Skip to main content

Food marketing and gender among children and adolescents: a scoping review

Abstract

Background

Pervasive marketing of unhealthy foods is a contributing factor to the growth of the global epidemic of childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity. Sex and gender differences come into play in the design of and responses to these marketing strategies, contributing to the perpetuation of stereotyped behavior and generating disparities in food choices and health. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature regarding gender differences in food marketing design and perception among children and adolescents to facilitate evidence-based policy dialogues to address gender-based health disparities in NCD prevention.

Methods

Scoping review of articles published in scientific journals in English and Spanish, from 2003 to 2018, that addressed the influence of food marketing among children and adolescents including a gender perspective. The methodological quality of each article was assessed following criteria specific to each study design.

Results

From a total of 37 articles (39 studies) included in the review, 17 were experimental and 22 had descriptive, cross-sectional designs. Twenty-one studies were found to have low methodological quality, while 10 and 8 were of medium and high quality, respectively. A total of 23 studies among children and adolescents found gender-based differences. Differences were found in the following dimensions: food marketing on intake; responses to specific marketing; perceptions and attitudes towards food marketing and marketing regulation initiatives; exposure to food advertising and gendered marketing content. The evidence was not conclusive in any of the dimensions.

Conclusions

The evidence suggests that food marketing has a similar impact on the consumption of unhealthy foods on boys and girls, but boys were found to be exposed to food advertising more intensively and their preferences to be more affected by this exposure, coinciding with a male-dominant advertising content. Limitations of these studies include taking gender as an unproblematic construct equivalent to biological sex and the lack of studies focused on developing countries. As gender is a cross-sectional dimension that interacts with other factors driving health disparities, an integrated gender perspective is needed to develop effective, evidence-based policies to control food marketing and tackle the childhood overweight and obesity pandemic.

Peer Review reports

Background

There is no doubt that the current childhood overweight and obesity epidemic is one of the most serious public health issues globally. The most recent global data suggest that 5.6% of all children under the age of five were overweight in 2019, following an upward trend over the past 20 years [1], while in 2016, 18% of the global population 5 to 18 years old had overweight or obesity [2]. Overweight and obesity can cause many physical conditions as well as psychosocial effects, such as negative body image, reduced self-esteem, social discrimination/isolation and, depression [3, 4], thus hindering the comprehensive development of children and adolescents.

The influence of food advertising on eating behaviors, particularly those that target children and promote the consumption of energy dense, processed food products that are high in sugar, salt, and fats, may be contributing to the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children [5,6,7,8,9]. There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating that children’s TV shows in Latin America include more food ads than programs targeting the general public; moreover, the food products marketed to children on TV have a lower nutritional quality than products advertised to other audiences [10]. This has also been documented in Argentina [11, 12]. The food industry invests heavily in marketing these products, most of which do not comply with current dietary guidelines, such as sugar-coated breakfast cereals, sweets and candy, soft drinks, and fast food [13]. They also employ a wide range of media and a diversity of strategies to deliver their messages, including advertising in school environments, food packaging, TV, internet, and social media platforms [10, 14, 15].

International recommendations to tackle the overweight and obesity epidemic [7, 13] include the restriction of food advertising, underscoring the urgent need to implement policies that limit, or even eliminate, the exposure of children and adolescents to food products with low nutritional quality marketing.

Sex (biology) and gender (cultural) differences are relevant to overweight and obesity [16]. Gender differences in food choices and dietary patterns are framed within social factors including societal expectations and stereotypes for males and females being transmitted via parental, peer and media influences. A research conducted by Sweeting [17] showed small differences among male and female obesity rates and no gender predominance within particular age groups. Another study showed that in high income countries, such as Singapore, Denmark and Canada, the prevalence of obesity in boys was almost two-fold greater than girls when comparing within age group [16].

Studies found gender differences in patterning of body fat, the fat levels at which health risks become apparent, levels of resting energy expenditure and energy requirements, ability to engage in certain physical activities, and the consequences of obesity for the female reproductive system. Cultural differences identified in the study include food choices and dietary concerns, overall physical activity levels, body satisfaction and the long-term psychosocial consequences of childhood and adolescent obesity [16].

In this context, it is necessary to gain better understanding of the interplay of gender and food marketing. The evidence shows that advertising tends to offer and exacerbate traditional and stereotyped images of men and women and gender roles. Advertising often contributes to consolidate gender stereotypes that perpetuate culturally rooted social and health disparities and condition differential food choices [18,19,20].

Here we present a scoping review of literature dealing with food marketing aimed at children and adolescents that also include a gender perspective. This analysis was conducted in the framework of the multi-component regional research project “Food Marketing targeted to kids: a collaborative and policy-oriented study in Argentina, Bolivia, Guatemala and Peru”. The overall purpose of this review was to assess the current state of the evidence regarding gender differences in the influence, design, and perception of food marketing directed at children and adolescents and to identify knowledge domains that would benefit from further inquiry. The ultimate goal of this study was to facilitate evidence-based policy dialogues to reduce gender-based health disparities in NCD prevention policies.

