Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the association between dietary patterns and NAFLD

From: Association of the dietary patterns with the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among Iranian population: a case-control study

  T1 T2 T3 P-trend
Ordinary pattern
 Model 1 1 2.95 (1.45–6.03) 11.86 (5.36–26.21) < 0. 001
 Model 2 1 2.14 (0.97–4.75) 4.55 (1.66–12.46) < 0.001
 Model 3 1 1.71 (0.71–4.11) 3.74 (1.23–11.42) < 0.001
Fast food type pattern
 Model 1 1 0.80 (0.39–1.62) 1.01 (0.50–2.05) 0.19
 Model 2 1 0.82 (0.38–1.81) 0.76 (0.30–1.93) 0.24
 Model3 1 0.91 (0.39–2.14) 0.72 (0.26–1.96) 0.19
Traditional pattern
 Model 1 1 2.12 (1.04–4.33) 3.03 (1.41–6.53) < 0.001
 Model 2 1 2.57 (1.19–5.54) 3.78 (1.66–8.65) < 0.001
 Model 3 1 2.37 (1.02–5.53) 3.58 (1.48–8.68) < 0.001
Dairy and vegetable pattern
 Model 1 1 0.79 (0.39–1.59) 0.41 (0.20–0.86) 0.02
 Model 2 1 0.59 (0.28–1.25) 0.21 (0.09–0.49) 0.005
 Model 3 1 0.60 (0.26–1.37) 0.23 (0.09–0.58) 0.02
  1. Model 1: crude
  2. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, BMI and energy intake
  3. Model 3: further adjusted for smoking, educational status, and physical activity