Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Head and neck cancer survivors’ program preferences assessed during a 12-week dietary intervention trial

From: Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention

  N (%) N (%) N (%)
Total (N = 23) Control (N = 12) Experimental (N = 11)
Objectives of study were clear
 Disagreea 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Agreeb 23 (100) 12 (100) 11 (100)
Study staff was helpful and easy to contact
 Disgreea 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Agreeb 23 (100) 12 (100) 11 (100)
I would recommend the study to others
 Disagreea 1 (4) 1 (8) 0 (0)
 Agreeb 22 (96) 11 (92) 11 (100)
Dietitian was knowledgeable and helpful (n = 22)
 Disagreea 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Agreeb 22 (100) 11 (100) 11 (100)
Dietitian was sensitive and respectful (n = 22)
 Disagreea 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Agreeb 22 (100) 11 (100) 11 (100)
I would recommend this program to others
 Disagreea 2 (5) 1 (9) 1 (9)
 Agreeb 21 (95) 11 (91) 10 (91)
Overall, how would you rank this program?
 Poor 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Fair 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Good 1 (4) 1 (8) 0 (0)
 Very good 9 (39) 4 (33) 5 (45)
 Excellent 13 (57) 7 (59) 6 (55)
Experimental only: Dietitian counseling sessions were tailored to my needs
 Disagreea   0 (0)
 Agreeb   11 (100)
Experimental only: My behavior regarding diet changed during the program
 Disagreea   2 (18)
 Agreeb   9 (82)
  1. aDisagree includes strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, or neutral responses
  2. bAgree includes somewhat agree or strongly agree