Methods

For this investigation, a specific protocol was elaborated, [21]. We followed the guidelines proposed by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Malley [22] to conduct scoping reviews. We identified and assessed the methodological quality of published scientific articles that addressed the influence of food marketing on eating behaviors among children and adolescents including a gender perspective. Specific themes were gender differences in: a) the effect of food marketing on food intake; b) the effect of food marketing in food choice and preferences; c) responses to specific marketing strategies and techniques; d) perceptions and attitudes towards food marketing and the need for its regulation; and e) advertising content and exposure.

Inclusion criteria

Studies were considered eligible for this scoping review if they met the following inclusion criteria:

  1. a)

    presented evidence pertaining to children and adolescents up to 18 years old;

  2. b)

    was published in Spanish or English from 2003 to 2018;

  3. c)

    addressed at least one of the following dimensions of interest:

    • a theoretical discussion of the association between food marketing strategies and gender disparities;

    • a model to estimate how food advertising incorporates gender in combination with other attributes (age, race, socioeconomic level);

    • differential food marketing strategies to target specific genders;

    • an evaluation of gender-based differences in the influence of food marketing on eating behaviors;

Editorial and commentary pieces, grey literature and articles that did not report specific data pertaining children and adolescents were excluded from this study. Studies including young adults were included if the mean age of the study population was less than 18 years old.

Search strategy

An electronic database search was conducted using PubMed and EBSCOHost; the latter includes Business Source Premier, CAB Abstracts, EconLit, LISTA, SocINDEX, Cairn.info, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), ERIC, HeinOnline, JSTOR, OECD iLibrary, Persée, SciELO, World Bank eLibrary, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. The structure of the search was [(food marketing AND gender) OR (food marketing AND femininity) OR (food marketing AND masculinity)] AND (child OR children OR teenager OR boy OR girl). Additional articles for potential inclusion were identified in a second stage by hand-searching the reference lists in relevant articles.

Study selection and data extraction

The search was conducted in September and October of the year 2018. Two researchers conducted a two-stage screening process to identify articles that met all inclusion criteria. Two reviewers completed data extraction and another researcher supervised the process.

First, titles and abstracts were analyzed to exclude clearly irrelevant articles and remove duplicates, and then the eligibility of these pre-selected articles was confirmed by evaluating the full text. Disagreements regarding inclusion/exclusion were settled by discussion between the three researchers.

The following information was collected for each included study: full reference (authors, year of publication, journal), country, study design, objectives and main results. The main themes and sub-themes explored in each paper were identified and a narrative synthesis was developed inductively based on these themes.

Quality assessment

The quality of each article was evaluated using different guidelines that establish the criteria to be met for each study design. Relevance, Appropriateness, Transparency, Soundness (RATS) guidelines [23] were used for qualitative studies, Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) guidelines for experimental studies [24], and CEBMa for cross-sectional designs [25]. The selected studies were classified according to the percentage of criteria met: low (< 33%), medium (34–66%), and high quality (> 66%).

Studies that analyzed advertising content were evaluated using an instrument specifically designed for this purpose, based on the methodology proposed by Leamy and colleagues [26]. For these studies, a tool was developed, taking into consideration the one described in a systematic revision that took place previously [27]. The dimensions and definitions of the tool were discussed within the research team, and the tool was applied to a subsample. An ordinal scale of three levels/grades was elaborated to evaluate the quality of the different dimensions (1 = the indicator is completely reached; 2 = the indicator is partially reached; 3 = the indicator is not reached). With this scale, the papers can be classified between 5 and 15. This type of scale has been used in previous studies [26] and is adjusted to Cochrane recommendations. The instrument was tested in a pilot study. Agreements and disagreements were discussed among the research team.

Results

Electronic searches in PubMed and EBSCOHost yielded 364 potentially relevant articles, of which 120 were duplicates and were removed from the list. Screening of title and abstracts excluded 147 articles, leaving a total of 97 potentially relevant articles of which 62 were excluded after full text assessment. The remaining 35 articles were included in this review. By analyzing the reference lists in these articles, an additional 2 were identified as relevant for this work, resulting in 37articles selected for the review (Fig. 1). A total of 39 studies (Table 1) were analyzed -two articles included two separate studies each- of which 17 were experimental and 22 had descriptive, cross-sectional designs. Over half the studies (n 21) were found to have low methodological quality, while 10 and 8 were of medium and high quality, respectively (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow chart of the selection of studies for inclusion in the review

Table 1 Studies included in the review. Summary and main findings
Table 2 Classification of included studies by theme, finding of differences by gender and methodological quality

Table 1 presents a summary of each study’s main objective and outcomes, as well as its quality score. Table 2 illustrates the distribution of studies of low, medium and high methodological quality within each dimension of interest.

