Skip to content

Advertisement

Nutrition Journal

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Inconsistent diagnosis of acute malnutrition by weight-for-height and mid-upper arm circumference: contributors in 16 cross-sectional surveys from South Sudan, the Philippines, Chad, and Bangladesh

  • Dominique Roberfroid1, 2Email author,
  • Lieven Huybregts3,
  • Carl Lachat4,
  • France Vrijens2,
  • Patrick Kolsteren1, 4 and
  • Benjamin Guesdon5
Nutrition Journal201514:86

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0074-4

Received: 15 April 2015

Accepted: 12 August 2015

Published: 25 August 2015

Abstract

Background

The two anthropometric indicators of acute malnutrition in children under 5 years, i.e. a Mid-Upper Arm Circumference < 125 mm (MUAC125) or a Weight-for-Height Z-score<−2 (WHZ−2), correlate poorly. We aimed at assessing the contribution of age, sex, stunting (Height-for-Age HAZ<−2), and low sitting-standing height ratio Z-score (SSRZ in the 1st tertile of the study population, called hereafter ‘longer legs’) to this diagnosis discrepancy.

Methods

Data from 16 cross-sectional nutritional surveys carried out by Action Against Hunger International in South Sudan, the Philippines, Chad, and Bangladesh fed multilevel, multivariate regression models, with either WHZ−2 or MUAC125 as the dependent variable and age, sex, stunting, and ‘longer legs’ as the independent ones. We also compared how the performance of MUAC125 and WHZ−2 to detect slim children, i.e. children with a low Weight-for-Age (WAZ<−2) but no linear growth retardation (HAZ≥−2), was modified by the contributors.

Results

Overall 23.1 % of the 14,409 children were identified as acutely malnourished by either WHZ−2 or MUAC125, but only 28.5 % of those (949/3,328) were identified by both indicators. Being stunted (+17.8 %; 95 % CI: 14.8 %; 22.8 %), being a female (+16.5 %; 95 % CI: 13.5 %; 19.5 %) and being younger than 24 months (+33.6 %; 95 % CI: 30.4 %; 36.7 %) were factors strongly associated with being detected as malnourished by MUAC125 and not by WHZ−2, whereas having ‘longer legs’ moderately increased the diagnosis by WHZ−2 (+4.2 %; 95 % CI: 0.7 %; 7.6 %). The sensitivity to detect slim children by MUAC125 was 31.0 % (95 % CI: 26.8 %; 35.2 %) whereas it was 70.6 % (95 % CI: 65.4 %; 75.9 %) for WHZ−2. The sensitivity of MUAC125 was particularly affected by age (57.4 % vs. 18.1 % in children aged < 24 months vs. ≥ 24 months). Specificity was high for both indicators.

Conclusions

MUAC125 should not be used as a stand-alone criterion of acute malnutrition given its strong association with age, sex and stunting, and its low sensitivity to detect slim children. Having ‘longer legs’ moderately increases the diagnosis of acute malnutrition by WHZ−2. Prospective studies are urgently needed to elucidate the clinical and physiological outcomes of the various anthropometric indicators of malnutrition.

Background

According to WHO experts, a weight-for-height Z-score lower than −3 standard deviations of the international reference population WHO 2006 (WHZ−3) or a mid-upper arm circumference lower than 115 mm (MUAC115) can be used independently to indicate severe acute malnutrition (SAM) [1]. The commonly used thresholds for global acute malnutrition (GAM) are WHZ<−2 (WHZ−2) or MUAC < 125 mm (MUAC125). However, these two indicators correlate poorly. It was reported that only about 40 % of SAM cases identified by one indicator are also diagnosed as such by the other [1]. For example, among severely malnourished children hospitalized in rural Kenya, 65.1 % (486/746) of the WHZ−3 cases also had a MUAC < 115 mm, whereas 56 % (489/873) of the MUAC115 cases were also identified by WHZ−3 [2]. In that study, 42.9 % (489/1140) of the SAM cases were identified by both indicators. The discrepancy between the two indicators can be even more extreme [35]. Fernandez et al. reported that among 34,937 children between the ages of 6 and 59 months from 39 nutritional surveys, 75 % of the children with a WHZ<−3 were not identified by a MUAC < 115 mm [3]. In Cambodia, this proportion was above 90 %, whereas 80 % of MUAC115 were not detected by WHZ−3 [4].

