diets are associated with increased C-reactive protein and rheumatoid arthritis in the UK biobank cohort. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2020.

  40. Fowler ME, Akinyemiju TF. Meta-analysis of the association between dietary inflammatory index (DII) and cancer outcomes. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(11):2215–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Matsumoto Y, Shivappa N, Sugioka Y, Tada M, Okano T, Mamoto K, et al. Change in dietary inflammatory index score is associated with control of long-term rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in a Japanese cohort: the TOMORROW study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chung CP, Oeser A, Solus JF, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A, Avalos I, et al. Inflammation-associated insulin resistance: differential effects in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus define potential mechanisms. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(7):2105–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu Y, Costenbader KH, Gao X, Hu FB, Karlson EW, Lu B. Mediterranean diet and incidence of rheumatoid arthritis in women. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67(5):597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vadell AK, Bärebring L, Hulander E, Gjertsson I, Lindqvist HM, Winkvist A. Anti-inflammatory Diet In Rheumatoid Arthritis (ADIRA)—a randomized, controlled crossover trial indicating effects on disease activity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111(6):1203–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tedeschi SK, Bathon JM, Giles JT, Lin TC, Yoshida K, Solomon DH. Relationship between fish consumption and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2018;70(3):327–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gioxari A, Kaliora AC, Marantidou F, Panagiotakos DP. Intake of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2018;45(114–24):e4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bustamante MF, Agustín-Perez M, Cedola F, Coras R, Narasimhan R, Golshan S, et al. Design of an anti-inflammatory diet (ITIS diet) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020;17:100524.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Tedeschi SK, Frits M, Cui J, Zhang ZZ, Mahmoud T, Iannaccone C, et al. Diet and rheumatoid arthritis symptoms: survey results from a rheumatoid arthritis registry. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(12):1920–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Linos A, Kaklamani VG, Kaklamani E, Koumantaki Y, Giziaki E, Papazoglou S, et al. Dietary factors in relation to rheumatoid arthritis: a role for olive oil and cooked vegetables? Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(6):1077–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Aparicio-Soto M, Sánchez-Hidalgo M, Rosillo MÁ, Castejón ML, Alarcón-de-la-Lastra C. Extra virgin olive oil: a key functional food for prevention of immune-inflammatory diseases. Food Funct. 2016;7(11):4492–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bekkelund SI, Jorde R. Lean body mass and creatine kinase are associated with reduced inflammation in obesity. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47(11):803–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Eagan TM, Aukrust P, Ueland T, Hardie JA, Johannessen A, Mollnes TE, et al. Body composition and plasma levels of inflammatory biomarkers in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(5):1027–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Costamagna D, et al. Role of Inflammation in Muscle Homeostasis and Myogenesis. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:805172. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/805172.

  54. Baker JF, Billig E, Michaud K, Ibrahim S, Caplan L, Cannon GW, et al. Weight loss, the obesity paradox, and the risk of death in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1711–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. McInnes IB, Schett G. Pathogenetic insights from the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2328–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. De Cock D, Hyrich K. Malignancy and rheumatoid arthritis: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32(6):869–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Reiss AB, Silverman A, Khalfan M, Vernice NA, Kasselman LJ, Carsons SE, et al. Accelerated atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: Mechanisms and treatment. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(9):969–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shivappa N, Hebert JR, Marcos A, Diaz LE, Gomez S, Nova E, et al. Association between dietary inflammatory index and inflammatory markers in the HELENA study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(6):1600707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Miggiano G, Gagliardi L. Diet, nutrition and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Ter. 2005;156(3):115–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Khanna S, Jaiswal KS, Gupta B. Managing rheumatoid arthritis with dietary interventions. Front Nutr. 2017;4:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to appreciate the participants and assistants for their help in this study. All the financial support was provided by the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

The financial support was provided by the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. The funder is not involved in the study design, data analysis and interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nutritional Sciences Department, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, 6719851552, Iran

    Atiyeh Nayebi, Davood Soleimani, Negin Elahi & Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak

  2. Research Center of Oils and Fats, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Davood Soleimani

  3. Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Shayan Mostafaei

  4. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Shayan Mostafaei

  5. Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran

    Naseh Pahlavani

  6. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

    Naseh Pahlavani

  7. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Bagheri

  8. Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Homayoun Elahi

  9. Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mahdi Mahmoudi

  10. Inflammation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mahdi Mahmoudi

Authors
  1. Atiyeh Nayebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davood Soleimani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shayan Mostafaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Negin Elahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naseh Pahlavani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amir Bagheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Homayoun Elahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mahdi Mahmoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak; Funding acquisition: Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak; Methodology: Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak; Resources: Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak; Project administration: Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak and Atiyeh Nayebi. Data curation: Negin Elahi and Homayoun Elahi. Formal analysis: Shayan Mostafaei and Davood Soleimani. Writing-original draft of the manuscript: Atiyeh Nayebi, Davood Soleimani and Naseh Pahlavani. Writing-review & editing: Amir Bagheri, Mahdi Mahmoudi and Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyyed Mostafa Nachvak.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial protocol was approved by the ethics committee at the Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (ID: IR.KUMS.REC.1400.219). All patients provided written informed consent for participation in this study. The current study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Consent is available for publication.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nayebi, A., Soleimani, D., Mostafaei, S. et al. Association between dietary inflammatory index scores and the increased disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J 21, 53 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00805-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00805-w

Keywords

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us