Gender differences in the effect of food marketing on food intake among children and adolescents

A group of ten studies analyzed the differential effects of food marketing on eating behaviors among children and adolescents, particularly of exposure to food advertising in different media (TV, internet, etc.), although TV was the most frequently investigated one. Most of these studies (n = 8) were classified as having low methodological quality (Table 2). Only three studies [32, 34, 35] found significant differences between genders, but the gender identified as more strongly influenced by food marketing varied among studies.

An experimental study conducted in the Netherlands on children of 8 to 12 years of age by Anschutz et al. [35] reported that boys tended to eat a greater amount of food when viewing TV shows embedded with food ads vs. non-food ads, but this association was not found among girls.

Moreover, a study conducted by Anderson et al. [32] on children and adolescents (9–14 years old) in Canada found that girls with overweight/obesity were more vulnerable to marketing techniques and increased their energy intake after exposure to food ads, while girls with average weight and boys did not. Similar results were obtained by Keller et al. [34] on an investigation conducted in the USA to determine the impact of familiar fast-food branding on test-meal intake in children (7–9 years old). Girls were found to increase food intake in the presence of familiar fast-food brands, while boys ate similar amounts when presented with fast-food branded items vs. neutral food items (i.e. in plain white containers).

The seven remaining studies that analyzed the effect of exposure to food advertising did not observe significant differences between genders [28, 31, 34, 42, 48, 50, 54], although they made some noteworthy observations regarding this influence and other intervening variables. One study found that brand recognition in TV ads of products high in sugar, fat and salt was a predictor of BMI in children as young as 3 years old [48], while other studies observed that maternal encouragement to be thin [42] and intra-family communication [54] had a moderating effect in the impact of food advertising in school-aged children. Young children with overweight were found to be more responsive to branding of food items than children with average weight [34]. More recent studies have also explored the impact of online advertising. Exposure to online food ads was found to be associated with increased consumption of unhealthy food products [50] and the influence of food advertising was observed to depend on the type of ad and media [31].

Gender differences in the effects of advertising on preferences and choice among children and adolescents

A group of nine studies explored gender differences in the effects of advertising on preferences and choice among children and adolescents, of which four [29, 43, 59, 60] generated evidence that food advertising exerts a more powerful influence on choices and preferences among male children and adolescents than among females.

An experimental study by Chernin et al. on children aged 5 to 11 years old in the USA found that exposure to food advertising increased the children’s preference for the advertised products, an effect that was more powerful among boys [29]. Also in the USA, Castonguay & Bakir [43] evaluated attitudes towards maintaining an active lifestyle among school-aged children after exposure to advertising portraying physical activities versus neutral ones. Boys manifested a greater intention to engage in physical activity when exposed to advertising depicting sports, compared to girls overall and to boys who only viewed neutral ones. The authors concluded that boys are more likely to believe that the energy-dense, low quality foods depicted in these advertising will help boost their physical performance than girls.

In Canada, Marquis et al. [59] evaluated how eating while watching TV affected purchase requests among school-aged children. Boys reported asking their parents to purchase the advertised products more frequently than girls, which suggests that boys were more vulnerable to food advertising than girls. Similar results were obtained by Kaur and Vohra [60] in a cross-sectional study regarding the influence of promotional marketing techniques in retail stores among school-aged children in India. The analysis of questionnaires administered to the children’s mothers showed that these promotion strategies affected boys’ purchase requests more strongly than girls’.

The remaining five studies that assessed the impact of advertising on preferences and choice did not show significant differences between genders [30, 33, 47, 56, 61]. However, these studies shed light on the specific ways in which this influence operates. These studies did not only confirm advertising and in-store promotional strategies to be powerful influences on food choice and preferences among children and adolescents [61], but in some cases they also identified other factors that moderate this effect, such as nutritional knowledge [30], the degree of attention to advertisements [33] and socioeconomic variables other than gender [56, 61].

Gender differences in responses to specific marketing techniques among children and adolescents

Six [36,37,38, 41, 58, 64] of the nine studies included in this category found that male and female children and adolescents responded differently to specific marketing techniques, such as promotions, cartoon characters or sport celebrities in food packaging, and offer of toys as premium. An experimental study conducted in the USA by Ogle et al. [38] focused on the influence of depictions of licensed cartoon characters in food packaging on the attention and food preferences of school-aged children, finding that children prefer products depicting characters of their same gender. In Australia, Dixon et al. [36] also conducted an experimental study in a similar age group, where male children were observed to be more attracted to products that showed sport celebrities or that included toys, compared to girls. In an experimental study on visual memory among school children in Brazil, Gines Geraldo and Machado Pinto e Silva [41] found that girls could remember images and characters to a greater degree than boys, although no significant differences were found between genders in the capacity to remember colors.

