The effects of a family-centered psychosocial-based nutrition intervention in patients with advanced cancer: the PiCNIC2 pilot randomised controlled trial

Table 5 Acceptability of the measured questionnaires

	Australian sample		Hong Kong Sample
Questionnaires	Mean (SD)	Range	Mean (SD)	Range
Patients^a
PG-SGA-SF: easy	7.52 (2.35)	0–10	6.62 ± 1.64	5–10
PG-SGA-SF: relevant	6.79 (2.69)	0–10	6.76 ± 1.67	5–10
Eating-related distress/enjoyment (single item): easy	7.97 (2.21)	0–10	6.61 ± 1.71	5–10
Eating-related distress/enjoyment (single item): relevant	6.28 (3.18)	0–10	6.86 ± 1.66	5–10
FACCT: easy	7.99 (2.21)	0–10	6.62 ± 1.62	4–10
FACCT: relevant	6.57 (3.04)	0–10	6.81 ± 1.71	5–10
Caregivers^a
CDC: easy	8.55 (2.16)	3–10	6.86 ± 2.15	0–10
CDC: relevant	6.27 (3.38)	0–10	6.67 ± 1.98	3–10
ERDQ: easy	6.70 (3.62)	1–10	6.79 ± 1.83	4–10
ERDQ: relevant	5.18 (4.24)	0–10	6.79 ± 1.72	4–10
HADS: easy	6.90 (3.45)	1–10	7.07 ± 1.92	3–10
HADS: relevant	6.50 (3.44)	0–10	6.60 ± 2.07	2–10
CaSES: easy	8.09 (2.43)	2–10	6.50 ± 1.98	0–10
CaSES: relevant	6.91 (3.08)	0–10	6.79 ± 2.03	1–10

PG-SGA-SF Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form, FACCT The functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, CDC Caregiver Distress Checklist, ERDQ Eating-related Distress Questionnaire, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, CaSES Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale
^a29 patients and 11 caregivers completed this assessment in the Australian sample. All patients caregivers completed this assessment in the Hong Kong sample

ISSN: 1475-2891