Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for MUO across energy-adjusted tertiles of the dietary TAC score (n = 203)a

From: Dietary total antioxidant capacity in relation to metabolic health status in overweight and obese adolescents

 

Tertiles of energy-adjusted FRAP

 
 

T1 (n = 67)

T2 (n = 68)

T3 (n = 68)

Ptrend

MUO Based on IDF criteria

 MUO cases (n)

31

27

21

 

  Crude

1.00

0.76 (0.39–1.51)

0.52 (0.26–1.05)

0.07

  Model 1

1.00

0.82 (0.40–1.66)

0.46 (0.22–0.99)

0.05

  Model 2

1.00

0.86 (0.38–1.94)

0.50 (0.21–1.15)

0.11

  Model 3

1.00

0.79 (0.35–1.81)

0.40 (0.16–0.96)

0.04

MUO Based on IDF/HOMA-IR criteria

 MUO cases (n)

25

24

18

 

  Crude

1.00

0.92 (0.45–1.85)

0.60 (0.29–1.26)

0.18

  Model 1

1.00

1.03 (0.50–2.15)

0.56 (0.25–1.24)

0.17

  Model 2

1.00

1.11 (0.48–2.55)

0.61 (0.25–1.47)

0.30

  Model 3

1.00

1.04 (0.43–2.36)

0.47 (0.19–1.19)

0.14

  1. aAll values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Ptrend was obtained by the use of tertiles of TAC score as an ordinal variable in the model. Model 1: Adjusted for age, gender, energy intake. Model 2: More adjustments for physical activity levels, socioeconomic status. Model 3: Further adjustment for omega-3 and BMI