Table 2 Dietary Typologies among WRA Participating in Photovoice and In-depth interviews (n = 18)
Participant no. | Age (yrs) | SES | Education Completed | Occupation | Marital Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Urban, medium-impact, mid-stage transitioners’ dietary typology (n = 5) | ||||||
 Participant 1 | 33 | High | Post-secondary | Lawyer | Single | Urban |
 Participant 2 | 22 | Mid | Primary | Shop attendant | Single | Urban |
 Participant 3 | 42 | High | Secondary | Businesswoman | Single | Urban |
 Participant 7 | 15 | High | Primary | Student | Single | Urban |
 Participant 17 | 17 | Low | Primary | Unemployed | Single | Rural |
‘Urban, low-impact, early-stage transitioners’ dietary typology (n = 5) | ||||||
 Participant 6 | 25 | Low | Primary | Housewife | Married | Urban |
 Participant 8 | 17 | Low | Not completed primary | Restaurant worker | Single | Urban |
 Participant 9 | 17 | Mid | Primary | Student | Single | Urban |
 Participant 11 | 19 | High | Secondary | Unemployed | Single | Rural |
 Participant 14 | 20 | Low | Primary | Peasant farmer | Married | Rural |
‘Rural, low-impact, early-stage transitioners’ dietary typology (n = 5) | ||||||
 Participant 10 | 16 | High | Not completed primary | Restaurant worker | Single | Rural |
 Participant 4 | 44 | Mid | Primary | Tailor | Married | Urban |
 Participant 15 | 16 | Mid | Primary | Unemployed | Single | Rural |
 Participant 16 | 30 | Mid | Primary | Unemployed | Single | Rural |
 Participant 5 | 42 | Low | Secondary | Unemployed | Single | Urban |
‘Rural, low-impact, traditionalists’ dietary typology (n = 3) | ||||||
 Participant 12 | 41 | High | Primary | Peasant farmer | Married | Rural |
 Participant 13 | 39 | Mid | Primary | Peasant farmer | Single | Rural |
 Participant 18 | 37 | Low | Not completed primary | Contract farmer | Married | Rural |