Is drop-out from obesity treatment a predictable and preventable event?

  • Ottavia Colombo4,

    Affiliated with

    • Virginia Valeria Ferretti2,

      Affiliated with

      • Cinzia Ferraris4,

        Affiliated with

        • Claudia Trentani4,

          Affiliated with

          • Piergiuseppe Vinai3, 4,

            Affiliated with

            • Simona Villani2 and

              Affiliated with

              • Anna Tagliabue4Email author

                Affiliated with

                Nutrition Journal201413:13

                DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-13

                Received: 18 October 2013

                Accepted: 28 January 2014

                Published: 3 February 2014

                Abstract

                Background

                Attrition is an important but understudied issue that plays a vital role in the successful treatment of obesity. To date, most studies focusing on attrition rates and/or its predictors have been based on pretreatment data routinely collected for other purposes. Our study specifically aims at identifying the predictors of drop-out focusing on empirically or theoretically-based factors.

                Methods

                We conducted a retrospective observational study in an academic outpatient clinical nutrition service in Pavia, Italy. We examined a total of 98 adult obese patients (36 males, 62 females) who underwent a 6-month dietary behavioral weight-loss treatment at our Center. Pre-treatment and treatment-related variables were collected or calculated from clinical charts in order to discriminate those subjects who completed treatment from those who abandoned it before its completion. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of drop-out.

                Results

                The drop-out rates were 21% at 1 month and 57% at 6 months. Compared with completers, noncompleters were significantly younger in terms of age at first dieting attempt (24.0 ± 10.7 vs. 31.3 ± 11.2 years, P = 0.005), had lower diastolic blood pressure (87.8 ± 9.7 vs. 92.7 ± 11.4 mmHg, P = 0.022), had a lower baseline body fat percentage (38.5 ± 6.4 vs. 41.2 ± 4.4% weight, P = 0.015), and had a lower percentage of early weight loss (-1.8 ± 1.8% vs. -3.1 ± 2.1%, P = 0.035). Moreover, noncompleters significantly differed from completers with regard to type of referral (34.1% vs. 53.3% sent by a physician, P = 0.036) and SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale (0.83 ± 0.72 vs. 0.53 ± 0.51, P = 0.022). A multivariable logistic regression analysis including pre-treatment variables showed that body fat percentage (P = 0.030) and SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale (P = 0.021) were independently associated with attrition. In a multivariable model considering both pre-treatment and treatment-related factors, attrition was found to be independently related to the age at first dieting attempt (P = 0.016) and the achievement of early weight loss (P = 0.029).

                Conclusions

                Our data confirm that psychopathological tracts, early dieting attempts, and a poor initial treatment response are key independent predictors of drop-out from obesity treatment.

                Keywords

                Obesity treatment Drop-out Attrition rate Predictors Early weight loss

                Introduction

                The treatment of obesity continues to present major challenges, including poor adherence to diet, inadequate and unsatisfactory weight loss, weight regain, and high rates of attrition. The literature on attrition in the treatment of obesity is heterogeneous, with ranges varying from 10% to 80% depending on the setting and the type of program [1]. Notably, intervention trials reported a mean attrition rate of more than 40% within the first 12 months [2].

                To date, most studies focusing on attrition rates and/or its predictors have been based on pre-treatment data (e.g., weight and presence of comorbidities) routinely collected for other purposes (e.g., identifying predictors and correlates of weight loss) [38]. High drop-out rates from obesity treatment have been associated with baseline characteristics such as young age [3, 911], low education levels [6, 9, 12], poor dieting behaviors [3, 5, 8, 12, 13], and unhealthy lifestyles [1215]. However, the literature on predictors of attrition in obesity treatment is limited by different study designs and inconsistencies across studies.

                Emerging evidence suggests that psychological distress (including depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem) [4, 7, 9, 12, 1619] and the failure to achieve reasonable weight loss goals during the first weeks of treatment [46, 9, 12, 13, 15] are important predictors of drop-out. Previous studies have also reported high rates of psychopathology both in obese [2022] and normal-weight persons [23] wishing to lose weight. These findings suggest that factors related to the psychological well-being need to be carefully considered so that obese patients keep attending their weight loss program.

