Table 3 Significance levels of comparisons between diagnostic groups using Marascuilo post-hoc analysis procedure
Children with marasmus | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparisons | All | IPF | OTP | SFC |
0–60 m | p | p | p | p |
muac v whz | 0.000 | ns | 0.001 | ns |
muac v both | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
whz v both | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
6 - < 18 m | ||||
muac v whz | 0.000 | ns | ns | ns |
muac v both | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 |
whz v both | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.000 | ns |
18 - < 36 m | ||||
muac v whz | 0.000 | ns | 0.000 | ns |
muac v both | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | ns |
whz v both | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ns |
36–60 m | ||||
muac v whz | ns | ns | ns | ns |
muac v both | 0.000 | 0.000 | ns | ns |
whz v both | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.019 | ns |
Children with kwashiorKor/marasmic-kwashiorKor | ||||
Comparisons | All | IPF | OTP | |
0–60 m | p | p | p | |
K-muac v Kwash | ns | ns | ns | |
K-whz v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
K-both v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
K-muac v K-whz | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | |
K-muac v K-both | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
K-whz v K-both | ns | ns | 0.041 | |
6 - < 18 m | ||||
K-muac v Kwash | ns | ns | ns | |
K-whz v Kwash | 0.014 | ns | ns | |
K-both v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.000 | ns | |
K-muac v K-whz | 0.007 | ns | 0.006 | |
K-muac v K-both | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | |
K-whz v K-both | ns | ns | ns | |
18 - < 36 m | ||||
K-muac v Kwash | ns | ns | ns | |
K-whz v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | |
K-both v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
K-muac v K-whz | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.001 | |
K-muac v K-both | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
K-whz v K-both | ns | ns | ns | |
36–60 m | ||||
K-muac v Kwash | 0.047 | ns | ns | |
K-whz v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.000 | |
K-both v Kwash | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
K-muac v K-whz | 0.007 | ns | 0.002 | |
K-muac v K-both | 0.000 | 0.002 | ns | |
K-whz v K-both | ns | ns | ns | |