Two studies focused on marketing techniques that involve active interaction with products. Using an experimental design, Hobin et al. [37] found that Canadian children were more likely to choose healthier products if toys were offered as a premium only with healthier foods, but this effect was stronger in boys than in girls. In turn, by means of focal groups, Elliot [64] explored the marketing techniques involved in “fun foods” and observed that products with enhanced interactive features were more appealing to male school-children, whereas female choices were more determined, on the one hand, by aesthetic values, such as package attractiveness, color and overall design and. On the other hand, they were determined by associative values such as those evoked by the food or package relating the food to, for example, a movie, a family outing, a feeling, among others.

As for adolescents, Vila-López and Kuster-Boluda [58] explored the importance of visual and information cues in food packages in the attitudes and preferences of adolescents in Spain. While visual cues were not found to be a significant influence for either gender, information cues were observed to affect female adolescents more strongly than males, because females tended to be more worried about weight control and health overall and these factors played more heavily on their food choices.

Of three studies that did not observe significant differences between genders, one found that the interaction of healthy/unhealthy slogans with healthy/unhealthy products had a significant influence in purchase intent among 15-year-olds in Belgium [39]. Another study assessed the potential of using cartoon characters to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among children, with varying results by type of character and age of the audience [57]. The third paper corroborated the power of health claims and their impact on children’s perceptions of relative healthfulness of food products with low nutritional quality, without finding any difference between genders [40].

Gender differences in perceptions and attitudes towards food marketing and marketing regulation initiatives

This group includes five studies [51, 53, 55, 62, 63] whose findings suggest that children and adolescents presented some level of awareness regarding the persuasive intent behind marketing, particularly gendered advertisements. The studies also show that males and females have different perspectives regarding the need for regulation of food marketing.

Focus groups conducted by Bunting et al. [63] in New Zealand explored perceptions involving the marketing of energy drinks among adolescents and young adults (16 to 35 years old). All participants demonstrated being highly aware of the fact that energy drinks advertising targeted preferentially men or women, and that this implies a certain level of manipulation of audiences to choose products based on gendered perceptions. In contrast, a similar design implemented by Busse and Díaz [62] among school-aged Peruvian children found that all boys were aware of the persuasive intent in TV advertising, but some girls did not, suggesting a greater vulnerability to advertising persuasion in girls than in boys.

Adachi-Mejia et al. [53] assessed receptivity to TV advertising among 10 to 13 years old in the USA, in which having a favorite advertisement was used as a measure of receptivity. Although both girls and boys showed similar receptivity levels, among respondents who declared having a food ad as their favorite, boys were more likely to prefer a beer ad than girls. Conversely, girls were more likely to name a candy ad than boys.

Bhawra et al. [51] and Grunseit et al. [55] gauged the support for food marketing regulations among adolescents and young adults (16 to 30 years old) in Canada and young Australian athletes (15 to 23 years old), respectively. In both cases, women were more likely to support food marketing restrictions and related policies. Additionally, female athletes also showed a greater level of disagreement with the promotion of unhealthy foods associated to sports than men [55].

Gender differences in exposure to food advertising and gendered marketing content targeting children and adolescents

There were six studies [43,44,45,46, 49, 52] that explored either gender differences in exposure intensity or gendered marketing content. Results suggest that boys were exposed to food advertising more frequently than girls and that there is a gender bias in food marketing.

When administered questionnaires, boys reported that they viewed/listened to food advertising more often and spent more time watching TV than girls, both in the USA [52] and Europe [49].

Studies focusing on advertising content found significant differences in both the frequency with which each gender was portrayed and the associated types of messages or foods. Castonguay and Bakir [43] observed that only 18.8% of TV advertisements in the USA had exclusively female characters and 6.7% showed both genders, while 74.6% showed only males. Moreover, there was an association between food healthfulness and gender, where women were more likely to be associated to healthful products and men to unhealthful ones. In the UK, Childs and Maher [44] also found that TV advertisements were gender bias towards boys, who were portrayed more often, either in image or as voice-over, than girls. Harrison [46] also included ethnicity in their study of gendered content in TV advertising, dividing advertisements into two groups: those portraying Black characters and those that did not. They observed that male characters were overrepresented in both groups (62.7 and 65.4%).

Skatrud-Mickelson et al. [45] followed a very different approach to this issue and estimated exposure by combining audience composition data, ticket sales for the top-20 box-office movies in the USA, and the number of times specific food brands appeared on screen in each of these movies. Their results suggest that gender differences in exposure to advertising were determined by the interaction of age and movie age rating. Exposure among girls was greater than boys for ages 6 to 11 and 12 to 17 in G/PG rated movies, while boys of all ages had a higher exposure in PG-13 and R-rated movies.

