Skip to main content

Table 3 Head and neck cancer survivors’ program preferences assessed during a 12-week dietary intervention trial

From: Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention

 

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

Total (N = 23)

Control (N = 12)

Experimental (N = 11)

Objectives of study were clear

 Disagreea

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Agreeb

23 (100)

12 (100)

11 (100)

Study staff was helpful and easy to contact

 Disgreea

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Agreeb

23 (100)

12 (100)

11 (100)

I would recommend the study to others

 Disagreea

1 (4)

1 (8)

0 (0)

 Agreeb

22 (96)

11 (92)

11 (100)

Dietitian was knowledgeable and helpful (n = 22)

 Disagreea

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Agreeb

22 (100)

11 (100)

11 (100)

Dietitian was sensitive and respectful (n = 22)

 Disagreea

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Agreeb

22 (100)

11 (100)

11 (100)

I would recommend this program to others

 Disagreea

2 (5)

1 (9)

1 (9)

 Agreeb

21 (95)

11 (91)

10 (91)

Overall, how would you rank this program?

 Poor

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Fair

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Good

1 (4)

1 (8)

0 (0)

 Very good

9 (39)

4 (33)

5 (45)

 Excellent

13 (57)

7 (59)

6 (55)

Experimental only: Dietitian counseling sessions were tailored to my needs

 Disagreea

 

0 (0)

 Agreeb

 

11 (100)

Experimental only: My behavior regarding diet changed during the program

 Disagreea

 

2 (18)

 Agreeb

 

9 (82)

  1. aDisagree includes strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, or neutral responses
  2. bAgree includes somewhat agree or strongly agree