Skip to main content

Table 6 The ORs (95% CIs) for the association between the quartiles of dietary pattern scores and hyperuricemia 

From: Association of dietary patterns with blood uric acid concentration and hyperuricemia in northern Chinese adults

 

Quartiles of dietary patterns scores

P

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Plant-based

 Model 1

1.00

0.85 (0.69–1.04)

0.90 (0.74–1.10)

0.88 (0.72–1.08)

0.42

 Model 2

1.00

0.80 (0.65–0.98)*

0.81 (0.66–0.99)*

0.74 (0.60–0.91)*

0.03

 Model 3

1.00

0.78 (0.63–0.96)*

0.812 (0.68–1.00)*

0.70 (0.56–0.87)*

0.01

Processed food diet

 Model 1

1.00

1.00 (0.81–1.23)

1.025 (0.83–1.26)

1.25 (1.02–1.52)*

0.08

 Model 2

1.00

1.01 (0.82–1.24)

1.002 (0.81–1.23)

1.18 (0.97–1.450)

0.27

 Model 3

1.00

0.99 (0.80–1.23)

0.94 (0.76–1.16)

1.19 (0.96–1.46)

0.12

Animal diet

 Model 1

1.00

1.38 (1.12–1.70)*

1.18 (0.95–1.46)

1.42 (1.16–1.76)*

 < 0.01

 Model 2

1.00

1.41 (1.14–1.74)*

1.20 (0.97–1.48)

1.40 (1.14–1.73)*

 < 0.01

 Model 3

1.00

1.38 (1.11–1.71)*

1.180 (0.95–1.47)

1.40 (1.13–1.74)*

 < 0.01

RRR diet

 Model 1

1.00

1.32 (1.07–1.63)*

1.60 (1.30–1.97)*

1.38 (1.11–1.70)*

 < 0.01

 Model 2

1.00

1.30 (1.05–1.61)*

1.53 (1.24–1.89)*

1.24 (0.10–1.54)

 < 0.01

 Model 3

1.00

1.25 (1.00–1.56)*

1.42 (1.15–1.76)*

1.14 (0.91–1.42)

0.01

PLS diet

 Model 1

1.00

1.08 (0.87–1.33)

1.23 (0.10–1.50)

1.20 (0.98–1.48)

0.18

 Model 2

1.00

1.05 (0.85–1.29)

1.13 (0.91–1.39)

1.04 (0.84–1.29)

0.73

 Model 3

1.00

1.02 (0.83–1.27)

1.07 (0.86–1.32)

0.99 (0.79–1.23)

0.90

  1. Model 1 was adjusted for gender and age
  2. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for residence, education level, alcohol consumption, and smoking status
  3. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for BMI, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia
  4. *P < 0.05