Skip to main content

Table 2 Dietary Typologies among WRA Participating in Photovoice and In-depth interviews (n = 18)

From: Factors influencing dietary practices in a transitioning food environment: a cross-sectional exploration of four dietary typologies among rural and urban Ugandan women using Photovoice

Participant no. Age (yrs) SES Education Completed Occupation Marital Status Location
‘Urban, medium-impact, mid-stage transitioners’ dietary typology (n = 5)
 Participant 1 33 High Post-secondary Lawyer Single Urban
 Participant 2 22 Mid Primary Shop attendant Single Urban
 Participant 3 42 High Secondary Businesswoman Single Urban
 Participant 7 15 High Primary Student Single Urban
 Participant 17 17 Low Primary Unemployed Single Rural
‘Urban, low-impact, early-stage transitioners’ dietary typology (n = 5)
 Participant 6 25 Low Primary Housewife Married Urban
 Participant 8 17 Low Not completed primary Restaurant worker Single Urban
 Participant 9 17 Mid Primary Student Single Urban
 Participant 11 19 High Secondary Unemployed Single Rural
 Participant 14 20 Low Primary Peasant farmer Married Rural
‘Rural, low-impact, early-stage transitioners’ dietary typology (n = 5)
 Participant 10 16 High Not completed primary Restaurant worker Single Rural
 Participant 4 44 Mid Primary Tailor Married Urban
 Participant 15 16 Mid Primary Unemployed Single Rural
 Participant 16 30 Mid Primary Unemployed Single Rural
 Participant 5 42 Low Secondary Unemployed Single Urban
‘Rural, low-impact, traditionalists’ dietary typology (n = 3)
 Participant 12 41 High Primary Peasant farmer Married Rural
 Participant 13 39 Mid Primary Peasant farmer Single Rural
 Participant 18 37 Low Not completed primary Contract farmer Married Rural
  1. *Participants in bold declined to take photographs and only participated in the in-depth interviews (source Auma 2020)
Back to article page

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us