Table 3 The association between the insulin response dietary patterns and incidence of diabetes: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

EDIH

 Median score

-0.03

0.06

0.16

0.38

 Case/Total

69 / 933

80 / 933

55 / 933

53 / 933

 Model 1^a

1.00 (Ref)

1.24 (0.88–1.75)

0.89 (0.61–1.29)

0.93 (0.63–136)

 Model 2^b

1.00 (Ref)

1.31 (0.93–1.86)

0.90 (0.62–1.32)

0.98 (0.66–1.45)

 Model 3^d

1.00 (Ref)

1.39 (0.96–2.01)

0.86 (0.58–1.29)

0.95 (0.63 1.44)

EDIR

 Median score

0.29

0.50

0.70

1.08

 Case/Total

58 / 933

58 / 933

64 / 933

77 / 933

 Model 1^a

1.00 (Ref)

1.09 (0.74–1.59)

1.30 (0.89–1.89)

1.62 (1.13–2.33)

 Model 2^b

1.00 (Ref)

1.11 (0.75–1.64)

1.33 (0.90–1.97)

1.72 (1.15–2.57)

 Model 3^d

1.00 (Ref)

1.14 (0.76–1.72)

1.45 (0.96–2.19)

1.58 (1.03–2.44)

ELIH

 Median score

0.99

1.19

1.34

1.56

 Case/Total

31 / 933

55 / 934

70 / 934

101 / 933

 Model 1

1.00 (Ref)

1.76 (1.11–2.78)

2.03 (1.30–3.17)

3.10 (2.02–4.75)

 Model 2^c

1.00 (Ref)

1.76 (1.11–2.78)

2.02 (2.29–3.16)

3.07 (2.00–4.76)

 Model 3^d

1.00 (Ref)

1.35 (0.84–2.18)

1.30 (0.81–2.09)

1.89 (1.20–2.97)

ELIR

 Median score

1.96

3.12

3.29

3.61

 Case/Total

50 / 934

62 / 932

79 / 934

66 / 933

 Model 1^a

1.00 (Ref)

1.46 (0.99–2.17)

2.21 (1.51–3.24)

1.78 (1.20–2.64)

 Model 2^c

1.00 (Ref)

1.49 (1.00–2.23)

2.32 (1.67–3.44)

1.89 (1.25–2.88)

 Model 3^d

1.00 (Ref)

1.44 (0.94–2.19)

2.19 (1.44–3.32)

1.74 (1.11–2.72)