Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

Social and psychological factors affecting eating habits among university students in a Malaysian medical school: a cross-sectional study

  • Kurubaran Ganasegeran1,
  • Sami AR Al-Dubai1Email author,
  • Ahmad M Qureshi2,
  • Al-abed AA Al-abed3,
  • Rizal AM3 and
  • Syed M Aljunid3, 4
Nutrition Journal201211:48

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-48

Received: 23 April 2012

Accepted: 18 July 2012

Published: 18 July 2012

Abstract

Background

Eating habits have been a major concern among university students as a determinant of health status. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of eating habits and its associated social and psychological factors among medical students.

Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted among 132 medical students of pre-clinical phase at a Malaysian university. A self-administered questionnaire was used which included questions on socio-demography, anthropometry, eating habits and psychosocial factors.

Results

Mean (±SD) age of the respondents was 22.7 (±2.4) years and (the age) ranged from 18 to 30 years. More than half had regular meals and breakfast (57.6% &, 56.1% respectively). Majority (73.5%) consumed fruits less than three times per week, 51.5% had fried food twice or more a week and 59.8% drank water less than 2 liters daily. Eating habits score was significantly low among younger students (18–22 years), smokers, alcohol drinkers and those who did not exercise. (p<0.05). Four psychological factors out of six, were significantly associated with eating habits (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, age and ‘eating because of feeling happy’ were significantly associated with eating habits score (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Most of the students in this study had healthy eating habits. Social and psychological factors were important determinants of eating habits among medical students.

Keywords

Eating habits Lifestyle Malaysia medical students Social and psychological

Background

Poor eating habits is a major public health concern among young adults who experienced transition into university life [1], during which, they are exposed to stress and lack of time [2, 3]. These factors pose a barrier against adoption of healthy behaviors, such as poor eating habits and substance abuse [1]. Although these behaviors of students are considered temporary, as part of university life; unhealthy habits picked up at this age generally persist in older adult life [4].

Rapid changes in physical growth and psychosocial development have placed these young adults as nutritionally vulnerable groups with poor eating habits, that fails to meet dietary requirements [57]. Some common unhealthy eating patterns among young adults included meal skipping, eating away from home, snacking and fast food consumption [6, 7].

Environmental factors also contribute to adoption of unhealthy eating habits among university students [8]. The mushrooming of shopping malls, convenience stores, vending machines and fast food outlets have created an alarming situation for young adults to practice unhealthy eating habits [9].

University students tend to make their own food choices [10] based on cost of food and availability of fast food [11]. They lack knowledge of healthy food choices that may affect eating habits and nutritional status negatively [11]. Previous studies revealed that university students failed to meet the recommended intakes of fruits and vegetables [12, 13]. University students had frequent snacking habits [14] and had a higher frequency of fast food consumption [15].

It has been assumed that medical students would practice healthy dietary habits compared to non-medical students [16]. Some studies have found otherwise. A previous study in China revealed that medical students exhibited early risk factors for chronic diseases due to poor eating habits [17]. It was found that although medical students had sufficient knowledge regarding good dietary habits, they failed to apply this knowledge into practice [2]. Stress of university life and medical study load would be factors that negatively influence their diet [18].

In 2011, Gan et al. highlighted the presence of unhealthy eating behaviours and inadequate nutrient intake among university students [11]. The study concluded that there was a need to promote healthy eating habits among young adults to achieve a healthy nutritional status. Chin & Nasir (2009) [5] revealed that meal skipping; particularly breakfast, snacking and various weight loss dietary behaviours were some of the unhealthy eating behaviours depicted by Malaysian adolescent girls. The study concluded that promotion of healthy eating was crucial for future health well-being. There was no study in Malaysia that investigated the relationship between eating habits and the psychological factors among university medical students. The current study is aimed at assessing the patterns of eating habit and its associated factors, with focus on psychological factors among medical students in a Malaysian university.

