Skip to main content

Table 8 Multiple analysis of socioeconomic, occupational and lifestyle factors associated with “industrialized” farmer dietary patterns

From: Dietary patterns of Brazilian farmers and their relation with sociodemographic, labor, and lifestyle conditions

Variables

Crude

Adjusted

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

3th pattern – Industrialized

Age group

  Up to 29 years

 

1

 

1

  30 to 39 years

0.027

0.64 (0.43–0.95)

0.009

0.56 (0.36–0.87)

  40 to 49 years

< 0.001

0.37 (0.25–0.56)

< 0.001

0.33 (0.21–0.53)

  50 years or more

< 0.001

0.23 (0.14–0.36)

< 0.001

0.18 (0.10–0.30)

Race/color

  White

 

1

 

1

  Non-white

0.063

1.61 (0.97–2.65)

0.066

1.74 (0.96–3.13)

Socioeconomic class

  A or B

 

1

 

1

  C

0.141

0.64 (0.36–1.16)

0.316

0.71 (0.37–1.38)

  D or E

0.001

0.35 (0.19–0.63)

0.037

0.48 (0.24–0.96)

Nearby places for physical activity

  There is no proper place

 

1

 

1

  Around the house

0.001

1.65 (1.21–2.24)

0.065

1.40 (0.98–2.00)

Type of worked crops

  Temporary only

 

1

 

1

  Permanent only

0.165

1.56 (0.83–2.91)

0.843

1.08 (0.52–2.25)

  Temporary and permanent

0.006

1.52 (1.13–2.06)

0.012

1.57 (1.11–2.24)

Alcohol consumption

  Non-drinking

 

1

 

1

  Drinking

< 0.001

2.21 (1.64–2.97)

0.050

1.43 (1.00–2.05)

Number of places where they usually buy food

  2 places or less

 

1

 

1

  3 places or more

0.002

1.60 (1.20–2.14)

0.002

1.71 (1.21–2.41)

Monthly per capita expenditure on food purchases

  R$ 100 or less

 

1

 

1

   > R$ 100 to < R$ 200

0.044

1.39 (1.01–1.92)

0.088

1.38 (0.95–1.99)

  R$ 200 or more

0.001

2.06 (1.32–3.23)

0.003

2.22 (1.32–3.73)

Habit of eating away from home

  No or rarely

 

1

 

1

  Yes, often

< 0.001

2.21 (1.61–3.03)

0.012

1.62 (1.11–2.36)

Place where they usually meal

  At the table

 

1

 

1

  Under a different setting

< 0.001

1.82 (1.30–2.54)

0.028

1.56 (1.05–2.31)

  1. Binary logistic regression with backward selection method: likelihood ratio test, adjusted for sex. N = 740. Subtitles: OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% Confidence Interval
  2. Variables with p < 0.2 in the binary analyzes were entered in the initial model, except for “Contact with pesticide” due to multicollinearity with “Type of worked crops”: sex, age group, marital status, race/color, socioeconomic class, location for physical activity, most commonly used transportation, type of crops worked, weekly workload, alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity extra-field, screen time, number of places buying food, spending on food, habit of eating out and eating places. Only variables kept in the backward selection are presented in the table. Hosmer-Lemeshow model fit quality = 0.954
Back to article page

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us