Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression coefficients (95 %CI) for the association between quartiles of FFR proportion and DHD15-index scores

From: Residential exposure to fast-food restaurants and its association with diet quality, overweight and obesity in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional analysis in the EPIC-NL cohort

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

 

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

400 m buffer

 N, (%)

2871 (34.9)

1240 (15.1)

2063 (25.1)

2057 (25.0)

 Median FFR (IQR)

0.00 (0.00–0.00)

0.07 (0.06–0.09)

0.14 (0.13–0.17)

0.29 (0.22–0.34)

 Model 1a

ref

1.56 (0.46; 2.66)e

0.43 (-0.51; 1.36)

0.10 (-0.83; 1.04)

 Model 2b

ref

1.46 (0.41; 2.52)e

0.28 (-0.62; 1.18)

-0.05 (-0.94; 0.85)

 Model 3c

ref

1.37 (0.29; 2.45)e

0.05 (-0.87; 0.96)

-0.15 (-1.05; 0.75)

 Model 4d

ref

1.10 (-0.07; 2.28)

-0.22 (-1.24; 0.81)

-0.21 (-1.12; 0.70)

1000 m buffer

 N, (%)

2057 (25.0)

2057 (25.0)

2044 (24.8)

2073 (25.2)

 Median FFR (IQR)

0.00 (0.00–0.09)

0.13 (0.11–0.13)

0.16 (0.15–0.17)

0.21 (0.20–0.25)

 Model 1a

ref

-0.22 (-1.22; 0.79)

0.38 (-0.63; 1.39)

-0.08 (-1.09; 0.93)

 Model 2b

ref

-0.21 (-1.18; 0.76)

0.10 (-0.87; 1.07)

-0.15 (-1.12; 0.82)

 Model 3c

ref

-0.48 (-1.45; 0.49)

-0.27 (-1.25; 0.71)

-0.34 (-1.31; 0.63)

 Model 4d

ref

-0.82 (-1.82; 0.18)

-0.16 (-1.14; 0.82)

-0.12 (-1.10; 0.87)

1500 m buffer

 N, (%)

2057 (25.0)

2060 (25.0)

2128 (25.9)

1986 (24.1)

 Median FFR (IQR)

0.10 (0.00–0.10)

0.13 (0.12–0.13)

0.17 (0.16–0.19)

0.22 (0.20–0.24)

 Model 1a

ref

-0.38 (-1.39; 0.63)

-0.56 (-1.55; 0.44)

0.16 (-0.85; 1.18)

 Model 2b

ref

-0.50 (-1.47; 0.47)

-0.53 (-1.49; 0.43)

-0.07 (-1.05; 0.91)

 Model 3c

ref

-0.70 (-1.68; 0.27)

-0.66 (-1.63; 0.30)

-0.18 (-1.16; 0.81)

 Model 4d

ref

-0.75 (-1.72; 0.23)

-0.27 (-1.27; 0.73)

0.37 (-0.67; 1.42)

  1. aModel 1 is adjusted for age, sex, and cohort
  2. bModel 2 is additionally adjusted for smoking, energy intake, and household educational level
  3. cModel 3 is additionally adjusted for neighbourhood level socioeconomic status and level of urbanisation
  4. dModel 4 is additionally adjusted for the total presence of food retailers in the corresponding buffer
  5. eIndicates statistical significance