Skip to main content

Table 6 Stratified analysis of the association between dietary fructose intake and the odds of having MetS by physical activity in urban residents

From: Dietary fructose and risk of metabolic syndrome in Chinese residents aged 45 and above: results from the China National Nutrition and Health Survey

  Dietary fructose intake p-Value
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Physical activity
 MetS, n (%) 233 (42.1) 236 (36.2) 324 (35.9) 367 (30.6) < 0.001
  Model 1 1.00 0.78 (0.62, 0.99) 0.77 (0.62, 0.96) 0.61 (0.49, 0.75) < 0.001
  Model 2 1.00 0.79 (0.62, 1.00) 0.79 (0.63, 0.99) 0.63 (0.50, 0.80) 0.002
  Model 3 1.00 0.79 (0.61, 1.03) 0.82 (0.63, 1.05) 0.67 (0.52, 0.87) 0.026
Non-physical activity
 MetS, n (%) 786 (29.0) 846 (32.3) 785 (33.2) 660 (32.0) 0.007
  Model 1 1.00 1.17 (1.04, 1.32) 1.22 (1.08, 1.37) 1.15 (1.02, 1.30) 0.007
  Model 2 1.00 1.15 (1.02, 1.30) 1.18 (1.04, 1.34) 1.09 (0.95, 1.26) 0.046
  Model 3 1.00 1.11 (0.97, 1.27) 1.15 (1.00, 1.33) 1.09 (0.93, 1.27) 0.252
  1. Model 1: crude; Model 2: adjusted gender, age, education, marital status, smoking, alcohol, income, energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, fiber, TC; Model 3: model 2 plus BMI