Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the twelve observational studies on associations between sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and bone health in adultsa,b

From: Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author, years (Ref), location

Study design

Sample size

Age range

Sex, % F

Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption

Bone health

Main finding

Method of assessment

Types

Intake levels or categories

Method of assessment

Sites

Outcomes

Alghadir,2015 [37]

Saudi Arabia

         

∙Men and women in both younger and older groups who consumed more than 3 cups of carbonated beverages per day had a significantly lower whole body BMD than did those who consumed less than 3 cups (young, M, p < 0.01; young, W, p < 0.01; old, M, p < 0.01; old, W, p < 0.01)

Young, M

Young, W

Cross-sectional study

100

86

25–30 y

46

Questionnaire developed by authorc

Carbonated

Beverage

Low: Normald,e

(< 3 cups/wk)

High: High

(≥3 cups/wk)

DEXA

WB

BMD

Old, M

Old, W

60

104

31–45 y

63

Cho

2008 [38]

South Korea

Cross-sectional study

229

18–29 y

100

Questionnaire developed by authorf

Carbonated

Beverage

Low: Not at all

High: Often

(≥1 serving per day)

USM

HL

BMD

SOS

∙No difference in heel BMD T-score between women who often consumed carbonated beverages and who did not consume carbonated beverages (p = 0.07). However, SOS levels of women who often consumed carbonated beverages was lower than those of women who did not consume carbonated beverages (p = 0.03).

Hammad

2017 [39]

Saudi Arabia

Cross-sectional study

101

20–24.9 y

100

Modified FFQg

Soft drinks

Low: Rare

(< 1 can/d)

High: Frequent

(> 3 cans/d)

QUS

HL

BMD

SI

∙Participants with frequent consumption of soft drinks had significantly lower T-scores and Z-scores for heel BMD than those with rare soft drink intake (Z-score, p = 0.02; T-score, p = 0.02).

∙Soft drink intake was inversely associated with T-score and Z-score of BMD and SI at the heel (T-score, p = 0.003; Z-score, p = 0.002; SI, p = 0.02).

Hostmark

2011 [40]

Norway

Cross-sectional study

2126

30–60 y

59

FFQ

Soft drinks

Not reported

SEXA

DR

BMD

∙Cola and non-cola soft drink consumption was inversely associated with distal forearm BMD (cola, p = 0.012; non-cola soft drinks, p = 0.026), whereas consumption of fruit juice was not associated with distal forearm BMD when covariates were adjusted for.

Jeong

2010 [41]

South Korea

Cross-sectional study

160

about 20

100

Modified FFQh

Carbonated

Beverage

Low: 51.3 ± 74.6 g/d

High: 92.9 ± 114.1 g/d

p < 0.05

USM

HL

BMD

BUA

SI

∙Women who consumed more carbonated beverages (p < 0.05) had significantly lower T-score (p < 0.001) and Z-score (p < 0.001) heel BMD, and showed significantly lower SI (p < 0.001) and BUA (p < 0.001).

Kim

1997 [42]i

USA

Cross-sectional study

1000

44–98 y

100

Questionnaire developed by author

Carbonated

Beverage

Low: Nondrinkers

or occasional drinkers

High: Drinkers

(≥1 serving per day)

DEXA

LS, TH

DR, MR

BMD

∙No difference in BMD at the distal radius, mid-shaft radius, total hip, or lumbar spine was observed between women who drank or did not drink/ occasionally drank carbonated beverages.

Kim

2020 [43]

South Korea

Cross-sectional study

2499

12–25 y

51

Dietary records

Cola

Low: Non-cola drinker

High: Cola drinker

DEXA

WB, WF

FN, LS

BMD

∙No difference in BMD at the whole body, whole femur, femoral neck, and lumbar spine was observed between participants who drank or did not drink carbonated beverage.

Kristensen

2005 [44]

Denmark

Intervention study

11

22–29 y

0

–

Cola

2.5 L/d, during 10 days

–

Serum

OC, ALP,

CTx, NTx

∙High consumption of cola over a 10-day period with a low-calcium diet reduced serum levels of OC. High intake of cola increased bone turnover compared to high intake of milk.

Pettinato

2006 [45]

USA

Cross-sectional study

151

11–26 y

53

Modified FFQ

Soda

Girls: 2.1 ± 3.1

Boys: 1.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.012, cups/d

QUS

DR

SOS

∙Inverse correlation found between non-diet soda and the radical SOS at forearm in girls (p = 0.002), but not in boys.

Supplee

2011 [46]

USA

Cross-sectional study

438

18 y<

100

FFQ

Soda

1.7 servings/d

QUS

HL

BMD

∙Soda consumption in the unadjusted model was positively and significantly associated with BMD (p < 0.0001). In the fully-adjusted model, however, soda consumption was no longer associated with BMD.

Tucker

2006 [47]

USA

Cross-sectional study

2538

30–87 y

56

FFQ

Soft drinks

Not reported

DEXA

TH, TC FN, WA

BMD

∙Soft drink intake was associated with significantly lower BMD at each hip site (TH, p < 0.01; TC, p < 0.01; FN, p < 0.001; WA, p < 0.001) in women but not in men.

Yeon

2009 [48]

South Korea

Cross-sectional study

133

18–23 y

100

Dietary records

Coffee with syrup or sugar

Low: 95.8 ± 163.5 g/d

High: 194.5 ± 168.6 g/d, p < 0.05

USM

HL

BMD

∙No difference was observed in heel BMD between groups that consumed different amounts of beverages and coffee with sugar/syrup.

  1. aALP alkaline phosphatase, BMD bone mineral density, BUA broadband ultrasound attenuation, CTx c-terminal telopeptide, d day, DEXA dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, DR distal radius, F female, FFQ food frequency questionnaire, FN femoral neck, High high intake of SSBs, HL heel, Low low intake of SSBs, LS lumbar spine, MR mid-shaft radius, NTx n-terminal telopeptide, OC osteocalcin, QUS quantitative ultrasound, Ref reference, SD standard deviation, SEXA single energy x-ray absorptiometry, SI stiffness index, SOS speed of sound, WB whole body, WF whole femur, TC trochanter, TH total hip, USA United States of America, USM ultra-sonometer, WA ward’s area, wk. week
  2. bQuality assessment was performed using the Cochrane criteria and Handel’s-developed scale and assessed by two authors (HA and YKP)
  3. c Beverage consumption was subdivided into subcategories: i. Tea or coffee (caffeine-containing beverages), ii. Alcoholic beverages (alcohol, beer or wine), iii. Carbonated sugary beverages (such as cola beverages) or other soft drinks, iv. Milk intake
  4. dValues are means ± SD (all such values)
  5. eParticipants with soft drink intake were divided into normal (less than average) and high groups (equal or more than average)
  6. fThe tool for lifestyle measurement consisted of 14 items known to be directly related to bone mineral density, including carbonated beverages
  7. gA simple food-frequency questionnaire was used, indicating the number of times per week that these foods were eaten and whether the portion size was large in the case of soft drinks
  8. hBased on Korean National Nutrition Survey 2008; frequently consumed food items based on amount and frequency were selected
  9. i95% confidence interval (CI) presented in this original article was converted to standard deviation (SD) for meta-analysis using the following formula: SD = (Mean-Lower endpoint/1.96)X√n or SD = (Upper endpoint-Mean/1.96)X√n