Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brenda Davy |
1 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bret Goodpaster |
8 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tore Christiansen |
24 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Coker |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bret Goodpaster |
29 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brenda Davy |
11 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Coker |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Coker |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
28 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-105 |
You can find further information about peer review here.