Such discrepancy generates important programmatic challenges and confusion [6]. On the one hand, a strategy where the diagnosis can be based on either indicator, as recommended by some authors [1, 4] may unduly inflate the workload of nutritional rehabilitation programmes, as the most appropriate management of children identified by one indicator and not by the other is uncertain. On the other hand, relying on only one of these indicators, e.g. using only MUAC115 in community-based programmes, may under-detect true acute malnutrition cases and result in missed opportunities to treat a severe condition [4, 7].

Thus, it is of paramount importance to gain more insight into the factors contributing to this diagnostic discrepancy in order to guide programmatic decisions.

These factors could be three-fold. First, the diagnosis of acute malnutrition based on MUAC relies on the utilization of a single cut-off independently of age and sex. These are factors known to be strongly associated with child anthropometry. As the reference MUAC is lower in younger children (< 24 months) and in females [8], a single cut-off to define acute malnutrition may result in the over-diagnosis of the condition in these sub-populations, and conversely may underestimate cases in older children, particularly in males [2, 9]. Diagnosis based on WHZ would be much less sensitive to this bias because it is standardized for sex and height, and thus indirectly for age [2, 9].

Second, the diagnosis of acute malnutrition by MUAC may be confounded by the presence of stunting given the strong association between MUAC and height-for-age Z-score (HAZ); using MUAC125 would result in an increased caseload among stunted children compared to non-stunted children, independently of acute malnutrition [2, 10].

Third, WHZ may overestimate acute malnutrition in children with a low sitting-to-standing height ratio (SSR), i.e. with long limbs, whereas MUAC would be relatively independent of body proportions [11]. Ethnic differences in SSR, like those observed between nomads and settled populations, or between African and Asian populations, might thus influence the diagnosis by WHZ, without indicating acute malnutrition. If this hypothesis is true, the same variations should be also observed within a given population, i.e. the individuals with longer legs should be more often identified as acutely malnourished by WHZ−2 than individuals with shorter legs.

The objective of this study is to test simultaneously these three hypotheses in a large multi-ethnic population, and to assess the contribution of age, sex, stunting, and SSR to the discrepant diagnosis of acute malnutrition by either WHZ−2 or MUAC125.

Methods

We analyzed data from 16 cross-sectional nutritional surveys conducted by Action Against Hunger International in South Sudan (13 surveys), the Philippines (1 survey), Chad (1 survey), and Bangladesh (1 survey). The surveys in South Sudan were conducted from 2004 to 2007 in different counties of the Upper Nile, Western Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria, and Bahr El Ghazal regions, mainly amongst agro-pastoralist communities of varying ethnic background. The survey in the Philippines was conducted in 2012 in the city of Cagayan de Oro. The survey in Chad was conducted in 2013 in the North Bahr El Ghazal district, among the Gorane pastoralist, nomadic population. All these surveys followed a two-stage cluster representative sampling methodology. In Bangladesh, data were collected in November 2012, through the regular monthly Growth Monitoring Program for children under 5 years old living in the Rohynguas refugee camps of Kutapalong and Nayapara in Cox’s Bazaar district.

Procedures to measure the sitting height were similar to those described in previous studies [11, 12]. Crown-rump length, a measure of trunk length, which is conceptually similar to sitting height in older children, was measured until the age of 2 years. Children laid down in supine position on the length board, and after the thighs were placed in a vertical plane, the footboard was pulled against the buttocks. From 2 years of age onward, sitting height was measured with the child sitting in erect position on a flat wooden table, with the knees at the edge of the table and the buttocks against the height board. Weight (with a SECA electronic scale or a SALTER scale of 25 kg), length or height (with locally made wooden boards), and MUAC (with a no stretchable MUAC band) were measured following the international recommendations, to the nearest 100 g or 1 mm, respectively. To determine age (months), the birth date was either extracted from official documents (e.g. birth certificates, refugee registers) or evaluated by maternal report in reference to locally adapted seasonal calendars when official documents were unavailable.

Individual Z-scores for WHZ and HAZ were computed in reference to the WHO 2006 growth standards using the Stata zscore06 command. We computed SSR as (Sitting height/standing height)*100 and generated individual Z-scores for the SSR within strata of 6 months of age of the pooled study population (SSRZ), as SSR is largely age-dependent and no reference distribution exists for SSR [12].

