Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between nutritional scores and CI-AKI by logistic regression analyses

From: The association between nutritional risk and contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a cross-sectional study

Nutrition indicators

Score

Model 1 (Crude)

 

Model 2 (Adjusted)

 

Model 3 (Adjusted)

 

Odds ratio [95% CI]

P value

Odds ratio [95% CI]

P value

Odds ratio [95% CI]

P value

NRS-2002

0

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 
 

1

1.580 [1.276 to 1.956]

< 0.001*

1.330 [1.045 to 1.694]

0.021*

1.364 [1.067 to 1.744]

0.013*

 

2

2.437 [1.880 to 3.159]

< 0.001*

1.811 [1.341 to 2.447]

< 0.001*

1.790 [1.319 to 2.430]

< 0.001*

 

3–7

5.796 [4.278 to 7.854]

< 0.001*

3.915 [2.678 to 5.723]

< 0.001*

4.026 [2.732 to 5.932]

< 0.001*

 

P for trend

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

CONUT

0–1

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 
 

2–3

1.040 [0.816 to 1.325]

0.754

1.043 [0.796 to 1.367]

0.762

1.059 [0.806 to 1.392]

0.682

 

4–5

1.617 [1.248 to 2.095]

< 0.001*

1.401 [1.039 to 1.890]

0.027*

1.308 [0.964 to 1.773]

0.084

 

6–12

3.470 [2.625 to 4.587]

< 0.001*

2.473 [1.771 to 3.451]

< 0.001*

2.230 [1.586 to 3.136]

< 0.001*

 

P for trend

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

PNI

< 38

4.516 [3.200 to 6.373]

< 0.001*

2.798 [1.841 to 4.253]

< 0.001*

2.349 [1.529 to 3.610]

< 0.001*

 

38–44

1.664 [1.213 to 2.282]

0.002*

1.192 [0.820 to 1.733]

0.356

1.068 [0.730 to 1.561]

0.735

 

45–51

1.174 [0.857 to 1.609]

0.317

1.002 [0.700 to 1.434]

0.991

0.960 [0.668 to 1.379]

0.825

 

≥52

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 
 

P for trend

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

GNRI

< 90

3.203 [2.327 to 4.408]

< 0.001*

2.122 [1.447 to 3.112]

< 0.001*

1.822 [1.229 to 2.702]

0.003*

 

90–96

1.321 [0.954 to 1.831]

0.094

1.097 [0.758 to 1.588]

0.622

1.009 [0.693 to 1.469]

0.961

 

97–103

1.196 [0.879 to 1.627]

0.255

1.081 [0.764 to 1.529]

0.660

1.035 [0.728 to 1.469]

0.849

 

≥104

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 

1 (reference)

 
 

P for trend

 

< 0.001*

 

< 0.001*

 

0.001*

  1. Model 1 adjusted for none
  2. Model 2 adjusted for age (per 10 years, except NRS-2002), gender (male or female), diabetes (yes or no), average SBP (< 90, 90–114, 115–139, ≥140 mmHg), eGFR (< 30, 30–59, 60–89, ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2), LVEF (< 50, 50–64, ≥65%), hemoglobin (< 110, 110–139, ≥140 g/L), C-reactive protein (< 5, 5–10, ≥10 mg/L), the volume of contrast agent consumption (< 60, 60–119, ≥120 mg), and the type of contrast agent (isotonic or hypotonic)
  3. Model 3 additionally adjusted for pre-procedure medication, including statin (yes or no), furosemide (yes or no), and dopamine (yes or no)
  4. We performed tests for the linear trend of coefficients by entering the median value of each category as a continuous variable in the models. The NRS-2002 scores already took age into account, and thus age was not adjusted in the multivariable model. The complete multivariable logistic regression model (including covariates) is presented in Table S4–5. CI indicates confidence interval. Other abbreviations refer to Table 1. *P < 0.05
Back to article page

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us