                The present study specifically aims at identifying the predictors of drop-out from obesity treatment focusing on empirically (e.g., unsatisfactory early weight loss) or theoretically-based (e.g., psychopathological symptoms and dieting behaviors) factors. Because some results may be population-specific [24, 25], we also sought to replicate in an Italian academic setting the previously identified predictors of drop-out [1, 319].

                Methods

                Study design and sample

                This research was designed as a retrospective observational study. Participants were adult (age ≥ 18 years) obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) who were consecutively referred for weight loss to the Human Nutrition Research Centre, University of Pavia (Italy) between January 2006 and December 2008. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, major physical illnesses, and psychiatric disorders requiring treatment with atypical antipsychotics. All of the participants underwent a standardized psychological and nutritional assessment before starting a dietary/behavioral weight loss protocol. This study was conducted according to the tenets of Helsinki Declaration and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pavia. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

                Weight loss protocol

                The weight loss protocol consisted in a 6-month dietary behavioral program. A dietary plan was prepared by a registered dietician for every patient at the beginning of the program; the dietary plan consisted of an individualized balanced low-calorie diet. The energy content was calculated to obtain a weight loss of 0.5 to 1 kg/wk within 6 months according to the Clinical guidelines for the treatment of obesity [26]. The macronutrient composition targets were 25-30% for fats, 55-65% for carbohydrates and 15% for proteins according to the Dietary Reference Values [27]. The diets were calculated using Dieta Ragionata 7.0 (Esi Stampa Medica srl, San Donato Milanese, Italy) which includes the Italian food composition tables. The patients were required to visit our center on a monthly basis for follow-up visits, which were conducted by a physician specialized in clinical nutrition. During the visits, we checked patient body weight and body composition and, when necessary, delt with obstacles hindering weight loss and physical activity. Moreover, possible changes to the dietary plan were discussed with the dietician.

                Predictors of drop-out

                The potential predictors of drop-out were collected and/or calculated from clinical charts. Both pre-treatment (i.e., socio-demographic, nutritional, psychopathological features) and treatment-related variables (i.e., achievement of early weight loss at one month) were considered for the purpose of analysis. The following data were collected: socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, marital status, education level, occupational status, smoking habits, physical activity), anthropometric and nutritional variables (weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio [WHR]), baseline body composition (percentage body fat [%BF] from skinfold thickness), lower and higher weight achieved during adulthood, age at first dieting attempt, number and reasons of previous attempts to lose weight, type of referral, weight loss goals, and components of the metabolic syndrome. The psychopathological features were assessed by means of validated psychometric instruments. In all participants, we assessed weight loss goals and the achievement of early weight loss at 1 month.

                Psychometric tests

                The Symptoms Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R), a self-report checklist inquiring about symptoms during the preceding week, was used as a measure of general psychopathology [28]. Depressive symptoms and eating behaviors were determined using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [29] and the Binge Eating Scale (BES) [30], respectively.

                Statistical analysis

                Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared using the chi-squared test or the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Continuous data were summarized as means and standard deviations. Unpaired Student’s t-tests (with Satterthwaite’s correction for degrees of freedom) or the Mann-Whitney’s U tests were applied to assess the differences in quantitative variables between patients who dropped out at 1 and 6 months and treatment completers. The net changes in the study variables at 6 months were expressed as percentages of the baseline data and compared using paired Student’s t-tests. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the independent predictors of attrition. All of the variables which were significantly associated with attrition (P < 0.05) in univariate analyses were selected into the multivariable model. All calculations were performed using the statistical softwares Stata 10 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) and SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