The initial dataset included 14,682 individuals. Cases of edematous malnutrition were excluded from analysis because the WHZ indicator is not valid in such cases (n = 15). We also excluded 258 outliers. These were defined based on the WHO standards with recommended flag limits: WHZ-5, +5; HAZ-6, +6 (source: http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/software/Differences_NCHS_WHO.pdf?ua=1). For SSRZ, as no reference population exists, we used the flag limits −3 SD, +3SD of the study population. Therefore, the final dataset included 14,409 children. Dependent variables were defined as either WHZ−2 or MUAC125. Independent variables were dichotomized to correspond to categories usually used in field nutrition programs: young age (age < 24 months vs. age ≥ 24 months), stunting (HAZ<−2SD vs. HAZ≥−2SD of the reference population), sex (male vs. female). We also created the variable ‘longer legs’ by dichotomizing SSRZ (SSRZ in the lower tertile vs. SSRZ in the 2 upper tertiles of the study population). These independent variables correspond with hypothetical contributors to the discrepant malnutrition diagnosis presented in the background section.

We tested the association of these independent variables with either WHZ−2 or MUAC125 by running multivariate multilevel linear regression models with ‘survey’ as a random effect to account for the clustering of data. In linear regression models, where both dependent and independent variables are dichotomous, the regression coefficient corresponds to the absolute percentage difference in the dependent variable (e.g. MUAC125) between the categories of the independent variable (e.g. males vs. females) [13]. In such models, linearity is always ensured and results are mathematically equivalent to those of a chi-square test, whereas adjustment for covariates and clustering of data is made possible. All statistical models included all covariates (i.e. sex, young age, stunting and ‘longer legs’) to control for potential confounding effects.

To assess the discrepancy between WHZ−2 and MUAC125 more specifically, we conducted the same analysis described above with a dummy variable coded 1 for cases of acute malnutrition identified by MUAC125only (MUAC < 125 mm and WHZ>−2) and coded 0 for cases identified by WHZ-2only (WHZ<−2 and MUAC > 125 mm). Finally, we compared the performance of MUAC125 and WHZ−2 to detect slim children, i.e. children too light for their age (WAZ<−2SD), yet not stunted (HAZ≥−2SD). The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to assess how sex, age, stunting and body proportions modify the sensitivity and specificity of MUAC125 and WHZ−2 to identify such cases. For this purpose, we ran the same models as described above, with “slimness” as the independent variable and sex, age, and ‘longer legs’ as covariates. The sensitivity of MUAC125 or WHZ−2 to detect slimness with adjustment for covariates and study design can be derived from such regression models by summing up the regression coefficient of the independent variable (“slimness”) with the constant of the model. Adjusted specificity is computed in the same way by inserting the reciprocal of the dependent and independent variables in the regression models. Interactions between covariates and “slimness” were tested using a chunk test, i.e. a likelihood ratio test comparing the models with and without the full set of interaction terms [14]. When the chunk test was statistically significant, we computed sensitivity and specificity by strata of covariates (age, sex, and ‘longer legs’), with adjustment for other covariates and clustering of data.

Outliers were excluded from the main analysis, but their influence on results was tested by a sensitivity analysis. Significance level was set at 5 % for all tests. All analyses were performed in Stata 12.0 (College Station, TX77845, USA).

As data came from past surveys carried out by Action Against Hunger International in the frame of their nutritional programs and were anonymous, no ethical clearance was requested.

Results

A sample of 14,682 children aged 6–59 months were included. After removal of 15 cases of edematous malnutrition and 258 outliers, 14,409 individuals (> 98 %) contributed to further analysis. The mean (±SD) age of participants was 31.9 (±15.8) months, with 34.8 % being younger than 24 months. Most of the children (70.9 %) were from an African setting (South Sudan or Chad).

