Skip to main content

Table 4 Demographic profile of students toward the use of vitamin enriched foods

From: Assessment of attitudes toward functional foods based on theory of planned behavior: validation of a questionnaire

variable

 

Non-user (%)

User (%)

Test statistics

(chi-square)

p-value

sex

male

144 (34.6%)

50 (40.0%)

1.212

p < 0.271

female

272 (65.4%)

75 (60.0%)

Income

< 300,000

18 (4.5%)

3 (2.4%)

9.907

p < 0.042

300,000–700,000

38 (9.5%)

5 (4.1%)

700,000–1,000,000

34 (8.5%)

9 (7.3%)

1,000,000–3,000,000

194 (48.4%)

54 (43.9%)

> 3,000,000

117 (29.2%)

52 (42.3%)

Place of residence

urban

367 (89.5%)

120 (95.2%)

3.804

p < 0.050

rural

43 (10.5%)

6 (4.8%)

Place of shopping

Local market

89 (22.1%)

8 (6.6%)

27.351

p < 0.000

Chain store

69 (17.1%)

26 (21.5%)

Special foods

49 (12.2%)

30 (24.8%)

Daily bazar

36 (89%)

4 (3.3%)

hypermarkets

120 (29.8%)

38 (31.4%)

Read of nutritional constituents

yes

238 (58.3%)

91 (72.8%)

8.476

p < 0.004

no

170 (41.7%)

34 (27.2%)

Familiar with enriched foods

yes

211 (51.8%)

93 (74.4%)

19.869

p < 0.000

no

196 (48.2%)

32 (25.6%)

Father’s education level

uneducated

12 (2.9%)

1 (0.8%)

20.107

p < 0.000

High school and lower

186 (45.4%)

36 (28.8%)

Bachelor of Science/Art

158 (38.5%)

54 (43.2%)

Master or Ph.D

54 (13.2%)

34 (27.2%)

Mother’s education level

uneducated

24 (5.9%)

2 (1.6%)

7.654

P < 0.050

High school and lower

227 (55.5%)

61 (48.8%)

Bachelor of Science/Art

121 (29.6%)

50 (40.0%)

Master or Ph.D

37 (9.0%)

12 (9.6%)