Skip to main content

Table 2 The numbers, mortality and significance of differences by criterion for studies analysed

From: Severely malnourished children with a low weight-for-height have similar mortality to those with a low mid-upper-arm-circumference: II. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Ref

Study

Author & year

Kwash

Total SAM

S-whz

S-muac

S-both

S-whz

S-muac

S-both

WHZ v MUAC

   

Total

dead

Total

dead

Total

dead

Total

dead

Total

dead

CFR

CFR

CFR

χ2

χ2

Fisher

Cramer

#

#

 

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

%

%

%

value

p (2-tail)

p (1-tail)

V

Studies giving numbers of children fulfilling both WHZ and MUAC criteria

 41

1

Aguayo 2015

231

11

6076

32

1333

3

859

2

3884

27

0.23

0.23

0.70

  

0.65

0.00

 42

2

Grellety 2012

2

0

530

13

177

3

167

2

186

8

1.69

1.20

4.30

  

0.53

0.02

 21

3

Grellety 2015

excl

excl

2205

40

1486

13

21

1

698

26

0.87

4.76

3.72

  

0.22

0.12

 43

4

Isanaka 2015

excl

excl

2399

13

530

3

929

4

940

6

0.57

0.43

0.64

  

0.48

0.03

 44

5

Lowlaavar 2016

excl

excl

262

21

171

11

32

0

59

10

6.43

0.00

16.95

  

0.14

0.10

 45

6

LaCourse 2014

97

8

210

15

29

2

68

4

16

1

6.90

5.88

6.25

  

0.58

0.02

 35

7

Olofin 2016

ng

ng

767

145

116

18

483

64

168

63

15.50

13.25

37.50

0.41

0.52

0.31

0.03

Studies including oedema

 46

8

Berkley 2005

390

ng

1140

193

267

27

384

42

489

124

10.11

10.94

25.36

0.11

0.74

0.42

0.01

 47

9

Chiabi 2017

ng

ng

106

22

23

1

21

3

62

18

4.35

14.29

29.03

  

0.27

0.17

 48

10

Sachdeva 2016

ng

ng

447

59

228

18

75

15

144

26

7.89

20.00

18.06

8.52

0.004

0.004

0.17

Studies where children fulfilling both criteria are incorporated into both the WHZ and MUAC categories

       

All-whz

All-muac

  

All-whz

All-muac

 

All-whz v All-muac

 49

11

Burza 2016

ng

ng

650

36

295

26

650

36

  

8.81

5.54

 

3.55

0.06

0.042

0.06

 50

12

Mogeni 2011

392

ng

1768

217

966

101

802

116

  

10.46

14.46

 

6.54

0.011

 

0.06

 51

13

Sylla 2015

ng

ng

272

42

90

27

117

15

  

30.00

12.82

 

9.28

0.002

0.002

0.21

 52

14

Vella 1990

ng

ng

118

22

34

3

96

18

  

8.82

18.75

   

0.14

0.12

 53

15

Dramaix 1993

320

102

442

122

267

63

175

57

  

23.60

32.57

 

4.31

0.038

0.025

0.10

 54

16

Girum 2017

363

25

545

51

130

26

277

41

  

20.00

14.80

 

1.74

0.19

0.12

0.07

 55

17

Savadogo 2007

excl

excl

1322

212

930

168

387

95

  

18.03

24.50

 

7.19

0.007

 

0.01

 36

18

Garenne1987

ng

ng

622

63

92

14

569

54

  

15.22

9.49

 

2.81

0.09

0.06

0.07

 37

19

Garenne 2009

ng

ng

281

44

183

23

98

21

  

12.57

21.43

 

3.79

0.051

0.040

0.12

 37

20

Garenne 2009

ng

ng

388

25

150

9

238

16

  

6.00

6.72

 

0.08

0.78

0.48

0.01

 38

21

Broeck 1993

56

8

652

13

113

3

539

6

  

2.65

1.11

   

0.14

0.05

  1. S-whz WHZ below cut off point with MUAC above cut-off point as defined in the paper, S-muac MUAC below cut off point with WHZ above cut-off point as defined in the paper, S-both MUAC and WHZ both below the cut-off point as defined in the paper, All-whz WHZ below the cut-off point, with MUAC either above or below the cut-off point as defined in the paper, All-muac MUAC below the cut-off point, WHZ either above or below the cut-off as defined in the paper, excl excluded from analysis, ng not given in report, CFR Case Fatality Rate in percentage, χ2 Pearson’s chi squared test (two-way significance), Fisher Fisher’s exact test (one-tailed test of significance), Cramer Cramer’s V test of association between the groups. The higher CFR and significant differences are shown in bold script