Overall 23.1 % of children were identified as acutely malnourished by either WHZ−2 or MUAC125, with a prevalence close to 31 % in the children aged less than 24 months (Table 1). Figures returned by these two indicators varied overall and by age range. Acute malnutrition defined by MUAC125 was overall present in 10.8 % (1,550/14,409) of children, with 70.6 % (1,094/1,550) of the cases younger than 24 months whereas acute malnutrition as defined by WHZ−2 was present in 18.9 % (2,727/14,409) of children, with 41.3 % (1,127/2,727) of the cases younger than 24 months. The proportion of congruent diagnosis returned by the two indicators was only 28.5 % (949 of the 3,328 children identified by either WHZ−2 or MUAC125) (Table 1). This proportion was highly variable, even within the same country, ranging from 19.8 % in Sudan-Myaiendit to 39.7 % in Sudan-Padak.
Table 1

Characteristics of study population

 

N

Male %

Age < 24 months %

Stunted %

SSR mean

MUAC125 %

WHZ−2 %

MUAC125 or WHZ−2 %

MUAC125 and WHZ−2 %

Overlap between 2 indicators %

Survey

 Bangladesh

3,831

50.5

32.2

59.3

58.6

8.5

15.0

18.8

4.7

25.0

 Chad

718

51.1

34.1

13.5

56.2

6.8

34.1

35.2

5.7

16.2

 Philippines

368

50.0

8.7

38.6

55.7

0.5

3.0

3.0

0.5

18.2

 Sudan-Myaiendit

465

51.4

35.7

10.5

55.9

8.2

20.4

23.9

4.7

19.8

 Sudan-Renk

613

49.4

42.9

13.9

56.1

11.4

17.6

21.2

7.8

36.9

 Sudan-Malut

705

47.2

38.0

15.3

56.5

4.4

21.1

21.7

3.8

17.6

 Sudan-Kapoetat

749

48.1

33.0

28.0

57.1

11.2

10.8

16.6

5.5

33.1

 Sudan-Padak

906

48.5

43.0

9.7

55.5

28.9

42.9

51.4

20.4

39.7

 Sudan-Malakal

751

48.1

41.8

7.7

56.6

7.9

21.6

23.6

5.9

24.9

 Sudan-Kajokeji

901

48.6

37.1

22.6

57.4

6.7

9.0

11.4

4.2

36.9

 Sudan-Nyadintoch

774

47.8

34.0

18.9

54.5

18.2

21.2

30.1

9.3

30.9

 Sudan-Mareang

748

47.3

33.0

18.9

54.4

18.3

21.4

30.2

9.5

31.4

 Sudan-Mvolo

658

54.0

30.2

24.5

55.9

7.0

8.4

11.2

4.1

36.5

 Sudan-Oldfangak

909

51.9

35.4

5.5

55.6

9.4

18.5

22.2

5.6

25.2

 Sudan-Bunagok

420

49.5

38.6

16.0

56.1

10.7

12.9

17.4

6.2

35.6

 Sudan-Duk

893

53.3

36.4

15.9

55.8

12.8

25.9

30.3

8.3

27.3

Age

  < 24 months

5,010

50.2

/

25.1

59.8

21.8

22.5

31.1

13.3

42.7

  ≥ 24 months

9,399

49.7

/

29.4

55.0

4.9

17.0

18.9

3.0

16.0

Sex

 Female

7,217

/

34.6

25.6

56.6

11.9

17.3

22.7

6.5

28.7

 Male

7,192

/

35.0

30.2

56.8

9.6

20.5

23.5

6.6

28.3

Stunting

 No

10,388

48.3

36.1

/

56.2

9.5

19.5

23.0

6.0

26.0

 Yes

4,021

54.0

31.2

/

58.0

14.1

17.5

23.5

8.2

34.9

Long leg

 No

9,692

51.1

37.8

37.3

58.3

9.8

15.0

19.0

5.8

30.3

 Yes

4,717

47.5

28.5

8.6

53.3

12.8

27.0

31.5

8.3

26.3

Total

14,409

49.9

34.8

27.9

56.7

10.8

18.9

23.1

6.6

28.5

MUAC 125 Mid upper arm circumference < 125 mm, WHZ −2 Weight-for-height Zscore<−2, SSR Sitting-standing height ratio (sitting height/standing height) × 100, Long leg SSR Zscore in the lower tertile of the study population, Stunting Height-for-age Zscore<−2, Overlap Proportion of cases being MUAC125 and WHZ−2 among children identified by either MUAC125 or WHZ−2

