Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear regression analyses showing association between optimism, diet quality, energy and macronutrient intake and food group consumption (NutriNet-Santé study, 2016)

From: Optimism is associated with diet quality, food group consumption and snacking behavior in a general population

Outcomes

Î’eta-coefficient (95% CI)

 

LOT-R

P3

Model 11

Model 22

 

Diet quality (N = 17,849)

 mPNNS-GS4

0.11 (0.08, 0.15)

0.07 (0.04, 0.11)

< 0.0001

Energy and macronutrient intake (N = 19,335)

 Energy intake, kcal/d

8.02 (−0.04, 16.08)

5.66 (−3.24, 14.55)

0.21

 Energy intake without alcohol, kcal/ d

4.19 (− 3.73, 12.12)

2.37 (−6.33, 11.08)

0.59

 Protein, %

−0.19 (0.25, − 0.13)

−0.16 (− 0.23, − 0.09)

< 0.0001

 Carbohydrate, %

−0.34 (− 0.48, 0.19)

−0.32 (− 0.47, − 0.16)

< 0.0001

 Lipid, %

0.33 (0.20, 0.45)

0.31 (0.17, 0.44)

< 0.0001

Food group consumption (N = 19,335)

 Fruit and vegetables, g/d

12.89 (7.86, 17.92)

7.76 (2.42, 13.10)

0.0044

 Seafood, g/d

1.49 (0.77, 2.21)

1.09 (0.31, 1.88)

0.0064

 Meat and poultry, g/d

−2.20 (−3.15, −1.25)

−2.07 (− 3.07, −1.07)

< 0.0001

 Dairy products, g/d

−8.35 (− 11.36, −5.34)

−8.84 (− 12.12, −5.58)

< 0.0001

  Cheese, g/d

0.33 (−0.25, 0.91)

0.10 (−0.51, 0.71)

0.74

 Starchy foods, g/d

−0.63 (− 2.48, 1.22)

− 0.94 (− 2.76, 0.89)

0.31

  Whole grains, g/d

1.96 (0.92, 3.01)

1.63 (0.49, 2.76)

0.005

 Fats, g/d

0.30 (−0.005, 0.60)

0.37 (0.05, 0.69)

0.023

 Sugary and fatty foods, g/d

0.63 (−0.40, 1.65)

−0.52 (−1.70, 0.67)

0.39

 Sugar and confectionery, g/d

−0,52 (−1.14, 0.11)

− 0.85 (− 1.51, − 0.20)

0.011

 Non-alcoholic beverages, g/d

16.46 (8.77, 24.15)

5.48 (−2.95, 13.92)

0.21

 Alcoholic beverages, g/d

6.87 (3.91, 9.82)

5.71 (2.54, 8.88)

0.0004

  1. 1Model adjusted for age and gender
  2. 2Model adjusted for age, gender, education level, occupational status, monthly income per household unit, energy intake (except for the model where energy intake was the outcome) BMI and depressive symptomatology
  3. 3P value based on linear regressions adjusted for age, gender, education level, occupational status, monthly income per household unit, energy intake (except for the model where energy intake was the outcome) BMI and depressive symptomatology, with optimism as a continuous independent variable
  4. 4mPNNS-GS, modified French National Nutrition and Health Program Guideline Score