Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brenda Davy |
| 1 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bret Goodpaster |
| 8 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tore Christiansen |
| 24 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Coker |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 27 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bret Goodpaster |
| 29 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brenda Davy |
| 11 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Coker |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Coker |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-105 |
You can find further information about peer review here.