Skip to main content

Table 5 Acceptability of the measured questionnaires

From: The effects of a family-centered psychosocial-based nutrition intervention in patients with advanced cancer: the PiCNIC2 pilot randomised controlled trial

  Australian sample Hong Kong Sample
Questionnaires Mean (SD) Range Mean (SD) Range
Patientsa
 PG-SGA-SF: easy 7.52 (2.35) 0–10 6.62 ± 1.64 5–10
 PG-SGA-SF: relevant 6.79 (2.69) 0–10 6.76 ± 1.67 5–10
 Eating-related distress/enjoyment (single item): easy 7.97 (2.21) 0–10 6.61 ± 1.71 5–10
 Eating-related distress/enjoyment (single item): relevant 6.28 (3.18) 0–10 6.86 ± 1.66 5–10
 FACCT: easy 7.99 (2.21) 0–10 6.62 ± 1.62 4–10
 FACCT: relevant 6.57 (3.04) 0–10 6.81 ± 1.71 5–10
Caregiversa
 CDC: easy 8.55 (2.16) 3–10 6.86 ± 2.15 0–10
 CDC: relevant 6.27 (3.38) 0–10 6.67 ± 1.98 3–10
 ERDQ: easy 6.70 (3.62) 1–10 6.79 ± 1.83 4–10
 ERDQ: relevant 5.18 (4.24) 0–10 6.79 ± 1.72 4–10
 HADS: easy 6.90 (3.45) 1–10 7.07 ± 1.92 3–10
 HADS: relevant 6.50 (3.44) 0–10 6.60 ± 2.07 2–10
 CaSES: easy 8.09 (2.43) 2–10 6.50 ± 1.98 0–10
 CaSES: relevant 6.91 (3.08) 0–10 6.79 ± 2.03 1–10
  1. PG-SGA-SF Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form, FACCT The functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, CDC Caregiver Distress Checklist, ERDQ Eating-related Distress Questionnaire, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, CaSES Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale
  2. a29 patients and 11 caregivers completed this assessment in the Australian sample. All patients caregivers completed this assessment in the Hong Kong sample