Having ‘longer legs’, being stunted, being a male and being younger than 2 years were all factors independently associated with acute malnutrition as diagnosed either by WHZ−2 or MUAC125 (Table 2). However, the strength of the association differed by anthropometric indicator. The diagnosis by WHZ−2 was +10.6 % (95 % CI: +9.1 %; +12.1 %) more frequent in children with ‘longer legs’, yet only +3.4 % (95 % CI: +2.3 %; +4.6 %) more frequent for MUAC125. On the contrary, being stunted and of young age were factors much less associated with WHZ−2 than with MUAC125. The diagnosis by MUAC125 was +9.2 % (95 % CI: +8.0 %; +10.4 %) higher in stunted children than in non-stunted children, and +17.1 % (95 % CI: +16.1 %; +18.2 %) higher in children younger than 24 months than in older ones; the corresponding increase was 3.4 % and 5.6 % for WHZ−2, respectively. With regards to sex, the relationship was the opposite for WHZ−2 (+3.4 % in males) compared to MUAC125 (−2.6 % in males).
Table 2

Factors associated with the diagnosis of acute malnutrition based on WHZ−2 and MUAC125

Indicator

WHZ−2 (n = 2 727)

MUAC125 (n = 1 550)

MUAC125only (n = 601)

Population

All (N = 14 409)

All (N = 14 409)

MUAC125only OR WHZ-2only (N = 1 778)

Independent variable

β coeff.

95 % CI

P

β coeff.

95 % CI

P

β coeff.

95 % CI

P

Long legs (yes vs. No)

10.6

9.1

12.1

< 0.0001

3.4

2.3

4.6

< 0.0001

−4.2

−7.6

−0.7

0.019

Stunted (yes vs. No)

4.1

2.5

5.6

< 0.0001

9.2

8.0

10.4

< 0.0001

18.8

14.8

22.8

< 0.0001

Sex (male vs. female)

3.4

2.1

4.6

< 0.0001

−2.6

−3.5

−1.6

< 0.0001

−16.5

−19.5

−13.5

< 0.0001

Age (< 24 months vs. ≥ 24 months)

5.6

4.3

7.0

< 0.0001

17.1

16.1

18.2

< 0.0001

33.6

30.4

36.7

< 0.0001

Results are derived from multivariate multi-level linear regression models, with “survey” as random effect. The regression coefficients represent the absolute % increase in the dependent variables (WHZ−2, MUAC125, MUAC125) between the 2 categories of the independent variables (long legs, stunted, sex, age). All models were adjusted for all covariates

The analysis of being detected by MUAC125only vs. WHZ-2only returned statistical associations consistent with those described above. Being stunted (+18.8 %), being a female (+16.5 %) and young age (+33.6 %) were factors strongly associated with being detected as malnourished by MUAC125only, whereas having ‘longer legs’ increased moderately the diagnosis by WHZ-2only (+4.2 %; 95 % CI: +0.7 %; +7.6 %).

Among the 10,388 children who were not stunted, 13.3 % (1,383/10,388) were considered slim, i.e. they had a low weight-for-age (WAZ<−2). Overall, the sensitivity to detect slim children by WHZ−2 (70.6 %; 95 % CI: 65.4 %; 75.9 %) was substantially higher than by MUAC125 (31.0 %; 95 % CI: 26.8 %; 35.2 %), whereas the specificity was very high for both indicators. The chunk test was highly significant for both indicators, and all covariates had a modifying effect on the sensitivity and specificity although the size of this modification varied across covariates and indicators (Table 3). The sensitivity of MUAC125 to detect slim children was lower in males than in females and much lower after 24 months of age than in younger children (18.1 % vs. 57.4 %). However, the difference between children with ‘longer legs’ and the others was negligible. For WHZ−2, the largest difference in sensitivity was observed between children with ‘longer legs’ compared to those without (84.2 % vs. 68.3 %). The sensitivity of WHZ−2 to detect slim children remain much higher than that of MUAC125 in children who did not have ‘longer legs’. Although the specificity was globally high for both indicators, the specificity of MUAC125 decreased in children younger than 24 months (87.7 %), and the specificity of WHZ−2 decreased in children with ‘longer legs’ (82.9 %).
Table 3

Sensitivity and specificity of MUAC125 and WHZ−2 to detect slim children

  

Total N

Slim n

WHZ−2 (n = 2 022)

MUAC125 (n = 983)

Covariates

   