Methodology

Study setting and population

This cross-sectional study was conducted among 140 medical students at a private university in Malaysia by using universal sampling. After arrangement with course co-coordinator and lecturers, students from the first year medical faculty were approached in the classroom after lectures. They were asked to participate in this study voluntarily. Objectives and benefits of the study were explained to respondents orally and in a written form attached to the questionnaire. They were assured that information obtained would be confidential and their participation would not affect their course progress. A written consent was obtained from those who agreed to participate. Approval of the study was obtained from the ethics committee of the University (approval number: JMS5/0182).

Study instruments

We used a self-administered questionnaire on eating habits which was adopted from previous published studies [14, 15]. The questionnaire consisted of three parts. The first part included questions on demographic data; such as age, gender, education level, marital status, ethnicity and living circumstances. Body mass index (BMI) and lifestyle; such as smoking, alcohol intake and exercise were also included in this part. The second part includes questions on eating habits and type of meals consumed (10 items), such as frequency of meals, type of meal, vegetables and fruits consumption, daily water intake, consumption of fast food, etc. The third part included questions on psychological factors that influenced dietary habits of respondents. Questions were selected from the validated Compulsive Eating Scale (CES) [16] that was used to measure uncontrolled eating patterns among college students; items included in this study were: “eat because of feeling lonely”, “feel out of control when eating”, “eat so much until stomach hurts”, “eat because of feeling upset or nervous”, “eat because of feeling bored” and “eat because of feeling happy”. The response options were ‘Yes’ or ‘No’.

Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 was used to analyse the data in this study. The BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in square metres (kg/m2). In this study, based on the WHO BMI cut-offs for the Asian population, a BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 was categorised as underweight, 18·5–22·9 kg/m2 as the normal range, 23.0–27.4 kg/m2 as pre-obese, 27.5–34.9 kg/m2 as obese Class I, 35.0–39.9 kg/m2 as obese Class II and ≥ 40 kg/m2 as obese Class III [19]. To check for the validity of the Compulsive Eating Scale (CES) among the Malaysian population, an exploratory factor analysis was performed using principal component method with varimax rotation and Cronbach’s alpha was used to test the internal consistency of the scale. Each item of eating habits was scored (1) if the response was healthy or (0) if non healthy. All items were summed and the total score was obtained (minimum = 0 and maximum = 10). Thus, a higher score on eating habits indicated better eating habits. Descriptive analysis was performed for all variables. Student t-test and ANOVA test were used to compare mean eating habits across socio-demographic variables. Test of normal distribution of the total score of eating habits was also conducted. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression was used to obtain factors associated significantly with eating habit score. Age, working status of mother, drinking alcohol, exercise and smoking status were entered in the first step. In the second step, five out of six psychological factors affecting eating behavior were entered. Multicollinearity was checked between independent variables.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

One hundred and thirty two out of 140 students participated in this study with a response rate of 94.0%. The majority was females (70.5%) and aged more than 22 years (old 61.4%). Most of them were Malays (61.4%) while Indians and Chinese constituted (of) 31.8% and 2.3% respectively. Regarding mother’s education level, 44.7% had tertiary education, 37.9% had high school or less and the rest had non-formal education (17.4%). Regarding father’s education, majority had tertiary education (51.5%), 33.3% had high school or less and 15.2% had non-formal education. The majority of mothers were not working (57.6%). The majority had an average monthly household income of RM 3000 or less (59.1%) and living with their families (64.4%). The majority had denied smoking (94.7%) and alcohol consumption (97%). A lot of them performed regular exercise (78%), but some did not (22%). More than half (53%) had a normal BMI, 22.7% were under weights, 16.7% were pre-obese and 7.6% were obese Class I (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio -demographic characteristics of respondents (n = 132)

Characteristics

N

%

Gender

  

Male

39

29.5

Female

93

70.5

Age

  

18-21

51

38.6

≥ 22

81

61.4

Ethnicity

  

Malay

81

61.4

Chinese

3

2.3

Indian

42

31.8

Others

6

4.5

Mother’s education level

  

Non-formal education

23

17.4

High school or less

50

37.9

Tertiary education

59

44.7

Father’s education level

  

