Investigating the obesogenic effects of marketing snacks with toys: an experimental study in Latin America
© Gregori et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 September 2012
Accepted: 8 July 2013
Published: 10 July 2013
The inclusion of toys in food packages is a common marketing practice, and it is suspected of promoting obesogenic behaviours. This study aimed to determine whether toys packaged with food are indeed increasing the amount of food eaten by children, and if this effect is enhanced by contemporary exposure to TV and/or advertising.
A total of 600 children (balanced according to gender and age groups, 3–6 and 7–10 years old) were randomized in three school facilities in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico and exposed to food (snacks) alone or food associated with toys in an experimental setting. All of the children received the same meal at lunchtime. The products were packages in which chocolate was associated with toys in an egg-shaped container partially filled by chocolate. The children were asked to eat ad libitum for 20 minutes during the afternoon break. In addition, the children were randomized into two groups and either shown or not shown a movie cartoon, with three different levels of exposure to commercials in the TV viewing condition (1, 2 or 3 advertisements).
No significant differences emerged between the “toys” and “no toys” groups even after taking into account exposure to TV, commercials and other confounding factors.
The inclusion of toys in food packages was not shown per se to lead to an increase in the caloric intake of children.
KeywordsToys for marketing food Obesogenic environment TV exposure TV advertising Ad libitum eating studies
There is growing concern regarding the rapidly increasing rate of obesity in childhood, which has become epidemic in some areas and is on the rise in others, with an estimated 17.6 million obese children worldwide; particularly, there are increasing trends in emerging economies. The early onset of obesity, which is a major risk factor for a number of non-communicable diseases, including diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, hypertension and some forms of cancer, needs to be addressed with high-impact strategies for prevention and, where this fails, with clinical management [1–3]. Specific attention has recently focused on limiting inappropriate (in amount and typology) caloric intake within a context defined as an “obesogenic environment” of childhood, which is an environment where TV viewing, advertising, marketing strategies promoting food associated with gadgets and snacking are identified as possible risk factors [4–7].
Recent literature and scientific research has therefore focused on television and advertising and assessed their influence on children’s eating behaviours, with results showing an increased daily caloric intake. Ample studies investigating the effects of TV viewing on total energy intake have concluded that there is a positive effect of increased screen time on energy intake in children and adolescents [8, 9]. Other studies have considered the short- and long-term effects of advertising on children’s food intake and the promotion of unhealthy diets [4, 10], demonstrating a causal link between food consumption and television exposure and advertising . Snacking during screen time is often associated with high, energy-dense products, therefore undermining the healthy balance of energy intake [11, 12]. In addition, other studies suggest the existence of a specific gender effect in the sense that boys seem to be more susceptible to food cues than girls . There is also growing evidence that children with greater exposure to commercials appear to be more responsive to food promotion messages than children with lower previous advertising exposure .
In this context, a long-standing yet under-investigated factor that might influence energy intake is the promotion of food to children in association with gadgets, usually toys, aimed at capturing the attention of the child and increasing loyalty to the brand or product; this could be related to obesogenic effects . Considering the possible link between gadgets and an obesogenic effect, a recent ordinance in the U.S.A. was implemented to prohibit the distribution of toys and other incentives to children in conjunction with meals, foods, or beverages that do not meet minimal nutritional criteria .
The debate over such regulatory measures is ongoing in several other countries as well, both in established and emerging economies. In Latin America, where obesity is an emerging trend, particularly in children, the need for regulatory proposals grounded on strong evidence has faced a lack of experimental information on the behavioural factors related to obesity. In such geographical areas, decision makers often refer to evidence translated from experimental studies that are usually performed in North American or, more generally, that refer to an Anglo-Saxon cultural setting [4, 5]. Such studies are indeed designed to detect an excess of caloric intake under certain experimental conditions, particularly exposure to TV watching and snacking, advertising or branding [4, 5, 10, 12, 16].
To fill this gap, a wide experimental study has been conducted in three Latin American countries (Mexico, Brazil and Argentina) that are facing a steep growth in obesity rates in children (with obesity rates of 41.8% , 22.1%  and 19.3%, respectively ). The primary aim of this study was to assess whether including toys in food packages increases the amount of food eaten by children during a snacking occasion.
Given the abovementioned evidence of the role of TV and advertising in promoting an excessive consumption of (branded) food in children , the children were also exposed to TV and advertising during the experimental sessions, to adjust for both their potential confounding effects and their intrinsic relevance as intervening factors.
