Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between maternal breakfast intake frequency and HDP subtypes

From: Skipping breakfast during pregnancy and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Japanese women: the Tohoku medical megabank project birth and three-generation cohort study

 

Frequency of breakfast consumption

p-for ternd1

Everyday

5–6 times/week

3–4 times/week

0–2 times/week

GH

 n cases/n (%)

559/13107 (4.3)

98/1712 (5.7)

64/1188 (5.4)

92/1519 (6.1)

 

 Model 1, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.36

(1.09–1.70)

1.28

(0.98–1.67)

1.45

(1.15–1.82)

< 0.001

 Model 2, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.26

(1.00–1.57)

1.15

(0.88–1.52)

1.29

(1.01–1.64)

0.03

 Model 3, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.25

(0.99–1.56)

1.14

(0.87–1.50)

1.27

(0.99–1.62)

0.04

CH

 n cases/n (%)

332/12880 (2.6)

72/1686 (4.3)

39/1161 (3.4)

61/1488 (4.1)

 

 Model 1, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.69

(1.30–2.19)

1.31

(0.94–1.84)

1.62

(1.22–2.13)

< 0.001

 Model 2, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.65

(1.26–2.16)

1.29

(0.91–1.83)

1.65

(1.23–2.22)

< 0.001

 Model 3, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.60

(1.22–2.09)

1.26

(0.89–1.78)

1.64

(1.21–2.20)

0.003

PE

 n cases/n (%)

335/12883 (2.6)

66/1680 (3.9)

33/1155 (2.9)

75/1502 (5.0)

 

 Model 1, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.53

(1.17–2.00)

1.10

(0.77–1.58)

1.97

(1.52–2.54)

< 0.001

 Model 2, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.35

(1.02–1.78)

0.95

(0.65–1.37)

1.66

(1.27–2.18)

0.003

 Model 3, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.34

(1.02–1.77)

0.95

(0.65–1.37)

1.67

(1.27–2.20)

0.004

SuPE

 n cases/n (%)

171/12719 (1.3)

32/1646 (1.9)

26/1148 (2.3)

20/1448 (1.4)

 

 Model 1, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.46

(0.99–2.13)

1.63

(1.12–2.58)

1.03

(0.65–1.64)

0.13

 Model 2, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.38

(0.94–2.05)

1.51

(0.97–2.37)

0.95

(0.59–1.56)

0.37

 Model 3, OR(95% CI)

1.00

1.35

(0.91–1.99)

1.48

(0.94–2.28)

0.91

(0.56–1.50)

0.54

  1. HDP hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, GH gestational hypertension, CH chronic hypertension, PE preeclampsia, SuPE superimposed preeclampsia, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. Model 1 was the crude model
  3. Model 2 was adjusted for age at delivery, pre-pregnancy body mass index, household income, smoking status, alcohol consumption, parity, gestational diabetes, morning sickness, and insomnia
  4. Model 3 was adjusted for the variables adjusted for in model 2 and consumption of energy, carbohydrate, potassium, sodium, vitamin D, and calcium
  5. 1p-for trends were calculated as trends across categories