Table 4 Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with poor food consumption status during enforcing and partial lifting of COVID-19 lockdown among 205 slum households in Nansana municipality, Wakiso district, Uganda
Variables (n) | Total lockdown | Partial lifting of lockdown | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poor food consumption status | COR (95%CI) | AOR (95% CI) | Poor food consumption status | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |||
Yes n (%) | No n (%) | Yes n (%) | No n (%) | |||||
 HH (205) | 31(15.1) | 174(84.9) |  |  | 113(55.1)** | 92(44.9) |  |  |
Sex of HH head | ||||||||
 Female (57) | 7(12.3) | 50 (87.7) | 1.2(0.7–3.3) | 1.2(0.6–3.3 | 37(69.4) | 20(30.6) | 1.4(1.2–1.8)* | 1.2(1.1–1.6)* |
 Male (148) | 24(11.7) | 124(89.3) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | 76(51.4) | 72(48.6) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
Age range | ||||||||
 18–24 (68) | 10(14.7) | 58(85.3) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | 38(55.9) | 30(44.1) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 25–44 (104) | 16(15.3) | 88(84.7) | 1.1(0.8–2.1) | 1.2(0.7–2.2) | 57(54.8) | 47(45.2) | 1.1(0.8–1.3) | 1.1(0.7–1.3) |
  ≥ 45(33) | 5(15.1) | 28 (84.9) | 0.9(0.6–1.7) | 0.8(0.7–1.8) | 18(54.5) | 15(45.5) | 1.1(0.9–1.3) | 1.1(0.8–1.2) |
HH size | ||||||||
 1–5 (149) | 23(15.4) | 126(84.6) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | 73(49) | 76(51) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 6–10 (56) | 8(14.3) | 48(85.7) | 1.2(0.7–1.3) | 1.3(0.6–1.4) | 40(71.4) | 16(28.6) | 1.3(1.1–1.5)* | 1.2 (0.9–1.2) |
Occupationc | ||||||||
 Daily wagea(99) | 15(15.2) | 84 (84.8) | 1.2(1.1–5.2)* | 1.1(0.8–4.3) | 71 (71.7) | 28(28.3) | 3.4(2.8–4.1)* | 3.2(2.6–3.8)* |
 Unemployedb (56) | 9(16.1) | 47 (83.9) | 1.1(0.8–7.9) | 1.1(0.7–7.7) | 30 (53.6) | 26(46.4) | 2.2(1.4–2.6)* | 1.9(1.5–2.1)* |
 Formal Employment (50) | 7(14.0) | 43(84.0) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | 12(24) | 38(76) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
Education status | ||||||||
 None (36) | 5(13.9) | 31(86.1) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00(ref) | 20(55.6) | 16(44.4) | 1.00(ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Primary (71) | 11 (15.5) | 60 (84.5) | 1.1(0.7–1.3) | 1.1(0.8–1.3) | 40(54.9) | 31(43.7) | 1.2(0.8–1.1) | 1.1(0.9–1.2) |
 Secondary (62) | 9(14.5) | 53(85.5) | 0.9(0.8–1.3) | 1.1(0.9–1.2) | 33(53.2) | 29(46.7) | 1.1(0.9–1.2) | 1.2(0.8–1.3) |
 Tertiary (36) | 6(16.7) | 30(83.3) | 1.2(0.7–1.2) | 1.2(0.8–1.2) | 20(55.6) | 16(44.4) | 1.2(0.8–1.3) | 1.1(0.9–1.2) |
Received food aid | ||||||||
 Yes (179) | 7(3.9) | 172(96.1) | 0.6(0.3–0.7)* | 0.4(0.1–0.6)* |  |  |  |  |
 No (26) | 22(84.6) | 4(15.4) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00(ref) |  |  |  |  |
House ownership | ||||||||
 Owner (21) | 4 (19) | 17(81) | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) | 3(14.3) | 18 (25) | 1.00(ref) |  |
 Tenant (184) | 27(14.7) | 157(85.3) | 1.8(0.8–2.1) | 1.7(0.8–2.2) | 110(59.8) | 74(48.2) | 2.7(1.9–3.7)* | 2.4(1.8–3.5)* |