Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias of studies included in this meta-analysis

From: The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Study

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants, personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Other sources of bias

Abbasnezhad 2016 [23]

Low risk; computer-generated blocked randomization list with a block size of 6

Low risk; quote "all the participants, researchers, and the physician were blind to the allocations using the random codes"

Low risk, double-blind

Low risk, double-blind

Low risk, quote "All analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population"

Low risk, all prespecified outcomes were reported

Low risk

Khalighi Sikaroudi 2020 [24]

Low risk; randomization was performed by using the online site www. sealedenvelope.com

Low risk; quote "For performing the concealment in the randomization process, dedicated codes were used on the pharmaceutical sheets, which were generated by the software."

Low risk, double-blind

Low risk, double-blind

Low risk, intention-to-treat analysis

Low risk, all prespecified outcomes were reported

Low risk

El Amrousy 2018 [25]

Low risk; quote "computer-generated random numbers using a random block size of 6"

Low risk; quote "Allocation concealment was done by sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes."

Low risk; participants and treating staff were blinded to the treatment group.

Low risk; all outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment group

Low risk, complete outcome

Low risk, all prespecified outcomes were reported

Low risk

Jalili 2016 [26]

Unclear; the author reported that participants were randomly assigned to different groups but did not mention how the random sequence was generated

Low risk; randomization was provided in sealed opaque envelopes with successive numbers.

Low risk; all participants and researchers were blinded to the treatment group.

Unclear; insufficient information

Low risk, intention-to-treat analysis

Low risk, all prespecified outcomes were reported

Low risk