Skip to main content

Table 4 Sociodemographic, behavioural, and knowledge-related correlates of the Food Processing Knowledge Score, International Food Policy Study, 2018 (n = 22,102)

From: Patterns and correlates of nutrition knowledge across five countries in the 2018 international food policy study

 

Parameter estimate (β)

95% CI

p-value

Country

 Australia vs. Canada

0.07

−0.01, 0.14

0.08

 Australia vs. Mexico

0.22

0.13, 0.30

*0.001

 Australia vs. United Kingdom

0.09

0.01, 0.16

*0.02

 Australia vs. United States

0.40

0.32, 0.48

* < .001

 Canada vs. Mexico

0.15

0.06, 0.23

* < .001

 Canada vs. United Kingdom

0.02

−0.05, 0.09

0.61

 Canada vs. United States

0.33

0.25, 0.41

* < .001

 Mexico vs. United Kingdom

−0.13

−0.21, − 0.05

*0.002

 Mexico vs. United States

0.18

0.10, 0.27

* < .001

 United Kingdom vs. United States

0.31

0.23, 0.39

* < .001

Age group

 30–44 years vs. 60+ years

−0.17

−0.24, − 0.09

* < 0.001

 45–59 years vs. 60+ years

− 0.10

−0.17, − 0.04

*0.002

 60+ years vs. 18–29 years

0.13

0.04, 0.21

*0.002

Sex

 Female vs. Male

0.26

0.21, 0.32

* < .001

Ethnicity

 Majority vs. Minority

0.19

0.11, 0.26

* < .001

Education Level

 Medium vs. Low

0.02

−0.05, 0.08

0.58

 High vs. Medium

0.01

−0.05, 0.07

0.80

 High vs. Low

0.03

−0.03, 0.08

0.40

Income Adequacy

−0.02

−0.04, 0.00

0.12

Body Mass Index

  < 18.5 vs. 18.5–24.9

−0.19

−0.34, − 0.04

*0.01

 25.0–29.9 vs. < 18.5

0.18

0.03, 0.34

*0.02

  ≥ 30.0 vs < 18.5

0.21

0.05, 0.36

*0.008

 Missing vs. 18.5–24.9

−0.32

− 0.41, − 0.23

* < .001

 Missing vs. 25.0–29.9

−0.33

0.42, − 0.24

* < .001

 Missing vs. ≥30.0

−0.31

−0.41, − 0.21

* < .001

Food Shopping Role

 Primary shopper vs. Not primary shopper

0.00

−0.12, 0.11

0.93

 Primary shopper vs. Share equally with others

−0.06

−0.12, 0.00

0.05

 Share equally with others vs. Not primary shopper

0.06

−0.06, 0.18

0.36

Dietary Practices

 One or more dietary practices (i.e., vegetarian, vegan, pescatarian, religious practices) vs. No specific dietary practices

−0.31

−0.39, − 0.23

* < .001

Dietary Efforts Score

−0.13

− 0.14, − 0.11

* < .001

Health Literacy

 Possibility of limited literacy (score 2–3) vs. High likelihood of limited literacy (0–1)

0.76

0.68, 0.84

* < .001

 Adequate literacy (score 4–6) vs. Possibility of limited literacy (score 2–3)

0.52

0.46, 0.58

* < .001

 Adequate literacy (score 4–6) vs. High likelihood of limited literacy (0–1)

1.28

1.21, 1.35

* < .001

Self-reported Nutrition Knowledge

 A little knowledgeable vs. Not at all knowledgeable

0.65

0.52, 0.79

* < .001

 A little knowledgeable vs. Somewhat knowledgeable

−0.09

−0.15, − 0.34

*0.002

 A little knowledgeable vs. Very knowledgeable

−0.16

−0.23, − 0.08

* < .001

 A little knowledgeable vs. Extremely knowledgeable

0.50

0.34, 0.66

* < .001

 Somewhat knowledgeable vs. Not at all knowledgeable

0.75

0.61, 0.88

* < .001

 Very knowledgeable vs. Not at all knowledgeable

0.81

0.67, 0.96

* < .001

 Extremely knowledgeable vs. Somewhat knowledgeable

−0.59

−0.75, −0.44

* < .001

 Extremely knowledgeable vs. Very knowledgeable

−0.66

−0.82, − 0.50

* < .001

  1. CI Confidence Intervals. *Variables are significant (p < 0.05) after post hoc adjustment using Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Only significant pairwise contrasts are shown for age group, body mass index, and self-reported nutrition knowledge. R2 = 0.24