Table 6 Stratified analysis of the association between dietary fructose intake and the odds of having MetS by physical activity in urban residents

 MetS, n (%)

233 (42.1)

236 (36.2)

324 (35.9)

367 (30.6)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.78 (0.62, 0.99)

0.77 (0.62, 0.96)

0.61 (0.49, 0.75)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.79 (0.62, 1.00)

0.79 (0.63, 0.99)

0.63 (0.50, 0.80)

0.002

  Model 3

1.00

0.79 (0.61, 1.03)

0.82 (0.63, 1.05)

0.67 (0.52, 0.87)

0.026

 MetS, n (%)

786 (29.0)

846 (32.3)

785 (33.2)

660 (32.0)

0.007

  Model 1

1.00

1.17 (1.04, 1.32)

1.22 (1.08, 1.37)

1.15 (1.02, 1.30)

0.007

  Model 2

1.00

1.15 (1.02, 1.30)

1.18 (1.04, 1.34)

1.09 (0.95, 1.26)

0.046

  Model 3

1.00

1.11 (0.97, 1.27)

1.15 (1.00, 1.33)

1.09 (0.93, 1.27)

0.252