Strongly agree (%) | Agree (%) | Neutral (%) | Disagree (%) | Strongly disagree (%) | Qualitative quotes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding | 43.8 | 43.0 | 13.20 | – | – | All agriculture related sections are clearly understood. |
Translation | 43.0 | 43.6 | – | 13.4 | – | No additional cost can be seen as high for goal achievement. Budgetary allocation is usually grossly inadequate. |
Acceptability | 51.3 | 38.6 | – | 10.3 | – | The roadmap stratifies and aligns to the ministry. |
Demand for a roadmap | 26.3 | 73.7 | – | – | – | The roadmap address issues on goals, training, employment, and integration. |
Implementation | – | 90.9 | 9.1 | – | Sections or recommendations are likely not be executed (institutional independence, develop indicators). (Staff) well trained to implement them (roadmap). The roadmap is well-articulated, and the programmes contained therein are capable of addressing the identified problem. (Implementable) with commitment and political will. | |
Practicality | 36.4 | 54.6 | 9.1 | – | – | No budgetary allocation or plan. The problem is how these will be sustained. The state has many problems to address therefore, choices will be made on which issues to address. This may take longer as funds are limited. |
Integration | 37.5 | 62.5 | – | – | – | The roadmap can help the Ministry of Social Welfare to rise up to its challenges. |
Political buy-in | 100 | – | – | – | – | Proposal should be sent to the stakeholders for a joint meeting to discuss the roadmap. |