This resulted in a factorial study design, which, at the price of a certain logistical and analytical complexity, aimed in a controlled situation to evaluate the effects on the amount of snacks eaten by the children when the children (i) had food presented with toys in the package, (ii) were exposed to TV when snacking, (iii) were exposed to advertising (at an increasing intensity during TV exposure) and (iv) had potential interactions from a combination of all these factors.
Materials and methods
The experimental study was a 2x5 full factorial ad libitum eating design. The first factor was represented by exposure to the toy during the experimental session and was organized on two levels: “food with toy” (Toy) or “food alone” (NoToy). The second factor was exposure to TV and advertising during the experimental session and was organized in five levels: “no exposure to TV” (NoFilmNoSpot), “exposure to TV without advertising” (FilmNoSpot), “exposure to TV and one advertisement” (FilmLowSpot), “exposure to TV and two advertisements” (FilmMediumSpot) and “exposure to TV and three advertisements” (FilmHighSpot).
The sample size was computed with reference to an alpha equal to 0.05 and a power of 0.90, which was aimed at detecting at least a difference of 20 Kcal of caloric intake (assuming an equal standard deviation in the two groups of approximately 10 Kcal) between the two groups “food with toy” (Toy) and “food alone” (NoToy) in each of the 10 randomization cells.
Six-hundred children were estimated to be necessary to accomplish this study’s goals. The sample was equally balanced between males and females ranging from 3 to 10 years old. Children were studied in 3 different Latin American countries: Argentina (120 children), Brazil (360 children) and Mexico (120 children). Children were enrolled in a school setting in each of the countries involved in the study, all of which were in metropolitan areas: Buenos Aires (Argentina), Fortaleza (Brazil) and San Louis Potosí (Mexico). The schools were of a middle socio-economic level. Limited percentages of the children had previously been exposed to the experimental product either via advertising or by personal experience (between 5% in Brazil and 10% in Mexico). Children with cognitive disorders or metabolic diseases or allergies to the products offered during the experimental session were excluded. Parental informed consent was obtained for all children prior to each child’s participation in the study. Participant treatment followed the experimental and ethical guidelines issued by the American Psychologist Association. Appropriate permission was obtained by the Institutional Review Boards.
Each child was randomized to one of the 10 cells of the full-factorial design, and the randomization was administered by ad hoc software integrated with the data collection and study conduction software system. The randomization was subdivided by age (two groups of children 3–6 and 7–10 years old) and by gender (male and female) to ensure a complete balance of the two potential confounding factors.
The children were evaluated during the afternoon break in a quiet room within the school buildings. The schools had a consistent pattern of programmed physical activity, and they were instructed to give the same meal to all the children participating in the study. The parents were asked not to assist during the session; if they refused, they were required to sit at a rear position in order to fill out the parent questionnaires without being seen by the children, who were sitting at a table facing a monitor (if applicable, according to the group to which they had been randomized). The children were video-recorded through two hidden HD cameras positioned to record frontal and side images, while the investigator assumed a back-screen position to easily accommodate the children’s requests without putting any pressure on the children’s performances.
The film was a non-spoken (but not silent) cartoon lasting approximately 22 minutes. The choice of this type of cartoon was made in order to avoid any language bias that might have arisen based on the multicultural sample (the children spoke Portuguese in Brazil and Spanish in Mexico and Argentina, although with different accents). The principal protagonist was the Disney character Pluto©. The movie consisted of a set of episodes, in accordance with previous studies [7, 21]. Following the setting adopted in other studies , the commercials referred to the product given to the children and lasted 30 seconds and were in the Country-specific language. Every commercial presented during the movie was different from the previous one with a maximum of three different commercials for the children randomized to that specific group.