                Results

                General characteristics of completers and noncompleters

                Ninety-eight obese adults (36 males and 62 females) were included in the study. The total drop-out rate at one month was 21 (21.4%), without significant sex differences (27.8% in males and 17.7% in females; χ2 = 1.4, P = 0.243). At 6 months, the total drop-out rate (including subjects who dropped-out at 1 month) was 57% (56 subjects). Again, we found no evidence of a significant sex difference (55.6% in males and 58.1% in females; χ2 = 0.1, P = 0.809). Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the entire study cohort, divided in completers and noncompleters. Subjects who did not complete the weight loss program were significantly younger at their first dieting attempt; moreover, they had lower%BF (skinfold thickness) and diastolic blood pressure values compared with completers. No other significant intergroup differences were noted in terms of clinical, nutritional, socio-demographic, and lifestyle-related characteristics.
                Table 1

                Baseline general and nutritional characteristics of the entire study cohort stratified according to the presence or absence of attrition (noncompleters and completers)

                 

                Entire cohort (n = 98)

                Noncompleters (n = 56)

                Completers (n = 42)

                t-test and P value

                Age (years)

                44.8 ± 14.2

                43.1 ± 15.0

                47.2 ± 12.7

                t = 1.5, p = 0.150

                Weight (Kg)

                98.3 ± 17.5

                97.3 ± 14.9

                99.7 ± 20.6

                t = 0.6, p = 0.530

                Height (cm)

                166.8 ± 9.7

                166.9 ± 9.0

                166.6 ± 10.6

                t = -0.2, p = 0.879

                Body mass index (kg/m2)

                35.2 ± 4.8

                34.9 ± 4.5

                35.7 ± 5.1

                t = 0.8, p = 0.413

                Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

                136.5 ± 14.9

                134.1 ± 14.5

                139.8 ± 15.1

                t = 1.9, p = 0.064

                Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

                89.9 ± 10.7

                87.8 ± 9.7

                92.7 ± 11.4

                t = 2.3, p = 0.022

                Waist circumference (cm)

                110.1 ± 12.5

                109.1 ± 11.9

                111.4 ± 13.3

                t = 0.9, p = 0.382

                Hip circumference (cm)

                119.5 ± 12.4

                118.7 ± 9.2

                120.8 ± 16.4

                t = 0.6, p = 0.529

                Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)

                0.92 ± 0.10

                0.91 ± 0.10

                0.93 ± 0.10

                t = 0.9, p = 0.384

                %BF skinfold thickness

                39.6 ± 5.7

                38.5 ± 6.4

                41.2 ± 4.4

                t = 2.5, p = 0.015

                Highest weight in adult age (Kg)

                100.2 ± 19.7

                99.1 ± 16.7

                101.6 ± 23.2

                t = 0.5, p = 0.592

                Lowest weight in adult age (Kg)

                66.7 ± 13.1

                67.7 ± 13.0

                65.5 ± 13.4

                t = -0.7, p = 0.475

                Age at first dieting attempt (years)

                27.4 ± 11.5

                24.0 ± 10.7

                31.3 ± 11.2

                t = 2.9, p = 0.005

                Weight loss goal (kg)

                23.6 ± 13.2

                23.3 ± 11.7

                23.9 ± 15.2

                t = 0.2, p = 0.838

                Weight loss goal (%)

                23.1 ± 9.8

                23.6 ± 9.3

                22.4 ± 10.6

                t = -0.5, p = 0.595

                Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation and compared using unpaired Student’s t-tests.

                Of the 42 subjects who completed treatment, more than 50% were referred to our center by a physician, 36.7% by relatives or friends, whereas 10% did not receive any referral. In contrast, only 34.1% of noncompleters was referred by a physician, 36.4% was advised by relatives or friends, whereas 30% did not receive any referral (Fisher’s exact test; P = 0.036).

