Source | Selection | Comparabilitya | Exposure | Total scores |
---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5A | 5B | 6 | 7 | 8 | Â |
---|
Mourouti et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | – | 8 |
Tajaddini et al. | * | * | – | * | * | * | * | * | – | 7 |
Yun et al | * | * | – | – | * | * | * | * | – | 6 |
Adzersen et al. | * | * | – | * | * | * | – | * | – | 6 |
Chatenoud et al. | * | * | – | * | * | * | – | * | * | 7 |
Levi et al. | * | – | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
LaVecchia et al | * | * | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
- 1 Is the case definition adequate? 2 Representativeness of the cases. 3 Selection of controls. 4 Definition of controls. 5 Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis. 6 Ascertainment of exposure. 7 Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls. 8 Non-response rate
- aStudies that controlled for age and traditional risk factors received one score, whereas studies that controlled for other important confounders received an additional score