Non-formal education

20

15.2

High school or less

44

33.3

Tertiary education

68

51.5

Monthly household income (RM)

  

≤3000

78

59.1

3001-4999

22

16.7

≥5000

32

24.2

Living arrangement

  

Living alone

47

35.6

Living with family

85

64.4

Body Mass Index (BMI)*

  

Underweight (< 18.5)

30

22.7

Normal (18.5 – 22.9)

70

53.0

Pre-obese (23.0-27.4)

22

16.7

Obese class I (27.5-34.9)

10

7.6

Mother working

  

Yes

56

42.4

Smoking

  

Yes

7

5.3

Alcohol

  

Yes

4

3.0

Regular exercise

  

Yes

103

78

* BMI is calculated based on WHO criteria for Asian population.

Eating habits

More than half took meals and breakfast regularly (57.6%, 56.1% respectively). About 57.6% had snacks less than three times per week and 42.4% took snacks three or more times per week. The majority consumed vegetables and legumes three or more times per week (81.8%). Almost half of them (51.5%) consumed fruits less than three times per week; the rest (48.5%) took it three times or more. Many had fried food twice a week or more (73.5%), while 26.2% took it less than two times. The majority (78.8%) had fast food rarely and took meals with family or friends daily (81.1%). Most of them had a balanced variety of foods (60.6%) while 18.9% preferred meat and 5.3% preferred vegetables. The majority had less than two liters water intake daily (59.8%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Eating habits among respondents (n = 132)

Characteristics

N

%

Regular meals

  

Yes

76

57.6

No

56

42.4

Daily breakfast

  

Yes

58

43.9

No

74

56.1

Frequency of daily meals

  

Less than three times

79

59.8

Three or more times

53

40.2

Frequency of having snacks (per week)

  

Less than three times

76

57.6

Three or more times

56

42.4

Weekly consumption of vegetables & legumes

  

Less than three times

24

18.2

Three or more times

108

81.8

Weekly consumption of fruits

  

Less than three times

68

51.5

Three or more times

64

48.5

Weekly consumption of fried food

  

Less than twice

35

26.5

Twice or more

97

73.5

Consumption of fast food

  

Often

28

21.2

Rarely

104

78.8

Meals with friends & family

  

Daily

107

81.1

Not daily

25

18.9

Type of food consumed

  

Mainly meat

25

18.9

Mainly vegetables

7

5.3

Carbohydrate (rice, bread)

20

15.2

Variety of food in balance

80

60.6

Water intake (liters/day)

  

< 2

79

59.8

≥2

53

40.2

Psychological factors affecting eating behavior

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Compulsive Eating Scale (CES) was 0.80. The exploratory factor analyses yielded one factors with given values greater than 1 (3.1). The two-factor solution accounted for 51.0% of the variance. Factor loading ranged from 0.41 to 0.50.

Nearly 48.5% ate because of feeling lonely, 62.1% felt completely out of control when it comes to food, 53.8% ate till stomach hurts, 53% ate because of feeling upset or nervous and 59.1% ate because of feeling bored. The majority ate because of feeling happy (80.3%) (Table 3).
Table 3

Psychological factors affecting respondents eating habits among respondents (n = 132)

Psychological factors

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

Eat because of feeling lonely

64 (48.5)

68 (51.5)

Feel completely out of control when it comes to food

82 (62.1)

50 (37.9)

Eat so much until stomach hurts

71 (53.8)

61 (46.2)

Eat because of feeling upset or nervous

70 (53.0)

62 (47.0)

Eat because of feeling bored

78 (59.1)

54 (40.9)

Eat because of feeling happy

106 (80.3)

26 (19.7)