Nutritional composition of the egg-shaped products
Egg-shaped snack (100 g)
Egg-shaped snack (20 g)
Vitamin E (mg)
3.5 (35% RDA**)
0.7 (7% RDA**)
Vitamin B2 (mg)
0.29 (18% RDA**)
0.05 (3% RDA**)
Vitamin B12 (μg)
0.40 (40% RDA**)
210 (26% RDA**)
42 (5% RDA**)
200 (25% RDA**)
40 (5% RDA**)
48 (16% RDA**)
9 (3% RDA**)
The half of the snack containing the chocolate was weighed and then offered alone to the children randomized to the NoToy group, whereas in the Toy group, the chocolate was given combined with the part containing the toy. In both cases the same snack was thus offered, for an amount of 109 Kcal each. If the child was assigned to a TV-exposure group, the movie was started at the time of the first offering of the snack to the child and not interrupted for any reason. After the first snack, the experimenter was allowed to present additional snacks, one at a time (always waiting for the child’s request). Each child was allowed to eat ad libitum up to a maximum of 12 snacks over the 22-minute time slot. The offering of the snack was performed using a pre-developed protocol as a way to control the influence of the investigator on the child as much as possible. The protocol specified the way the investigator was supposed to interact with the child both verbally (i.e.: smiling, kindly asking but not pushing for additional snacks, …) and by gestural approaches (i.e.: how far from the child the snack was offered, in which position with respect to her/his eyes, …).
Once the experimental session ended, the experimenter weighed the chocolate residues for each product, recording all weights in the study software. All of the sessions were digitally recorded for subsequent examination and data quality assurance.
During the first meeting, the basic characteristics of the children were recorded by the study conductors. The children were weighed and measured in light clothing and without shoes on an electronic stand-up balance scale and with a rigid metric belt. The measurements were taken with the child’s back against the wall with the back of the feet touching the wall and with a straight angle formed between the wall and the floor. A straight surface was then placed over the child’s head, and a mark was fixed on the wall, which was the initial point. Weights and heights were utilized to calculate the BMI values, according to CDC Pediatric Growth Charts . The BMI z-scores were computed for each child . Additional information on the presence of any allergy was recorded during the first meeting.
The questionnaire given to the child’s parents was divided into two sections. The first section was aimed at determining the socio-demographic characteristics of the entire family. It included questions about the parental educational level, the BMI of the parents and siblings, and a detailed set of queries covering the principal meals and basic physical activities performed within the family. Questions on the child’s eating habits were introduced in the second part of the questionnaire to assess the TV viewing habits and the physical activity habits of the children and their families.
A validated questionnaire to assess the child’s brand awareness, the IBAI questionnaire , was utilized in this study . The questionnaire was composed of 12 images of food products on the market, including both international and Country-specific products. The children were asked to recognize the brand by matching it to an image chosen from 4 different options. At the end, the interviewer questioned the child on the specific name of the product. Brand Awareness Scores (IBAI-score) could range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36 points. A cut-off value of 16 points was used to define two groups: low brand awareness children (<16) and high brand awareness children (≥ 16) .
At the beginning of the study, every snack was assigned with a specific code and weighed in order to record the data within the software used for the study. At the end of every session, each snack eaten by the child was weighed once again to calculate the weight difference in terms of the amount eaten. All weights were collected by the mean of an Acculab© precision weighing scale with the capacity of 510 g and 0.1 g readability.
A basic exploratory data analysis was performed on the sample and was reported using the median (I-III quartile) for continuous variables and the percentages (absolute numbers) for categorical variables, as appropriate.
The main analysis was based on a linear model where the subdivided factors (i.e., Gender and Age in two classes according to the randomization procedure, Toy, FilmSpot and the interaction between FilmSpot and Toy) have been inserted in the model. This was the base model used in the analysis. Specific investigations on single factor-level effects were conducted using the appropriate linear contrasts.
Base: Nation + Age + Gender + Toy + FilmSpot + Toy:FilmSpot
M1: Base + BMI + Breast Feed + Hours/Week TV + Physical activity (hours/week)
M2: M1 + BMI Father + BMI Mother + number Brothers + number of Sisters
BA: M2 + Brand Awareness (BA) IBAI-Score
M3: BA + Number of rooms in the house + number of TVs in the house + Educational level of the mother
M4: M3 + breakfast in the morning + fruit portions/day + vegetables portions/day
Each model was individually evaluated, selecting among the candidate variables by using the AIC criterion in a backward fashion, which forced the inclusion of the design variables in each of the models. Thus, for each model, the significance of the main experimental factors (Toy, FilmSpot and Toy-FilmSpot interaction) was assessed.
In addition, children were identified as “high consumers” if their caloric intake during the experimental session exceeded the top quartile of the observed distribution. The variables related to the probability of being a high consumer were modelled using a logistic regression model and selected via the AIC criterion in a backward fashion.
The analyses were performed using the R System .
