Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary Cost and Effectiveness Results for Adjusted Prevalence of Stunting at end-line (~23mo old) – Model Excluding Lost-To-Follow-Up (EL)

From: Impact of stakeholder perspectives on cost-effectiveness estimates of four specialized nutritious foods for preventing stunting and wasting in children 6–23 months in Burkina Faso

Excluding LTFU
n = 5204
CSB+ w/ oil arm (n = 1312)CSWB w/ oil arm
(n = 1255)
SC+ arm
(n = 1324)
RUSF arm
(n = 1313)
MeanUncertainty Range1MeanUncertainty Range1MeanUncertainty Range1MeanUncertainty Range1
Total Cost per enrolled child: Base Case Program Perspective (USD 2018)126.6(117.3, 135.9)145.7(143.1, 148.2)236.8(216.2, 257.5)254.3(237.4, 271.3)
Total Cost per enrolled child: Caregiver Perspective (USD 2018)206.5(175.4, 237.5)222.8(201.0, 244.5)218.9(167.0, 270.7)148.3NA
Total Cost per enrolled child: Program and Caregiver Perspective (USD 2018)333.1(292.7, 373.5)368.5(344.2, 392.7)455.7(383.2, 528.2)402.7(385.7, 419.6)
Total Cost per enrolled child: Donor Perspective2(USD 2018)104.3(94.9, 113.6)125.6(123.1, 128.2)217.4(196.7, 238.0)232.4(215.4, 249.3)
Adjusted Prevalence of Stunting (%) at end-line (Model EL3)20.1%(18.0, 22.2%)27.5%*(25.0, 30.0%)20.3%(18.3, 22.4%)21.9%(20.0, 23.9%)
  1. 1 Uncertainty ranges for total cost per child from program perspective and from donor perspective were constructed based on 1 standard deviation (SD) above and below the mean three-year USAID historical product cost for CSB+, RUSF, SC+, and oil. Uncertainty ranges for total cost per enrolled child from caregiver perspective were constructed based on 1 SD above and below the mean adjusted study food preparation time per meal for the three flour-based arms. Uncertainty ranges for program and caregiver perspective were the sum of the uncertainty ranges for program perspective and for caregiver perspective. Uncertainty ranges for adjusted prevalence of stunting at end-line were constructed based on 95% confidence intervals around the adjusted marginal means estimated from the respective model
  2. 2 Donor perspective cost per enrolled child = Program perspective cost per enrolled child – Volunteer opportunity cost per enrolled child
  3. 3 Adjusted Odds Ratios for each arm compared to CSB+ w/oil in the Model EL: RUSF (adj.OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.44); SC+ (adj.OR: 1.21; 95%CI: 0.89, 1.66); CSWB w/oil (adj.OR: 2.07; 95%CI: 1.46, 2.94)
  4. * p < 0.05 for odds ratio compared to CSB+ w/oil arm in the stunting model