                Psychometric characteristics of completers and noncompleters

                Table 2 shows the psychometric characteristics of the entire study cohort, divided in completers and noncompleters. Compared with completers, subjects who did not complete the weight loss program had significantly higher scores at the SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale. Although there was a marginally significant difference in BES scores between the two groups, no other significant psychometric differences were found.
                Table 2

                Baseline psychometric characteristics of the entire study cohort stratified according to the presence or absence of attrition (noncompleters and completers)

                 

                Entire cohort (n = 98)

                Noncompleters (n = 56)

                Completers (n = 42)

                t-test and P value

                SCL-90

                    

                Somatization

                0.87 ± 0.70

                0.78 ± 0.64

                0.98 ± 0.77

                t = 1.32, p = 0.189

                Obsessivity-compulsivity

                0.74 ± 0.58

                0.83 ± 0.57

                0.63 ± 0.57

                t = −1.66, p = 0.101

                Interpersonal sensitivity

                0.71 ± 0.68

                0.82 ± 0.71

                0.57 ± 0.31

                t = −1.73, p = 0.087

                Depression

                0.81 ± 0.69

                0.91 ± 0.70

                0.68 ± 0.67

                t = −1.60, p = 0.112

                Anxiety

                0.71 ± 0.62

                0.80 ± 0.66

                0.60 ± 0.56

                t = −1.51, p = 0.135

                Anger-hostility

                0.70 ± 0.65

                0.83 ± 0.72

                0.53 ± 0.51

                t = −2.33, p = 0.022

                Phobic anxiety

                0.29 ± 0.49

                0.29 ± 0.51

                0.29 ± 0.46

                t = −0.00, p = 0.998

                Paranoid ideation

                0.66 ± 0.60

                0.68 ± 0.64

                0.64 ± 0.56

                t = −0.31, p = 0.755

                Psychoticism

                0.39 ± 0.46

                0.43 ± 0.49

                0.34 ± 0.44

                t = −0.93, p = 0.358

                GSI

                0.67 ± 0.51

                0.73 ± 0.52

                0.60 ± 0.49

                t = −1.20, p = 0.233

                BES

                9.4 ± 7.0

                12.7 ± 9.1

                9.2 ± 7.1

                t = −1.9, p = 0.059

                BDI

                11.2 ± 8.5

                9.8 ± 7.1

                8.9 ± 6.9

                t = −0.6, p = 0.531

                SCL-90: Symptom Checklist-90; GSI: Global Severity Index; BES: Binge Eating Scale; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory.

                Weight loss

                Independent of treatment length, 69 of the study participants (70.4%) showed weight loss, 23 (23.5%) did not show significant weight changes, whereas the remaining 6 subjects (6.1%) had weight gain (Figure 1). The weight loss was greater than 5% of the initial body weight in 43 of the study subjects (43.9%). The mean weight loss percentage was 4.1 ± 4.2% (ranging between +4.0% and -16.3%), whereas the mean early weight loss percentage was 2.5 ± 2.0% (ranging between from +2.0% to -8.8%). Compared with noncompleters, completers showed higher percentages of weight loss both at one month (-3.1 ± 2.1% vs. -1.8 ± 1.8%, P < 0.01) and at the end of treatment (-7.3 ± 4.1% vs. -1.7 ± 2.4%, P < 0.001).
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2891-13-13/MediaObjects/12937_2013_752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                Figure 1

                Percentage of weight change in the 98 study participants observed during the entire study period (weight registered at the last visit attended vs. weight at the first visit).

                Predictors of drop-out

                A multivariable logistic regression analysis including pre-treatment variables (Table 3) showed that body fat percentage (P = 0.030) and the SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale (P = 0.021) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of attrition. The risk of drop-out was reduced by approximately 15% for each one percent increase in body fat, whereas there was a 4-fold increase in the risk of drop-out for each 1-point in the SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale. In a multivariable model considering both pre-treatment and treatment-related factors (Table 4), attrition was found to be independently related to the age at first dieting attempt (p = 0.016) and the achievement of early weight loss (p = 0.029). The risk of drop-out decreased by 11% for each 1-year increase in the age at the first dieting attempt. Moreover, the risk of drop-out was reduced by 40% for each 1-point percentage decrease in body weight at one month compared with baseline values.
                Table 3

                Multivariable logistic regression analysis for pre-treatment variables predicting drop-out from obesity treatment

                 

                Odds ratio

                95% confidence interval

                P value

                Age at first dieting attempt

                0.95

                0.90 − 1.01

                0.096

                Sex (males vs. female)

                0.26

                0.04 − 1.61

                0.149

                Diastolic blood pressure

                0.98

                0.93 − 1.04

                0.553

                %BF skinfold thickness

                0.84

                0.72 − 0.98

                0.030

                SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale

                4.61

                1.26 − 16.85

                0.021

                %BF: percentage body fat.

