Skip to main content

Table 1 Background characteristics of households by treatment status

From: The impact of food fortification on stunting in Zimbabwe: does gender of the household head matter?

VariableAdopted Food FortificationDifference in means
[Y – N]
Yes [Y]No [N]
Observations (%)3038(12%)22,259(88%) 
Household head is female0.2460.430.2650.441−0.019b
Household head age [Years]42.32914.91242.26615.6370.063
Marital status of household head
 Living with partner0.0220.1460.0210.1420.001
 Never married/never lived with a partner0.0140.1160.0120.1110.001
Education level of household head
 Primary level0.3110.4630.4060.491−0.095a
 ZJC level0.1080.310.0980.2970.010c
 O′ level0.3960.4890.3360.4720.060a
 A’ level0.0230.1510.0170.1310.006b
 Diploma/Certificate after primary0.0080.0910.0030.0510.006a
 Diploma/Certificate after secondary0.0410.1970.0120.1070.029a
Household characteristics
 Household size (number of members)4.7791.9314.6971.9340.083b
 Proportion of economically active household members0.4470.2460.4240.2490.023a
 Number of chronically ill household members0.1550.4760.1460.4580.009
 Number of mentally ill household members0.0840.3230.0910.34−0.008
 Number of children with sick mothers in the household0.0210.1650.0280.196−0.007b
 Number of children with sick fathers in the household0.0160.1510.0180.161−0.001
 Household is located in rural areas0.9270.260.9250.2640.002
 Mash Central0.1180.3220.1180.3220
 Mash East0.1520.3590.1260.3320.025a
 Mash West0.10.30.1170.322−0.018a
 Mat North0.1840.3880.1090.3120.075a
 Mat South0.0880.2830.1020.303−0.015a
  1. Notes
  2. Sample size of 25,297 is the actual number of households with children under 5 years
  3. The fifth column shows the results of two-tailed t-test for the difference in the means. a, b, and c indicate the 1, 5, and 10% levels of significance, the assumption is that the sub-samples have an unequal variance
  4. The data are expressed as proportions unless otherwise stated