Skip to main content

Table 4 Age-standardized mean urinary concentrations (picomoles per mg creatinine) of estrogens and estrogen metabolites (EM) and multivariable-adjusted percent difference 1 across categories of green tea intake in postmenopausal women

From: Green tea intake is associated with urinary estrogen profiles in Japanese-American women

 

Categories of green tea intake

 
 

<1 per week (n = 62)

1-6 times per week (n = 32)

7+ times per week (n = 25)

 
 

Urinary concentration

Urinary concentration

Percent difference

Urinary concentration

Percent difference

Ptrend

Total Estrogens and Metabolites

27.7

26.7

−6.2% (-33.7%-32.6%)

26.5

−10.5% (-36.0%-25.1%)

0.52

Parent Estrogens

5.81

3.89

−37.0% (-58.0%- - 5.4%)

4.01

−38.6% (-58.3%- - 9.6%)

0.01

Estrone

1.96

0.66

−41.1% (-60.5%- - 12.0%)

0.59

−47.0% (-63.9%- - 22.3%)

0.001

Estradiol

2.06

1.36

−41.5% (-65.9%-0.1%)

1.46

−36.0% (-61.8% -7.2%)

0.09

2-Hydroxylation pathway

6.41

4.13

−33.6% (-57.2% -3.0%)

5.92

−15.1% (-44.4%-29.6%)

0.48

2-Pathway catechols

4.90

3.53

−30.8% (-58.4%-15.1%)

4.18

−20.3% (-51.1%-30.0%)

0.37

2-Hydroxyestrone

4.12

2.42

−31.5% (-59.0%-14.6%)

3.29

−24.9% (-54.3%-23.4%)

0.27

2-Hydroxyestradiol

0.65

0.4

−15.3% (-58.4%-72.6%)

0.80

6.7% (-45.1%-107.2%)

0.83

2-Pathway methylated catechols

1.18

0.89

−26.9% (-50.6%-8.1%)

1.39

9.7% (-24.8%-60.0%)

0.54

2-Methoxyestrone

0.72

0.48

−35.8% (-61.3%-6.2%)

0.68

−6.2% (-42.7%-53.4%)

0.85

2-Methoxyestradiol

0.11

0.08

−33.2% (-64.8%-27.0%)

0.12

19.3% (-36.7%-124.8%)

0.60

2-Hydroxyestrone-3-methyl ether

0.2

0.25

−19.4% (-52.8%-37.7%)

0.45

34.9% (-19.1%-124.8%)

0.17

4-Hydroxylation pathway EM

1.01

0.67

−40.1% (-59.2%- - 11.8%)

1.04

−13.6% (-40.6%-25.7%)

0.60

4-Pathway catechol: 4-Hydroxyestrone

0.81

0.49

−39.1% (-61.7%- - 3.0%)

0.73

−18.0% (-47.6%-28.2%)

0.43

4-Pathway methylated catechols

0.16

0.13

−14.1% (-49.0%-44.7%)

0.25

48.8% (-10.4%-146.9%)

0.11

4-Methoxyestrone

0.12

0.09

−9.5% (-45.7%-51.0%)

0.15

69.1% (2.0%-180.4%)

0.05

4-Methoxyestradiol

0.02

0.02

−29.9% (-70.7%-67.7%)

0.07

87.2% (-19.3%-334.2%)

0.08

16-Hydroxylation pathway

12.9

15.9

19.5% (-24.8%-90.1%)

13.4

−1.6% (-37.4%-54.8%)

0.95

16α-Hydroxyestrone

1.15

1.22

−6.7% (-42.1%-50.1%)

1.25

−22.1% (-50.6%-22.7%)

0.27

Estriol

5.41

7.24

24.3% (-32.4%-128.6%)

5.85

3.5% (-42.8%-87.6%)

0.91

16-Ketoestradiol

4.28

5.09

20.5% (-22.1%-86.3%)

3.86

−18.5% (-46.8%-25.0%)

0.36

16-Epiestriol

0.88

0.77

−20.6% (-48.9%-23.4%)

0.91

6.4% (-30.5%-63.0%)

0.75

17-Epiestriol

0.15

0.11

−8.8% (-53.5%-79.0%)

0.16

1.6% (-46.2%-91.9%)

0.94

Ratios

Parent estrogens / estrogen metabolites

0.27

0.17

−37.8% (-57.2%- - 9.5%)

0.18

−32.6% (-53.3%- - 2.8%)

0.04

2-Hydroxylation pathway / parent estrogens

1.10

1.06

8.7% (-29.4%-67.4%)

1.48

12.0% (-26.4%-70.6%)

0.60

4-Hydroxylation pathway / parent estrogens

0.17

0.17

6.0% (-37.4%-79.5%)

0.26

32.5% (-21.2%-122.6%)

0.28

16-Hydroxylation pathway / parent estrogens

2.22

4.08

95.0% (25.5%-202.9%)

3.34

57.1% (2.6%-140.5%)

0.05

2-Hydroxylation pathway / 16-hydroxylation pathway

0.50

0.26

−50.2% (-70.6%- - 15.5%)

0.44

−19.9% (-51.7%-33.0%)

0.41

4-Hydroxylation pathway / 16-hydroxylation pathway

0.08

0.04

−51.4% (-71.0%- - 18.6%)

0.08

−10.1% (-45.7%-48.8%)

0.69

2-Hydroxylation pathway / 4-hydroxylation pathway

6.34

6.15

7.6% (-14.9%-36.0%)

5.70

2.6% (-18.9%-29.9%)

0.87

4-Pathway methylated catechols / 4-pathway catechol

0.20

0.26

37.3% (-23.3%-145.7%)

0.35

86.1% (6.6%-225.0%)

0.03

2-Pathway methylated catechols / 2-pathway catechols

0.24

0.29

14.4% (-25.4%-75.4%)

0.32

33.6% (-11.2%-100.8%)

0.16

  1. Derived measures of estrogen metabolism and statistically significant estimates are presented in bold font.
  2. 1 Robust linear regression models were used to estimate percent difference in EM measures with 95% confidence limits across categories of green tea intake while adjusting for age and study center.
  3. 2 Robust linear regression was used to test for trends in log-transformed EM measures across tea categories. Ptrend was modeled using categories coded as 0, 1, and 2.