                Table 4

                Multivariable logistic regression analysis for pre-treatment variables and treatment-related factors predicting drop-out from obesity treatment

                 

                Odds ratio

                95% confidence interval

                P value

                Age at first dieting attempt

                0.89

                0.81–0.98

                0.016

                Sex (males vs. female)

                0.17

                0.02–1.94

                0.155

                Diastolic blood pressure

                1.00

                0.94–1.07

                0.980

                %BF skinfold thickness

                0.81

                0.65–1.01

                0.059

                SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale

                3.97

                0.79–19.90

                0.094

                Early weight loss (%)

                0.57

                0.34–0.95

                0.029

                %BF: percentage body fat.

                Discussion

                The identification and validation of reliable predictors of attrition would be helpful in reducing the drop-out from obesity treatment. In this study, we specifically aimed at identifying the predictors of drop-out focusing on theoretically- (e.g., psychopathological symptoms and dieting behaviors) or empirically-based (e.g., unsatisfactory early weight loss) factors.

                Despite the higher drop-out rate (57% at 6 months) observed in our study, our findings are generally in line with those reported in recent studies with a similar treatment duration [5, 17, 31]. Our results indicate that few baseline variables (%BF, diastolic blood pressure, type of referral, and age at first dieting attempt) significantly differed between completers and noncompleters. It is conceivable that subjects with a higher awareness of their impaired health status may have a lower drop-out rate. Notably, obese subjects are characterized by a high prevalence of psychopathology [23] which may in turn have a significant impact on attrition. Interestingly, our results indicate that higher anger-hostility scores on the SCL-90 are associated with increased drop-out rates, suggesting that anger and anger expression styles may predict attrition among adult obese individuals wishing to lose weight. Different mechanisms may explain the relation between anger-hostility and an increased risk of drop-out. Burns and coworkers [32] reported that hostile patients are characterized by a negative set of expectations and tend to be suspicious of others [33]. Such a suspicious relational style may predispose them to reject the physician’s suggestions [34]. Negative expectations may also undermine the confidence with health care providers and lead to an inability to follow the clinician’s recommendations. Moreover, physicians may be alienated [32] by cynicism and hostility, which can in turn result in poor treatment engagement. Finally, hostility could also contribute to the likelihood of drop-out through its association with negative affect [35].

                The high attrition rate (21.4%) observed in our study at one month highlights the paramount role played by baseline motivational status for predicting treatment discontinuation [31, 36]. In accordance with previous data [6], we found that the achievement of early weight loss may represent a strong motivational incentive for obtaining clinically meaningful weight loss goals. Taken together, these data confirm that the attrition rates in weight loss programs are not only related to psychopathological variables (i.e., anger) and age at first dieting attempt, but also to treatment-related factors such as the percentage of initial body weight lost after the first weeks of treatment [9]. It is likely that anger and hostility can act as upstream factors of early weight loss, i.e. individuals who show signs of anger will be less likely to comply with the weight loss regimen and therefore lose less weight early in the program. Additionally, both a lower stress threshold and a poorer capability to accept worse-than-expected outcomes (i.e., weight loss) could make those subjects abandon treatment before its completion. Notably, we found a borderline higher BES score in noncompleters, which may suggest a reduced self-control level towards food.

                Several previous studies conducted in different settings have been designed to identify the potential baseline predictors of drop-out from obesity treatment. The findings from our current study are generally in agreement with the majority of previous reports in the field [3, 715, 17, 18] although the results were not always consistent [6, 8, 9, 12] and sporadically even were at variance [5, 11]. There are several potential reasons that may account for the discrepant findings across studies, including differences in the study settings, the number and characteristics of the subjects recruited, and the type of weight loss protocols.