Association between eating habits and socio-demographic factors

Mean total score of eating habit for all the participant was 6.3(SD ± 1.8) and ranged from 2 to 10. Mean with (SD) total score of eating habits was compared across the categorical variables in the study. Mean for those aged ≥22 years and those aged 18–21 years was 6.68(SD ±1.66) and 5.86 (SD ± 1.87) respectively and this difference was significant (p = 0.01). Significant difference in eating habits score was also found between smokers, 4.86 (SD ± 1.57) and non smokers, 6.45 (SD ±1.76), (p = 0.02) and between those who drank alcohol, 4.25 (SD ±2.06) and those who did not, 6.43(SD ±1.74), (p = 0.02). No significant association was found between eating habits and other socio-demographic factors (Table 4).
Table 4

Association between eating habits score and categorical variables (n = 132)

Categorical variable

 

Mean(SD)

pvalue

Gender

Male

6.28 (1.82)

 
 

Female

6.40 (1.77)

0.73

Age

18-21

5.86 (1.87)

 
 

≥ 22

6.68 (1.66)

0.01

Ethnicity*

Malay

6.31 (1.81)

 
 

Chinese

8.33 (1.53)

 
 

Indian

6.33 (1.75)

 
 

Others

6.33 (1.51)

0.29

Mother’s education level *

Non-formal education

6.99 (1.56)

 
 

High school or less

6.32 (1.58)

 
 

Tertiary education

6.19 (1.99)

0.25

Father’s education level *

Non-formal education

7.05 (1.76)

 
 

High school or less

6.32 (1.68)

 
 

Tertiary education

6.19 (1.99)

0.16

Monthly household income*

≤3000

6.36 (1.71)

 
 

3001-4999

6.23 (1.54)

 
 

≥5000

6.47 (2.11)

0.88

Living arrangement

Alone

6.40 (1.79)

 
 

With family

6.30 (1.78)

0.75

Mother working

Yes

6.04 (1.61)

 
 

No

6.61 (1.87)

0.07

Smoking

Yes

4.86 (1.57)

 
 

No

6.45 (1.76)

0.02

Alcohol

Yes

4.25 (2.06)

 
 

No

6.43 (1.74)

0.02

Regular exercise

Yes

6.51 (1.81)

 
 

No

5.86 (1.60)

0.09

Body Mass Index (BMI)*

Underweight (< 18.5)

6.23 (1.57)

 
 

Normal (18.5 – 22.9)

6.47 (1.90)

 
 

Pre-obese (23.0-27.4)

6.68 (1.67)

 
 

Obese class I (27.5-34.9)

5.30 (1.49)

0.20

* One way ANOVA test was used to compare mean between categories.

Association between eating habits and Psychological factors

Mean with (SD) of total score of eating habit was compared between those who answered ‘yes’ and those who answered ‘no’ on each item of the psychological factors. Mean total score of eating habit for those who ate when lonely was 5.95 (SD ±1.78) and for those who did not was 6.75 (SD ±1.70) (p = 0.01). Mean for those ate till stomach hurt was 6.06 (SD ±1.76), and for those who did not was 6.72 (SD ±1.74) (p = 0.03). Mean for those who ate when upset and those who did not was 6.07 (SD ± 1.75) and 6.69 (SD ± 1.77) respectively (p = 0.04). Mean for those who ate when bored was 5.91 (SD ±1.67) and for those who did not was 7.02 (SD ± 1.74) (p<0.01) (Table 5).
Table 5

Association between eating habits score and psychological factors (n = 132)

Psychological factors

Mean(SD)

pvalue

Yes

No

Eat because of feeling lonely

5.95 (1.78)

6.75 (1.70)

0.01

Feel completely out of control when it comes to food

6.32 (1.85)

6.44 (1.08)

0.70

Eat so much until stomach hurts

6.06 (1.76)

6.72 (1.74)

0.03

Eat because of feeling upset or nervous

6.07 (1.75)

6.69 (1.77)

0.04

Eat because of feeling bored

5.91 (1.67)

7.02 (1.74)

<0.01

Eat because of feeling happy

6.31 (1.82)

6.58 (1.63)

0.50

Factors associated with eating habits in the hierarchical multiple linear regression