Sensitivity

95 % CI

Specificity

95 % CI

Sensitivity

95 % CI

Specificity

95 % CI

Long legs

Yes

4,309

847

84.2

75.9

92.5

82.9

73.7

92.1

32.2

26.4

38.0

96.8

90.2

100

No

6,079

536

68.3

63.9

72.8

95.2

90.2

100

32.0

28.0

36.1

97.5

92.9

100

Sex

Male

5,020

720

73.4

67.4

79.3

93.6

86.9

100

25.9

20.9

30.9

99.2

93.7

100

Female

5,368

663

68.8

62.7

75.0

93.4

86.6

100

33.6

28.7

38.6

100

94.8

100

Age < 24 months

Yes

3,754

664

75.0

69.9

80.2

95.0

89.2

100

57.4

51.1

63.7

87.7

80.6

94.8

No

6,634

719

65.8

59.1

72.5

94.1

86.9

100

18.1

14.0

22.1

97.6

93.1

100

Total

 

10,388

1,383

70.6

65.4

75.9

93.9

88.3

99.6

31.0

26.8

35.2

98.4

93.9

100

Slimness was defined as a WAZ<−2 in children with no linear growth retardation, i.e. with HAZ≥−2. Adjusted sensitivity and specificity are derived from multivariate multi-level linear regression models, with “survey” as random effect. The regression coefficients represent the absolute % in the dependent variable (WHZ-2 or MUAC125) between the categories of the independent variable (slimness). Sensitivity is computed by summing the regression coefficient with the constant of the regression model. Specificity is computed by using the reciprocal of the dependent and independent variables in the model. All models were adjusted for all covariates. Interactions between covariates and slimness were tested all together through a chunk test. The chunk test was highly significant for both indicators, and all covariates had a modifying effect on the sensitivity and specificity

Among the 1,383 slim children, 80.5 % (1,113/1,383) were detected by either WHZ−2 or MUAC125, but only 32.6 % (451/1,383) were identified by both indicators. Of the 508 cases identified by MUAC125, 88.8 % were also identified by WHZ−2, whereas among cases undetected by MUAC125 (n = 875), the diagnosis by WHZ−2 was consistent in only 30.9 %. Conversely, in cases undetected by WHZ−2, the diagnosis by MUAC125 was consistent in 82.6 %.

Including outliers in the analysis did not modify substantially the results (changes in coefficients were all < 5 %).

Discussion

The diagnosis of acute malnutrition by either MUAC125 or WHZ−2 was globally congruent in less than one third of the cases diagnosed in this multi-survey population, and the proportion of congruence was variable between surveys. Being a female, less than 24 months of age, and stunted were strong predictors of MUAC125, whereas having ‘longer legs’ was a factor associated with a moderate increase in WHZ−2. The sensitivity of MUAC125 for slimness (as defined by WAZ<−2 and HAZ≥−2) was overall low and extremely low in children aged ≥ 24 months. The specificity of both indicators for slimness was overall high, except in children with ‘longer legs’ for WHZ−2 (82.9 %) and in young children for MUAC125 (87.7 %).

The prevalence of MUAC125 was much lower in children aged ≥ 24 months than in younger ones, whereas the difference in the proportion of WHZ−2 between these two age categories was much smaller. Two explanations can be proposed. First, as MUAC125 relies on a single cut-off from age 6 to 59 months, it does not account for the higher MUAC observed in older normal children. Therefore, the sensitivity of MUAC125 is expected to drop with increasing age, making it a poor screening tool for acute malnutrition after age 24 months. Our results support that explanation. The sensitivity of MUAC125 to detect slim children was 57.4 % in children under 24 months of age, but dropped to 18.1 % in older children. The difference in sensitivity by age was also observed for WHZ-2, but was much smaller (75.0 % vs. 65.8 %). The overall congruence between the 2 indicators increased to 42.2 % in children with age ≤ 24 months. Our results are consistent with those reported by Myatt in a review of more than 500 surveys [15].