Description of the sample
(N = 120)
(N = 360)
(N = 120)
(N = 600)
p = 0.781
p < 0.001
p < 0.001
p < 0.001
Mixed (breast + bottle)
Number of sisters
p < 0.001
Number of brothers
p < 0.001
Frequency of breakfast before school
2-3 times per week
p = 0.024
3-4 times per week
Daily fruit portions
p < 0.001
More than 4
Daily vegetable portions
p < 0.001
More than 4
TV viewing (hours/week)
p < 0.001
Television set at home (n°)
p < 0.001
p < 0.001
Overall energy intake of children
Energy intake and glycaemic load by Country
(N = 120)
(N = 360)
(N = 120)
(N = 600)
Energy intake (kcal)
Effect of toy alone or combined with TV viewing and advertising
Overall energy intake (Kcal) according to the study factors
Median (I-III quartile)
Median (I-III quartile)
Median (I-III quartile)
The interaction between the variables Toy and TV was also assessed. The highest energy intake was recorded in the Toy-NoFilmNoSpot group, but the interaction was not significant. The crude effect of the variable Toy can be observed in the NoFilmNoSpot subgroup, with no significant difference between the two groups (Table 4).
Significance of the factors Toy, TV, advertising and their interactions after adjustment for several potential confounding factors
Base + M1
Base + M1 + M2
Base + M1 + M2 + BA
Base + M1 + M2 + BA + M3
Base + M1 + M2 + BA + M3 + M4
Characterization of the high consumers according to the main study variables
(N = 450)
(N = 150)
(N = 600)
Age class: Y7-10
Mixed-feeding /breast + bottle)
Number of sisters: 0
Number of brothers: 0
Weekly TV hours
Number of TVs in the house
Breakfast before school: 2–3 times per week
3–4 times per week
Number of fruit portions per day: 1
more than 4
Number of vegetables portions per day: 1
more than 4
The first hypothesis that toys might have an effect on increasing energy intake in children was not supported by our results. The median consumption was not significantly different in the two subgroups, Toy and NoToy, and this result was confirmed in all of the countries studied. The second aim of the study was to assess a potential boosting effect of TV viewing on the mere gadget effect in increasing energy intake. The results did not confirm this second hypothesis either. Similar conclusions can be made when considering the influence of advertising, which showed no effect, even at an increasing level of exposure, on energy intake in any of the observed countries. Given the rejection of both hypotheses, the authors of this study performed an in-depth evaluation of the “higher consumer” subgroup to detect any differences in behaviour with regards to the considered objectives of the study. This analysis showed that belonging to a specific Country was the only factor influencing an increased energy intake, confirming the conclusions above based on the general sample.
Interaction with TV and advertising
Previous research on the effects of advertising, including a study by Boyland , has shown significant increases in energy intake due to the exposure to specific advertisements, particularly in overweight and obese children, as well as on the effect of TV screening time, acting as a sedentary replacement for physical activity . Based on these results, the authors evaluated the potential effect of these two additional factors on the specified outcome.
The effects of TV viewing and advertising on snack consumption were investigated according to the snack that the children were presented with. The objective was to understand whether the present study was aligned with other studies on the potential role of visual media in increasing total energy intake. Unlike previous studies that reported an association between television viewing and an increase in caloric intake [8, 28] and found a positive association between advertising exposure and energy intake [14, 29], the children in this particular sample did not increase their intake of snacks while watching TV or when they were subjected to the high-advertisement conditions. Previous studies reported a subtle and potentially far-reaching effect of food advertising on eating behaviours that may occur outside of the participants’ intention or awareness . In our research, the children did not appear to be influenced by the advertisements, even when the interactions were evaluated after adjustment for several potential confounding factors, such as the parents’ BMI, the brand awareness score, the physical activity level or the number of hours of TV viewing. These results, although gathered from an experimental study rather than a real-life scenario, highlighted the fact that, as noted by Goris and colleagues, the contribution of TV advertising of foods and drinks in altering a child’s energy intake differs distinctly by Country .
The interaction between the presence of the toy and TV and advertisement viewing was also not significant. In the subgroup analysis of those who were not selected for TV viewing (the NoFilmNoSpot group), representing a “TV-free” experimental context, the level of consumption in terms of caloric intake was not significantly related to the presence of the toy.
