Skip to main content

Table 3 Diet Quality Index-International and sub-scores overall and by gender, 20–49 y. in Greater Tunis

From: Gender inequalities in diet quality and their socioeconomic patterning in a nutrition transition context in the Middle East and North Africa: a cross-sectional study in Tunisia

 

All

(n = 2545)

Women

(n = 1651)

Men

(n = 894)

Women vs. Men

Meana

SEMb

Meana

SEMb

Meana

SEMb

Diff.c

95% CId

Pe

Diet Quality Index-International (/100)

59.5

0.3

58.6

0.3

60.4

0.3

− 1.8

− 2.6, − 1.0

<0.0001

Variety score (/20)

11.1

0.1

10.1

0.1

12.1

0.2

−2.0

− 2.3, − 1.6

<0.0001

 Overall food group variety

9.4

0.1

8.8

0.1

10.0

0.1

−1.3

− 1.5, − 1.0

<0.0001

 Within-group variety for protein source

1.7

0.0

1.4

0.1

2.1

0.1

−0.7

− 0.9, − 0.6

<0.0001

Adequacy score (/40)

31.6

0.1

30.8

0.1

32.5

0.1

−1.8

−2.0, − 1.5

<0.0001

 Grain group

4.7

0.0

4.7

0.1

4.7

0.1

0.0

−0.1, 0.1

0.44

 Fruit group

1.9

0.1

2.1

0.1

1.8

0.1

+ 0.3

0.2, 0.5

0.0003

 Vegetable group

2.7

0.0

2.7

0.1

2.7

0.1

+ 0.0

−0.1, 0.1

0.85

 Dietary fibers

4.8

0.0

4.7

0.1

4.8

0.1

−0.1

−0.1, 0.0

0.0032

 Protein

5.0

0.0

5.0

0.1

5.0

0.1

+ 0.0

−0.1, 0.1

0.29

 Iron

4.2

0.0

3.4

0.1

5.0

0.1

−1.6

− 1.7, − 1.6

<0.0001

 Calcium

3.4

0.0

3.2

0.1

3.6

0.1

−0.4

−0.5, − 0.3

<0.0001

 Vitamin C

5.0

0.0

5.0

0.1

5.0

0.1

+ 0.0

−0.1, 0.1

0.73

Moderation score (/30)

13.2

0.1

14.2

0.2

12.3

0.2

+ 1.8

1.4, 2.2

<0.0001

 Total fat

2.1

0.1

2.2

0.1

2.1

0.1

+ 0.1

−0.1, 0.2

0.39

 Saturated fat

4.6

0.1

4.5

0.1

4.6

0.1

−0.1

−0.3, 0.1

0.28

 Cholesterol

5.0

0.1

5.4

0.1

4.7

0.1

+ 0.7

0.5, 0.9

<0.0001

 Sodium

1.4

0.1

1.9

0.1

0.8

0.1

+ 1.2

1.0, 1.3

<0.0001

 Empty calorie foods

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

+ 0.0

−0.1, 0.1

0.42

Overall balance score (/10)

3.5

0.1

3.5

0.1

3.4

0.1

+ 0.1

−0.2, 0.4

0.42

 Macronutrient ratio

2.6

0.1

2.7

0.1

2.6

0.1

+ 0.1

−0.1, 0.3

0.58

 Fatty acid ratio

0.8

0.0

0.9

0.1

0.8

0.1

+ 0.0

−0.1, 0.2

0.46

  1. aWeighted mean (accounting for unequal probabilities of selection and differential response rates)
  2. bSEM: standard error of the mean taking into account sampling design
  3. cWomen vs. Men difference of means (unadjusted)
  4. d95% confidence interval taking into account sampling design
  5. eP value for Women vs. Men difference. Diet quality as assessed by the DQ-I (Diet Quality Index-International) and sub-components (variety, adequacy, moderation and balance), derived from the 3-day prospective food record, overall and by gender, among 20-49 year old subjects in the Greater Tunis area, Tunisia