Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bridget Benelam |
23 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Moorhead |
25 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Levitsky |
8 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vicky Drapeau |
7 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Poppitt |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Moorhead |
6 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Levitsky |
6 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vicky Drapeau |
14 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Poppitt |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
18 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sally Poppitt |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
24 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
24 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1475-2891-9-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.