                Our report has some limitations that merit consideration. First, this study was based on a convenience sample, which limits the generalizability of its findings. Second, we did not specifically investigate the reasons of drop-out. Finally, our study was conducted on a limited number of Italian obese patients who were enrolled in an obesity treatment program in an outpatient academic setting; therefore, our results might not apply to different settings and need further validation before firm conclusions can be made.

                Conclusion

                In summary, the results from the current study indicate that baseline body fat percentage, SCL-90 anger-hostility subscale, and age at first attempt to diet were independent predictors of drop-out from treatment in an Italian cohort of adult obese subjects. Importantly, we also demonstrate that the achievement of early weight loss was independently associated with a reduced attrition rate. These results highlight the importance of a close clinical monitoring in the first weeks of treatment to reduce the attrition rates and make drop-out from obesity treatment not only predictable but also preventable. Future studies are needed to determine whether targeted psychological interventions may reduce attrition rates in obese subjects with significant anger and anger expression styles.

                Abbreviations

                BMI: 

                Body mass index

                %BF: 

                Percentage body fat

                WHR: 

                Waist-to-hip ratio

                SCL-90: 

                Symptoms checklist-90

                BDI: 

                Beck depression inventory

                BES: 

                Binge eating scale.

                Declarations

                Authors’ Affiliations

                (1)
                Human Nutrition and Eating Disorder Research Center, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensics Medicine, University of Pavia
                (2)
                Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensics Medicine, University of Pavia
                (3)
                Studi Cognitivi” Post Graduate Cognitive Psychotherapy School Research Group
                (4)
                “GNOSIS” Research and Psychotherapy Group V