Discussion

Little is known about the role of gender in food marketing to children and adolescents. This narrative review revealed that gender may play an important role in the development of food marketing techniques and how children respond to them. Literature [16] shows how the election of the foods and different food behaviors may be related to social expectations and gender stereotypes. Social media may contribute to the development of gender stereotypes in children and adolescents by reinforcing gender roles [65].

However, the results found are not consistent. For example, with regards to the effect of exposure to food marketing on food intake, three of the studies included in this study [32, 34, 35] find differences between boys and girls. Whereas in two studies [32, 34] girls seem to be the most influenced by marketing, the third one differs and concludes that boys seem to be more affected [35]. These studies do not inquire into the reasons for these differences and, if they do, these are stated in a superficial way.

In the case of the studies that analyze the exposure to food marketing and the gendered advertising content, five [43, 44, 46, 49, 52] of the six studies included in this dimension, found that the advertising content was mostly directed to boys. Likewise, all the studies that analyze the effects of the advertisements in the elections and preferences found that advertisements have more influence on boys. Nevertheless, only some of the studies [43, 44, 52, 56] analyze the possible causes for this difference.

The masculine predominance in advertising contents could be explained as a cultural bias [44]. Food advertising reinforces, in this way, gender stereotypes built socially. Gender stereotypes determine the practices in which boys and girls are represented in advertisements. For example, the fact that boys appear more frequently in advertisements that represent a physical activity compared to girls reinforces the idea that sports are not for women [43]. In addition, the association between the marketing of certain products with the male strength [43] could make boys feel more persuaded to buy this kind of product. It is recognized that there is the need of a more profound analysis on socially built stereotypes [29], and how this can be embodied in advertisements with a consequent impact on the food preferences of girls and boys.

Regarding the different marketing techniques implemented, this revision found that, although food products do not have a gender per se, marketing strategies are constructed in such a way that products have become gendered, resulting in foods that are more appealing to girls or to boys depending on the promotional techniques applied [36,37,38, 41, 58, 64].

Another possible explanation for gender differences mentioned in the studies [52] refers to the existence of a differential consumption between boys and girls [56]. In this case, it would be interesting to explore with further detail the motives that explain the difference in the consumption of food products between boys and girls.

The studies also bring to light the many variables that could mediate the association among advertising, gender, and eating behaviors, such as weight status, nutritional knowledge, advertising techniques, type of media, brand awareness, intra-family pressures, and others. It is important to understand the way in which the variables that mediate the correlation between publicity exposition and eating behaviors are affected by gender difference. In this respect, the existing literature is still scarce [16]. In addition, it is important to highlight that, the studies that do mark a difference between genders, the origin of this difference is not well problematized. The inclusion of additional theoretical frameworks used in the analysis of gender and media, such as social cognitive theories and stereotype threats would be relevant to analyze the results and expand the depth of the research results [65].

Strengths and weaknesses of the selected studies

The main strength of this review is that it contributes to the systematization of data regarding the role of gender in food advertising and in providing new research lines for future studies.

One limitation of this study is that the body of research reviewed is heavily biased towards TV advertising, with very few studies focusing on the impact of relatively new marketing channels, such as online games or social media platforms. Another limitation is the lack of common definitions for key variables, such as “persuasion” or “attention”. It is difficult to compare results, as there is no standardization in the measurement of outcome variables. It must be taken into consideration that n = 3 of the investigations incorporated by this study [51, 55, 63]) include young adults (over 18 years) within their analysis. Therefore, the results of these studies may not represent our universe of study exclusively.

The methodological quality varies among the studies, although certain dimensions seem to have been explored using consistently more sound methodologies than others, such as gender differences in exposure to advertising and gender bias in advertising content. In contrast, most of the studies assessing the effect of marketing on food intake were of low quality. However, no associations between study quality and the identification of gender differences in any of the issues of interest for this review were identified.

Perhaps the most serious shortcoming of the work discussed in this review is the poor development of a common theoretical framework to investigate gender issues. Most of the studies reviewed here have taken a simplistic approach that limits the question to biological, genetic or metabolic differences between the sexes, which also precludes any possible consideration of other, non-binary gender identity. In this way, the necessity of developing approaches that are able to differentiate sex from gender has been recently stated. This is necessary so as to fill a vacancy that exists in the literature respect transgender and gender nonconforming population (TGNC) and, in this way, achieve the inclusion of these populations in the development of investigations and nutrition programs [66]. In addition, in order to make a meaningful contribution to gender studies, the research of the influence of food marketing on the eating behaviors of girls and boys must account for the cultural, economic and social factors that come into play in the construction of gender identities and how these factors influence the relationship between food advertising and people, mediated by social expectations and stereotyped “masculine” and “feminine” behaviors, attitudes, and preferences [67].