Age, working status of mother, drinking alcohol, exercise and smoking status were entered in the first step. In the second step, the following factors were entered: “eat because of feeling lonely”, “feel out of control when eating”, “eat so much until stomach hurts”, “eat because of feeling upset or nervous” and “eat because of feeling happy”. The results from the first step indicated that age was significantly associated with eating habits score (p = 0.006). In the second step, factors associated with eating habits score were age (p = 0.009), drinking alcohol (p = 0.037) and eat because of feeling happy (p = 0.009) (Table 6). The total model was significant (p<0.001) and accounted for 19% of the variance. There was no multicollinearity between variables.
Table 6

Results of the hierarchical multiple linear regression; factors associated with eating habits score (n = 132)

 

Step 1

Step 2

B

Beta

pvalue

B

Beta

pvalue

≥ 22 years old

0.675

0.238

0.006

0.629

0.222

0.009

Mother working

0.344

0.096

0.264

0.283

0.079

0.349

Drinking alcohol

1.514

0.146

0.139

2.090

0.202

0.037

Exercise

0.619

0.145

0.083

0.546

0.128

0.121

Smoking

0.906

0.115

0.251

0.394

0.050

0.613

Eat because of feeling lonely

   

0.229

0.065

0.478

Eat because of feeling out of control when eating

   

0.544

0.149

0.096

Eat so much until stomach hurts

   

0.410

0.115

0.199

Eat because of feeling upset or nervous

   

0.093

0.026

0.778

Eat because of feeling happy

   

0.931

.258

0.009

The reference group for age is ‘18-21 years’; for exercise is ‘no’; for all other variables is ‘yes’.

Discussion

In this study, more than half of respondents had meals regularly and 40.2% had meals of at least three times per day. This finding was comparatively lower than that reported by a Chinese study in which 83.6% of university students consumed regular meals, with 79% of them took at least three times per day [17]. Another study reported that 61.4% of Lebanese university students had regular meals daily[14].

Regular breakfast consumption among medical students is important for sufficient energy intake to overcome fatigue due to busy (daily) learning schedule [20]. In this study, less than half of respondents (43.9%) had breakfast daily. This finding was higher in comparison to a previous study [14] which found that 31.8% of study population had breakfast daily. However, some studies from Malaysia found higher rates of daily breakfast consumption among Malay undergraduate students in Selangor (75.6%) [21] and female adolescents in Pahang (52.6%) [5].

The frequent consumption of snacks and light meals is a recognizable aspect of teenage food behavior [22]. Surprisingly, our study found that only 42.4% of respondents had snacking at least three times per week. This finding was comparatively lower than previous studies from different countries, which found greater proportion of Syrian adolescents (53.0%) and Lebanon students (53.2%) [14, 23] consumed snacks regularly.

The majority of respondents in our study consumed vegetables and legumes frequently (81.8%). This finding was high in comparison to previous studies from China (47.9%) [17] and Bahrain (26.3%) [22]. However, one study from Malaysia found that only 19% of university students consumed vegetables more than three times per week [11]. Our study also found that 48.5% of respondents consumed fruits at least three times per week. Similar finding was reported by Yahia et al.,(2008) [14]. It was reported that low intake of fruits and vegetables is associated with several chronic diseases at adulthood [24]. Our study disclosed that majority of medical students were aware of this health risk.

The typical university student diet is usually high in fat [25]. Students often select fast food due to its palatability, availability and convenience [14]. Surprisingly, our study found that only 21.2% of respondents consumed fast food often. Chin and Nasir, (2009) [5] reported that only 4.7% of respondents visited fast food restaurants frequently. In contrast, Moy et al., (2009) [12] reported that 60-70% of primary school students were fond of fast food. However, our study also found that majority of respondents (73.5%) consumed fried food at least twice a week or more, which was in line with that found by a previous study [14].

Most of the respondents in this study (81.8%) had meals with their family or friends. This is comparatively higher to that found by a previous study in which 42.7% of university students had meals with their families or peers [14].

Smoking and alcohol consumption were significantly associated with eating habit in this study. Similar findings were reported among Chinese university students [17]. Our study also found a significant association between age and eating habits.