The cultural environment
The in-depth analysis performed separately on the three countries under study contributes additional insight beyond the original hypotheses. Although not significantly different, the children’s behaviours were not consistent across the countries. When considering the average energy intake, Argentina presented the lowest levels, with Mexican and Brazilian children eating 1.5 times as much as their Argentinean peers, on average. Country was the only risk factor associated with an augmented intake of snacks; there was no association between the presence of the toy and the increased intake of calories, according to the number of snacks eaten by the child in this ad libitum study. Unlike previous studies set in a single Country [5, 16], children responded with a general lower awareness when questioned on brand, even when considering the highest scores, which were reached in Mexico. Our study, unlike Kopelman’s,  included children across a broader age range and focused on 12 specific items related to high energy intake, thus addressing the entire developmental period of children. Differences in the brand awareness of children were also observed within the Latin American setting and were significantly different between Argentina and the other two countries. The median IBAI score observed in Mexican children defined the Country as a high brand awareness Country, with scores twice as high as those observed in Argentina. Because the present findings challenge previous studies, understanding the influence of culture and setting on different variables and related links to patterns of eating and physical activity, which influence obesity, should be critical in developing public policies and effective clinical interventions to prevent and treat childhood obesity.
Although all results were confirmed after adjustment, showing strong consistency, there are several limitations to the study. First, these results refer to an experimental setting and need to be validated in real-life scenarios. However, the choice of an experimental setting allowed us to eliminate a wide variety of biases that could decrease the power of the study. Second, the children could possibly have been aware that the study related to food/body weight because, for logistical reasons, the anthropometric measures were taken before the experimental session. Additionally, the children took part in the study by sitting at a table and being observed by an investigator and interacting with her/him for getting more snacks; all of these factors could potentially have inhibited their behaviour. However, there are no a priori reasons to think that this mechanism would have acted selectively on one group more than another. Thus, if bias occurred, most likely it would have been spread out across the groups equally. Third, there was no possibility for the children to choose between different types of snack, given the a priori decision to use a single type of snack that was adequate for the research objectives and measurements. The children enrolled in the study might have been limited by the lack of choice in the ad libitum snacking setting. Further research involving a broader choice of products will provide a deeper understanding of the children’s behavioural perspectives in afternoon snacking. Finally, the product used in this experimental study is on the border of the definition of gadgets and food because it is a derivation of the traditional “Easter egg”, in which toys and chocolate are present simultaneously (the definition of the product itself).
Our results showed that the presence of a toy or a toy packaged and sold with a child’s snack did not alter the amount of the item consumed in a Latin American context. In a broader context, our results advocate the need for multi-cultural and cross-cultural research. Indeed, for a full understanding of the association between obesity and its risk factors, in-depth research is necessary in different scenarios to provide the best evidence for decision makers and the basis for prevention in evidence-based strategies rather than focusing on single factors without the recognition of their mutual influence. Moreover, from a public health point of view, effective interventions to improve health and nutritional status need to be grounded on culturally appropriate evidence.
The work of the coordinating centre was partially supported by an unrestricted grant from the University of Padova, and the work of the participating centres from Argentina and Brazil was supported by an unrestricted grant from Prochild ONLUS (Italy). The work in Mexico was partially supported by an unrestricted grant from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the program “Programmi di alta rilevanza scientifica e tecnologica Italia-Messico”. The study group gratefully acknowledges Ferrero Inc. for having provided all the experimental food and toys free to the experimenters.
All of the authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the three reviewers of this paper, who greatly helped in improving the paper. Responsibility remains, of course, solely to the authors.
