Maternal dietary patterns and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies: a longitudinal twin pregnancies birth cohort study

Table 5 Logistic regression analysis for the risk of GDM according to the quartiles of dietary pattern scores

Dietary patterns	Q1 (n = 81)	Q2 (n = 81)	Q3 (n = 81)	Q4 (n = 81)	P for trend
Dietary patterns	Reference	Odds Ratio (OR) (95% CI)			P for trend
Vegetable-based pattern
Model 1^a	1.00	1.20 (0.61–2.36)	1.14 (0.65–2.57)	0.94 (0.47–1.89)	0.169
Model 2^b	1.00	1.18 (0.59–2.36)	1.12 (0.61–2.24)	0.98 (0.47–2.01)	0.235
Model 3^c	1.00	1.50 (0.72–3.14)	1.89 (0.90–3.98)	1.23 (0.57–2.66)	0.357
Poultry-fruit-based pattern
Model 1^a	1.00	1.12 (0.58–2.19)	1.00 (0.51–1.96)	1.19 (0.60–2.31)	0.943
Model 2^b	1.00	1.10 (0.55–2.18)	1.05 (0.51–2.16)	1.10 (0.54–2.20)	0.994
Model 3^c	1.00	1.02 (0.50–2.11)	0.98 (0.46–2.10)	0.96 (0.45–2.03)	0.999
Sweets-based pattern
Model 1^a	1.00	1.36 (0.68–2.72)	1.28 (0.64–2.57)	1.99 (1.02–3.91)	0.236
Model 2^b	1.00	1.24 (0.61–2.52)	1.17 (0.57–2.38)	1.84 (0.92–3.69)	0.340
Model 3^c	1.00	1.37 (0.65–2.89)	1.34 (0.64–2.83)	1.97 (0.94–4.12)	0.349
Plant protein-rich-based pattern
Model 1^a	1.00	1.18 (0.61–2.28)	0.78 (0.40–1.56)	0.82 (0.58–2.07)	0.649
Model 2^b	1.00	1.13 (0.58–2.22)	0.75 (0.37–1.54)	0.81 (0.59–1.92)	0.655
Model 3^c	1.00	0.98 (0.48–2.00)	0.68 (0.32–1.43)	1.02 (0.49–2.09)	0.667

^aCrude model
^bAdjusted for other dietary patterns
^cModel 2 plus maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, ethnicity, education level, parity, smoking status, chorionicity, mode of conception, previous history of GDM and family history of DM

ISSN: 1475-2891