Attending a university or college can be a stressful experience for many college students [26]. Previous studies found that behavioral consequences of stress may affect eating habits [27, 28]. People living in a stressful society tend to eat more as a way of coping with stress [26]. A possible new innovation in this study was the association between eating habits and psychosocial factors among Malaysian medical students; eating habits score in this study was significantly lower among those who answered ‘yes’ on the following statements: “eat because of feeling lonely”, “eat until stomach hurts”, “eat because of feeling upset or nervous” and “eat because of feeling bored”. Kagan & Squires, (1984) [16] suggested that uncontrolled eating patterns among college students could be due to compulsive eating behaviors. With the paradigm shift towards industrialization and cultural change globally, information on healthy diet has become scarce in many developing and developed nations. The most vulnerable group, being university students, have adopted unhealthy eating behaviors due to reduced availability, affordability and accessibility of healthy diet in university campuses and surrounding food outlets. This study exhibited multi-factorial causes affecting eating habits among Malaysian university students. Understanding the contexts of such multi-factorial causes may help healthy food promotional activities by parents, university authorities, food providers and health promotion officers. Results of this study may help to create a foundation for possible interventional programs on healthy eating habits promotions. Blended with different socio-cultural and psychological attributes across different regions, a unified healthy eating policy should be drafted, being potentially amalgamated and practiced in all regions including developing and developed nations.

Conclusion

In general, most of the students in this study had healthy eating habits except in frequency of meals, fruit consumption, water intake and consumption of fried food.

Social and psychological factors were important determinants of eating habits among medical students. Nutritional education among medical students should be encouraged to promote healthier eating habits and lifestyles, as well as adherence to the healthier traditional food. It is recommended that the scope of future research should be broadened to include a larger representative sample size of medical students by including students from different medical colleages from all Malaysia.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

OR: 

Odds ratio

CES: 

Compulsive Eating Scale

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

SD: 

Standard Deviation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Fairuz Binti Yusoff (International Medical School, Management and Science University (MSU) for her participation in data collection.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Community Medicine, International Medical School, Management and Science University (MSU)
(2)
Community Medicine and Public Health, Cyberjaya University College of Medical Sciences
(3)
Community Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)
(4)
United Nations University- International Institute for Global Health

