Peer Review reports
From: Food for thought: an exploratory study of how physicians experience poor workplace nutrition
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chesluk |
| 18 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hector Baillie |
| 13 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jane Lemaire |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chesluk |
| 30 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jane Lemaire |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jane Lemaire |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jane Lemaire |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-18 |
You can find further information about peer review here.