                References

                1. Moroshko I, Brennan L, O'Brien P: Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev 2011, 12:912–934.View Article
                2. Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, et al.: Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction; a randomized trial. JAMA 2005, 293:43–53.View Article
                3. Gunnarsdóttir I, Sigurgeirsdóttir GK, Thórsdóttir I: Predictors of dropping out in a weight loss intervention trial. Ann Nutr Metab 2010, 56:212. Epublication 11 March 2010View Article
                4. Lim SS, Norman RJ, Clifton PM, et al.: Psychological effects of prescriptive vs. general lifestyle advice for weight loss in young women. J Am Diet Assoc 2009, 109:1917–1921.View Article
                5. Messier V, Hayek J, Karelis AD, et al.: Anthropometric, metabolic, psychosocial and dietary factors associated with dropout in overweight and obese postmenopausal women engaged in a 6-month weight loss programme: a MONET study. Br J Nutr 2010, 103:1230–1235. Epublication 24 November 2009
                6. Elfhag K, Rossner S: Initial weight loss is the best predictor for success in obesity treatment and sociodemographic liabilities increase risk of drop-out. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 79:361–366.View Article
                7. Chang MW, Brown R, Nitzke S: Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:424.View Article
                8. Inelmen EM, Toffanello ED, Enzi G, et al.: Predictors of drop-out in overweight and obese outpatients. Int J Obes 2005, 29:122–128.View Article
                9. Fabricatore AN, Wadden TA, Moore RH, et al.: Predictors of attrition and weight loss success: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther 2009, 47:685–691. Epublication 20 May 2009View Article
                10. Gripeteg L, Karlsson J, Torgerson J, et al.: Predictors of very-low-energy diet outcome in obese women and men. Obes Facts 2010, 3:159–165. Epublication 11 June 2010View Article
                11. Dalle Grave R, Calugi S, Molinari E, et al.: Weight loss expectations in obese patients and treatment attrition: an observational multicenter study. Ob Res 2005, 13:1961–1969.View Article
                12. Bradshaw AJ, Horwath CC, Katzer L, et al.: Non-dieting group interventions for overweight and obese women: what predicts non-completion and does completion improve outcomes? Public Health Nutr 2010, 13:1622–1628.View Article
                13. Greenberg I, Stampfer MJ, Schwarzfuchs D, et al.: Adherence and success in long-term weight loss diets: the dietary intervention randomized controlled trial (DIRECT). J Am Coll Nutr 2009, 28:159–168.View Article
                14. Busetto L, Mazza M, Salvalaio S, et al.: Obesity treatment in elderly outpatients: predictors of efficacy and drop-out. Eat Weight Disord 2009, 14:e56-e65.View Article
                15. Kong W, Langlois MF, Kamga-Ngandé C, et al.: Predictors of success to weight-loss intervention program in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010, 90:147–153. Epublication 24 July 2010View Article
                16. De Panfilis C, Cero S, Dall’Aglio E, et al.: Psychopathological predictors of compliance and outcome in weight-loss obesity treatment. Acta Biomed 2007, 78:22–28.
                17. De Panfilis C, Torre M, Cero S, et al.: Personality and attrition from behavioral weight-loss treatment for obesity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008, 30:515–520. Epublication 3 August 2008View Article
                18. Komulainen T, Keränen AM, Rasinaho E, et al.: Quitting a weight loss program is associated with anhedonia: preliminary findings of the Lifestyle Intervention Treatment Evaluation Study in northern Finland. Int J Circumpolar Health 2011, 70:72–78. Epublication 16 February 2011View Article
                19. Somerset SM, Graham L, Markwell K: Depression scores predict adherence in a dietary weight loss intervention trial. Clin Nutr 2011, 30:593–598. Epublication 14 May 2011View Article
                20. Marchesini G, Bellini M, Natale S, et al.: Psychiatric distress and health-related quality of life in obesity. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2003, 16:145–154.
                21. Onyike CU, Crum RM, Lee HB, et al.: Is obesity associated with major depression? Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol 2003, 158:1139–1147.View Article
                22. Scott KM, Bruffaerts R, Simon GE, et al.: Obesity and mental disorders in the general population: results from the world mental health surveys. Int J Obes 2008, 32:192–200.View Article
                23. Martinelli V, Colombo O, Nichini C, et al.: High frequency of psychopathology in subjects wishing to lose weight: an observational study in Italian subjects. Public Health Nutr 2011, 14:373–376. Epublication 11 June 2010View Article
                24. Teixeira PJ, Scott BG, Houtkooper LB, et al.: Weight loss readiness in middle-aged women: psychosocial predictors of success for behavioral weight reduction. J Behav Med 2002, 25:499–523.View Article
                25. Teixeira PJ, Palmeira AL, Branco TL, et al.: Who will lose weight? A reexamination of predictors of weight loss in women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004, 1:1–12.View Article
                26. NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults – the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res 1998, 6:51S-209S.View Article
                27. Italian Society of Human Nutrition: Recommended levels of assumption of energy and nutrients for the Italian population (LARN). Rome; 2012. [http://​sinu.​it/​documenti/​20121016_​LARN_​bologna_​sintesi_​prefinale.​pdf]
                28. Prunas A, Sarno I, Preti E, et al.: Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SCL-90-R: a study on a large community sample. Eur Psychiatry 2012, 27:591–597. Epublication 21 February 2011View Article
                29. Beck AT: Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1967.
                30. Gormally J, Black S, Daston S, et al.: The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addict Behav 1982, 7:47–55.View Article
                31. Minniti A, Bissoli L, Di Francesco V, et al.: Individual versus group therapy for obesity: comparison of dropout rate and treatment outcome. Eat Weight Disord 2007, 12:161–167.View Article
                32. Burns JW, Higdon LJ, Mullen JT, et al.: Relationships among patient hostility, anger expression, depression, and the working alliance in a work hardening program. Ann Behav Med 1999, 21:77–82.View Article
                33. Pope MK, Smith TW, Rhodewalt F: Cognitive, behavioral, and affective correlates of the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale. J Pers Assess 1990, 54:501–514.View Article
                34. Smith TW: Hostility and health: current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol 1992, 11:139–150.View Article
                35. Pugh R: An association between hostility and poor adherence to treatment in patients suffering from depression. Br J Med Psychol 1983, 56:205–208.View Article
                36. Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Mata J, et al.: Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:22.View Article

                Copyright

                © Colombo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.