References

  1. Nelson MC, Story M, Larson NI, Neumark-Sztainer D, Lytle LA: Emerging adulthood and college-aged youth: An overlooked age for weight-related behavior change. Obes. 2008, 16 (10): 2205-2211. 10.1038/oby.2008.365.View Article
  2. Rubina A, Shoukat S, Raza R, Shiekh MM, Rashid Q, Siddique MS, Panju S, Raza H, Chaudhry S, Kadir M: Knowledge and practice of healthy lifestyle and dietary habits in medical and non-medical students of Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009, 59 (9): 650-655.
  3. Webb E, Ashton CH, Kelly P, Kamah F: An update on British medical students’ lifestyles. Med Educ. 1998, 32: 325-331. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00204.x.View Article
  4. Silliman K, Rodas-Fortier K, Neyman M: A survey of dietary and exercise habits and perceived barriers to following a healthy lifestyle in a college population. Californian J Health Promot. 2004, 2 (2): 10-19.
  5. Chin YS, Mohd NM: Eating behaviors among female adolescents in Kuantan District, Pahang, Malaysia. Pak J Nutr. 2009, 8 (4): 425-432.View Article
  6. Savige GS, Ball K, Worsley A, Crawford D: Food intake patterns among Australian adolescents. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007, 16: 738-747.
  7. Shi Z, Lien N, Kumar BN, Holmboe-Ottesen G: Socio-demographic differences in food habits patterns of school children and adolescents in and preferences of school adolescents in Jiangsu Province, China. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005, 59: 1439-1448. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602259.View Article
  8. Dowda M, Ainsworth B, Addy C, Saunders R, Riner W: Environmental influences, physical activity and weight status in 8 to 16 year olds. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2001, 155: 711-717.View Article
  9. King KA, Mohl K, Bernard AL, Vidourek RA: Does involvement in healthy eating among university students differ based on exercise status and reasons for exercise?. Californian Journal of Health Promotion. 2007, 5 (3): 106-119.
  10. Satalic Z, Baric IC, Keser I: Diet quality in Croatian university students: Energy, macro-nutrient and micro-nutrient intakes according to gender. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2007, 58 (5): 398-410. 10.1080/09637480701252393.View Article
  11. Gan WY, Mohd NM, Zalilah MS, Hazizi AS: Differences in eating behaviours, dietary intake and body weight status between male and female Malaysian university students. Mal J Nutr. 2011, 17 (2): 213-228.
  12. Moy FM, Johari S, Ismail Y, Mahad R, Tie FH, Wan Ismail WMA: Breakfast skipping and its associated factors among undergraduates in a public university in Kuala Lumpur. Mal J Nutr. 2009, 15 (2): 165-174.
  13. Huang TTK, Harries KJ, Lee RE, Nazir N, Born W, Kaur H: Assessing overweight, obesity, diet and physical activity in college students. J Am Coll Health. 2003, 52 (2): 83-86. 10.1080/07448480309595728.View Article
  14. Yahia N, Achkar A, Abdallah A, Rizk S: Eating habits and obesity among Lebanese university students. Nutr J. 2008, 7 (32): -http://​www.​nutritionj.​com/​content/​7/​1/​32View Article
  15. Alizadeh M, Ghabili K: Health related lifestyle among the Iranian medical students. Res Biol Sci. 2008, 3 (1): 4-9.
  16. Kagan DM, Squires RL: Compulsive eating, dieting, stress and hostility among college students. J Coll Stud Pers. 1984, 25 (3): 213-220.
  17. Sakamaki R, Toyama K, Amamoto R, Liu CJ, Shinfuku N: Nutritional knowledge, food habits and health attitude of Chinese university students: a cross sectional study. Nutr J. 2005, 4 (4):  -View Article
  18. Mikolajczyk R, El Ansari W, Maxwell A: Food consumption frequency and perceived stress and depressive symptoms among students in three European countries. Nutr J. 2009, 8 (1): 31-10.1186/1475-2891-8-31.View Article
  19. WHO Expert Consultation: Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004, 363: 157-163.View Article
  20. Tanaka M, Mizuno K, Fukuda S, Shigihara Y, Watanabe Y: Relationships between dietary habits and the prevalence of fatigue in medical students. Nutrition. 2008, 24: 985-989. 10.1016/j.nut.2008.05.003.View Article
  21. Anuar K, Ghazali M: The association of breakfast consumption habit, snacking behavior and body mass index among university students. Am. J. Food. Nutr. 2011, 1 (2): 55-60. 10.5251/ajfn.2011.1.2.55.60.View Article
  22. Musaiger AO, Bader Z, Al-Roomi K, D’Souza R: Dietary and lifestyle habits amongst adolescents in Bahrain. Food & Nutrition Research. 2011, 55: 7122-View Article
  23. Bashour HN: Survey of dietary habits of in-school adolescents in Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2004, 10 (6): 853-862.
  24. Kerkadi A: Evaluation of nutritional status of United Arab Emirates university female students. Emirates J Agricultural Sci. 2003, 15: 42-50.View Article
  25. Galore SR, Walker C, Chandler A: Brief Communication: Dietary habits of first year medical students as determined by computer software analysis of three-day food records. J Am Coll Nutr. 1993, 12: 517-520.View Article
  26. Gower B, Hand CE, Crooks ZK: The relationship between stress and eating in college-aged students. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences. 2008, 7: ISBN1-929083-13-0-http://​www.​kon.​org/​urc/​v7/​crooks.​htm
  27. Torres S, Nowson C: Relationship between stress, eating behavior and obesity. Nutrition. 2007, 23 (11–12): 887-894.View Article
  28. Adam T, Epel E: Stress, eating and the reward system. Physiol Behav. 2007, 91: 449-458. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.011.View Article

Copyright

© Ganasegeran et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement