Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - M. Daniel Lane |
9 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Havel |
12 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John White |
20 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy Carr |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John White |
6 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - M. Daniel Lane |
11 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Havel |
18 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy Carr |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Barclay |
31 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luc Tappy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
2 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Timothy Carr |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
14 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-130 |
You can find further information about peer review here.