An alternative hypothesis is that WHZ−2 would exaggerate the diagnosis of acute malnutrition in populations with ‘longer legs’ (low SSR). In our results the specificity of WHZ−2 to identify slim children indeed decreased to 82.9 % in children with ‘longer legs’, whereas the specificity of MUAC125 was more robust. However, the contribution of SSR to the diagnosis discrepancy between the 2 indicators was small, with a congruence ranging from 26.3 % in children with ‘longer legs’ to 29.7 % in others. The multivariate analysis of being detected by MUAC125only vs. WHZ-2only showed that having ‘longer legs’ resulted in a moderate increase of WHZ-2only by about +4 %. Moreover, we observed that MUAC125 also increased in children with ‘longer legs’ in multivariate analysis, although less strongly than WHZ-2. A previous study carried out in a sample of children aged 24 to 59 months in Ethiopia reported also that both WHZ and MUAC were associated with SSR, with a weaker association for MUAC than for WHZ [11]. The implications in terms of clinical management and outcome are unknown, and should be investigated in further studies.

Being stunted was a factor associated with both indicators, but more strongly with MUAC125 than with WHZ−2. In our analysis, 18.8 % more children were identified by MUAC125only if they were stunted. Stunting is usually considered to result from a history of sub-optimal nutrition and poor health. It is therefore not unexpected that stunted children be also more vulnerable to episodes of acute malnutrition. The stronger association of stunting with MUAC125 than with WHZ−2 is less straightforward. MUAC is seen by some authors as mainly a measure of muscle mass [1618] and muscle mass is reduced in stunted children [17]. Consistently, a study in Kenya reported that upper arm muscle area Z-score, an age and gender adjusted measure of absolute lean body mass, explained most of the variability in the progression of stunting among more than 1,000 school-aged children over a 2 year-period [19]. Therefore, a low MUAC is also an indicator of stunting, in contrast to WHZ which is standardized for sex and height. This could also explain why the overlap of MUAC125 and WHZ−2 was greater in stunted than in not stunted children in our study, as a proportion of children with a WHZ−2 in stunted children would also be identified by MUAC125 because of the presence of stunting. The extent to which acute malnutrition could be overestimated by MUAC125 in stunted children or underestimated in not stunted children remains to be elucidated. For example, a study in Burkina Faso where children were admitted for nutritional rehabilitation on the basis of a low MUAC only reported that the mean daily gain in MUAC and weight was lower, the treatment duration longer and the proportion of non-responders greater in smaller children [20]. This might correspond to a suboptimal response in less severely acutely malnourished children, or be an indicator that the treatment is less effective or required in such children. It is worth mentioning that the same observation was also reported for younger children and in females in that study, i.e. in children presenting characteristics independently associated with a low MUAC.

On the other hand, the extent to which the association of stunting and low MUAC would increase the severity of the pathophysiological profile of acute malnutrition in the affected children also needs to be carefully examined. A recent meta-analysis showed a dramatic increase in mortality risk in children combining low WHZ and stunting [21]. A similar analysis is needed for MUAC.

Our study is the first one to document the concomitant influences of age, sex, HAZ and ‘longer legs’ on the diagnosis of acute malnutrition by either MUAC125 or WHZ-2. However, it is not without limitations. First, we used routine data collected in a growth monitoring program or data collected in field surveys conditions, which may have an impact on the accuracy of measurements. However, assessors received a training or a refresher session prior to the data collection, and outliers were few. Second, the analysis was based on cross-sectional assessments of anthropometric indicators alone with no possibility to assess the functional outcomes of the various malnutrition indicators. While this was useful to examine the pre-existing hypotheses to explain diagnostic discrepancy, we believe that further investigations are required now to formally analyze the pathophysiology and functional severity of the cases diagnosed by the different types of anthropometric deficits. For example, there are indications that children presenting with both MUAC125 and WHZ−2 [2] or with both stunting and a low WHZ [21] are at higher risk of dying.

Today there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of one unique indicator of acute malnutrition. The low sensitivity of MUAC125, even in children ≤ 24 months, is particularly worrisome if applied as the unique indicator in program screening. Consistently, a recent study reported that using MUAC alone to identify severely malnourished children for admission in a therapeutic centre would have failed to identify 33 % of deaths, while 98 % were identified by WHZ<−3 alone [7]. Prospective studies on the clinical and physiological outcomes of the various anthropometric indicators of malnutrition are urgently needed.