Finally, most of the studies were conducted in Europe, the USA or Australia, with little to no representation of the developing world.

Areas identified for future research

The body of work explored in this scoping review is a testimony to the increasing interest of the academic community in exploring gender-related determinants to eating behaviors and its implications for disparities in public health. We have identified issues that would particularly benefit from further inquiry, especially in the developing world, including gender stereotypes portrayed and reinforced in food advertising and how they have changed over time, how exposure to advertising in children and adults varies in relation to their gender, the impact of new media and the role of influencers. The majority of studies focused on the gender difference among children and adolescents concerning the effect of food marketing on food intake and the effects of advertising on preferences and choice showed no differences based on gender. These results can be an effect of study limitations and require further investigation.

Conclusions

This scoping review revealed that gender may play an important role in the development of food marketing techniques and how children respond to them. In addition, the review highlights the necessity of continuing developing studies that not only evidence the difference between sex but of studying the difference from a gender perspective.

Gender is a transversal dimension that interacts and enhances all other forms of health disparities, and it must be considered in policies that address obesogenic environments. It is necessary to develop more studies that do not only show the differences, but that understand the sources of the differences and that exceed the definitions of gender based only on biological aspects. These investigations will be of great use for the development of transversal gender policies.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization, International Bank for Reconstruction Development/The World Bank. Levels and Trends in Child Malnutrition: Key Findings of the 2020 Edition of the joint child malnutrition estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in children's and adolescents' body mass index, underweight and obesity, in comparison with adults, from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2,416 population-based measurement studies with 128.9 million participants. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pizzi MA, Vroman K. Childhood obesity: effects on children's participation, mental health, and psychosocial development. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013;27(2):99–112. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2013.784839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pulgarón ER. Childhood obesity: a review of increased risk for physical and psychological co-morbidities. Clin Ther. 2013;35(1):A18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boyland EJ, Whalen R. Food advertising to children and its effects on diet: review of recent prevalence and impact data. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015;16(5):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Boyland EJ, Nolan S, Kelly B, Tudur-Smith C, Jones A, Halford JC, et al. Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults1,2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):519–33. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.120022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    WWorld Health Organization. Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

  8. 8.

    Vargas CM, Stines EM, Granado HS. Health-equity issues related to childhood obesity: a scoping review. J Public Health Dent. 2017;77:S32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Corvalán C, Garmendia M, Jones-Smith J, Lutter C, Miranda J, Pedraza L, et al. Nutrition status of children in Latin America. Obes Rev. 2017;18:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12571.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chemas-Velez MM, Gómez LF, Velasquez A, Mora-Plazas M, Parra DC. Scoping review of studies on food marketing in Latin America: summary of existing evidence and research gaps. Rev Saude Publica. 2019;53:107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Allemandi L, Castronuovo L, Tiscornia MV, Ponce M, Schoj V. Food advertising on Argentinean television: are ultra-processed foods in the lead? Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):238–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kelly B, Vandevijvere S, Ng S, Adams J, Allemandi L, Bahena-Espina L, et al. Global benchmarking of children's exposure to television advertising of unhealthy foods and beverages across 22 countries. Obes Rev. 2019;20(S2):116–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pan American Health Organization. Recommendations from a PAHO expert consultation on the Marketing of Food and non-Alcoholic Beverages to children in the Americas. Washington DC: PAHO; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Letona P, Chacon V, Roberto C, Barnoya J. Effects of licensed characters on children's taste and snack preferences in Guatemala, a low/middle income country. Int J Obes. 2014;38(11):1466–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G, Caraher M. Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary. Appetite. 2013;62:209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shah, B, Tombeau Cost, K, Fuller, A, Birken, C S, & Anderson, L N: Sex and gender differences in childhood obesity: contributing to the research agenda. Bmj Nutriotion, Prevention & Health, 3 (2):387–390.

  17. 17.

    Sweeting HN. Gendered dimensions of obesity in childhood and adolescence. Nutr J. 2008;7(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-7-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Uray N, Burnaz S. An analysis of the portrayal of gender roles in Turkish television advertisements. Sex Roles. 2003;48(1/2):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022348813469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Royo-Vela M, Aldas-Manzano J, Küster I, Vila N. Adaptation of marketing activities to cultural and social context: gender role portrayals and sexism in Spanish commercials. Sex Roles. 2008;58(5-6):379–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9341-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gentry J, Harrison R. Is advertising a barrier to male movement toward gender change? Mark Theory. 2010;10(1):74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109355246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Castronuovo L, Guarnieri L: Food marketing, eating behaviors and gender among children and adolescents; scoping review protocol, 2020. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15pv2mvCCMEc9qDq8FxElRrIiMsK3iH40/view?usp=sharing.

  22. 22.

    Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Clark JP. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. Peer Review in Health Sciences. Second ed. London: BMJ Books; 2003. p. 219–35. Available at: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/suppl/2012/01/12/bmjopen-2011-000138.DC1/BMJ_Open_IMG_Physician_Migration_RATS_Checklist.pdf (Accesed March 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Evans, N., M. Lasen, and K. Tsey. ”Appendix a: effective public health practice project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool for quantitative studies." A systematic review of rural development research SpringerBriefs in Public Health (2015): 45–55. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%253A978-3-319-17284-2/1.pdf (Accessed March 2021).

  25. 25.

    Center of Evidence Based Management: Cricitcal Appraisal Checklist for Cross-Sectional Study. July, 2014.

  26. 26.

    Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;1:2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ueda P, Tong L, Viedma C, Chandy SJ, Marrone G, Simon A, et al. Food marketing towards children: brand logo recognition, food-related behavior and BMI among 3–13-year-olds in a south Indian town. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chernin A. The effects of food marketing on children's preferences: testing the moderating roles of age and gender. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2008;615(1):101–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207308952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tarabashkina L, Quester P, Crouch R. Food advertising, children’s food choices and obesity: interplay of cognitive defences and product evaluation: an experimental study. Int J Obes. 2016;40(4):581–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.234.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Norman J, Kelly B, McMahon A-T, Boyland E, Baur LA, Chapman K, et al. Sustained impact of energy-dense TV and online food advertising on children’s dietary intake: a within-subject, randomised, crossover, counter-balanced trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0672-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Anderson GH, Khodabandeh S, Patel B, Luhovyy BL, Bellissimo N, Mollard RC. Mealtime exposure to food advertisements while watching television increases food intake in overweight and obese girls but has a paradoxical effect in boys. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(2):162–7. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2014-0249.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Velazquez CE, Pasch KE. Attention to food and beverage advertisements as measured by eye-tracking technology and the food preferences and choices of youth. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(4):578–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Keller KL, Kuilema LG, Lee N, Yoon J, Mascaro B, Combes A-L, et al. The impact of food branding on children's eating behavior and obesity. Physiol Behav. 2012;106(3):379–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Anschutz DJ, Engels RC, Van Strien T. Side effects of television food commercials on concurrent nonadvertised sweet snack food intakes in young children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1328–33. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27075.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dixon H, Scully M, Niven P, Kelly B, Chapman K, Donovan R, et al. Effects of nutrient content claims, sports celebrity endorsements and premium offers on pre-adolescent children's food preferences: experimental research. Pediatr Obes. 2014;9(2):e47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00169.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Hobin EP, Hammond DG, Daniel S, Hanning RM, Manske SR. The happy meal® effect: the impact of toy premiums on healthy eating among children in Ontario, Canada. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(4):e244–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ogle AD, Graham DJ, Lucas-Thompson RG, Roberto CA. Influence of cartoon media characters on children's attention to and preference for food and beverage products. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117:265 270. e262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Adams L, Geuens M. Healthy or unhealthy slogans: That's the question. J Health Commun. 2007;12:173–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Harris J, Haraghey K, Lodolce M, Semenza N. Teaching children about good health? Halo effects in child-directed advertisements for unhealthy food. Pediatr Obes. 2018;13(4):256–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12257.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gines Geraldo AP, Machado Pinto E, Silva ME. Processed foods in infant feeding: analysis of the visual memory of schoolchildren in Taubaté city, São Paulo. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012;22:53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Anschutz DJ, Engels RC, Van Strien T. Maternal encouragement to be thin moderates the effect of commercials on children's snack food intake. Appetite. 2010;55(1):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.03.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Castonguay J, Bakir A. You eat “like a girl”: gender differences in content and effects of food advertising depicting sports. Food Prod Mark. 2019;25(3):233–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2018.1524807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Childs NM, Maher JK. Gender in food advertising to children: boys eat first. Br Food J. 2003;105(7):408–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700310497219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Skatrud-Mickelson M, Adachi-Mejia AM, MacKenzie TA, Sutherland LA. Giving the wrong impression: food and beverage brand impressions delivered to youth through popular movies. J Public Health. 2012;34(2):245–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Harrison K. Fast and sweet: nutritional attributes of television food advertisements with and without black characters. Howard J Commun. 2006;17(4):249–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170600966576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Olivares S, Lera L, Mardones MA, Araneda J, Bustos N, Olivares MA, et al. Promoción de alimentos y preferencias alimentarias en escolares chilenos de diferente nivel socioeconómico. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2011;61:163.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cornwell TB, McAlister AR, Polmear-Swendris N. Children's knowledge of packaged and fast food brands and their BMI. Why the relationship matters for policy makers. Appetite. 