- Bray GA, Macdiarmid J: The epidemic of obesity. West J Med. 2000, 172: 78-79. 10.1136/ewjm.172.2.78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pardo Silva MC, De Laet C, Nusselder WJ, Mamun AA, Peeters A: Adult obesity and number of years lived with and without cardiovascular disease. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006, 14: 1264-1273. 10.1038/oby.2006.144.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haffner SM: Relationship of metabolic risk factors and development of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006, 14 (Suppl 3): 121S-127S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halford JC, Gillespie J, Brown V, Pontin EE, Dovey TM: Effect of television advertisements for foods on food consumption in children. Appetite. 2004, 42: 221-225. 10.1016/j.appet.2003.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halford JC, Boyland EJ, Hughes GM, Stacey L, McKean S, Dovey TM: Beyond-brand effect of television food advertisements on food choice in children: the effects of weight status. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11: 897-904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buijzen M, Schuurman J, Bomhof E: Associations between children’s television advertising exposure and their food consumption patterns: a household diary-survey study. Appetite. 2008, 50: 231-239. 10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris JL, Bargh JA, Brownell KD: Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health Psychol. 2009, 28: 404-413.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wiecha JL, Peterson KE, Ludwig DS, Kim J, Sobol A, Gortmaker SL: When children eat what they watch: impact of television viewing on dietary intake in youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006, 160: 436-442. 10.1001/archpedi.160.4.436.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Utter J, Scragg R, Schaaf D: Associations between television viewing and consumption of commonly advertised foods among New Zealand children and young adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2006, 9: 606-612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Robinson JL, Paluch RA, Winiewicz DD, Fuerch JH, Robinson TN: A randomized trial of the effects of reducing television viewing and computer use on body mass index in young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008, 162: 239-245. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Agostoni C, Braegger C, Decsi T, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Mihatsch W, Moreno LA, Puntis J, Shamir R, Espghan Committee on Nutrition, et al: Role of dietary factors and food habits in the development of childhood obesity: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011, 52: 662-669. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182169253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borradaile KE, Sherman S, Vander Veur SS, McCoy T, Sandoval B, Nachmani J, Karpyn A, Foster GD: Snacking in children: the role of urban corner stores. Pediatrics. 2009, 124: 1293-1298. 10.1542/peds.2009-0964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anschutz DJ, Engels RC, Van Strien T: Side effects of television food commercials on concurrent nonadvertised sweet snack food intakes in young children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 1328-1333. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyland EJ, Harrold JA, Kirkham TC, Corker C, Cuddy J, Evans D, Dovey TM, Lawton CL, Blundell JE, Halford JC: Food commercials increase preference for energy-dense foods, particularly in children who watch more television. Pediatrics. 2011, 128: e93-e100. 10.1542/peds.2010-1859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Otten JJ, Hekler EB, Krukowski RA, Buman MP, Saelens BE, Gardner CD, King AC: Food marketing to children through toys: response of restaurants to the first U.S. toy ordinance. Am J Prev Med. 2012, 42: 56-60. 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kopelman CA, Roberts LM, Adab P: Advertising of food to children: is brand logo recognition related to their food knowledge, eating behaviours and food preferences?. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007, 29: 358-367. 10.1093/pubmed/fdm067.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moraes SA, Beltran Rosas J, Mondini L, Freitas IC: Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and associated factors in school children from urban area in Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico, 2004. Cad Saude Publica. 2006, 22: 1289-1301. 10.1590/S0102-311X2006000600018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Assis MA, Rolland-Cachera MF, Grosseman S, de Vasconcelos FA, Luna ME, Calvo MC, Barros MV, Pires MM, Bellisle F: Obesity, overweight and thinness in schoolchildren of the city of Florianopolis, Southern Brazil. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005, 59: 1015-1021. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Butte NF, Garza C, de Onis M: Evaluation of the feasibility of international growth standards for school-aged children and adolescents. J Nutr. 2007, 137: 153-157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman FJ, Bell JF: Associations of television content type and obesity in children. Am J Public Health. 2010, 100: 334-340. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155119.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Francis LA, Birch LL: Does eating during television viewing affect preschool children's intake?. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006, 106: 598-600. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Franchin L, Zobec F, Ghidina M, Stefanini G, Berchialla P, Gregori D: Measuring brand awareness in as a component of eating habits in children: the development of the IBAI (Italian Brand Awareness Instrument). Prog Nutr. 2012, 14-Google Scholar
- CDC Pediatric Growth Charts. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts,
- Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL: 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat. 2002, 11: 1-190.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2008, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org, ISBN 3-900051-07-0
- Boyland EJ, Halford JC: Television advertising and branding. Effects on eating behaviour and food preferences in children. Appetite. 2013, 62: 236-241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boulos R, Vikre EK, Oppenheimer S, Chang H, Kanarek RB: ObesiTV: how television is influencing the obesity epidemic. Physiol Behav. 2012, 107: 146-153. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taveras EM, Sandora TJ, Shih MC, Ross-Degnan D, Goldmann DA, Gillman MW: The association of television and video viewing with fast food intake by preschool-age children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006, 14: 2034-2041. 10.1038/oby.2006.238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa SM, Horta PM, dos Santos LC: Food advertising and television exposure: influence on eating behavior and nutritional status of children and adolescents. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2012, 62: 53-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bargh JA, Morsella E: The unconscious mind. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008, 3: 73-79. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00064.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Goris JM, Petersen S, Stamatakis E, Veerman JL: Television food advertising and the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity: a multiCountry comparison. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13: 1003-1012. 10.1017/S1368980009992850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.