Table 5 Linear mixed predicting MUAC of pregnant women in West Gojjam Zone
Fixed effect | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate(SE) | 95% CI |
Intercept | 23.225 (0.069) | (23.08,23.36) | 23.259 (0.127) | (23.01,23.51) | 22.781 (0.399) | (21.99,23.56) |
Baseline MUAC (IG) |  |  | −0.163 (0.153) | (−0.46,0.13) | −0.116 (0.153) | (−0.41,0.18) |
Endline MUAC (CG) |  |  | −0.255 (0.063) | (−0.37,-0.13) | −0.255 (0.063) | (−0.37,-0.13) |
The intervention effect | Â | Â | 0.615 (0.091) | (0.43,0.79) | 0.615 (0.091) | (0.43,0.79) |
Food secure |  |  | 0.032 (0.086) | (−0.13, 0.19) | 0.027 (0.085) | (−0.12, 0.17) |
Age |  |  |  |  | 0.011 (0.017) | (−0.02,0.04) |
Family size |  |  |  |  | −0.013 (0.055) | (−0.12,0.09) |
Have formal education |  |  |  |  | 0.157 (0.191) | (−0.22,0.53) |
Use latrine | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.322 (0.137) | (0.05,0.59) |
Drink protected water |  |  |  |  | 0.065 (0.148) | (−0.22,0.35) |
Random effect | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Level two variance | 2.77(0.17) | Â | 1.69(0.17) | Â | 1.28 (0.69) | Â |
ICC | 0.798 | Â | 0.442 | Â | 0.564 | Â |
AIC | 4623.28 | Â | 4567.33 | Â | 4573.13 | Â |
Number of parameters | 3 | Â | 9 | Â | 19 | Â |