2014;81:277–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Klepp K-I, Wind M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Rodrigo CP, Due P, Bjelland M, et al. Television viewing and exposure to food-related commercials among European school children, associations with fruit and vegetable intake: a cross sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-4-46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Baldwin HJ, Freeman B, Kelly B. Like and share: associations between social media engagement and dietary choices in children. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(17):3210–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018001866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bhawra J, Reid JL, White CM, Vanderlee L, Raine K, Hammond D. Are young Canadians supportive of proposed nutrition policies and regulations? An overview of policy support and the impact of socio-demographic factors on public opinion. Can J Public Health. 2018;109(4):498–505. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0066-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kumar G, Onufrak S, Zytnick D, Kingsley B, Park S. Self-reported advertising exposure to sugar-sweetened beverages among US youth. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(7):1173–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Adachi-Mejia AM, Sutherland LA, Longacre MR, Beach ML, Titus-Ernstoff L, Gibson JJ, et al. Adolescent weight status and receptivity to food TV advertisements. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43(6):441–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Buijzen M, Schuurman J, Bomhof E. Associations between children's television advertising exposure and their food consumption patterns: a household diary–survey study. Appetite. 2008;50(2-3):231–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Grunseit AC, MacNiven R, Orr R, Grassmayr M, Kelly B, Davies D, et al. Australian athletes’ health behaviours and perceptions of role modelling and marketing of unhealthy products. Health Promot J Austr. 2012;23(1):63–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE12063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Olivares-Cortés S, Araneda-Flores J, Morales-Illanes G, Leyton-Dinamarca B, Bustos-Zapata N, Hernández-Moreno M-A, et al. Actitudes de escolares chilenos de distinto nivel socioeconómico al inicio de la implementación de la ley que regula la venta y publicidad de alimentos altos en nutrientes críticos. Nutr Hosp. 2017;34(2):431–8. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bezbaruah N, Brunt A. The influence of cartoon character advertising on fruit and vegetable preferences of 9-to 11-year-old children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44(5):438–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Vila-López N, Kuster-Boluda I. Adolescents’ food packaging perceptions. Does gender matter when weight control and health motivations are considered? Food Qual Prefer. 2016;52:179–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.04.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Marquis M, Filion YP, Dagenais F. Does eating while watching television influence children's food-related behaviours? Can J Diet Pract Res. 2005;66(1):12–8. https://doi.org/10.3148/66.1.2005.12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kaur P, Vohra J. Preference for promotional strategies directed at children: an empirical investigation. Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2013;5:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Vohra J, Soni P. Logit modelling of food shopping behaviour of children in retail stores. Manag Res Rev. 2015;38(8):840–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2014-0061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Busse P, Díaz R. What are the television viewing and eating habits of children in Peru? Glob Health Promot. 2016;23(1):50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975914547923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bunting H, Baggett A, Grigor J. Adolescent and young adult perceptions of caffeinated energy drinks. A qualitative approach. Appetite. 2013;65:132–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Elliott C. Healthy food looks serious: how children interpret packaged food products. Can J Commun. 2009;34:359–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ward LM, Grower P. Media and the development of gender role stereotypes. Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2020;2(1):177–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051120-010630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Linsenmeyer W, Waters J. Sex and gender differences in nutrition research: considerations with the transgender and gender nonconforming population. Nutrit J. 2021;20(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    García Oliva M: El bueno de Adán y la malvada de Eva. Proceso de enculturación, establecimiento de roles y violencia de género. Ser hombre y ser mujer en Oaxaca. In Mujeres (in) visibles: Género, alimentación y salud en comunidades rurales de Oaxaca. Volume 10. Edited by Arnaiz MG, Pérez Gil Romo SE. Tarragona: Publicacions URV; 2014: 137–171.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Belén Beltramo for her assistance in collecting and analyzing the articles included in this review, Malena Pirola and Victoria Bortnik for her assistance in writing the manuscript, and the rest of FIC-Argentina’s team for their contribution during the conduct of this study. They also thank the other research teams involved in the collaborative project for their feedback: Joaquín Barnoya; Peter Busse; Lucila Rozas; Sophia Mus, Alejandra Karina Garron Monje, Christiam Arce Vargas.

Funding

International Development Research Centre (IDRC) under grant 108645. The funding agency had not role in the design of the study, collection of data, interpretation of results or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.C was responsible for the research design, data collection, interpretation of results and writing of the manuscript, L.G. contributed to the research design, data collection and interpretation of results. M.V.T. contributed to the design of the overall research strategy and the interpretation of results. L.A. contributed to the interpretation of results and writing of the manuscript. All co-authors reviewed drafts of the paper and contributed to the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Castronuovo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castronuovo, L., Guarnieri, L., Tiscornia, M. et al. Food marketing and gender among children and adolescents: a scoping review. Nutr J 20, 52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-021-00706-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Food marketing
  • Gender perspective
  • Children and adolescents
  • Scoping review