Abbreviations

HAZ: 

Height-for-age Z-score

MUAC125

Mid upper arm circumference < 125 mm

SSRZ: 

Sitting-standing height ratio Z-score

WAZ: 

Weight-for-age Z-score

WHZ-2: 

Weight-for-height Z-score<−2

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Action Against Hunger-France for providing the data collected in their programs in South Sudan, the Philippines, Chad, and Bangladesh.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine
(2)
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center
(3)
International Food Policy Research Institute
(4)
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University
(5)
Action Against Hunger

References

  1. WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. 2009. http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9789241598163/en/. Accessed 02 August 2015.
  2. Berkley J, Mwangi I, Griffiths K, Ahmed I, Mithwani S, English M, et al. Assessment of severe malnutrition among hospitalized children in rural Kenya: comparison of weight for height and mid upper arm circumference. JAMA. 2005;294:591–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fernandez MA, Delchevalerie P, Van Herp M. Accuracy of MUAC in the detection of severe wasting with the new WHO growth standards. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e195–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Laillou A, Prak S, de Groot R, Whitney S, Conkle J, Horton L, et al. Optimal screening of children with acute malnutrition requires a change in current WHO guidelines as MUAC and WHZ identify different patient groups. PLoS One. 2014;9:e101159.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dairo MD, Fatokun ME, Kuti M. Reliability of the mid upper arm circumference for the assessment of wasting among children aged 12–59 months in Urban Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Biomed Sci. 2012;8:140–3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. ENN, SCUK, ACF, UNHCR. Mid Upper Arm Circumference and Weight-for-Height Z-score as indicators of severe acute malnutrition: a consultation of operational agencies and academic specialists to understand the evidence, identify knowledge gaps and to inform operational guidance. 2012. http://www.cmamforum.org/Pool/Resources/MUAC-WFH-Report-ENN-2013.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2015.
  7. Grellety E, Krause LK, Shams EM, Porten K, Isanaka S. Comparison of weight-for-height and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) in a therapeutic feeding programme in South Sudan: is MUAC alone a sufficient criterion for admission of children at high risk of mortality? Public Health Nutr. 2015;25:1–7.Google Scholar
  8. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Roberfroid D, Hammami N, Lachat C, Weise Prinzo Z, Sibson V, Guesdon B et al. Utilization of mid-upper arm circumference versus weight-for-height in nutritional rehabilitation programmes:a systematic review of evidence. 2013. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/updates_management_SAM_infantandchildren_review1.pdf. Accessed 02 August 2015.
  10. Dasgupta R, Sinha D, Jain SK, Prasad V. Screening for SAM in the community: is MUAC a simple tool? Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:154–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Myatt M, Duffield A, Seal A, Pasteur F. The effect of body shape on weight-for-height and mid-upper arm circumference based case definitions of acute malnutrition in Ethiopian children. Ann Hum Biol. 2009;36:5–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, van Heel WJ, Dijkman-Neerincx RH, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Wit JM. Nationwide age references for sitting height, leg length, and sitting height/height ratio, and their diagnostic value for disproportionate growth disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:807–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hellevik O. Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Qual Quant. 2009;43:59–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleinbaum DG. Logistic regression: a self-learning text. New York: Springer; 1994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Myatt M, Duffield A. Weight-for-height and MUAC for estimating the prevalence of acute malnutrition. 2007. http://tng.brixtonhealth.com/sites/default/files/IASC.MUAC_.WFH_.Presentation.pdf. Accessed 02 August 2015.
  16. Bagenholm G, Nasher AA, Kristiansson B. Stunting and tissue depletion in Yemeni children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990;44:425–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Soares-Wynter SY, Walker SP. Resting metabolic rate and body composition in stunted and nonstunted children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:137–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Briend A, Zimicki S. Validation of arm circumference as an indicator of risk of death in one to four year old children. Nutr Res. 1986;6:249–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman JF, Phillips-Howard PA, Mirel LB, Terlouw DJ, Okello N, Vulule JM, et al. Progression of stunting and its predictors among school-aged children in western Kenya. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:914–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harczi G, Goossens S, Minetti A, Bekele Y, Ouannes M, Lamy M et al. Advantages of mid-upper arm circumference as an admission and discharge criterion in a selective feeding programme. 2010. Doctors Without Borders. Results presented during a WHO, UNICEF, WFP and UNHCR Consultation on the Management of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Children under 5 on 24–26 February in Geneva.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald CM, Olofin I, Flaxman S, Fawzi WW, Spiegelman D, Caulfield LE, et al. The effect of multiple anthropometric deficits on child mortality: meta-analysis of individual data in 10 prospective studies from developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:896–901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Roberfroid et al. 2015

Advertisement