Skip to main content

Table 6 Reduction in mean WOMAC subscores in placebo, GC and UC-II groups over 180 days

From: Efficacy and tolerability of an undenatured type II collagen supplement in modulating knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Parameter reduction

Day

Placebo (n = 53)

GC (n = 57)

UC-II (n = 54)

p value

     

Overalla

GC vs PBO

UC-II vs PBOb

UC-II vs GCc

WOMAC pain

7

3.21 ± 0.58

4.57 ± 0.54

3.88 ± 0.55

-

-

-

-

30

6.61 ± 1.04

7.89 ± 1.00

9.18 ± 1.01

-

-

-

-

60

8.17 ± 1.10

10.1 ± 1.07

12.7 ± 1.09

0.0149

-

0.011

-

90

11.2 ± 1.17

12.7 ± 1.14

16.4 ± 1.16

0.0063

-

0.0059

-

120

12.9 ± 1.28

15.6 ± 1.22

19.9 ± 1.26

0.0005

-

0.0004

0.040

150

15.0 ± 1.21

17.5 ± 1.16

21.5 ± 1.20

0.0007

-

0.0006

0.047

180

17.0 ± 1.25

19.2 ± 1.20

24.0 ± 1.23

0.0003

-

0.0003

0.016

WOMAC stiffness

7

3.47 ± 0.64

4.22 ± 0.61

4.24 ± 0.62

-

-

-

-

30

6.81 ± 1.10

8.76 ± 1.05

9.28 ± 1.07

-

-

-

-

60

9.36 ± 1.28

11.5 ± 1.25

13.1 ± 1.27

-

-

-

-

90

11.3 ± 1.36

13.8 ± 1.32

17.0 ± 1.35

0.0158

-

0.010

-

120

13.6 ± 1.40

15.0 ± 1.34

20.0 ± 1.39

0.0035

-

0.0039

0.029

150

15.5 ± 1.32

17.7 ± 1.26

21.3 ± 1.31

0.0079

-

0.0058

-

180

17.8 ± 1.31

19.4 ± 1.27

23.8 ± 1.30

0.0043

-

0.004

0.044

WOMAC physical function

7

3.17 ± 0.56

4.14 ± 0.53

3.91 ± 0.53

-

-

-

-

30

6.30 ± 1.00

7.80 ± 0.96

9.26 ± 0.98

-

-

-

-

60

7.75 ± 1.08

9.50 ± 1.05

11.9 ± 1.07

0.0278

-

0.020

-

90

10.4 ± 1.17

12.1 ± 1.14

15.1 ± 1.16

0.0182

-

0.0136

-

120

12.7 ± 1.20

14.5 ± 1.15

17.9 ± 1.19

0.0083

-

0.0064

-

150

14.8 ± 1.19

16.9 ± 1.14

20.0 ± 1.18

0.0078

-

0.006

-

180

17.3 ± 1.21

18.8 ± 1.16

22.5 ± 1.20

0.0068

-

0.007

-

  1. Values presented as Mean ± SE
  2. aOverall p value was obtained by comparing the mean changes among the three groups using ANCOVA
  3. bSignificant difference between the UC-II and the placebo groups using Tukey-Kramer test
  4. cSignificant difference between the UC-II and the GC groups using Tukey-Kramer test. ‘-’denotes a non-significant statistical outcome